Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[scathefire]

Even if he was post-op it would still be objectionable. Mangling your penis doesn't make you a non-threat to women in a nude spa.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

Brazil: Journalist Ordered to Pay Damages to 'Trans Woman' over 'Misgendering'​

Archive

A Brazilian journalist, Madeleine Lacsko, was convicted of causing “moral damage” to a trans-identified male influencer, who adopted the name Rebecca Gaia. Ms. Lacsko was found guilty of “transphobia” over “misgendering” for addressing Gaia using the word “cara,” as “cara” means “dear” but also “guy” (a man). The journalist was told to delete her tweets and pay three thousand reais (over $500) to the influencer.

The social media interaction between Lacsko and Gaia that led to the charging of the journalist occurred on Twitter in July 2021 during a “pile-on” on Lacsko after she’d endured months of online abuse. The influencer asked Ms. Lacsko if she was going to answer a question posed by another man. According to the journalist, the influencer’s profile picture indicated to her that this person was a woman, so Lacsko replied with “Olá, cara (hello, dear)! I’ve already answered it.”

“However,” Lacsko said, “it turned out to be a transgender woman [who] immediately accused me of being racist and transphobic, which led to a new wave of attacks.”

The word “cara,” in Portuguese, can mean “dear/darling” (cara/querida for women, caro/querido for men, in formal language), which Ms. Lacsko says she meant, or it can mean “guy” in a more informal context.

“In Portuguese,” Lacsko told 4W, “the slang term ‘cara’ (guy), when used as a noun, means ‘guy’, a man. For example, ‘ele é um cara’ means ‘he is a guy/man’.” As in English, she explained, “as a vocative, the slang term [guy] is neutral and can be used for both men and women.”

Ms. Lacsko took her case to the court “in order to put an end to the attacks, which always came from the same group of influencers.” She won three judicial actions against a group of influencers, including Gaia, who accused her of “transphobia” and “racism” in December 2022. She told 4W that, in the first decision on the matter, a female judge ordered the influencers to pay Lacsko three thousand reais in compensation.

But in June 2023, Gaia filed an appeal, and a male judge reversed the decision in favor of the influencer, reducing in half the amount he had to pay to Ms. Lacsko. On top of that, he granted him compensation by the journalist. According to the appeal, the journalist’s “conduct” - using the word “cara” as a masculine form, was “enough to conclude that there was grave violation of the [influencer’s] personality, resulting in their humiliation in front of other users on social media.”

“The Judiciary decided that I had been transphobic and ordered me to delete the post and pay compensation. The amount is double the amount stipulated for the accusation of racism, a serious crime, and the other insults directed at me,” Ms Lacsko told 4W.

The journalist considers “interesting” that, throughout the proceedings, the Court of Justice of the State of São Paulo referred to both her and the trans-identified male as "defendant" in the masculine form, “requerido,” instead of “requerida.” “This is the same court that condemned me as transphobic for using the vocative ‘cara’.”

According to the newspaper Globo, Ms. Lacsko can appeal the decision, but she told 4W that “the only recourse now is the Supreme Court, which does not usually reexamine procedural evidence and only decides on constitutional violations.”

“In other words, the discussion about the use of the word 'cara' theoretically has no chance of being reopened in the Brazilian Judiciary,” Lacsko said. “This sets a dangerous precedent for criminal proceedings. Under Brazilian law, the crime of transphobia has been equated with racism and can result in a sentence of up to five years of imprisonment.”

“The case that happened to me is important for the freedom of expression of women in the public sphere, especially in discussions about gender. I was judicially sanctioned without even having entered into the discussion, simply because I used a vocative that was misunderstood by the people attacking me,” Ms Lacsko continued.

Lacsko has been a journalist for 27 years and also works as a “digital and social reputation risk management consultant.” She is a columnist for the news outlet UOL, a speaker, an author and has focused on the topic of lifelong learning for senior executives, Digital Citizenship and human rights while working as a consultant for UNICEF Angola and as an advisor to Brazil’s Supreme Court.

