Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Iniciador del tema trannyfucker
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 8 de Mar, 2020
lol manlet
- Registrado
- 1 de Ene, 2021
Terf Island tranny screws money out of supermarkets.
"Miss Yeomans says she's experienced six similar incidents over the past four years and on each occasion threatened legal action with the organisations settling with her before any cases came to court."
"Miss Yeomans says she's experienced six similar incidents over the past four years and on each occasion threatened legal action with the organisations settling with her before any cases came to court."
- Registrado
- 13 de Ene, 2019
The FTM troon that shot up a Colorado school in 2019 was sentenced in life in prison. Last I heard she was kept in a men’s prison in isolation. No mention of where she will serve her time.
www.npr.org
A Colorado School Shooter Is Sentenced To Life In Prison
Devon Erickson was convicted of first degree murder and other charges for a 2019 shooting attack inside a suburban Denver high school that killed one student and injured eight others.
www.npr.org
- Registrado
- 3 de Jun, 2016
Yes, because Kobane killed himself and did not shower. That makes him a tranny.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 4 de Jun, 2018
The Keira Bell case has been overturned. Expected, given the shaky legal foundation of the case (what happened to Bell was in line with established best practice) and Bell's team (renegade professor, people associated with anti-abortion & nutty christian groups -> not actual experts on trans care). Wonder if it'll go anywhere from here, I doubt it. There will be an independent review, but it'll take a year (if not longer) before we see any results. The likely medical malpractice and other worrisome trends will continue unabated.
You just know TRAs everywhere will use this case to reinforce their "poor widdle minority" status and ignore any and all correct complaints against their ideology. Despicable, I can see the clueless news articles now.
(https://archive.md/VsD4G)
IMAGE SOURCE,PA MEDIA
image captionKeira Bell (centre) said she should have been challenged more when she decided to transition to male
Doctors can judge if under-16s can give informed consent to puberty blocker use, the Court of Appeal has ruled.
The appeal was brought by the Tavistock Trust, which runs the UK's only youth gender identity clinic.
The decision reverses a 2020 ruling that under-16s lacked capacity to give informed consent to the treatment, which delays the onset of puberty.
The original case was brought by Keira Bell, who says the clinic should have challenged her more over transitioning.
She said she was disappointed by the decision, and will seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Court of Appeal judges said they recognised "the difficulties and complexities" of the issue, but that "it is for the clinicians to exercise their judgement knowing how important it is that consent is properly obtained according to the particular individual circumstances".
Puberty blockers are drugs used to "pause" puberty by suppressing the release of hormones.
They are prescribed to some children who are experiencing gender dysphoria, which the NHS describes as "a sense of unease that a person may have because of a mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity".
IMAGE SOURCE,PA MEDIA
image captionMs Bell says she will seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court
The Tavistock clinic said it welcomed the decision.
"The judgement upholds established legal principles which respect the ability of our clinicians to engage actively and thoughtfully with our patients in decisions about their care and futures," a spokesperson said.
"It affirms that it is for doctors, not judges, to decide on the capacity of under-16s to consent to medical treatment."
The Tavistock's Gender Identity Development Service (Gids) said that hormone treatment "allows a young person time to consider their options and to continue to explore their developing gender identity before making decisions about irreversible forms of treatment".
In December 2020, the High Court ruled under-13s were "highly unlikely" to be able to give informed consent to what it described as "experimental" treatment and it was "very doubtful" those aged 14 and 15 would have the sufficient understanding of the implications.
Keira Bell, one of the claimants in the case, started taking puberty blockers at the age of 16 after being referred to Gids.
She was later prescribed the male hormone testosterone and had surgery to remove her breasts.
Now in her mid-20s, she regrets the decision to transition to a male, and feels there wasn't enough investigation or therapy before she reached that stage.
She said she had "no regrets" about bringing the case, which she said "shone a light into the dark corners of a medical scandal that is harming children and harmed me.
"I am obviously disappointed with the ruling of the court today, and especially that it did not grapple with the significant risk of harm that children are exposed to by being given powerful experimental drugs."
This a complex, controversial area, yet the Court of Appeal's ruling is very clear.
It is for doctors working with families and the children themselves to decide whether that young person can truly understand the implications of taking drugs that could change the course of their life.
