US Transphobes have no idea what they’re talking about - "What cis people don’t understand is that even the most basic trans healthcare is basically magic.

1731937542049.png

Article / Archive

Following Harris’ loss, Democrats are scrambling to find scapegoats, with trans people being one of the most enticing. The Atlantic recently published an article arguing that, because Democrats are unable to actually defend trans athletes, they may as well abandon this politically unpopular “issue.” Instead, they recommend going for a “compromise position” to “defend transgender Americans who want to live their lives in peace.” Why do mainstream Democrats see a trans woman playing a sport as somehow being in opposition to living our lives in peace?

The transphobes of this country have done an incredible job of turning the public against trans athletes. They’ve done this in two ways. Their first complaint usually occurs when a transgender athlete wins something, and critics label her as an example of an unfair advantage. Take Lia Thomas, for example, who, in addition to being transgender, is also a strong swimmer. Because of this, she won a 500-yard freestyle race in 2022, after three years of transitioning with hormone replacement therapy (HRT). At that same meet, she finished behind many cis women in plenty of other events. Other articles go into more detail about the reality of her performance — nonetheless, it’s safe to say that Thomas is not exceptional. This “debate” isn’t really about how broad Thomas’ shoulders are; it’s about the use of selection bias to shit on trans athletes when they win, and ignore them when they lose.

The other argument surrounds “biological differences” between men and women. Another lovely article in The Atlantic rattles off comparisons between male and female sports leagues. This would be a very smart and astute analysis — if it made any sense at all. They use statistics of men in place of actual statistics of trans women, usually referring to trans women as “men” in their rhetoric. And when we call them out for this, we’re “shouting down” opinions. Trans women are not men. This is, as the saying goes, basic biology.

Transphobes are predictably unconcerned with the actual science at play. In 2021, the Canadian Center for Ethics in Sport commissioned a “review of scientific and grey literature on transgender athlete participation in competitive sport.” This study found that “available evidence indicates trans women who have undergone testosterone suppression have no clear biological advantage over cis women in elite sport.” Despite this, both the NCAA and Olympics have banned trans athletes. So, if there really are no actual statistical differences, why do people flip their shit every time a trans athlete … *gasp* wins an athletic event?

The answer is that transphobes are a bunch of scumbags, and the consequences affect both cis and trans people. We’re at the point where the Florida House of Representatives is giving schools the power to subject students to “physical examination” — aka genital inspections. As they enact these policies, they use the trans sports “debate” to try and find “nuance” in the transgender “issue.” It’s a starting point to exclude trans women from other spaces too. How in the world can you justify banning trans people from women’s chess leagues? And, if this debate is truly about biological “advantage,” why does the debate make its way to the locker rooms as well?

Well-meaning cis “allies” promote the view that, while gender is changeable, sex is the immutable characteristics controlled by chromosomes. This is why you’ll hear people yapping about “biological” men and “biological” women. To that, I say, any doctor that is treating me like a “biological man” is a bad fucking doctor.

What cis people don’t understand is that even the most basic trans healthcare is basically magic. Since starting HRT, my hormone levels are a lot closer to an average cis woman than an average man.

Feminizing HRT does a lot. It changes fat distribution, decreases muscle mass, and changes your emotions. It thins body hair and decreases sweat. It can change shoe size and height. I shit you not, HRT is giving me cute freckles on my nose. Many trans women report monthly menstrual cramps. With the right hormone cocktail, trans women can breastfeed their children, and some doctors now believe that the first uterus transplant for a trans woman is “anticipated to take place within the next few years, if not sooner.” I call dibs.

The fact that you actually can change your sex is a terrifying threat to anyone who is currently trying to control women’s bodies. If there’s not actually much of a biological difference between men and women, it’s harder to enforce structures that maintain men in power.

Honestly, I don’t really care about sports all that much. But when liberals blame trans people for Harris’ loss, it really pisses me off. Instead of letting trans rights even more rapidly slip away — why not just actually take the time to learn about our issues, learn that we’re not a threat to sports or locker rooms, and just be fucking normal?
 
