💬 Off-Topic Tranny/LGBTQ Historical Revisionism - Retroactive rewriting of history by degenerates

What the Nazis burned was pretty much one of the biggest libraries of sexological research at the time - there were no doubt various case studies, rare out of print books, ethnographic artifacts and personal effects that could never be replaced, but for the most part it was a collection of publications that existed elsewhere (and also a lot of porn, which you can notice the Nazi soldiers looking at when they burned it). Die Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft e.V. in Tiergarten has been rebuilding the library since the early 1980s, both in terms of sourcing books that were in his library as well as original works and even case studies of his patients (a lot of stuff “went missing” before it got burned - it was raided, vandalised and left abandoned; the burnings did not happen until four days later). Despite being presented as the burning of the Library of Alexandria, it’s a sexological institute from the early 20th century. The “lost knowledge” is of immense historical interest, but it’s not something that would advance society if we suddenly recovered it all today. There weren’t any grimoires of sexual transformation, or necronomicons that would make gender crits see the light. In fact, because it was a sexological institute from the early 20th century, a lot of books would probably be considered highly offensive and retrograde today. And the “library” also functioned as a “museum of sexual biology”, which was essentially a bit of a freak show.
Another point of tranny revisionism regarding the burning of Hirshfeld's library is the way that trannies cite it as evidence that the Nazis were targeting trannies. Magnus Hirschfeld was a politically active critic of the Nazis, Jewish, and gay. All of those seem like more likely reasons for the Nazis targeting him than that he had trans clients. Especially because the Nazis clearly didn't have a problem with the surgeons who performed the first SRS surgeries, Kurt Warnekros and Erwin Gohrbandt.
 
Another point of tranny revisionism regarding the burning of Hirshfeld's library is the way that trannies cite it as evidence that the Nazis were targeting trannies. Magnus Hirschfeld was a politically active critic of the Nazis, Jewish, and gay. All of those seem like more likely reasons for the Nazis targeting him than that he had trans clients. Especially because the Nazis clearly didn't have a problem with the surgeons who performed the first SRS surgeries, Kurt Warnekros and Erwin Gohrbandt.
I'm still typing up the next bit but I'd also add that the known (surgical) trans patients of the clinic
21_ToniCharlotteDora.jpg
Dora Richter, Charlotte Charlacque and Toni Ebel all survived the war (and Charlotte Charlacque was Jewish - Toni converted into it so they could be together), along with several holders of transvestite passes. Admittedly the last two did leave Germany for Czechoslovakia. I'm afraid I've also now seen at least one of their amholes as a result of reading the scientific paper on it.

And yep, Erwin Gohrbandt was even awarded the Knight's Cross of the War Merit by Hitler himself for his work on the hypothermia experiments conducted in Dachau. Kurt Warnekros is a really funny one because he basically wanted to out-Hirschfeld Hirschfeld and Lili Elbe basically refused to listen to Hirschfeld's "transition pathway" (in part because he didn't like hanging around the gay transvestites). The other two who were involved, Ludwig Levy-Lenz and Felix Abraham, were both Jews and so they had a harder time of it (they both left Germany and Felix Abraham killed himself in 1937). Ludwig Levy-Lenz speculated that one of the reasons the Institute was targeted so early on in Nazi Germany was because they'd actually been treating a significant number of Nazi officials and Party members with marital counselling, sexual health counselling, therapy, possibly procuring illegal abortions for some of them, some of them were gay and used to go to the clinic, and also the clinic treated a variety of prostitutes (female and male) for injuries or STDs received after sexual violence from high ranking Nazi officials. Admittedly he was a German Jew who'd been forced to flee the country and was writing in the 1950s, so I think he would have a vested interest in portraying the Nazis as hypocritical sex maniac deviants, but the idea that the Institute basically was sitting on a Nazi blackmail stockpile is a pretty compelling one.
 
Heliogabalus becoming a 'transgender' emperor is one of the most bizarre and comical attempts at historical tranny revisionism that come to my mind. The man was painted as a complete and utter degenerate and a lunatic by the contemporaries and was widely named as one of the absolute worst roman emperors in history.
I suppose that's 100% accurate depiction of a real tranny (whether it was true or just propaganda against him) but one would think that at least one of these people would stop to think for a moment about how this is a bad look (then again they are too mentally handicapped to comprehend how asking people to respect rapists' pronouns is reprehensible to overwhelming majority of a population).
Ver archivo adjunto 6210173
I’m not well versed in Roman history (btw, where is a good book to start?), but I know enough that Elegabalus/Heliogabalus was highly unpopular, likely for being a foreigner on the Roman throne, to the point where they killed him and his mother, beheaded them both, threw their bodies in the sewer, and paraded their heads around town. Remember, most historical accounts come from the Senatorial class, who have a very adversarial relationship with the Emperor. It’s entirely possible that they took aspects of him they didn’t like, such as the makeup he wore as part of his culture and his hypersexuality, and exaggerated them to trash him even further. It’s entirely possible he wasn’t a tranny at all, and was just a bad (or even just unpopular) ruler. He may or may not even be a faggot.
 
I’m not well versed in Roman history (btw, where is a good book to start?), but I know enough that Elegabalus/Heliogabalus was highly unpopular, likely for being a foreigner on the Roman throne, to the point where they killed him and his mother, beheaded them both, threw their bodies in the sewer, and paraded their heads around town. Remember, most historical accounts come from the Senatorial class, who have a very adversarial relationship with the Emperor. It’s entirely possible that they took aspects of him they didn’t like, such as the makeup he wore as part of his culture and his hypersexuality, and exaggerated them to trash him even further. It’s entirely possible he wasn’t a tranny at all, and was just a bad (or even just unpopular) ruler. He may or may not even be a faggot.

It's one of those instances where whether his critics were correct or not, it doesn't do the LGBTQ movement any favors to try to claim him as their own.
 
It's one of those instances where whether his critics were correct or not, it doesn't do the LGBTQ movement any favors to try to claim him as their own.
Knowing the current LGBTQ movement they'll cherry pick the parts they like about him, but the parts where he was a bad ruler or a degenerate? All transphobic lies. I wouldn't be shocked if hollywood ever does a story about him they'll paint him as a foreign tranny who was trying to do good but the evil bigoted roman people couldn't stand a "beautiful trans woman" leading them, so they spread lies about him.
 
Knowing the current LGBTQ movement they'll cherry pick the parts they like about him, but the parts where he was a bad ruler or a degenerate? All transphobic lies. I wouldn't be shocked if hollywood ever does a story about him they'll paint him as a foreign tranny who was trying to do good but the evil bigoted roman people couldn't stand a "beautiful trans woman" leading them, so they spread lies about him.

As opposed to that one pornographic movie they made about Caligula....
 
As opposed to that one pornographic movie they made about Caligula....
The film while funded by Penthouse was actually an Italian Production not Hollywood. It makes me laugh they tricked legitimate legends from the British films industry like Peter O'Toole, Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren, and John Gielgud to be in this porno. They had to track O'Toole down who was hiding like the mob was looking for him to do English dubs.
 
Magnus Hirschfeld and transgender surgeries

Following on from my last post, Hirschfeld's conception of his transgender patients began to change. He noticed he received about as many heterosexual transvestites as he did homosexual ones, and the heterosexual ones would frequently get very annoyed/upset/embarrassed/disgusted at being lumped in with his gay clients (even the crossdressing ones). This lead to a refinement of his theories. He does still insist that "transexualismus" in the heterosexual is very strongly correlated with "automonosexualismus" (auto-eroticism) and interestingly does also insist that autism is strongly correlated with auto-eroticism, although from what I've seen he doesn't suggest that autism and transvetism were correlated. Separately he suggests it's correlated with "infantilismus" - infantilism, which is a whole other topic but basically it ties in with that thing Jennie June was saying about wanting to be perceived as a little girl and not a full grown woman, or the distressing amount of DDLG/"Littles" we see today. But onto his more evolved theory:

institutewall.jpg

This photo from 1925 features a picture wall used for demonstrating his 64 sexual traits that could be used to determine the “individual type” between full man and full woman. These were grouped into four areas. I've spoilered this bit because it's a bit long, but I want to include it so no third party accuses me of making random lies up.
The areas were:
  • The sexual glands and apparatus
  • The “other” sexual characteristics - secondary sex characteristics, essentially, so things like hirsutism and gynaecomastia, but also other traits like men with feminine hips and women with deep voices.
    • General physical traits also got bundled in here, like if a man had gay handwriting (from the limp wrists) or a woman had a lesbian gait (from stomping around with her lesbian muscles).
  • The sex drive - libido, metatropism (dominant and pursuing vs submissive and passive), orientation (down to "if you find men attractive, do you like feminine juvenile men or strong masculine men")
  • The other personality traits - a man who liked cooking and cleaning, a woman who liked outdoor work and horse riding.
Every trait he identified existed on a continuum between masculine and feminine. This could be used to determine a person’s sexual “type”. For example a woman who was conventionally feminine in every way except she liked to be sexually dominant was one “type”. A woman who was conventionally feminine in every way but had a deep voice was another “type”. A conventionally feminine and intelligent woman was another “type” because as far as Hirschfeld was concerned, women were stupid, so a smart analytical woman must have a sexually intermediate male brain. But moreover a woman who had a deep voice, intelligence and a penchant for sexual dominance was her own “type” again, separate from any of the previous ones. Each combination of traits represented its own type and so he reckoned there must be at least 43 million potential combinations of traits. And therefore, since everyone was made of “unwiederholbaren Kombinationsproportionen” - unique and unrepeatable combinations of proportions - like a fingerprint, and so there was not really any such thing as a “male” or a “female”. A man with fully male characteristics in every single category, or a woman with fully female characteristics in every single category, just didn’t exist. Sex is a spectrum and there are 43 million genders.
This enormous number may be surprising at first, since it is already about a fortieth part of the total number of all people living on earth (this number is 1800 million), but on closer reflection it is not only understandable, but also far too small, since we observe that no person is exactly alike to another. There are so many extraordinarily numerous deviations and nuances in appearance and character that every individual appears to be something special.