Effectively this ruling has removed the courts from the decision-making process in all but the most difficult cases.
This will be welcomed by many young people struggling with their gender identity, who believe the long wait for treatment that they already face is causing huge distress and harm.
But for those like Keira Bell, who believe they weren't challenged enough when they made decisions that shaped their futures, there will be real disappointment.
However, the court cases have led to more discussion of the issues - and many will hope that they will also lead to greater understanding.
In March, a separate judgement from the court's Family Division had ruled parents could give consent for under-16s to access puberty blockers, with other safeguarding measures considered.
The Tavistock temporarily paused new referrals to its endocrinology service following the rulings.
Eligible under-16s who had already been referred for treatment, and have parental consent, are having their cases reviewed by Gids, with decisions overseen by an independent NHS England review group.
The NHS said the findings of Dr Hilary Cass's independent review into NHS gender identity services for children and young people would shed further light on the issue.
The review was announced in September 2020, when it was said it would take "12 months or possibly longer".
"The NHS commissioned Dr Hilary Cass to review gender identity services prior to the original High Court ruling to ensure the best model of safe and effective care is delivered - this will set out wide-ranging recommendations including on the use of puberty blockers and the many contested clinical issues identified by the court," a spokesperson said.
"An independent multi-professional review group will continue to confirm whether clinical decision making has followed a robust consent process now that the endocrine pathway has been reopened by the Tavistock."
Some more articles.
https://www.theguardian.com/society...ers-ruling-for-under-16s-tavistock-keira-bell
(https://archive.md/OyOME)
https://www.losangelesblade.com/202...bfNG3tCYhGU-1632253597-0-gqNtZGzNAzujcnBszRfR
(https://archive.md/Ii7qJ)
You just know TRAs everywhere will use this case to reinforce their "poor widdle minority" status and ignore any and all correct complaints against their ideology. Despicable, I can see the clueless news articles now.
Ruling limiting under-16s puberty blockers overturned
The appeal decision reverses a High Court ruling that under-16s would struggle to give informed consent.
www.bbc.com
Ruling limiting under-16s puberty blockers overturned
By Eleanor Lawrie
image captionKeira Bell (centre) said she should have been challenged more when she decided to transition to male
Doctors can judge if under-16s can give informed consent to puberty blocker use, the Court of Appeal has ruled.
The appeal was brought by the Tavistock Trust, which runs the UK's only youth gender identity clinic.
The decision reverses a 2020 ruling that under-16s lacked capacity to give informed consent to the treatment, which delays the onset of puberty.
The original case was brought by Keira Bell, who says the clinic should have challenged her more over transitioning.
She said she was disappointed by the decision, and will seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Court of Appeal judges said they recognised "the difficulties and complexities" of the issue, but that "it is for the clinicians to exercise their judgement knowing how important it is that consent is properly obtained according to the particular individual circumstances".
Puberty blockers are drugs used to "pause" puberty by suppressing the release of hormones.
They are prescribed to some children who are experiencing gender dysphoria, which the NHS describes as "a sense of unease that a person may have because of a mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity".
image captionMs Bell says she will seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court
The Tavistock clinic said it welcomed the decision.
"The judgement upholds established legal principles which respect the ability of our clinicians to engage actively and thoughtfully with our patients in decisions about their care and futures," a spokesperson said.
"It affirms that it is for doctors, not judges, to decide on the capacity of under-16s to consent to medical treatment."
The Tavistock's Gender Identity Development Service (Gids) said that hormone treatment "allows a young person time to consider their options and to continue to explore their developing gender identity before making decisions about irreversible forms of treatment".
In December 2020, the High Court ruled under-13s were "highly unlikely" to be able to give informed consent to what it described as "experimental" treatment and it was "very doubtful" those aged 14 and 15 would have the sufficient understanding of the implications.
Keira Bell, one of the claimants in the case, started taking puberty blockers at the age of 16 after being referred to Gids.
She was later prescribed the male hormone testosterone and had surgery to remove her breasts.
Now in her mid-20s, she regrets the decision to transition to a male, and feels there wasn't enough investigation or therapy before she reached that stage.
She said she had "no regrets" about bringing the case, which she said "shone a light into the dark corners of a medical scandal that is harming children and harmed me.