 

[Fëanor Curufinwë]

As far as I know "cara" means "dude" and a lot of people use it when talking to women in an informal setting. It's a really weak basis for misgendering.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Brazil: Journalist Ordered to Pay Damages to 'Trans Woman' over 'Misgendering'

Doesn't Brazil have much bigger problems to deal with than the fee fees of trannies?

Ah who am I kidding trannies always get high priority above everything else no matter what.

 

[Geranium]

Following the same track as Norway an Sweden, who have announced similar policy changes. Bell v Tavistock blew the whole thing wide open, even though it was reversed on appeal; they've all seen just how much damage their previous policies were doing, but also the level of anger and push-back amongst the commoners over how much transgender bullshit has damaged society. The question is: are they taking a tactical retreat so they can regroup and continue, or are they genuinely changing course?

Also Finland.

I think it's pretty clear that there are two factions at work in the NHS on "gender" -- the ideologues who ran GIDS itself (Carmichael & friends) and their counterparts at UCLH & Leeds General endocrinology (eg Gary Butler), then the more evidence-minded people who've gotten involved as part of and following the Cass Review. (The motley group of whistleblowers have next to no institutional power.)

The second group are all middle-class liberals (non-US sense) so it's yet to be seen whether they'll be unduly influenced by hand-wringing about the poor oppressed trans.

---

MtF tranny Rose Montoya got his plastic moobs out on the White House lawn after posing for selfies with President Joe Biden. SHOCKING: Trans TikTok influencer goes topless in front of families during Biden’s White House Pride celebration | The Post Millennial (archive)

Relevant clip:

Full TikTok video:

Video posted by rosemontoya on TikTok, via Libby Emmons on Twitter: @libbyemmons, tweet 1668451683091742727 (archive)

Edit: Reuters pictures make it clear there were lots of young children there. Bidens offer 'joy' at White House Pride event as LGBTQ attacks mount | Reuters (archive)

And the degenerate has doubled down:

Transcript:

It has recently come to my attention that conservatives are trying to use the video of me topless at the White House to try to call the community, groomers, etc. And I would just like to say that first of all, going topless in Washington DC is legal and I fully support the movement in freeing the nipple because why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However, before coming out as trans, it was not. All you're doing is affirming that I am a woman. All you're doing is saying that trans women are women because for some reason people like to sexualize women's bodies and say that they are inappropriate. My trans masculine friends were showing off their top surgery scars and living in joy and I wanted to join them. And because it is perfectly within the law in Washington DC. I decided to join them and cover my nipples just to play it safe, because I wanted to be full free in myself. I had zero intention of trying to be vulgar or be profane in any way. I was simply living, enjoy living my truth and existing in my body. Happy, pride. Free the nipple.

 

[Markass the Worst]

why is my chest now deemed inappropriate or illegal when I show it off? However, before coming out as trans, it was not. All you're doing is affirming that I am a woman. All you're doing is saying that trans women are women because for some reason people like to sexualize women's bodies and say that they are inappropriate.

No we're not fucking saying that, you groomer piece of shit. That is an entirely different sentence, nigger.

 

[Geranium]

Yesterday was the Westminster Hall debate on two related parliamentary petitions in the UK, for and against amending the Equality Act 2010 to make clear that the protected characteristic of "sex" means biological sex, as opposed to "legal sex" (which can be changed, via a Gender Recognition Certificate, under the Gender Recognition Act 2004).

Spoiler: Context

The current ambiguity means that services are reluctant to exclude trans-identified males from female-only services. Even though only males with a GRC would be considered "legally female", it is a (serious!) offence to attempt to find out if an individual has a GRC in the first place. In practice, this means that organisations don't apply the single-sex exemptions and exclude trans-identified males, for fear of being sued.

Trannies oppose the amendment of the Equality Act to make "sex" clearly mean "biological sex" because it would very likely means trans-identified males would have a harder time worming their way into women's spaces.

The recording is here: LIVE: E-petition debate relating to the definition of "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 - YouTube (archive)

The transcript is here: Legislative Definition of Sex - Hansard - UK Parliament (archive)

I've not archived the video as it's three hours long, and Parliament is pretty anal about preserving records of its debates.

Edit: Sex Matters have done some summaries of the best/worst contributions, so I'll collect them and add them here.