All these sexual varieties form a closed circle in which certain intermediate types represent only particularly striking points, between which, however, there are no empty points anywhere, but rather unbroken connecting lines. The number of conceivable and actual sexual types is infinite; in every human being there is a different mixture of male and female substance, and just as we are unable to find two identical leaves on a tree, we will never be able to find two human beings in whom the mixture of the male and female principle is completely the same in type and quantity. Whether someone regards the sexual intermediate stages as pathological - a view that is, in my opinion, untenable for a biologist trained in Darwinism - or whether one considers only the stronger signs of masculinity in a woman and femininity in a man to be pathological, and the weaker degrees as physiological - in which case it would be difficult to draw a line in the series of types that merge imperceptibly into one another - or whether one regards, as I do, all these intermediate stages as sexual varieties - all these are relatively subordinate questions compared to the fact, and the main thing is that I have to reckon with the sexual intermediate stages as an incontrovertible law of nature and a widespread and significant natural phenomenon.
Everyone is part of the natural sexual variation of the human race, and therefore if everyone is intersex, nobody is intersex - so you shouldn't pathologise people for being sexual intermediates!

He still argues that there’s various physiognomic elements that help with classifying types, caused by different levels of gland secretions that tend to induce other sexual intermediacies. He’s still insistent that gay men/urnings are a “special feminine species” that inherently come combined with other girly-man traits, because their muscles are weaker than men, and he needed photographs of them sleeping to identify their gay faces so they couldn’t pretend to be more masculine with their facial expressions. This sounds at odds with his theory that the sexual traits could all occur in unique combinations (I think he's mostly trying to create broad classification systems for different combinations and clustered types), but if it wasn't completely clear already he is just wholesale making this up. Nevertheless, a lot of current claims we hear today - "sex isn't real", "you can change sex", "sex isn't binary", "there's many forms of sex and chromosomal sex is only one of them" link back to this style of thinking.

The “Verkleidungstrieb” (“disguise drive”) was by now considered by him to be its own complete separate trait that was not related to homosexuality; that is to say, he abandoned his earlier theories about transvestites either being really gay guys who were so gay they were mentally women, or straight guys who had a misplaced fetish. He notes that his patients dislike him calling it a disguise drive, because many of them felt that it was the opposite of disguising themselves and instead they were being their true selves.
Some transvestites have criticized (and not without reason, as I must admit after getting to know so many of them) the fact that I speak of the "disguise drive," because for them it is not a matter of concealing but of revealing their individuality. The same reasons that I have given for the constitutional character of homosexuality also prove that transvestism embodies a sexual type in itself. The more transvestites I got to know, the clearer it became to me that transvestites show characteristic physiognomic and physical types that can only be explained as glandular (= caused by glands). As with the lack of sex glands and other intersexual and infantilistic groups, not all transvestites are similar in terms of facial features and body structure, but there are various subgroups. One of the most common corresponds to the type of which the Chevalier d'Eon is a classic example. Again and again I am visited by transvestites whose physiognomic similarity (to judge the character of a person by his facial structure) to the d'Eon type is unmistakable.
He noted that there were various extremes - periodic vs permanent (how often they crossdress - all the time, or just in phases, or just when they're alone), the “partial” transvestite, who only sought to e.g. wear women’s stockings vs the complete transvestite (“Oollständige Transoestiten”) who wanted to dress as the opposite sex from head to toe. Of that last group there’s a minor “extreme” subset who seek to transform their body as well as their clothing (e.g. men aggressively epilating all their body hair off, women who bind their breasts).

He also suggests there’s name transvestites like George Sand (although this “rarely occurs in isolation”) and also uses her as an example for the “metatropical transvestite”;
a fairly large group; they are attracted to women who have a lot of masculinity in them and who enjoy the feminine touch that is in themselves. They therefore find their natural complement in metatropic women. These, too, are often transvestite at the same time. For example, George Sand, who not only had a male name but also wore male clothes, was by no means woman-loving; rather, she left the feminine poet Alfred de Müsset for love of the even more feminine composer Frederic Chopin These metatropic types and relationships are particularly widespread in artistic circles, because the artist's own nature (which also includes many people working in the scientific field) in its mixture of receptivity and productivity (= receptiveness and desire to create) is more closely related to the androgynous (male-female and female-male) type than highly male and female personalities. The flowing hair (“artist's quiff”), ties and robes that one so often sees in artists, the opposite preference for short hair, high collars and tight-fitting "costumes", which one often finds in women working in the arts and sciences, is neither accidental nor purely arbitrary, but is based on the sexual type of the artist.
Teenage girls who have crushes on Jimin and men who are "tomboy enjoyers" are all transgender, you heard it here first. He does still split the causes of transsexuality up into different categories, though:
  • Narcissistic transvestite - These find complete satisfaction in assuming the form of the other sex; the sight of their opposite-sex self (for example in the mirror) triggers in them pleasurable feelings that have a more or less conscious erotic character. The man in them loves the woman in them or vice versa. Some want to "mark" the simple middle-class woman, others a maid (I have several pictures of them being photographed with a broom), others again act like "schoolgirls" or like ladies of the demimonde, like salon ladies of the highest style, or prefer riding costumes, sporty or national costumes.
  • Bisexual transvestites; in keeping with their own duality, they find types in both sexes that suit them, but usually more in one sex than in the other.
  • Homosexual transvestites; their sexual feeling, projected (= expressed) in their external appearance, is also simultaneously translated into their attraction to male persons.
To summarise: sex isn't real, everyone exists on a spectrum. There's not really anything like a man or a woman - there's 48 million+ sexes/genders, even if it's just because you're a woman with a deep voice or a man with fancy handwriting - those are sexes. Nobody fits within the gender binary, and therefore you shouldn't mistreat people for being gay/trans because you're a sexual intermediate too. But also trans people can basically be divided into HSTS (they're so gay that they're trans) and AGP (they're skinwalking women they find attractive).

Before I continue, a quick note on how he handled his gay patients - after about 1925 they completely abandoned the Steinach ball implants:
In this therapy the physician must first determine whether the homosexual seeking consultation has any organic diseases and then examine his or her overall psychological condition. If these examinations show that no specific diseases exist, or that the diseases may be regarded as consequences of the rejection of homosexuality by the patient and/or by his or her social milieu, then the physician should inform the patient that homosexuality is not a disease and cannot be “healed.” The physician should support the patient in strengthening his or her self-esteem and discuss the possibilities for shaping his or her life and sexuality without coming into conflict with the law. In Hirschfeld’s era this presented a barrier to physicians. They could not simply recommend unlawful sexual conduct, especially since the danger of blackmail was well known. Thus they had to discreetly discuss what types of sexual behavior were not covered by the law (anal and oral sex was punishable), and how one could meet other homosexuals without exposing oneself to blackmail. Hirschfeld viewed it as especially helpful if, at this stage, the physician could put the patient in contact with “intellectually superior like-minded persons,” so that social isolation could be avoided and the patient given the opportunity of learning a way of living and behaving from “people like him or her.”
He'd established that being gay was part of the normal sexual variation in people and so they should be told there was nothing wrong with them, and then introduced to a self help group to meet other gay people who'd already accepted being gay and then learn how to be gay effectively in Weimar. Despite seeming to lay out that heterosexual transvestites had a narcissistic/autoerotic element, he concluded this was just the result of glands doing something mysterious and therefore it was also ok (so not so much "it's not a fetish", but "the fetish is valid"). He has very similar things to say about trans people:
Wenn in einem Falle, so zeigt der der hier geschilderten Geschwister Z., wie zutreffend diese Ansicht ist. Wir haben kein Recht, einem Menschen der Weib sein will, zu sagen: , Du bist ein Mann’ , oder jemandem, der ein Mann sein möchte, zu befehlen: . Bleibe Weib“ — es sei denn, er sei im Sinne des Bürgerlichen Geseßbuches nicht zurechnungsfähig oder verfügungsfähig, was weder für Hermaphroditen noch Transvestiten gilt. Die Auf* gäbe des Sachverständigen kann es nur sein, zu ergründen, worauf das Geschlechtsgefühl und der aus ihm entspringende Geschlechtstrieb beruht.
We have no right to say to someone who wants to be a woman: 'You are a man', or to order someone who wants to be a man: 'Stay a woman' - unless he is not responsible or capable of making decisions in the sense of the German Civil Code, which does not apply to hermaphrodites or transvestites. The task of the expert can only be to find out what the sexual feeling and the sexual drive arising from it is based on.
Das Geschlecht eines Menschen steckt nicht in seinem Körper, sondern in seiner Seele. Und darüber kann der Arzt nicht befinden, sondern nur das Subjekt selbst
The gender of a person is not in his body, but in his soul. And the doctor cannot decide about that, only the subject himself can. From all this he argues that if a person comes to his clinic as a transvestite, he has a duty to affirm them and help them transition.