"I am obviously disappointed with the ruling of the court today, and especially that it did not grapple with the significant risk of harm that children are exposed to by being given powerful experimental drugs."
This a complex, controversial area, yet the Court of Appeal's ruling is very clear.
It is for doctors working with families and the children themselves to decide whether that young person can truly understand the implications of taking drugs that could change the course of their life.
Effectively this ruling has removed the courts from the decision-making process in all but the most difficult cases.
This will be welcomed by many young people struggling with their gender identity, who believe the long wait for treatment that they already face is causing huge distress and harm.
But for those like Keira Bell, who believe they weren't challenged enough when they made decisions that shaped their futures, there will be real disappointment.
However, the court cases have led to more discussion of the issues - and many will hope that they will also lead to greater understanding.
In March, a separate judgement from the court's Family Division had ruled parents could give consent for under-16s to access puberty blockers, with other safeguarding measures considered.
The Tavistock temporarily paused new referrals to its endocrinology service following the rulings.
Eligible under-16s who had already been referred for treatment, and have parental consent, are having their cases reviewed by Gids, with decisions overseen by an independent NHS England review group.
The NHS said the findings of Dr Hilary Cass's independent review into NHS gender identity services for children and young people would shed further light on the issue.
The review was announced in September 2020, when it was said it would take "12 months or possibly longer".
"The NHS commissioned Dr Hilary Cass to review gender identity services prior to the original High Court ruling to ensure the best model of safe and effective care is delivered - this will set out wide-ranging recommendations including on the use of puberty blockers and the many contested clinical issues identified by the court," a spokesperson said.
"An independent multi-professional review group will continue to confirm whether clinical decision making has followed a robust consent process now that the endocrine pathway has been reopened by the Tavistock."
Some more articles.
https://www.theguardian.com/society...ers-ruling-for-under-16s-tavistock-keira-bell
(https://archive.md/OyOME)
https://www.losangelesblade.com/202...bfNG3tCYhGU-1632253597-0-gqNtZGzNAzujcnBszRfR
(https://archive.md/Ii7qJ)
Última edición:
Ivy Triangle
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 5 de Jul, 2021
I'm so dysphoric my family needs to die
www.hindustantimes.com
Rohtak youth killed family as they refused money for gender-reassignment surgery: Cops
The accused Abhishek Malik had allegedly shot dead his property dealer father Pradeep Malik, mother Babli Devi and maternal grandmother Roshni Devi at their house in Vijay Nagar in Rohtak, while his 17-year-old sister succumbed to bullet wounds at Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences two...
- Registrado
- 10 de Sep, 2021
A man choking out a woman. How progressive.
Transgender fighter wins MMA debut after choking out opponent in second round
Alana McLaughlin, the first openly-transgender MMA fighter to compete in the US since 2014, beat Celine Provost on Friday nightwww.mirror.co.uk
He has a reddit account
Some hot takes from his AMA
You totally caught me. I'm just trying to sneak up on you with my fairy wand, aka girl-dick to sprinkle magical goo on you that will turn you into a homosexual.
I'm going to have to disagree. A trans woman has no obligation to disclose. It's probably not smart to withhold the information, especially if she hasn't had surgery, but she is in no way assaulting someone by not disclosing the status of her genitals before sex. And often if she DOES disclose that information she's very likely to be beaten, raped, or killed because of it. If she's had surgery she definitely doesn't have any obligation to disclose, especially since it's likely that her partner would never know otherwise. I feel like it's a bit dishonest if she doesn't and I personally would always disclose, but again, she's under no obligation. You can't catch transsexuality by touching one of us. We're not deadly tricksters that want to turn you gay. And honestly if things haven't gotten sexual then what right do you have to know what's in our pants? At what point are we obligated to tell you that we're trans? The first smile? The first conversation? If we're not having sex, it's none of your business, frankly. It might be frustrating to you that you run the risk of making out with a trans woman (oh noes!) but it can and does literally get us killed, so I'm sorry but I think a trans woman's safety comes before a potential partner's fear that they might be grossed out.
r/casualiama - I am a 30-year-old trans woman and former special forces operator.