Their first complaint usually occurs when a transgender athlete wins something, and critics label her as an example of an unfair advantage

Interesting, why does the author assume that the issue only applies to men claiming to be women rather than women claiming to be men? Oh that's right, because anyone with two braincells to rub together knows that it's the men in women's sports that are causing the problem, because if a woman tried to play in men's sports she wouldn't stand a chance - and probably get seriously injured if it was a contact sport, because that's what happens when men go against women. As much as they try to claim this isn't true, subtle slip-ups like this show that they 100% know it's true.
 
Ideas are not reality.

I can no more think a table into existence than turn a man into a woman through belief alone.

There is no argument.

Reinstate the asylum system.
 
The fact that these people legit think you can just use hormone blockers and replace the lost test with estrogen is fucking batty. Like we're all some blank state androgynous homoculus you can build with blue or pink legos.
 
The fact that these people legit think you can just use hormone blockers and replace the lost test with estrogen is fucking batty. Like we're all some blank state androgynous homoculus you can build with blue or pink legos.
Yup. Then they pull surprised Pikachu faces when they gather health issues like Pokémon cards.

Totally more knowledgeable about biology than real doctors.
 
Well-meaning cis “allies” promote the view that, while gender is changeable, sex is the immutable characteristics controlled by chromosomes. This is why you’ll hear people yapping about “biological” men and “biological” women. To that, I say, any doctor that is treating me like a “biological man” is a bad fucking doctor.
The fact that you actually can change your sex
Remember when one of the main points the trans community pushed to explain how a man can become a woman was because "gender and sex are two different things, we are just swapping genders not our sex!" and the very infamous "gender is actually just a social construct!!!"

Trannies inability to pick a lane and stick to it is why the pendulum is beginning to swing back as hard as it is. You retards deserve orange hitler.
 
Their first complaint usually occurs when a transgender athlete wins something, and critics label her as an example of an unfair advantage.
Thats because they do have an unfair advantage. For the same reason we don't allow people to take performance enhancing drugs when they're participating in competitions

Take Lia Thomas, for example, who, in addition to being transgender, is also a strong swimmer.
Manipulative, deceptive troon logic. He's a 'strong swimmer' because he's got larger, stronger muscles as a result of being born male that gives him a competitive advantage against most women

Because of this, she won a 500-yard freestyle race in 2022, after three years of transitioning with hormone replacement therapy (HRT). At that same meet, she finished behind many cis women in plenty of other events
So not a strong swimmer after all then. Doesn't mean there isn't an advantage from being male, it just means that advantage didn't overcome the training of some other women

nonetheless, it’s safe to say that Thomas is not exceptional. This “debate” isn’t really about how broad Thomas’ shoulders are; it’s about the use of selection bias to shit on trans athletes when they win, and ignore them when they lose.
Nobody said he was exceptional. Just that he has an unfair advantage. Which he does. You're doing exactly what you're accusing the 'transphobes' of - ignoring when he wins and focusing on when he loses

The other argument surrounds “biological differences” between men and women.
Why are biological differences in quotations? That implies this isn't true. Are you trying to claim there are no biological differences between men and women?

This would be a very smart and astute analysis — if it made any sense at all. They use statistics of men in place of actual statistics of trans women, usually referring to trans women as “men” in their rhetoric.
Nigger what? It makes perfect sense. You're talking nonsense. Trans women are men. Using male statistics is accurate. You're either legitimately delusional or you're flat out lying

And when we call them out for this, we’re “shouting down” opinions. Trans women are not men. This is, as the saying goes, basic biology.
Basic biology? Basic biology proves trans women are men. Period. You have no business quoting 'basic biology' when you can't get a basic biology fact right

Transphobes are predictably unconcerned with the actual science at play.
You're the one who just lied about a basic fact of biology

In 2021, the Canadian Center for Ethics in Sport commissioned a “review of scientific and grey literature on transgender athlete participation in competitive sport.” This study found that “available evidence indicates trans women who have undergone testosterone suppression have no clear biological advantage over cis women in elite sport.”
and they got called out for lying through their teeth for it. They lied to promote trans bs, just like you are doing right now