2nd edit: See below. Even as a dirty commie, I'll admit to being impressed by many of the contributions of the pro-amendment Tories, which really scotch any of the (ludicrous) claims that the Tories are just trying to import the transgenderism debate from the US as a "culture war" issue.

Spoiler: MPs

Kirsten Oswald


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668663676042194965 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 4:56 PM UTC
Kirsten Oswald (East Renfrewshire) (Scottish National Party) started by complaining that the language used in the debate had not been "measured". She said that the suggested change would be likely to increase confusion, to the detriment of both trans people and women – and that it was a change, not a clarification. She said that she wanted to hear more about women's rights, that women's rights were not diminished by someone else having their rights upheld, and that what endangers women is predatory and violent men. She described that people have been going to the loo without any issue for many years but this was now a thorny issue. She talked about "intersex people" and commented that large proportion of adult women do not ovulate.
"There is no legal precedent for the definition of biological sex […]. That means that there is not a way of looking at how we support women’s rights to privacy, for instance. That kind of change could have regressive consequences: it could actually entrench gender stereotypes and biological determinism for women."
@kirstenoswald

Anna Firth


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668658685579603977 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 4:36 PM UTC
Anna Firth (Southend West) (Conservative) focused on single-sex spaces and services. She wanted the Equality Act to be clear that having a gender recognition certificate does not give male people the right to compete in women’s sports, undress or shower with women and girls, or be employed in a job that involves intimate contact with women. She described this as a very simple clarification., and emphasised that “case by case” simply does not work, since it leaves service providers to make difficult decisions. She gave the NHS's Annex B policy as an example of the confusion caused.
"Families, women and children in Southend West want to know that when the sign on the door says or indicates female, that is not up for negotiation. The only people who should be in that space are biological women. Biological males or trans women or non-binary people should simply not be in those spaces."
@Anna_Firth

Caroline Ansell


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668655940189470725 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 4:25 PM UTC
Caroline Ansell (Eastbourne) (Conservative) rose to say that her argument had been won before the debate started, when the chair had mentioned two live court cases – her point being that individuals were operating in a legal grey space, rather than being directed by Parliament. She mentioned that the lead petitioner, Maya Forstater, had spent nearly two years and £100,000 just to determine that her beliefs were covered by the Equality Act, and this meant that a GRC could not force other people to change their perception of a person’s sex.
She talked about the woman driven out of Oxfam; Professor Kathleen Stock hounded from her post at Sussex University simply for saying that male people and female people are two different groups; and “Sarah Surviving” who is suing Brighton’s rape crisis centre for refusing to provide women-only support.
"Those individuals and organisations are forced to run the legal gauntlet case by case, isolated and alone, and sometimes at very great cost to their reputation, to their career and to their health."
@Caroline_Ansell

Kirsty Blackman


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668654425873719296 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 4:19 PM UTC
Kirsty Blackman (Aberdeen North) (Scottish National Party) said she rejected the idea that trans people were potential predators, as this was demonising a protected group, and that the term “ordinary people” was an exclusionary phrase if it was used to mean "non-trans people". She disliked being called "straight" on social media.
She said that nobody had been able to explain what biological sex was, but had talked about XX and XY chromosomes; she had no clue about her own, she said, but assumed they were probably XY. She felt that both women and trans people were treated as lesser in society. She talked about "gatekeeping" in relation to toilets and said that a friend of hers had been told that her two teenage daughters could not use a toilet because they had short hair and wore trousers. She suggested that what we should want is for everybody to be able to to the loo when they were shopping.
"I have a fair idea of what my genitals look like and how they compare with how other people’s look, but if we are talking about biological sex there needs to be a definition that everybody in this room can agree with."
@KirstySNP

Peter Gibson


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668653306191781890 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 4:15 PM UTC
Peter Gibson (Darlington) (Conservative) spoke in favour of the status quo petition, and noted Baroness Falkner remark that changing the definition of sex that “could bring clarity in a number of areas” but also “ambiguity in others.” He said that his fear was the change ran the risk of excluding trans people from effective protection by the Equality Act, and that changing the act would alter its original intention and could throw into question over 10 years of case law.
"By restricting the definition of sex to sex assigned at birth, we could have a situation whereby protection from discrimination created a two-tier system. Trans people who are perceived to be cisgender would have more protection under the law than trans people who are not perceived to be cisgender."
@Gibbo4Darlo