101 votes and 200 comments so far on Reddit
www.reddit.com
He does talk about being more dangerous now than he was in the army, but look at the name of the now banned subreddit, it might just be emotions talking
雑音🐈
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Nov, 2017
what a gross ita.He has a reddit account
Ver archivo adjunto 2568020
Some hot takes from his AMA
r/casualiama - I am a 30-year-old trans woman and former special forces operator.
101 votes and 200 comments so far on Reddit
He does talk about being more dangerous now than he was in the army, but look at the name of the now banned subreddit, it might just be emotions talking
Ver archivo adjunto 2568029
Amber the Hedgehog
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 23 de Ago, 2018
Yes because not telling until more personal feelings are involved will definitely lower the chance of violence.He has a reddit account
Ver archivo adjunto 2568020
Some hot takes from his AMA
r/casualiama - I am a 30-year-old trans woman and former special forces operator.
101 votes and 200 comments so far on Reddit
He does talk about being more dangerous now than he was in the army, but look at the name of the now banned subreddit, it might just be emotions talking
Ver archivo adjunto 2568029
Seriously Blaire White, a more passing than average transwoman regardless of any lolcow status, made video about this topic where he said that making sure that your potential partners know as early as possible is how you keep safe and I agree. If a guy might beat you up for being a tranny then he's definitely going to beat you up if feels you made fool out him too because duh, that's what violent people do when upset. If you want to keep safe they you don't give reasons for things to go personal because that will raise potential the negative feelings and so consequences. There is absolutely no safety reason keep this information when dating or hooking up and everyone knows that. Stealthing is all about ego and ego is a powerful drug. It doesn't matter that it's unsafe because passing feels so good.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 1 de Ene, 2021
One more reason for trannies to never step away from the computer. People might hear their actual manly voices.
- Registrado
- 4 de Jun, 2015
You don't even need AI tracking to do shit like this, just an adequate voice mixer/voice changer. Garageband's voice changer is nerfed to shit nowadays a (sounds all warbly and crunchy if you touch any setting other than pitch) but like around 7 years back or so it was really fucking powerful to the point you could literally make any voice imaginable with enough tweaking. I used to prank people in FPS game mic chats by altering the settings to the point I literally sounded like a fucking femoid and then I'd switch it to demon growls and echoes and shit after people offered me free stuff. I also micspammed various songs and video audio but that's unrelated. Trannies never seemed to use shit like that, though. they just fucking used a normal pitch shift and sounded like a fucking chipmunk or an extremely nasally man. This doesn't seem to have ever changed but if this voice tracking spyware shit takes off then they might be using something new.
- Registrado
- 31 de Ago, 2019
God I love GarageBand.
You can also straight up buy gaming headsets with pitch changers built in, they have them on Amazon.
- Registrado
- 15 de Nov, 2016
Sorry that this is just Twitter shit and not news, but I wasn't sure where else to post it. Beyond that, I get all my science from Reddit, too. Wuv da science.
Twitter / Archive
Plot twist: I don't think any of this Reddit post is correct. Not one bit. But if you're gonna fib, I guess go big or go home. (The brain stuff is especially weird. IIRC until very recently the "feminist" position was to claim males and females do NOT have different brains, though perhaps I'm not remembering correctly.)
Twitter / Archive
Plot twist: I don't think any of this Reddit post is correct. Not one bit. But if you're gonna fib, I guess go big or go home. (The brain stuff is especially weird. IIRC until very recently the "feminist" position was to claim males and females do NOT have different brains, though perhaps I'm not remembering correctly.)
- Registrado
- 12 de Mar, 2021
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
That doesn't remotely fix the issue. It just avoids the optics of people seeing some hulking ogre of a man beat a woman to death, which even troons are beginning to realize peaks transes people faster than anything.
It doesn't avoid the fact that women stand no chance in weightlifting, throwing shot put, or any number of other things that don't involve direct physical contact.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
And of course it's that worthless shithole country New Zealand that would do something this woke. If we hadn't been called Kiwi Farms for years already, I'd wish nool would change the name to some less shitty, pussified country's bird of note.
- Registrado
- 15 de Nov, 2016
If women aren't going to call this kind of shit out, what can men do except point and laugh?
How exactly do you do that in basketball, never mind, I dunno, tae kwon do?