Despite this, both the NCAA and Olympics have banned trans athletes. So, if there really are no actual statistical differences, why do people flip their shit every time a trans athlete … *gasp* wins an athletic event?
Do you realize that you just contradicted your own argument with that statement? They win because there is very much a statistical difference. You just proved that canadian nonsense was a lie

The answer is that transphobes are a bunch of scumbags
So no answer and just an insult. Go up to a 'transphobe' and say that to their face and see what happens to you

and the consequences affect both cis and trans people. We’re at the point where the Florida House of Representatives is giving schools the power to subject students to “physical examination” — aka genital inspections. As they enact these policies, they use the trans sports “debate” to try and find “nuance” in the transgender “issue.” It’s a starting point to exclude trans women from other spaces too. How in the world can you justify banning trans people from women’s chess leagues? And, if this debate is truly about biological “advantage,” why does the debate make its way to the locker rooms as well?
They are banned from womens chess leagues because those are womens chess leagues and they are men. Why does it get to the locker room? Because women do not want predatory men in dresses watching them undress in locker rooms or making them watch them undress. But you're well aware of this fact. It used to be the kind of thing you're pushing would either get a man beaten or arrested as a predator

Well-meaning cis “allies” promote the view that, while gender is changeable, sex is the immutable characteristics controlled by chromosomes. This is why you’ll hear people yapping about “biological” men and “biological” women. To that, I say, any doctor that is treating me like a “biological man” is a bad fucking doctor.
In other words you don't understand basic biology then. and any doctor that does not treat you as a biological man is a bad doctor by definition. You're a manipulative psycho trying to force others into a literal delusional fantasy. An exceptionally dangerous one at that. Are you trying to imply a 'good doctor' would ignore the fact that a transwoman has a prostate and other male anatomy that requires specific medical monitoring to ensure its health? Or a trans man not be checked for cervical cancer? This is a dangerous thing to push

What cis people don’t understand is that even the most basic trans healthcare is basically magic
and with that statement you just proved you have no idea what you are talking about

Since starting HRT, my hormone levels are a lot closer to an average cis woman than an average man.
No it is not. That isn't how it works, but even if it were, your biology is not

I shit you not, HRT is giving me cute freckles on my nose
No it is not

No they do not, and they physically cannot. Did these trans women magically grow a functional womb? I've seen saner rants about biology from lucas werner

In other words they can't and are just being fed chemical induced dangerous chemical cocktails rather than milk

and some doctors now believe that the first uterus transplant for a trans woman is “anticipated to take place within the next few years, if not sooner.”
No competent doctor believes that. It'll never happen, nor would it ever be safe to attempt to bring a fetus to term in one given the absolutely massive amount of fuckery you'd have to be doing hormone wise to even remotely attempt it. You'd end up with a fucking horrifying deformed monstrosity assuming the fetus even somehow managed to survive. Mengele wouldn't even try something like this

The fact that you actually can change your sex is a terrifying threat to anyone who is currently trying to control women’s bodies.
Except you can't do anything of the sort

If there’s not actually much of a biological difference between men and women, it’s harder to enforce structures that maintain men in power.
There are massive differences and this statement sounds like it was written by a cult

Honestly, I don’t really care about sports all that much
Except when you can use them to push a looney agenda

why not just actually take the time to learn about our issues, learn that we’re not a threat to sports or locker rooms, and just be fucking normal?
How about you take some time to learn about basic biology instead of lecturing people about something you clearly do not understand and blatantly lie about? You are absolutely a threat in locker rooms. and you should take your own fucking advice and be normal

cypocryphy dijo:
Nah, there's 2 sexes and then every person has their own individual personality. Being a woman or a man is not a list of stereotypes or a costume.
On that note i'd love to see somebody pull a native and make a PSA of a troon with a normal woman pointing at him and the caption my gender is not a costume like the natives did awhile back for halloween

KiwiFuzz2 dijo:
Power word: Jared Goodman.
Figures the goodman would be into the bad touch

Nicholas II of Russia dijo:
He hath the serial killer look, methinks.
Excuse me miss, you're about a size 14 right....?
 
Transphobes are predictably unconcerned with the actual science at play.
Ah yeah the actual science being the data that gets hidden when it does not fit your delusion.

The constant in all of these ramblings is that they refuse to accept that people do understand the science and long since realized that the people pushing this horror show are either in it for the money or out of their minds.

Boys have a penis.
Girls have a vagina.
A surgo-sausage is not a penis.
A gaping groin wound is not a vagina.
 
Basic biology? Basic biology proves trans women are men. Period. You have no business quoting 'basic biology' when you can't get a basic biology fact right
I like it when women try to counter them by saying "Okay, I'm a bio-transwoman, which means I'm a woman who identifies as a trans woman" and they get mad and say "That's not how this works!" because they're implying they know you have to be a man before you can identify as a transwoman.
Are you trying to imply a 'good doctor' would ignore the fact that a transwoman has a prostate and other male anatomy that requires specific medical monitoring to ensure its health? Or a trans man not be checked for cervical cancer? This is a dangerous thing to push
Let the pooner handle medication like Proscar and see what happens. Totally valid doods, dood.
There are massive differences and this statement sounds like it was written by a cult
He's trying to use patriarchy theory against radical feminists. Saying the power structure is run by men is a feminist talking point, but it's the radfems who don't consider men to be women.

It inadvertently shows patriarchy theory is the wrong lens to be looking at power structures; it does not matter if it's a girlboss or a dudebro because both women and men are capable of cruelty.
 
Última edición:
Ever grow tired of how this all rings the same?
Christians know nothing of Islam.
Christians know nothing of Judaism.
Rural people know nothing of diversity and city life.
White women know nothing of black women.
Men have no idea of what it's like being a woman.


Get new material trannies; you're like a century late to the party.
 
and some doctors now believe that the first uterus transplant for a trans woman is “anticipated to take place within the next few years, if not sooner.”
Ooh I like this because this article lays out a few reasons why that's not going to happen;
  • Men have a narrower pelvis
  • Different supportive ligaments
  • Different connective tissue
  • Different iliac artery diameter (a mismatch can cause thrombosis)
  • Nobody knows how to hook a uterus up to an amhole
  • The amhole has insufficient blood supply
  • The amhole has the wrong bacterial flora
  • Significant thrombolytic risk from high levels of estrogen in a body used to high levels of testosterone (let's not put the cart before the horse)
This is what the journal calls an "Inkling" - i.e. a brief editorial. The tone of the article is very breathlessly going "but I bet we could figure something out!". They then dwell on how an orchiectomy would probably be required (no shit) and that if there were no medical barriers for transgender uterine implants then ethically they should be trialled, before confirming that uterine transplants generally only hang about for one pregnancy because of the burden it places on a woman's body. Because uterine transplants have only become successful in the last 10 years in women who otherwise have a fully functioning reproductive system. And the authors note "oh no but this might be upsetting for trans women who want to keep it for menstruating :c "

There's precisely zero research backing this - it's genuinely a gender affirmation surgeon and some endocrinologists going "I reckon we could give it a go! Maybe in a few years trans women can get pregnant!". It glosses over the very obvious ethical concern that given the huge numbers of things that are likely to go wrong, what exactly would be the point? Well they argue that maybe it could be a groundbreaking piece of clinical work to create a four-factor baby (sperm, egg, uterus donor and then hormonal environment of the trans woman all impacting genetic and epigenetic factors). They kick around the idea that someone somewhere could try doing some research about it, but there's no research proposal.

Interesting to finally find out that THIS is the article that causes our sideshows to say "doctors and experts thinks trans women will be able to get pregnant within a few years!". It's about as compelling as saying "I reckon artificial wombs are feasible, we'd just need to find a way to make them and then find a way to keep them alive while ensuring the baby grows healthily - I reckon we can puzzle that all out in like a decade".
 
Atrás
Top Abajo