Neale Hanvey


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668643575381327872 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:36 PM UTC
Neale Hanvey (Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath) (Alba) spoke as someone who has worked in clinical practice for 25 years and as a same-sex-attracted man – his sex and sexual orientation being strong parts of his identity. He made the point that if sex were to mean anything other than the biological category of natal male, gay men would not be able to describe themselves and the law would not be able to protect them. He said he felt that the statement "transwomen are women" both implied the need to subvert and subsume the meaning of “woman” as it is commonly understood and suggested that there was something less, something other, about a trans identity, and he did not agree with that. He was clear that that telling children there was something intrinsically wrong with them was absolutely unforgivable.
"I see absolutely nothing controversial in calling a transwoman a transwoman, and a transman a transman. These are necessary biological categories for society and the Equality Act to accommodate, value and protect. Without a stable, codified language, the whole meaning of protected characteristics, hitherto based on sex, comes tumbling down."
@JNHanvey

Jonathan Gullis


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668642333556981760 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:31 PM UTC
Jonathan Gullis (Stoke-on-Trent North) (Conservative) said that he was speaking passionately about this issue because a woman in his life had fled domestic violence and would have been terrified to be near anyone male, whether or not they were a transwoman, because of the abuse, rape and torture that she and her daughter had suffered. He said his constituents were "befuddled" by the debate since they thought it obvious that to them it was obvious that in the Equality Act “sex” was biological sex. Women were being persecuted and abused for speaking out, just as much as anyone in the trans community. He wanted his daughter to grow up looking to heroines such as Rosie Duffield, Joanna Cherry and JK Rowling.
"Their rights should not be eroded because of an extremist minority shouting very loudly on social media and pursuing a very hard-line agenda that is not in keeping with the majority opinion, as we have seen during the national debate."

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:32 PM UTC
In response to a question from Dame Nia Grifith about his understanding of the Equality Act, he added:
"I want to make it perfectly clear: sex is not assigned at birth. You are born a man or you are born a woman. Those are indisputable facts. You have XY chromosomes or XX chromosomes. Again, that is not up for debate or discussion."

Lloyd Russell-Moyle


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668640966209687553 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:26 PM UTC
Lloyd Russell-Moyle (Brighton, Kemptown) (Labour/Co-op) mentioned abuse directed at politicians on all sides of the debate. He said that MPs were hearing cherry-picked case studies and that cases, people and sex were complex and not binary. If there was a rule that discrimination could only happen according to biological sex, he said, organisations would not be allowed to be trans-inclusive. He wanted local flexibility; he said the law was clear but services were under-funded.
"People are complex. That is why flexibility in the current law is important. By defining things too much, what we suddenly do is assume that everyone lives in these easy, binary boxes."
@lloyd_rm

Tim Loughton


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668639984792788996 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:22 PM UTC
Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham) (Conservative), like Antoniazzi, emphasised that parliament was the place for issues of sex and gender to be resolved and highlighted that the debate was about about clarification, not change. His focus was on sport: since the London Olympics ten years ago, around 60 governing bodies have opened up the female category to male athletes, when the entire purpose of competitive women’s sport is to recognise and reward female excellence by allowing girls and women to compete fairly, like against like. He flagged that even when sporting regulators have the law behind them, they worry about the risk of vexatious, costly legal actions and online abuse.
"Parents worry that their daughters will get injured on the field playing with bigger, stronger, heavier boys who identify as girls. Faced with such unfairness and risk, women and girls vote with their feet. A measure that is described as ‘inclusive’ actually means that girls and women are excluded from their own competition."
@timloughton