Die Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft e.V. in Tiergarten argued that there were several stages in the transition pathway: name change, transvestite license, surgery. In some cases there were actually five stages - a "social transition" with a transvestite pass, a "legal transition" with a name and legal sex change, hormone treatment and then surgery. So we'll go through them one by one and the reasons behind them. I'll spoiler this bit too as I'm aware of length.
Social transition - transvestite passes
Unlike many American cities, it wasn't illegal to crossdress in Germany. This is in part to their long standing tradition of Karneval/Fasching, which is basically the German version of Mardi Gras. People wear costumes and this does include crossdressing - in fact, the Tanzmariechen dancers traditionally were always men in drag. Think blokes on a stag do. This might also help explain how seemingly weirdly chill people were about crossdressing, you'd be surprised how many people in the 19th and early 20th century seem to have been like "oh that's crazy Hans, he dresses like a woman and we call him Matilda, he's harmless really" as isolated incidents.

For police forces in Germany, they generally went after crossdressers because they suspected them of being gay (and especially of being gay prostitutes), because they might have been in disguise in order to commit a crime, or because they were dressed as women to cause public disorder. Most of the investigations relating to crossdressing were handled by the "Homosexuellendezernat" of the Berlin police (the approach varied between German cities) because initially, it was assumed anyone crossdressing must be doing so because they were gay. Transvestitenschein ("transvetite certificates") were an innovation that seems to have emerged in 1908ish. Hirschfeld was already actively lobbying, and essentially mounted a defence over one "Katharina T" who was a woman who dressed in men's clothing. Hirschfeld basically mounted an argument that she had a pathology that made her need to cross dress in public, that crossdressing as a man helped with her employment, that she experienced psychological distress if forced to wear dresses and also that she was such a bulldyke that she looked stupid in dresses, so she wasn't up to any mischief and was just crossdressing for her own reasons. Most of Hirschfeld's political lobbying was focused on legalising homosexuality (which he never achieved), so lobbying for recognition of his sexual intermediate theory was useful in that goal.

The police issued her with a certificate saying as much, so if she got arrested she could show the policeman she was already known and wasn't up to no good. This established a pathway for Hirschfeld to issue medical reports which would then make the police issue transvestite passes (every single pass issued in Germany was signed off by Hirschfeld - it's worth noting this was a nice little money maker for him).
Attest-Katter.jpgpass.png
Interestingly these were only popular with women initially - seemingly because dressing as a man tended to help them with employment, while men dressing as women tended not to fare so well in (legal) employment and indeed many of the patients were "periodic" transvestites for this reason. The first passes issued to men were around 1912 in Munich and 1913 in Pottsdam, and were almost always recognised throughout Germany by various police forces (along with "Transvestite passports" to help travelling between cities). Passes issued to men tended to emphasise that they were NOT gay, and it does seem like it was mainly the "heterosexual transvestites" who got the passes, although I'm a bit unclear if that's because Hirschfeld refused to issue such passes to Urnings or if he just lied for his transvestite patients. Certainly a fair few of his heterosexual transvestites wanted the pass to distance themselves from Berlin's gay community, because as discussed, they actively disliked gay men (and by extension, gay transvestites). After the Imperial era (so 1918 onwards) Weimar police, at least in Berlin, continued to liberalise at the urging of Hirschfeld. From a 1922 police report:
Apart from male prostitution, transvestism in general has no criminal significance. The widespread public opinion that the disguised individuals are generally criminals in disguise (pickpockets, spies, pimps, etc.) is obsolete. With regard to the male transvestites, recent experience shows that even the formerly taken-for-granted view that men in women's clothing are all homosexuals is no longer tenable….On the basis of this insight emerges a duty of gentle treatment [schonenden Behandlung] of transvestites, as long as they are not engaged in male prostitution.
Transvetite passes could be revoked by police, like with the case of "Baroness Gerd von Zobeltitz" who got one in 1913 - who got married to his wife wearing a wedding dress and drew crowds with his elaborate costumes (he was a dressmaker), which was used by a relative to argue he was causing a public nuisance with his crossdressing and so shouldn't be exempt from being arrested for that. Passes also often came with restrictions - a common one was that holders were not allowed to visit public toilets or public baths while dressed in their desired clothing.

Legal Transition - Name Change and Birth Certificate amendments
Katharina T - the woman who got the first transvestite pass - also attempted to change her name and birth sex. She was not successful, but in 1912 "Louise Sch." was successful thanks to Hirschfeld. An important bit of context here is that the Prussian General Law of 1794 had granted the “hermaphrodite” the right to choose “which sex he wanted to belong to” while the Saxon Civil Code of 1863/65 stated that a “person whose sex is doubtful […] should be counted as belonging to the sex that predominates in him”. The German Civil Code of 1900 changed approach a little bit, arguing that hermaphrodites were all just deformed men or deformed women and a doctor needed to work out which one they were. So there was already a bit of understanding that intersex people might be ambiguous and they could have been "assigned" the wrong sex at birth.

Hirschfeld successfully argued that Louise was a "man-woman", saying that although she had normal female genitals, she very clearly was a sexual intermediate, because she looked like a man and she looked stupid in dresses, she was a lesbian so had a man's sex drive, and she liked sports and cigars, so therefore it was a "case of hermaphrodite formation, not only in a purely external sense but also in a deeper sense". He stated that her female first name caused her immense psychological distress and interfered with her ability to find work, so just letting her cross dress wasn't enough. Sure enough, she was allowed to change her name to Louis and was legally classified as a man, which enabled her to marry her wife. The lawyer Eugen Wilhelm commented in 1914, the legal sex change had now "normalized her previous abnormal transvestite tendencies and her 'perverse' sexual drive". They transed the gay away!

There doesn't seem to have been another success like this, but Hirschfeld was usually able to argue that his transvestites were intersex and therefore they were typically granted permission to update their names to gender neutral ones like "Toni" as a compromise, although. Other trans patients of the clinic who had very specifically cross-sex names usually didn't have these as legally recognised names.

Hormonal transition
Hirschfeld treated some of his transvestite patients with "organ preparations". I'm not too clear on the details, but it's likely that he made them himself. The Wissenschaftliche Humanitäre Kommittee, which was the main gay rights campaign group that Hirschfeld was part of, complained that he was trying to make loads of money by associating them with the snake oil Titus-Perlen. They were the drugs he shilled aggressively at his clinic as basically sexual virility pills, and they were based off his early formation Testifortan that he'd made with the endocrinologist Bernard Schapiro - basically a bunch of Spanish Fly type aphrodisiacs mixed with extracts of bull testicles. It seems likely that he was probably making similar preparations out of animal ovaries, because he mentions "Eierstockextrakten" in his book Geschlechtskunde (Gender Studies) published in 1926.

Hormonal remedies were also available to purchase in the 1920s. Steinach (remember him? The crazy ball transplant guy) had joined forces with Schering Pharmaceuticals and by 1928 a product called Progynon, initially made with ovary and placenta extracts, later with the urine from pregnant women - horse piss drugs came a decade later). This was advertised as some what of a cureall for a range of conditions caused by "ovarian insufficiency"
progy.png
We know that some transvestites absolutely used Progynon for its feminising effects, because in 1936 - during Nazi Germany, more on that later - a transvestite specifically mentions using it. Despite the quackery going on with hormones being magic, the developing field of endocrinology was undermining Hirschfeld's theories around magical gland activity making everyone intersex and he gradually stopped working on it, although it continued to prove a useful legal fiction.

Surgical transition
Dr Ludwig Levy-Lenz recalls:
As we knew this and as only few places of work were willing to employ transvestites, we did everything we could to give such people a job at our Institute. For instance, we had five maids – all of them male transvestites, and I shall never forget the sight one day when I happened to go into the Institute’s kitchen after work: there they sat close together, the five “girls”, peacefully knitting and sewing and singing old folk-songs. These were, in any case, the best, most hardworking and conscientious domestic workers we ever had. Never ever did a stranger visiting us notice anything
As mentioned upthread, we know who three of them are - Dora Richter, Charlotte Charlacque and Toni Ebel. Charlotte also worked as the receptionist, and sometimes as an image consultant for transvestites, advising them how to dress. Dora had trained as a baker and seems to have been a kitchen maid, and Toni was a painter who lived in the (unpleasant) basement and sold paintings while helping out with cleaning. The other two are unknown, although one seems to have been a "housekeeper" but this may be a mistranslation as the household manager was Hinrike Friedrichs (unless Hinrike was also a transvestite?).

An interesting point to note here is that many transvestites had no desire for surgery. Hirschfeld considers the ones who don't just want to dress and live as women, but specifically want to transform their bodies, as the Extreme subcategory "Oollständige Transoestiten", and it's in this context that he uses the word "transsexual" as opposed to "transvestite". That's a distinction that crops up throughout the 20th century and is still used by "transmedicalists". The psychiatrist Felix Abraham considered surgical interventions to be an emergency surgery to prevent the transsexuals hurting themselves with amateur surgery - the notion of self-inflicted castration crops up multiple times, and as a child Dora claimed to have tied a string around his penis to cut off the bloodflow, in the hopes it'd drop off. Dr Ludwig Levy-Lenz performed mastectomies on women who came to the patient seeking to pass better as men, although rotdog surgery was a long way off. Oophorectomy appears to have been recommended but it's unclear to me if any were performed.

Dr Levy-Lenz also performed castrations and penectomies (cutting the penis off) in-house, but for vaginoplasty (amhole creation) they needed to go to the director of surgery of Berlin-Urban Hospital, Dr Erwin Gohrbandt. Both Dora and Toni got vaginoplasties in 1929 after have earlier having had everything else cut off. Charlotte got one in 1930. Felix Abraham notes that the castration caused physical changes - he doesn't outright say it's a benefit of the treatment, but I read it as implying that the impact of the surgeries, combined with hormone therapy, was seen as improving the patients' mental wellbeing (rather than just being emergency surgery).

