Trauma Informed Investigations - Why do we keep hearing women curl up in balls instead of fighting back and running for the door?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Ivan Shatov

Ceterum autem censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
kiwifarms.net
Registrado
13 de Jun, 2019
ATIXA is a membership organization for Title IX administrators in the US. They recently published a position statement acknowledging skepticism of trauma-informed investigations.


For those who don't know, Title IX is a Federal Guideline for ensuring equality at Universities. It's also the chief tool used by administrators to defame and discriminate against white male students over accusations that cause PR problems in our hyper-political feminist age.

This statement goes into detail about the way administrators are trained, often using any claim of trauma as evidence of sexual assault (in lieu of empirical evidence or a coherent story.) It's a strange read, like putting a positive light on the makers of the hangman's noose.

This position has been challenged previously by legal scholars and neuroscientists, who have noted people react different ways to trauma. Notably, this statement was released after a ruling against Syracuse for the actions of it's Title IX administrators and lack of due process. Title IX administration is big business in the US, along with mandatory diversity and inclusion training for academics.

Possible the courts actually work and lawsuits are going to lead to an end of this practice? I have a feeling a slew of additional judgements are coming and will be watching the Kaiser Dillon blog closely.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo