Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Última edición:
A bunch of troons came to the defence of brave and stunning transwoman Jerry Smith after Etute’s acquittal, including my favourite Tony Reed (erininthemorn):

Naturally he silently deleted those tweets after the truth about Smith became very clear:
Thanks, I wasn't reading Tony's thread at the time. Lol at his sniveling little backpedals.

It's more like they had a second sexual encounter where Etute's fears were confirmed. It's not a big leap from there to realize you're in a dangerous situation.

I don't know if I would have acquitted him given the defense they went with, but I can totally understand why he might have fully thought he was about to get murdered himself.

Also interesting how he is trying to forgive himself now by saying "at least he can't do that to anybody else."
 
This is a minor story, but it turns out that Nexus Mods will ban anybody that uploads a mod for Starfield that removes pronouns and is encouraging people who are mad about this to delete their account...and this is coming out right after gaming media was saying that the pronouns in Starfield was no big deal or a minor issue.




If a troon identifies as a member of the opposite sex, then what the hell is stopping them from playing an opposite sex character and using the conventional identifiers? After all, is that not what they are after in the first place?
 
Última edición:
This is a minor story, but it turns out that Nexus Mods will ban anybody that uploads a mod for Starfield that removes pronouns and is encouraging people who are mad about this to delete their account...and this is coming out right after gaming media was saying that the pronouns in Starfield was no big deal or a minor issue.


Starfield No Pronouns Mod BAN CONFIRMED REAL _ NexusMods Goes Full ACTIVIST As Admins SILENCE ...mp4

If a troon identifies as a member of the opposite sex, then what the hell is stopping them from playing an opposite sex character and using the conventional identifiers? After all, is that not what they are after in the first place?
I can only think of gender specials and proto-pooners.
 
Forget trannies, I don't even think womb transplants are a good idea in women, it can't be good for the baby to be in a womb that doesn't match the body it is implanted into. Maybe we should accept that there isn't some universal right to get pregnant, if you're infertile your body is trying to tell you something.
Also, while it sounds like surrogacy is pretty sus, is it really better to take some other woman's uterus out of her body than having someone carry the pregnancy for you? It wouldn't surprise me if uterus transplants are more expensive than surrogacy.
 
Also, while it sounds like surrogacy is pretty sus, is it really better to take some other woman's uterus out of her body than having someone carry the pregnancy for you? It wouldn't surprise me if uterus transplants are more expensive than surrogacy.
I'm very much against commercial surrogacy. Though charitable, like for family members or close friends, surrogacy is far less skeevy.
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • fb1ed1142f5cd9ad9ebbae4944ab5001-3745341236.gif
    fb1ed1142f5cd9ad9ebbae4944ab5001-3745341236.gif
    872.5 KB · Vistas: 23

The majority of children in a landmark study on puberty blockers experienced positive or negative changes in their mental health, new analysis suggests.
The original study of 44 children, who all took the controversial drugs for a year or more, found no mental health impact - neither benefits nor harm.
But a re-analysis of that data now suggests 34% saw their mental health deteriorate, while 29% improved.
The authors of the original report have welcomed the new evidence.
The re-analysis of the original data, seen by BBC Newsnight, questions some of the conclusions from the 2021 study about the potential mental health impact of puberty blockers on under 16s. It also sheds some light on this much-debated, but little understood, area of children's medicine.
The new study has not been in a peer-reviewed journal yet. The authors say they felt there was an urgency in getting the information into the public domain.

The original study​

In 2011, a team from the Tavistock's Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) - England's only NHS specialist gender clinic for children - and University College London Hospitals (UCLH) embarked on what became known as the early intervention study.
They enrolled 44 children, aged between 12 and 15, over the following three years. The study looked at the impact taking puberty blockers - medicines used to postpone puberty in children - was having and it resulted in the age at which puberty blockers could be offered on the NHS being lowered.
When the landmark study's results were published in 2021, it revealed blockers brought "no changes in psychological function" to them.
This differed from earlier findings of Dutch researchers, who pioneered this approach to treating gender dysphoria. They reported a positive impact on young people's mental health and wellbeing.
The original study used scores from both parent and child questionnaires, which assessed children's behavioural and emotional problems. These are widely and reliably used in psychology in many countries and include more than 100 questions on things like school, feelings, and relationships.
The overall finding of "no change" was based on a group average - or mean - of those scores, given at different points in time.
"That's a very standard way of doing things," Professor Chris Evans, a retired psychiatrist and psychotherapist, told Newsnight. "The problem is it doesn't pay attention to how much variation there was across the participants."
For example, a quarter could score extremely high, a quarter could score quite high, a quarter could score quite badly, and a quarter could score extremely badly. Yet the group average would be somewhere in the middle.

Re-analysis of data​

Prof Susan McPherson, from the University of Essex, and David Freedman, a retired social scientist, have since re-analysed the data. They instead looked at the individual trajectories of each of the young people in the early intervention study.
They found, after 12 months of puberty blocker injections - 34% of the children had reliably deteriorated, 29% had reliably improved, and 37% showed no change, according to their self-reported answers.
The proportions were a little lower in the parents' scores, but in three quarters of the cases, there was broad agreement between parents and their children.
The impact on each of the children varied.
For a child who "deteriorated", it could mean moving from being psychologically well and not needing treatment for their mental health, to meeting criteria for a psychiatric diagnosis such as depression or anxiety. Whereas a child who "improved" could move from needing mental health treatment to being considered mentally well.
However, what neither the original research paper, nor the re-analysis, can do is tell us why these young people fared so differently.
The study is small - just 44 young people. And because of the way the original study was designed - without a control group - experts can't infer cause and effect or say these changes in wellbeing were caused by being on puberty blockers.
But despite those limitations, the new analysis suggests the need for more research, both into this specific group and on the impact of puberty blockers more generally.
Mr Freedman argues it is vital that young people and their families have the "best information possible" when making decisions on medical treatment.

Gaps in evidence​

In June NHS England announced that puberty blockers will only be made available to young people taking part in clinical trials.
Dr Hilary Cass's interim report into children's gender services highlighted "gaps in evidence" around the drugs, and a systematic review carried out by NICE found the quality of the evidence for the use of puberty blockers in this context to be "very low".
Similar reviews have been undertaken in Sweden and Finland, with both reaching the same conclusion. A number of other European countries have begun taking a more cautious, less medical approach to helping young people questioning their gender identity.
Both the Tavistock and Portman Trust and UCLH said they welcomed new contributions to the evidence base around how to support young people with gender incongruence.
A spokesperson from Tavistock and Portman [NHS Foundation] Trust said data from the original study had been published to allow other researchers to conduct "further analyses". It said the analysis plan for the original study was independently produced by experts in medical statistics.
A spokesperson for UCLH said it supported Dr Cass's recommendation that "research should be fully embedded in the development of new services for children and young people expressing gender incongruence".
They added: "We will work closely with the new national [Children and Young People's Gender Dysphoria] research oversight board to support the collection and analysis of robust data in this area."
The board will oversee the design and conduct of the new puberty-blocker research trial, as well as ensure research is embedded at the heart of new children and young people's gender dysphoria services.
The Cass Review Team told the BBC that it has commissioned "an updated systematic review" of academic publications on puberty blockers.
This review, along with this new analysis will be taken into account in its final recommendations, which are expected by the end of the year.
 
So some actress named Emma Roberts is currently blowing up on Twitter because she's allegedly based transphobic and mean:
ER.JPG
I have no fucking idea who she is, and I am doubtful that the tranny is telling the truth, but if it actually happened that way then it's unironically based as fuck
 
I have no fucking idea who she is, and I am doubtful that the tranny is telling the truth, but if it actually happened that way then it's unironically based as fuck
American Horror Story is the wokest show on TV so the chance of a regular cast member 'misgendering' another is virtually null.
I predict they'll shift it to a racism accusation and there will be a tearful apology to "do better" and a sizeable donation to Black Trans Lives Matter or whatever.
 
So some actress named Emma Roberts is currently blowing up on Twitter because she's allegedly based transphobic and mean:
Ver archivo adjunto 5351737
I have no fucking idea who she is, and I am doubtful that the tranny is telling the truth, but if it actually happened that way then it's unironically based as fuck
It's weird that they don't put a pic of Emma Roberts next to Macho Ma'am in that article, if I didn't know her from her Nickelodeon days I'd have assumed she was that black chick. Did they not post her pic 'cuz you could more easily compare a real woman to him?
 
Emma Roberts is Hollywood nepo royalty. She is Eric Roberts daughter and Julia Roberts neice. She is notoriously a mean girl with no fucks to give (probably because she is coked out and hangry) and was arrested for beating up her boyfriend.

edited- a word
 
Atrás
Top Abajo