Vaginoplasty for women had been pioneered in the 1890s using sections of bowel, but for whatever reason Dr Gohrbandt decided to try something new and instead used "Steinach" (split thickness) skin grafts to line the neovagina. The scrotal skin was retained to be used to make labia, just like they do today, and the depth achieved was 12-15cm (about what's achieved today). The patients had to maintain a constant regimen of dilation. As no penile tissue was retained and the neovagina was lined with skin (penile inversion was developed in the 1950s) it wouldn't have really felt like anything and seems to have been developed basically to make the patients happy or act as a fuckhole for men... but Charlotte and Toni were transbians for each other (less clear about Dora).

Lili Elbe was a bit of a different case. Lili transitioned in 1930 and stayed at the Institute for a couple of years. The actual records of the case are lost, but it's clear that Lili was very demanding in wanting to become a "full woman". Lili apparently was very unhappy with Hirschfeld's diagnostic protocols, thinking it was obvious he was a woman and this rude Jewish doctor had no business asking all these invasive questions as part of his diagnostic exam, and should just rubber stamp an approval. Lili also flat out refused to follow the integration therapy approach Hirschfeld recommended as it required attending support groups that contained homosexual transvestites - he felt disgust at gay men and was repulsed by men who hit on him out of drag, although in drag assumed everyone hitting on him was straight and loved flirting with men. After a castration performed by Dr Gohrbandt, he sought out a Dresden based gynaecologist called Kurt Warnekros. Lili appears to have really fancied Kurt Warnekros, gushing over his "masculine potency". Anyway, he paid a lot of money to Dr Warnekros to do pioneering treatment, including implanting an ovary based off of Steinach's experiments. Around this time Lili had developed an infatuation with an art dealer called Claude Lejeune, and wanted to marry and bear his children (Lili was 49 by then). So after a third surgery to remove his penis and scrotum, Lili demanded a uterus and vagina. Warnekeros obliged. It's a bit unclear what exactly was done and if anything got hooked up, since the hospital records were destroyed in the Dresden firebombing, but Lili got his uterus. And then died a month later from transplant rejection. It doesn't seem like Hirschfeld was looped in with any of this so I don't think he actually thought a uterus implant was a good idea or that it'd work, it's very much more Lili being incredibly demanding and having money to pay a doctor for experimental surgeries - Dr Warnekros seemed to like the media attention.
Basically there's a bit of "trans the gay away" (although not from Hirschfeld himself), and mostly he and his associates argue transition should be allowed both because the person is actually intersex, and also framing the idea of not allowing transition as being immensely psychologically harmful to the individual and it being something they can't help. He also creates a split between "transvestite" (which includes people who want to live full time as the opposite sex) and "transsexual" (people who want medical procedures to transition to the opposite sex), which is a distinction that continues to crop up throughout the 20th Century.

Nazi Germany
Was there a trans genocide in Nazi Germany? No. Absolutely not. The Nazis did not make crossdressing illegal and here's some Wehrmacht soldiers crossdressing.
wehrm1.jpg wehrm2.jpg wehrm4.jpg wehrm3.jpg
In fairness they probably were doing this for a laugh, or making a mockery of Jewish women if they found their clothes after they'd been packed off to a death camp, but it's telling these personal photographs (and a weirdly large number of others) existed. Most of the patients labelled retrospectively as transgender would have engaged in similar behaviours, crossdressing only on occasion - it's not out of the realms of possibility that some of this soldiers were actual transvestites (especially the ones who were taking photos of themselves).

According to "Transvestitismus in der NS-Zeit – Ein Forschungsdesiderat" published in Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung by Rainer Herrn (a member of Die Magnus-Hirschfeld-Gesellschaft e.V. , a prominent sexologist and historian who is probably one of the foremost experts in this field) there is ZERO evidence of anyone being sent to a death camp purely for being a transvestite. This is not to say the Nazis were exactly pro-transvestite, but they didn't even really crack down on it that much. They just saw it as a weird fetish that ideally shouldn't be done in public, but they were willing to permit it in special cases. I guess if you take the definition of genocide in the way it gets used today, like when Britain's accused of doing a trans genocide because puberty blockers got banned and trans people are killing themselves, I guess it's a genocide - but transvestites were not targets of the Holocaust.

To my knowledge no translation of Transvestitismus in der NS-Zeit exists, and Rainer Herrn identified it as the only research paper on how transvestites were treated in Nazi Germany - no other research existed, at least when it was published in 2013. I'm not going to powerlevel on how I got it, but I got scans of all the pages and then ran them through Google Translate. When I quote it below, I'll leave in all the citations. Many of the citations are for documents that are not accessible anywhere online, because they exist only in the Berlin National Archives and are rarely available to researchers because they are so fragile. I will also note that Rainer Herm is very specifically on the side of trans people and tends to specifically refer to all the cases by their correct pronouns outside of direct quotes, so it's not like it's a hit piece.

The Nazis killed transvestites, but that was for having sex with men. They were killing gay men whether or not they crossdressed (although actually sometimes just sending them to regular prison). Heterosexual men who were transvestites? They would not be sent to the camps just for crossdressing. And in fact, although they did castrate some transvestites for eugenics reasons (and Hirschfeld himself had opined on the eugenics aspect of transvestites and recommended they did not marry women and have children - forgot to mention that bit), the Nazi Reich did in fact perform some sexual reassignment procedures and legal name and gender changes based on Hirschfeld's theories of sexual intermediaries and/or transing the gay away in a way that's pretty much indistinguishable from Hirschfeld's own practices. In a couple of cases, they get their way by threatening to commit suicide if they don't get gender affirming surgery. I'll expand on this below (spoilered for length)
Before the Nazis took over
Magnus Hirschfeld was not popular.
hirschfeld-fort-mit-175-250.png1024px-Stoßtrupp_gegen_jüdischen_Redner_in_Hamburg_1920.jpg
Shock troop with whistles. We read in “Vorwärts”: The “Hamburger Echo” publishes the following invitation that was sent to it: Hamburg, the 12th of September 1920. Good Lord! On the 16th of September the Jew Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld will give a lecture in The Convent Garden. You are kindly requested to arrive there on time with a whistle and useful utensils. Please gather on the right side of the hall!
The shock troop of the German ethnic leagues The 16th "Scheiding" is now over and we don't know whether the brave shock troop managed to kill Doctor Hirschseld. The Hamburg data cruisers show their deep understanding of all areas of culture; Moissi (Aleksandër Moisiu) encountered them at an artistic lecture and now it's the turn of 20th century science!
He was a very prominent figure in trying to decriminalise homosexuality, as previously mentioned. As early as 1907 his house got vandalised with the slogan ""Dr. Hirschfeld eine öffentliche Gefahr – die Juden sind unser Unglück!" - "Dr. Hirschfeld is a public danger - the Jews are our misfortune!". He was criticised by the gay movement for having "Oriental" views on sexuality, he was criticised by sexologists for misusing sexology to promote homosexuality, he was criticised by large swathes of the public for promoting sexology and talking about sex so openly. He was labelled the Jew that brought the scourge of "Eulenburgism" to Germany. The Eulenburg affair was basically a scandal that rocked Germany in 1908 when a lot of Kaiser Wilheim's inner circle were exposed as gay, and Hirschfeld (who'd already tried to get homosexuality decriminalised in the 1890s) acted as an expert witness for the defence (who were Jewish lawyers, possibly gay Jewish lawyers). Germans felt the gays (and Jews) had made Germany look bad internationally, and later during WW1, felt the gays (and Jews) had basically stabbed Germany in the back and that's why they lost. Hirschfeld appeared playing himself in the 1919 film Anders als die Andern (Different From The Others) which was basically a melodrama about two gay violinists who fall in love while Hirschfeld lectures the audience about how there's nothing wrong with homosexuality and it's terrible that gay people are persecuted, ending with a hand crossing out Paragraph 175 (the law that criminalised homosexuality). The reception of this film was so extreme that Weimar Germany literally introduced cinema censorship laws specifically to ban this film.

By the early 1920s his lectures - which, by the way, were mostly on Steinach's ball transplantation science but also contained defences of homosexuality and arguments for decriminalisation - were frequently disrupted by gangs of youths. On October 4th 1920 this escalated and he was pelted with stones and very nearly killed - in fact some papers actually reported he had been killed (he'd been knocked unconscious and dragged to hospital). The "Miesbacher Anzeiger" condemned negative reporting in other countries, noting that if Hirschfeld had exhibited a tenth of the shamelessness of his lecture in America, he'd have been tarred and feathered - calling him an apostle of sodomy and the Berlin Jews were all "spinach boys" (basically euphemistically "arse fuckers") who wanted to undermine Germany. Hitler himself made comment on Hirschfeld's attack, accusing him of the "spiritual murder" of thousands of Germans, of being anti-Aryan, and saying if he'd been in Munich at the time he'd have personally punched the "dirty old Jew" in the face as he was offering the vilest mockery of science and the attack on him represented the healthy resisting the unhealthy. It cannot be emphasised enough that people hated Hirschfeld because he was a gay Jew who was using Jewish trickery to undermine Germany by promoting gayness, and he came to be a symbol for all the excesses of Weimar sexual decadence. The Nazis increasingly targeted him in their publications framing him and his institute as public enemy number 1, highlighting his anti-volk undeutschen Geist (Un-German thinking) attitudes around homosexuality (and also promoting marital planning and contraception, which they characterised as the Jew trying to encourage the German volk to stop reproducing, to undermine them).