Luke Pollard


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668639330489778176 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:19 PM UTC
Luke Pollard (Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport) (Labour/Co-op) said that he wanted to spend as much time talking about trans people’s access to healthcare. He said that trans people are legally allowed to access opposite-sex toilets and changing rooms and it was wrong to characterise them as predators. He thought that changing the Equality Act was unnecessary, unworkable and unfair and was worried that it might lead to a roll-back of rights for the LGBT+ community.
"When we talk about biological sex, we are talking about the sex assigned at birth. That means that there is a real complication and a potential assault on people with intrusive medical tests to look at their biological sex at birth rather than where they are today."
@LukePollard

Andrew Lewer


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668636654100262914 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:09 PM UTC
Andrew Lewer (Northampton South) (Conservative) made the point that people can identify however they like, so long as claims about their identity do not injure other people. But laws had drifted away from reality and got muddled, he said, and other people were now being injured. He described some intimate procedures and reasons why women might want them carried out only by another woman. He referred to the recent NHS Confederation guidance and said that its claim that a man who identifies as a woman would be a satisfactory person to provide that care was not only heartless, but illegal.
"If a man provides such care to a woman who says that she is only willing to receive it from another woman, it is a sexual assault. Have we reached the point where medical associations are instructing care providers to sexually assault women in the name of inclusion? That is why it is essential that the meaning of sex in the Equality Act is made much clearer, in order to end this and save lives."
@ALewerMBE

Nia Griffith


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668635698021416960 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:05 PM UTC
Dame Nia Griiffith (Llanelli) (Labour) said that existing services could choose either to be single-sex or could be women-only services that are trans-inclusive and that the proposed clarification of the act would create a blanket ban on trans people from services that they had previously enjoyed without concern or complaint. She said that there had been a conflation of transwomen with criminals.
"Why the idea that someone can dress up as a woman and therefore carry out whatever criminal act they intend to should determine how we decide to treat trans women is absolutely indecipherable to me."
@NiaGriffithMP

Nick Fletcher


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668635287105437702 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:03 PM UTC
Nick Fletcher (Don Valley) (Conservative) started by flagging that many members would be thinking about adult men who identify as trans entering adult women’s spaces, but his real concern was what happens when a six-year-old girl is in that changing room. Having worked in construction for most of his life, he made the analogy with health and safety rules – a near miss reported to stop tragedy happening. He then talked about the need to prevent unfairness in sport, and the danger of telling children that they can change sex.
"I feel that I have to stand up for the six-year-old girl in the changing room confronted with a 50-year-old male who is going through a tough time. I am standing up for the nine-year-old who wants to stand in first place at the Olympics but thinks, “What’s the point?” when a biological man will be there in her place."
@NickFletcherMP

Rosie Duffield


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668634712393523200 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 3:01 PM UTC
Rosie Duffield (Canterbury) (Labour) mentioned the abuse that she and other women face every day for speaking about this issue. She explained that one in four women will experience domestic abuse in her lifetime; two women a week are killed by a current or former partner; 41% of women care for a child or other relative compared with 25% of men; around 90% of single parents are women.
"Because of those and other differences in men’s and women’s lives, we need to be able to monitor sex discrimination and provide for the needs of women and girls, particularly when they are most vulnerable. The Equality Act is the law that allows for that."
@RosieDuffield1

Peter Bottomley


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668631067593695232 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 2:47 PM UTC
Sir Peter Bottomley (Worthing West) (Conservative) referenced Helen Joyce's book Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality and Kathleen Stock's book Material Girls and talked about how Stock has been bullied. He referenced the anomalies caused by a badly worded question about gender identity in the 2021 census. He also mentioned sport, and asked:
"Why should a cyclist who is the 500th fastest in his age group or category be allowed to declare themselves a woman, and win a women’s cycling race? There is no justification for that. There never was, and there never will be."
@PBottomleyMP

Jess Phillips


@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668630295598473219 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 2:43 PM UTC
Jess Phillips (Birmingham Yardley) (Labour) emphasised that sex and gender are different and that biology matters. She drew on her experience of running single-sex services to argue strongly that generic services that are expected to cover men and women simply do not work – sometimes resulting in victims and perpetrators of violence women using the same service.
"The majority of victims of domestic violence are women, and they are much more likely to be seriously hurt or killed. We must be really careful to protect our intricate and finely balanced services for women."
@jessphillips