By the late 1920s Hirschfeld had basically stopped lecturing at all in Germany, and in 1930 he left Germany for good, because the Nazis made it clear they'd kill him if he stepped foot on German soil again. He tried to run his Institute from afar, but was not very successful at it.

After the Nazis took over
By late 1932 the Institute had started to crumble - the Prussian government was attempting to revoke its non-profit status, because whatever was left of the administrative staff hadn't filed any of the financial paperwork.

Hitler became Chancellor in January 1933. This reduced the need for Ernst Röhm's paramilitary brownshirts - Röhm was gay and his influence in the party meant homosexuality had been somewhat (slightly) tolerated, but his influence had been waning for some time. Immediately after the Reichstag Fire in February 1933, Hitler and his cabinet issued a decree that was signed into law by President von Hindenburg, which suspended habeas corpus, ended freedom of assembly, freedom of thought, freedom of expression, freedom of the presses and the right to privacy. Searches and property seizures were authorised to prevent activity that might endanger the state. At this point all well known gay bars were shut down and all gay publications and gay groups were banned (although it took them a while to work through them all, so many burned their membership lists). In March 1933, the "Enabling Act" was signed, allowing Hitler to make laws without the Reichstag's approval. In April, the Civil Service (including everything from teachers to judges) began to get purged of non-Aryans and people who could not be trusted to support the state - at universities, the emphasis was on professors who misused the scientific method to correspond to their own liberal views. April is also approximately when the Institute stopped operating, although presumably they'd already stopped offering their gay affirming therapy by this point - Bernard Schapiro wrote to Hirschfeld suggesting appointing an Aryan Director to see if they'd be able to carry on; regardless there were still a fair few people living there. The Gestapo visited several times during this period, apparently hoping to get their hands on something, but Hirshfeld's partner Karl Geise had already sent the most important personal records, documents and publications to Hirschfeld in Switzerland. It's speculated these included a variety of patient notes on prominent Nazis who'd received treatment there, which is something Ludwig Levy-Lenz suggested - he said they'd treated quite a few and they could be juicy blackmail material. Certainly some of their staff were Nazis or Nazi sympathisers; the head receptionist (who it has to be noted, didn't actually work there - she just turned up one day and started acting as the receptionist and set up a desk in the foyer, and everyone just went along with it - Hirschfeld never paid her) worked to help identify some of their homosexual patients.

Continuing on in April, The Boycott of Jewish businesses was announced, and The Twelve Theses Against Un-German Thought was published by the German Students Union. These theses basically argued that the German people needed to uphold purity of the German language, and because Jews can only think Jewishly and can't think Germanly, everything they wrote was a lie. The German Students Union were organised into groups and local chapters to purge academia of anti-German thought, to the point they started erecting pillories in universities. Students were then given blacklists of authors and directed to search their homes and the homes of friends for "corrosive literature", then search their university libraries for it. This was all in effort to have a mass burning of these books on May the 10th. On May 5th, students at the University of Rostock jumped the gun a little bit and piled up books they'd found from the "8 most evil authors" - Hirschfeld, Kurt Tucholsky (a satirist and outspoken critic of the Nazis), Stefan Zweig, Lion Feuchtwanger, Vicki Baum (Jewish authors accused of writing "asphalt literature" - basically globalist - also all critics of the Nazis), Erich Remarque (the pacifist who wrote "All Quiet On The Western Front"), Emil Ludwig (a Jewish biographer and journalist who was critical of the Nazis in the international press) and Die Weltbühne (an arts magazine that was openly critical of the Nazis).

This intensified on May the 6th, when "Aktion wider den undeutschen Geist" (action against un-German thought) occurred. Students across Germany organised themselves into shock troops, forcing their way into bookstores and public libraries. They had a long and ever growing list - Ernest Hemingway, James Joyce, Oscar Wilde, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Victor Hugo, Dostoyevsky, D.H. Lawrence, Jack London, H.G. Wells, art books containing lithographs of Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec or Paul Klee, sheet music of Mendelssohn compositions, anything communist, anything Jewish, anything obscene, anything that promoted neuroticism (a lot of psychiatry books including Freud). Also "Writings on sexuality and sexual education which serve the egocentric pleasure of the individual and thus, completely destroy the principles of race and Volk". So that included the works of Margaret Sanger, birth control advocate, but also very obviously included Hirschfeld's works (although he obviously was already on the list for being Jewish) and much of his library.

It would be weird if the institute wasn't raided - and it certainly wasn't targeted in isolation, despite the claims that one of the first act of the Nazis was to destroy the "trans clinic". So while students across Germany were raiding bookstores, in Berlin students from the Veterinary College and the PE Teacher College turned up, alongside brownshirts and a big brass band, and ransacked the place. Interestingly the brownshirts apparently told them to leave the case files alone (including all the surveys people did to get diagnosed with various conditions) because those didn't count as un-German. A lot of books were loaded into a truck, that would take them to Opernplatz to join all the other books seized from across Berlin to be burned on May the 10th - but the library was massive.
Institut_für_Sexualwissenschaft_-_Bibliothek_1933 (2).jpg
As I mentioned, a lot of it didn't get burned. You can see a student and a Nazi officer looking through it here, and there's lots of copies of a porn magazine called Die Ehe ("Marriage") that they're rifling through. Some of the archive was auctioned off and some was transferred to the Prussian State Library - large libraries kept "poison chests" of banned books so Party members could study their enemy and combat them more effectively, but also some of the library no doubt was just legitimately useful medical research and scientific journals. The students also found a bust of Hirschfeld and added it to their wagon, so they could chuck it on their big Nazi bonfire - this later got found by a street cleaner (because it was made of metal and obviously didn't burn) and is displayed in the Hirschfeld institute today. A separate plaster bust made its way to the Nazi Revolution Museum, where it was displayed with a sign "Der schöne Magnus Hirschfeld , das grösste Rübenschwein des 20. Jahrhunderts" - "The beautiful Magnus Hirschfeld, the greatest turnip pig of the 20th century" (Rübenschwein was used as slang during WWI to refer to a coward who never raised his head above the parapet and hid on the ground, like a rooting pig). Hirschfeld attempted to set up a new institute in Paris, but it failed due to lack of interest, so instead he wrote his thoughts on the Nazi ideology. In doing so he wrote that race was a social construct, and ideas of other races being primitive were made up to justify colonialism, and that racial purity was a bad idea and race mixing was good. He also accused them of misusing eugenics which he still maintained was a good thing (including involuntary castrations of the genetically undesirable) and he invented the word racism.

What happened to transvestites
So after the night of the long knives killed Ernst Röhm, nothing was stopping Himmler doing everything he could to eradicate homosexuality. Unlike Hirschfeld, the Nazis viewed homosexuality as a contagious illness that potentially could be cured. In 1934 they refined the code criminalising homosexuality from sodomy to "lewdness with men", which mean flirtation or even glances could be used for an arrest. They later expanded their approach to include forced castration of homosexual men (Dr Warnekros, the Lili Elbe surgeon, performed many such castrations on gay men) and Himmler pondered introducing the death penalty. It is worth noting that a conviction of homosexuality was not a guaranteed ticket to the ovens - most homosexuals were arrested and put in regular prisons, and released after finishing their sentence. Initially the only homosexuals who went to concentration camps were prostitutes and "seducers of youth" (child molesters), and then also people who were already on thin ice for something else (so a trade unionist might not be sent, but a gay trade unionist would be). This did later expand to include gay men who'd been proven to have had sex with more than one man and repeat offenders. The camps were sometimes temporary sentences designed to "educate" them not to be gay. However, if they got sent to the camp they'd often be worked to death or tortured by guards - the death rate was about 60% (far higher than other groups). They were also more likely to be selected for medical experimentation, such as the hypothermia experiments performed by Dr Gohrbandt (the vaginoplasty guy). Himmler allowed Dr. Carl Værnet to specifically see if he could cure gay concentration camp prisoners by injecting them with testosterone or implanting an artificial testicle into them, in a manner directly feeding off Steinach's research and very similar to Hirschfeld's own efforts in the 1920s.

They weren't as concerned with lesbians, although lesbians could be labelled "asocial" and if they were convicted of a political crime, would be more likely to face harsher sentences. But it was gay men Himmler wanted to eradicate and police would investigate effeminate men. Naturally this included the transvestite pass holders. But if they weren't gay, then no crime had been committed (unless they were doing something else like "causing distress".

There's a really long case history here about Gerd R. who was an unhinged masochist who kept hiding naked in his neighbour's bin. The gestapo cut his hair and forced him to live as a man, but as he was not homosexual, they attempted to rehabilitate his impulsive masochism in a sanatorium.

Another example, of a married transvestite from Annaberg who was seen by neighbours dressed as a woman:
No files have been issued against [him] and no incidents or previous convictions are known. Intercourse with homosexuals could not be proven. There are no known fetishists here with whom he might have been in contact. Given the circumstances, Obenauf is probably an outspoken onanist and transvestite. He did not commit his actions publicly. He has not committed any criminal offenses. However, he was thoroughly instructed about his reprehensible behaviour and warned not to continue - he promised to stop.

Remember how a lot of the heterosexual transvestites didn't want to associate with homosexuals, and formed their own support networks? This became relevant. Helia Knabe ran a mail order transvetite business, making corsets for men, custom lingerie, wearable breasts and what was called a "jockstrap genitalis". She also produced a periodical featuring writings from other transvestites - she did all this because her husband was a transvestite. Incredibly she carried on advertising in public newspapers throughout the 1930s, which is how she eventually got caught.

Despite a long transvestite career, Richard Knabe had no previous convictions. He not only assisted his wife in dealing with customer mail, but also provided legal assistance by writing letters to the public prosecutor, Dr. Arthur Richter, the Minister of Justice Franz Gürtner and the Prussian Prime Minister, Field Marshal Hermann Göring. Finally, he offered himself as "guarantee" to go to prison instead of his wife. He stressed his wife had started her business as a result of his inclinations. Both made no secret of this, neither before nor after 1933, and even aggressively supported transvestites during the course of the trial. To this end, they tried to awaken the Minister of Justice's understanding of their own and the collective fate of this morally completely harmless but deeply unhappy class of people - [who] have already had to suffer a lot". He eventually got sentenced for distributing illegal materials, but faced no punishment for crossdressing. The judge conceded “He is a transvestite, but only wears women's clothing and women's underwear at home, not on the street. He is married and also has two underage children." George Dehmel was convicted because the writings he copied had indecent content and were capable of hurting the sense of shame and modesty of the normally sensitive reader," but no punishment for being a transvestite. The police conducted a thorough search of everyone on the mailing list.

There was a report about a married office worker living in Mannheim: He was definitely a geriatric fetishist, and also a budding masochist. He had women's underwear in his apartment kept to which he idolized shows adoration. [...] However, it was not possible to prove that he had committed a criminal offense. Nothing negative has come to light." LAB A Rep. 35802 No. 116782, special volume II: 31.

Another married transvestite living in Quedlinburg sent in a letter, after a search-and-seize, demanding the return of his clothing and books (besides any that were banned by the Reich) insisting he'd done nothing wrong and didn't deserve to be treated like a criminal. The police agreed and returned them.

Anton Maier was a trained locomotive driver who, due to an eye problem, because as. Road roller driver worked on various construction sites in southern Germany. During his first interrogation he stated: “My urge for wearing women's clothing dates back to my early youth," so he "can't resist it at times." In public, Maier only wore women's clothing at carnival time; otherwise, he sometimes wore them in his room before going to bed in the evenings. "He had no criminal record and has never given rise to any complaints". He was released without charge.

A doctor's note on a case that recommends allowing full time crossdressing:
His behaviour is much more rude in men's clothing than in women's clothing. Given the integrity of his character, which I had plenty of opportunity to judge, there is no danger that he will engage in any abuse with transvestites. As a pure transvestite, he has absolutely no tendency to approach other people in an erotic manner of any kind. Rather, the real transvestite lives out his instinctual life in transvestiture, i.e. moving and acting in the role of the opposite sex. The real transvestite feels humanly worthy only in transvestiture. If he is constantly hindered by this, life will lose all charm and joy for him. In fact, all transvestites become severely depressed when crossdressing is made impossible for them. They then feel as unworthy as a normal man who is forced to wear women's clothing. In this particular case, from a medical point of view, I consider it justified if the authorities do not cause any problems for Mr. M. regarding his women's clothes and their wearing, since, based on my detailed knowledge of Mr. M.'s personality, it can be expected that he will not cause offense by doing so. Dr. Weigel.

Homosexual transvestites would be charged and the transvestite behaviour often resulted in them receiving the harsher penalty associated with homosexual prostitution, as it was believed gay prostitutes crossdressed. They seemed to be aware of this and frequently mounted defences that although they crossdressed, they were straight - only to be brought down either by a former sexual partner admitting it, or because they were overly honest and said something like "ok, I jerked off a couple of guys one time but besides that I'm straight". The police did also seem to consider two transvestites hooking up with each other as gay, since they were both men (as that's what they were checking for, although no known cases of t4t transbians actually getting punished for it).

Amazingly, some homosexual transvestites (or meta-attracted heterosexual transvestites) did manage to get away with it. Henriette B was arrested on July 21, 1941 in Vienna on suspicion of being a prostitute. During the medical examination it turned out that he was a "normally developed man" who was born on August 5, 1908 and whose real name was Heinrich Wilheim (Huelke 1949: 91). Therefore, a case was immediately filed for "evading military service". He admitted having sex with men and an investigation was thus launched. He stated during his interrogation that he had always felt attracted to men and had never been interested in girls - but he insisted he had never once had sex with a homosexual. Instead, all his partners were heterosexual and viewed him as a woman - and when he provided names and the police followed up, they all concurred that they viewed him as a woman.

Heinich had started working at age 17 as a maid, and had only worn women's clothing since. At around age 24, he had sexual contact with a man for the first time and considered self-castration, because "he felt like a woman and wanted to be one". The senior criminal inspector Hans-Heinrich Huelke distinguishes this and similar cases from “normal homosexuality”:
While the homosexual's social harmfulness lies primarily in the fact that he supports other people in living out their degenerate sexual drive, [...] this component of danger to the community does not exist in the case of the accused. His sexual partners believed that he was a woman and were not homosexuals. The accused therefore did not have a demoralizing effect on those around him due to his feminine attitude and therefore appears less dangerous to the public than a homosexual who appears in men's clothing (ibid.: 92).
B. was sentenced to six months in prison by the Vienna Regional Court for failing to register for military service. When he returned to Hanover after serving his sentence, he was emasculated at his own request in 1943, whereby "the health department [...] deemed emasculation necessary because B. had often come into conflict with the law and morals" (ibid.). At his insistence after his castration, he also got his penis removed. After that, B. applied to change his male first name to a female one, and no objections were raised. I think Heinrich is the transvestite who was then admitted to the Nazi Mutterschule and was allowed to foster a child

Another case of attempted transition is the aircraft manufacturer W. D., born in 1908, a married father of two daughters. His efforts “always focused on the desire to be completely female, to have female breasts and genitals” (Voss 1938: 22). W. D. had been trying for a long time to feminize his physique with the hormone preparation “Progynon”. . Since this did not lead to success, inspired by newspaper reports of cases of gender reassignment that had taken place (likely Lili Elbe) he repeatedly and stubbornly expressed his wish to have ovaries implanted" (ibid.: 26). His sister and his wife offered to donate one ovary each (ibid.: 32 f.). In order to achieve gender reassignment, W.D. initially contacted the Hamburg health authorities, who, however, only made him aware of the annoying paragraph (paragraph 183 of the penal code, which regulated causing public nuisance)" (ibid.: 27). He was probably aware of this, because when it comes to living out his transvestite inclinations it is said: "Fear of (going out in public) is only because of police concerns that lately he has had to give up taking his evening walks in women's clothes" As a next step, W. D. applied for approval from the Reich's Health Department. "I request castration and the implantation of a uterus and ovaries because I have felt the need to dress as a woman since my early youth, and my whole attitude is closer to the female sex than to the male."

On January 3rd In 1936 this request was rejected on the grounds that !there was no possibility of complying with it" (ibid.: 28). He now turned to the Reich Health Office. To add weight to the request, he added as justification "because I suffer a lot from it in my current condition and only recently had to leave my job because of it, but I also don't want to accept being fed by the state indefinitely" (ibid.: 28). He was suspected of being a homosexual and investigated, but despite his extended family being questioned, there was no evidence of any homosexual activity whatsoever. Therefore he wasn't charged.

There's more! But this post is far too long already. There's a really funny anecdote about a lesbian apple-seller who argued she needed to gradually reduce crossdressing or else her customers would freak out, but it'd be way better for a separate post specifically on women in this era.
TransX, a German activist group, actually adopted the position that a memorial specifically to the transgender victims of the Holocaust would NOT be appropriate, as they were not really targeted by the state - this was initially controversial but became unanimous after reviewing the biographies of 25 known transvestites.
biograph.png
To be clear: the Nazis did not like transvestites. They very much wanted the transvestites to stop crossdressing, and could arrest them for causing a public nuisance. But if the transvestites were heterosexual, they did not punish them for crossdressing, and would acknowledge if people were just crossdressing and not causing a scene. A transvestite ball was held in Berlin in 1940, and the Nazi state continued in extreme cases to accept the Hirschfeld argument that these people needed to transition for their own wellbeing. In one case they even let a transitioned transvestite attend Mutterschule and adopt a child.

Hirschfeld would become largely obscure and forgotten until the late 1970s when German gay rights activists would rediscover him. However the people he worked with and treated would go on to influence a lot of transgender studies, including Dr Harry Benjamin - who had spent time studying with Hirschfeld and visited the institute, along with arranging much of Hirschfeld's American tours. He'd influence Dr Alfred Kinsey before reintroducing America to the Hirschfeld philosophy in the 1960s, becoming the "father of transsexuality".
 
One more for the list! Catalina de Erauso. A Spanish woman born in the 16th century, she's known as the Nun Lieutenant. She was raised in a convent and got in trouble for fighting with the nuns, so at age 15 she disguised herself as a boy and ran away. Catalina had an adventurous life, working at the royal court, traveling to South America, and fighting in a war in Chile. We know about her because she wrote an autobiography.

An edition of this autobiography from the 1990s describes her as a transvestite - fair enough, she was a woman who disguised herself as a man.

The English-language Wikipedia article refers to her with male pronouns and uses the male name she adopted. There's a long section of the article about gender and sexuality and a lot of hand-wringing on the talk page about 'misgendering' Catalina, whom they claim as trans.

The Spanish article has none of that nonsense.
 
Here's another one, a documentary that apparently tries to make the case that Abraham Lincoln was gay:

It used to be an annoyance of mine, how they retconned every same sex close friendship in fiction and history into being a gay affair.