Angela Richardson

@SexMattersOrg, tweet 1668629263736799232 (archive)

Sex Matters (@SexMattersOrg) · Jun 13, 2023 · 2:39 PM UTC
Angela Richardson (Guildford) (Conservative) explained how the law needs to protect everyone's rights and said that the protected characteristic of gender reassignment – which covers trans people whether they have a gender-recognition certificate or not – does not give someone the right to use opposite-sex facilities or services. She highlighted the need for legislation that can be explained clearly and easily, in practical terms.
"[Employers and service providers] need to be able to explain their rules on their signs and websites, on the phone and to staff. That means being clear about where there are sex-based rules and where a service is provided for both sexes together."
@AJRichardsonMP

 

[JustSomeDong]

"There is no legal precedent for the definition of biological sex"

I'm not sure one was needed. I also doubt there is legal precedent for other self-evident yet worldshaking truths, such as water is wet, or the sky is blue, or that cows say moo, or that fat people stink.

Only now would we need to establish such legal precedents.

 

[Punished Neco]

MtF tranny Rose Montoya got his plastic moobs out on the White House lawn after posing for selfies with President Joe Biden.

In recently: Rose Montoya banned from all future White House events. Can't even bring troons to meet the Senile President of the United States without them acting inappropriately.
[A]
Imagine thinking going topless on the White House lawn was appropriate
Probably was trying to get some gender affirmation from Hunter Biden.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

I'm not sure one was needed. I also doubt there is legal precedent for other self-evident yet worldshaking truths, such as water is wet, or the sky is blue, or that cows say moo, or that fat people stink.

Something that can be looked up in a biology textbook doesn't a need a legal precedent.

 

[JustSomeDong]

Something that can be looked up in a biology textbook doesn't a need a legal precedent.

I'm not sure any biology textbooks just openly and plainly states that fatties stink, but we all know they do. The point is, we don't even need to go that far to know these things. You shouldn't need a citation to say water is wet. Anyone who would ask for one is a hopelessly pedantic bag of dicks, and should be fed into a woodchipper.

Feet first, I reckon.

 

[Geranium]

The American Medical Association has doubled-down on pediatric medical transition.

AMA strengthens its policy on protecting access to gender-affirming care (archive)

AMA strengthens its policy on protecting access to gender-affirming care

Endocrine Society-proposed resolution passes with overwhelming support in House of Delegates

Newswise — CHICAGO—The American Medical Association (AMA) House of Delegates today passed the Endocrine Society’s resolution to protect access to evidence-based gender-affirming care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals.

As political attacks on gender-affirming care escalate, it is the responsibility of the medical community to speak out in support of evidence-based care. Medical decisions should be made by patients, their relatives and health care providers, not politicians.

In the resolution, the AMA committed to opposing any criminal and legal penalties against patients seeking gender-affirming care, family members or guardians who support them in seeking medical care, and health care facilities and clinicians who provide gender-affirming care. The AMA will work at the federal and state level with legislators and regulators to oppose such policies and collaborate with other organizations to educate the Federation of State Medical Boards about the importance of gender-affirming care.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Urological Association, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the American College of Physicians, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology, GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBTQ+ Equality and AMA’s Medical Student Section co-sponsored the Society’s resolution.

Due to widespread misinformation about medical care for transgender and gender-diverse teens, 18 states have passed laws or instituted policies banning gender-affirming care. More than 30 percent of the nation’s transgender and gender-diverse youth now live in states with gender-affirming care bans, according to the Human Rights Campaign. Some policies are even restricting transgender and gender-diverse adults’ access to care.

These policies do not reflect the research landscape. More than 2,000 scientific studies have examined aspects of gender-affirming care since 1975, including more than 260 studies cited in the Endocrine Society’s Clinical Practice Guideline.

Pediatric gender-affirming care is designed to take a conservative approach. When young children experience feelings that their gender identity does not match the sex recorded at birth, the first course of action is to support the child in exploring their gender identity and to provide mental health support, as needed.

Medical intervention is reserved for older adolescents and adults, with treatment plans tailored to the individual and designed to maximize the time teenagers and their families have to make decisions about their transitions. Major medical organizations also agree on waiting until an individual has turned 18 or reached the age of majority in their country to undergo gender-affirming genital surgery.