Then it started to be more of a concern- what impact is this going to have on younger people? It's obviously leading to confusion and social isolation.

Now it has passed both of those points. When I see this shit it activates full schizo panic mode. They WILL successfully rewrite history. I will die and that will be one fewer person who remembers how it was before. Enough of us die, that's it. Their way prevails. It will be taken as solid fact that anyone who said "my dear friend, I miss you so" in a letter was buttfucking/scissoring with said friend.

I'm watching the complete destruction of my culture and I can do precious little about it except fill a storage closet with books, educate the young people around me, and scream into the void on my little tiny censorship-free corner of the internet.
 
There's yet another instance I bet @WelperHelper99 and @Roboute Guilliman and @Kari Kamiya will get a huge kick out of:

The late D Michael Quinn and his book Same-Sex Dynamics Among Nineteenth-Century Americans: A Mormon Example. It's exactly what it sounds like.

As Quinn was a willfully stupid faggot who desperately wanted to believe that other guys also had a fetish for poopy man butt, he, naturally, was among the september six. The september six were leftist pseudointellectuals who got excommunicated from the LDS church for apostasy in the 90s.

Mainly because the church had little patience for leftist sophistry, and those who tried too hard to reconcile the silly philosophies of men with said religion.

I've attached a very interesting essay written in response to the book.
 

Archivos adjuntos

I got sidetracked a bit on my research project, so dumping a bit in here to necro the thread. This was going to tie into Alfred Kinsey (and his transgender assistant, Louise Lawrence, who kept in contact with some of Hirschfeld's patients) and Harry Benjamin (and his transgender associate Virginia Prince) and their links to Hirschfeld, but it go a bit long. So he's the premable.

This first bit is a note on Freud. I didn’t really touch on Freud too much because my posts were very long already, but he is relevant to understanding developments in understanding of sexuality and gender identity - and specifically an alternative model than the one being suggested by Hirschfeld and Steinach that trans people were intersex.
Here’s a letter from 1928 from Sigmund.
Ich habe immer die Ansicht vertreten, dass der Lebenskampf des Dr Magnus Hirschfeld gegen die grausame und ungerechtfertigte Einmengung der Gesetzgebung in das menschliche Sexualleben allgemeine Anerkennung und Unterstützung verdient.
I have always been of the opinion that Dr Magnus Hirschfeld’s struggle for survival against the cruel and unjustified interference of legislation in human sexual life deserves general recognition and support.
Freud was well aware of both Magnus Hirschfeld (some of his writings were published in Hirschfeld’s journals) and transvestites, but I’m going to give an outline of Freud’s theories around psychosexual development. I’m not a Freud expert so if any Kiwis want to dispute my explanation, go ahead! I’m also not going to dwell on the “Todestrieb” (death drive) as this is really just about context to what followed.

Freud argued the mind was made up of the superego, the ego and the id. The id is the instinctual drive and represents, basically, “I want” - you feel a need and you want it fulfilled. For example, “I am horny right now. I want to have an orgasm. I want to masturbate or have sex with someone in this room to fulfill this need”. It’s fully subconscious; you’re not aware of what the id is dictating. The superego represents “I should” - it’s the internalised understanding of social mores, derived from your parents. Freud felt society was an achievement for humanity but a tragedy for the individual. In this example, the superego is “Thinking lustful thoughts is something to be ashamed of. Premarital sex is a sin and so is onanism. I should not have sex with anyone or masturbate, and I should do penance for even considering these urges”. The superego (sorta) resides in the preconscious; you’re not fully consciously aware of a Jiminy Cricket on your shoulder but you haven’t repressed it, you can access most of it (aka “My therapist helped me realise I learned fucked up understandings of relationships from my dysfunctional parents!”). The ego is the in-between, basically “I will”. “I want to have an orgasm, but I shouldn’t have premarital sex or masturbate. As a compromise, I will secretly masturbate when I go to bed tonight to avoid any social penalty, because it is shameful”. The ego (sorta) represents conscious thought. Inability to access the subconscious id, and lack of understanding of the preconscious is why people do weird shit in the Freudian dynamic.

An infant is pure id. Baby is hungry, baby cries, baby is fed. What happens next is how everything else develops. This is where libido comes in - which is not exactly about sex, but more about a drive towards comfort, pleasure and affection. The initial stage is the oral stage - the baby learns that they can control pleasure through their mouth (namely, by suckling on their mother’s breast and getting milk). Being neglected at this stage leads to the baby growing into an adult who is orally fixated and obsessed with having their needs met and their mouth as a source of pleasure (anxious, talking too much, smoking, drinking, being manipulative to try and get needs met, gorging on food, pica). Between the ages of 1-3, they are then in the anal stage because they’re being toilet trained. They get pleasure (libidinal fulfillment) from being rewarded for using their potty properly, and they find it unpleasant to be chastised for failure to use the potty. Fuck ups at this stage can result from an overly punitive approach leading to an anally retentive adult (one who is obsessed with order, control, neatness and obsequiousness). Conversely, parents being too lax and failing to enshrine the appropriate level of shame - or being really over the top with punishments too - results in a child who might piss or shit themselves deliberately to upset their parents and who becomes the anally expulsive type as an adult (oversharing, messy, inconsiderate of others, sometimes coprophilia).

Basically these issues are impacting the normative development of the superego. Children fixated at these stages are developing a misunderstanding of social norms from poor parenting (so their Jiminy Cricket is defective) or they’re overly scared of their parents (so they can’t assert their needs effectively against Jiminy Cricket). The next phase is the Phallic stage and I must stress again this is Freud’s understanding of healthy sexual development. The phallic stage is the child (age 3-6) developing an understanding of sex differences and that they are in possession of a sex.

Mother stands for comfort. Mummy gives you kisses and cuddles and tucks you into bed at night, and reads you stories and calms you down if there’s a monster under the bed. Daddy is the big scary man who stomps off for work all day long and demands things from Mummy. So Mummy is the source of libidinal fulfillment (she meets your needs) and Daddy is the obstruction to that fulfillment, as he possesses her and she must cater to his needs (at least in upper class 19th century Viennese society). So the child wishes to possess the mother in the way the father possesses the mother.

According to Freud, for boys, this manifests as basically wanting to fuck his mother. He doesn’t necessarily have an understanding of sex, but he understands that his Dad being a man means he’s able to possess the boy’s source of comfort (the male father is able to possess his female mother) and so be jealous of his father and wish to eliminate him. However Dad is bigger and stronger and intimidating and could cut off the boy’s genitals, leading to Kastrationsangst (castration anxiety). Freud felt this was exacerbated by circumcision, which lead the boy-child to subconsciously remember the pain of circumcision and view it as an imposition of the father’s will upon his erogenous zones (Freud was Jewish). It also seems to have not helped that threatening boys with castration was apparently common parental practice for the Viennese upper classes at that time - “if you keep playing with your winky, I’ll cut it off!” - but anyway the way the boy eventually learns to resolve all this and overcome the Oedipal complex is by accepting his sexual urges towards his mother are taboo and thus beginning to identify with his father. This in turn leads to the development of his superego.

Girls are different. They wish to possess the source of their libidinal fulfillment (their mother) but discover they’re not like their Dad, and don’t have a penis, resulting in Penisneid (penis envy). They resent their mother for having created them without a penis, which means they cannot possess their mother. So they instead begin to want to possess their father and so compete with their mother for their father’s affections, trying to be a Daddy’s girl - what Jung termed the “Electra Complex”, although Freud felt it was a false equivalency. This failure to identify with the father and their identification with their mother means women never develop the same superego and so are emotional, impulsive and weak-willed and require a man’s firm hand because women aren’t shit (again, 19th century society) and to accept their role as submissive to men.

After this point children go into a latent phase around their libido and focus on learning social norms, before entering the genital phase where all things being considered equal, they go on to become normal heterosexual adults that are acceptable to society.

The changes in developmental pathways then result in how the genital phase manifests. Freud argued that everyone possessed “attraction” (Anlehnungstypus - anaclitic; alignment/support types) and “narcissism” types. Anaclitic types are focused on finding someone who can fulfill your libidinous needs - a man searches for a nurturing, kind, loving and supportive woman because he wants someone who represents the role of his mother in his childhood - whereas a woman searches for a dominant, strong, stoic and protective man because he represents the role her father played in her childhood. Narcissistic is obviously about seeking someone who can remind you of you, how you were or how you’d like to be - an example would be a university professor who is attracted to his student, because her thirst for knowledge reminds him of what he was like as a student. Freud’s On Narcissism sort of argued that men tended towards anaclitic attraction (they want to love, be dominant, and so possess the source of having their needs met) while women tended towards narcissistic attraction (they want to be loved, be passive, rooted in their desire to compete with their mother for their father’s affection). You can obviously argue that loving someone because “they’ll fulfill my needs like my parents did” is narcissistic, and that’s basically what Lacan does.

Freud’s take on peversions - which he doesn’t necessarily view as pathological - are when developments occur that result in someone not fitting into the socially desired outcome. Homosexuality, for him, resulted from misapplied parenting in the phallic stage. With regards to male homosexuality - perhaps the mother was overfamiliar and mollycoddled the boy, or the father was overly harsh and cold, leading the boy to overidentify with the mother. Or alternatively maybe the mother was ambivalent and inconsistent with her love and affection, leading the boy to self soothe - and therefore act as his own mother. Either way, the resulting man therefore narcissistically seeks a man who reminds him of himself, so that he can love that man as his mother loved him, or how he wished his mother loved him.