Gender-affirming care can be life saving for a population with high suicide rates. For example, a 2020 study analyzed survey data from 89 transgender adults who had access to puberty-delaying medication while adolescents and data from more than 3,400 transgender adults who did not. The study found that those who received puberty-delaying hormone treatment had lower likelihood of lifetime suicidal ideation than those who wanted puberty-delaying treatment but did not receive it, even after adjusting for demographic variables and level of family support. Approximately nine in ten transgender adults who wanted puberty-delaying treatment, but did not receive it, reported lifetime suicidal ideation.

# # #

Endocrinologists are at the core of solving the most pressing health problems of our time, from diabetes and obesity to infertility, bone health, and hormone-related cancers. The Endocrine Society is the world’s oldest and largest organization of scientists devoted to hormone research and physicians who care for people with hormone-related conditions.

The Society has more than 18,000 members, including scientists, physicians, educators, nurses and students in 122 countries. To learn more about the Society and the field of endocrinology, visit our site at www.endocrine.org. Follow us on Twitter at @TheEndoSociety and @EndoMedia.

It “is the responsibility of the medical community to speak out in support of evidence-based care”. Couldn't agree more! Talk about torching your credibility.

@jessesingal, tweet 1668765540058533888 (archive)
@benryanwriter, tweet 1668781806726836227 (archive)

 

[AnOminous]

The American Medical Association has doubled-down on pediatric medical transition.

AMA confirms its status as nothing more than a propaganda organ of Big Pharma, trying to force children onto life-destroying regimens of drugs and genital mutilation that leads to permanent dependence on extremely expensive pharmaceuticals.

 

[CuzinEd]

Did anyone here about the tranny event at the white house. It seems Biden invited some trannies over for a PR stunt and they started flashing their trans literal man boobs. Biden got upset and the trannies got offended or triggered.

Some tranny freak named Rose Montoya.

This is totally shocking. LOL

https://archive.ph/IPO4g

 

[AnOminous]

Did anyone here about the tranny event at the white house. It seems Biden invited some trannies over for a PR stunt and they started flashing their trans literal man boobs. Biden got upset and the trannies got offended or triggered.

Imagine you have a photo op with the literal President of the United States (however much of a senile faggot as he is) and instead of making your weird sexual deviant community look good, you instantly perv out and start exposing yourself and your disgusting perversions.

And then you wonder why your approval rating is plummeting as people realize troons are just disgusting perverts and that's all there is to it.

 

[CuzinEd]

Imagine you have a photo op with the literal President of the United States (however much of a senile faggot as he is) and instead of making your weird sexual deviant community look good, you instantly perv out and start exposing yourself and your disgusting perversions.

And then you wonder why your approval rating is plummeting as people realize troons are just disgusting perverts and that's all there is to it.

It's almost like mentally ill people can do any fucked up shit.

When Trump is president again he should get some big titty strippers to run around on the White House lawn to make up for it. If Biden can do it then why can't he?

 

[Secret Asshole]

I'm just fucking tired of these self-centered, narcissistic, empty fucking mentally ill men. I've never seen so many people deserving of so little get so much. We've got literal tent cities, skid rows, drug addicts with their limbs rotting off, people can't afford to build houses so they have to build houses in the backyards of other houses, inflation through the roof but god fucking help you if you misgender a fucking mentally ill man, its the fucking apocalypse.

 

[Septictic]

CBC guest says children know they are trans at two years old

Este contenido es privado.

 

[Markass the Worst]

CBC guest says children know they are trans at two years old

Of course it would be Canada. That country is #2 in sucking the girl dick, right behind the UK.

 

[Positron]

Van Moorsel said, “We’re all children of God. God loves us. We are not mistakes.

We are not mistakes, but we make mistakes and defy our divine purpose -- and through faith in God we strive to correct our mistakes.

If you want a consumerist religion that you opt in and feel good, go look in the New Age shops. Christianity is not for you.

“…And to promote love over hate.”

Love does not mean indulgence or unlimited tolerance. Jesus is very mean to some people.