Lesbianism in women was a similar metric - there’s one case where he basically gave up trying to treat a girl for her sexual inversion and suggested that her family just learned to accept it. He identified the girl as having had a severe case of penis envy but then also getting traumatised at her mother getting pregnant, and coped with this by “becoming a man” (being attracted to women) and nothing would unstick it. She’d basically gone down the route of a conventional male psychosexual development, oedipal complex and all.

For Freud, conventional heterosexuality is “normal” and the result of specific parenting. But it’s just a potential outcome and children start out in a state of polymorphous perversity. Sexuality is conditioned, not innate. I’m not sure if Freud wrote much on transvestites but you can easily see how a Freudian analysis would apply to it. There’s quite a good Freudian breakdown on it here, I just can’t verify if this is from the works of Freud or just a Freudian practitioner explaining their perspective. Freud didn’t necessarily think being gay was inherently pathological, just abnormal, and even signed a petition to decriminalise homosexuality. These ideas that sexuality was exclusively the result of social conditioning resonated with the psychologist and sexologist (“fuckologist” in his own words) John Money.

John Money came up through John Hopkins Hospital, which pioneered intersex treatments. Previously fatal conditions like congenital adrenal hyperplasia could, by the 50s, be treated - and also breakthroughs in understanding of chromosomes and chromatin meant sex could be tested. Surgeons in general tried to “fix” the babies, which usually meant cutting bits off to make them outwardly appear female. I don’t know if they also performed vaginoplasty on these children or if it was planned to be added later, because reading about it is going to make me sad, but suffice to say doctors there including John Money in his Psychohormonal Research Unit adopted a viewpoint that someone’s actual sex was not necessarily the sex they should be assigned and raised in.

This fed off the Freudian view of social construction of sexuality. John Money basically theorised that a child who could not be an effective male due to malformed or damaged genitals could be reassigned to be a girl and, if raised properly as a girl, would end up as a heterosexual woman. Children pass through a “gender gate” at around age two (after which point their gender identity and sexuality becomes fixed) and proper parenting is what helps a child understand their gender. Failures of parenting is how you get gay people or transgender people.

David Reimer was not the only boy this was done to - if a baby boy had been born normally but had suffered damage to the genitals as a result of a botched circumcision, surgeons found it “easier to dig a hole than build a pole”. David Reimer was a high profile case because in the midcentury, twin studies were all the rage. Money forced David and his twin to engage in “childhood sexual rehearsal” on the basis that gender identity was rooted in the reproductive drive, and therefore by forcing the two six year olds to simulate sex (with David in the female role) it would cement David’s gender identity as a heterosexual woman. This was obviously child sex abuse and John Money was probably a paedophile, given he’d later go on to defend “chronophilias” and arguing there was a difference between sadistic paedophilia (bad) and “affectional paedophilia” (“a boy aged 10 attracted to a man in his 30s... if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding totally mutual, I would not call it pathological in any way”). Also it didn’t work, David always felt something was wrong with being a girl and was himself attracted to girls… but Money claimed it was a great success and so went on to become a pretty standard treatment pathway for infants with ambiguous genitals (minus the child sexual abuse that he kept quiet). However John Money never revealed that his experiment had failed and detransitioned age 13, so these findings were represented as completely accurate up until about 2000 when David Reimer finally spoke up about his experiences.

Money developed the terms “paraphilia” (to replace Freud’s “perversion”) along with “gender role” and “sexual orientation”. The work on intersex surgeries overlapped with gender reassignment surgery, so he was aware of transgender people and had his own theories on them. This is where he differed from Hirschfeld - Money didn’t think transgender people had an intersex condition with a woman’s brain in a man’s body, because he didn’t think gender was anything other than the result of social conditioning (the “gender neutrality” of infants).

He did have a paradigm for sex, though, defining sex as being made up of seven different elements;
  1. Assigned sex and sex of rearing
  2. External genital morphology
  3. Internal reproductive structures
  4. Hormonal and secondary sex characteristics
  5. Gonadal sex
  6. Chromosomal sex
  7. Gender role and orientation as male or female, established while growing up
“Gender role is appraised in relation to the following: general mannerisms, deportment and demeanor; play preferences and recreational interests; spontaneous topics of talk in unprompted conversation and casual comment; content of dreams, daydreams and fantasies; replies to oblique inquiries and projective tests; evidence of erotic practices, and, finally, the person's own replies to direct inquiry.”

The UCLA Gender Identity Research Clinic in the early 60s was set up to combat “sissy boy syndrome” and largely conducted research on trying to make gender non-conforming boys and men into heterosexual male adults. Aversion therapy was used, but there was also a belief that if the parents adopted rigid gender norms and lived as “Leave It To Beaver” a life as possible, distancing the boy from his mother and ensuring the boy spent time with his father”, he’d be conditioned out of being feminine. Money disagreed with this approach. He thought being gay or trans was the result of a failure of parenting resulting in a poor formation of gender identity, but at the point it became identifiable it had already been locked in and so couldn’t be changed.

Money didn’t really think there were only two genders, but like Freud, he felt anyone who existed outside of those genders was going to have an unhappy life in society and therefore the best thing to do would be to help them transition. He personally seems to have thought that a society with less rigid gender roles would result in fewer people presenting as transsexual - “a tomboy-ish girl, prenatally androgenized, grows up to be a career-minded woman, not a transsexual who claims to need sex reassignment”. (There seems to have been consideration at points that prenatal hormone exposure played a role in gender non-conforming behaviour).

Nevertheless, if transgender people were stuck as experiencing gender incongruity due to getting raised improperly, and society wouldn’t accept a girly-man, the only option to treat their mental illness was to try and make them into convincing women. He opened the Gender Identity Clinic at Johns Hopkins and had a strict treatment regimen where he’d observe his patients for two years before consenting to treatment, and this was the first clinic in the United States to perform sex reassignment surgery. Money’s approach was based on trying to assimilate gender non-conforming men into fitting into a convincing role as a heterosexual woman, so they basically refused to accommodate patients he thought would become hons or transbians.

He had a less-than-favourable opinion of his transgender patients.
The seven cases of the present series are not representative of all male transsexuals, yet it is our impression that they indicate what is, indeed, a strong trend among male transsexuals in their womanly role, namely to be devious, demanding and manipulative in their relationships with people on whom they are also dependent. In their relationships with medicine, for instance, they commonly use people as instruments of their own purpose and play them off, one against the other, exploiting the human foibles of vanity, rivalry and status for their own anticipated advantage-or perhaps for the sheer exuberance of dictating policy. The outcome may be either astutely self-advantageous, or it may be self-defeating, if it carries expediency and exploitative demandingness too far. In romance and marriage, the transsexual woman is capable of tenderness and affection, and also of being a public-relations show- piece of great advantage to her husband's professional advancement. Nonetheless, one has the impression that there is something contrived in the relationship. As in a commercial relationship, the husband must meet certain standards of instrumental perfection-or else! There is no more arresting example of this contingency of relation- ship than that which occurs when a sex-reassigned transsexual marries a man with a history of transvestism on the condition that he will never be so unmanly as to cross-dress again. In the one pertinent case in our series, this turned out to be the effective formula for the "cure" of the husband's transvestism. He obeyed his new wife's uncondi- tional veto. Apparently he was able to appease his own transvestite compulsion by displacing and transforming it into an urge to see his wife fashionably dressed and ultra-feminine, perhaps in clothes that were his own personally selected, lavish gifts to her.
There is one other patient whose husband, never seen and, there- fore, not included in the present series, fits this same pattern, according to the evidence of hearsay. We have also heard of a somewhat similar case in the series under followup elsewhere, by the Harry Benjamin group in New York. This was an elderly transvestite who appeased his own transsexual desires, unsatisfiable because of age, by sponsoring younger transsexual friends through surgery. The fact that such displacement can take place in certain transvestites and would-be transsexuals lends credence to the hypothesis that a basic psychic and cerebral mechanism of transvestism is dissociation, as in multiple personality and fugue state. The instrumental and contingent nature of the demand that a transsexual wife may require of her partner may be stringent, lenient, or in-between. Nonetheless, as when the same phenomenon is ob- served in the wives of ordinary heterosexual partnerships, one is led to wonder whether the wife ever did experience the genuine fallen-in- love experience. Though there is no definite proof at the present time, it is quite likely that one of the characteristics of the transsexual con- dition in males is impairment of the neuropsychologic mechanism that mediates the experience of falling in love. If such be the case, then the full-blown experience of being in love is replaced, in the male transsexual, by what, at the outset at least, is a more perfunctory, instrumental and opportunistic relationship. It may well be that the transsexual male, when first reassigned as a fe- male, is erotically "turned on" more by the subjective imagery of having a functional role as a coital female than by the erotic stimulus- image of the partner or prospective partner.
That’s from “Heterosexual vs. Homosexual Attitudes: Male Partners' Perception of the Feminine Image of Male Transexuals”, published 1970, which is a look into why seemingly heterosexual men might get into a relationship with a transsexual (and features some very weird references to experiments involving turkeys having sex with beheaded hens or the hen’s head and the implications on human sexual response). Money basically thinks that his transgender patients can’t be trusted and are incapable of love, and being incapable of love might actually part of the requirement of being transsexual. The plastic surgeon John Hoopes who performed many of the surgeries there eventually started condemning the patients as “freakish”, “hysterical” and “artificial”. The clinic closed down after Hoopes had mostly refused to keep on working there but also claimed that the clinical outcomes didn’t show any benefit to the patients, prompting the head of the clinic, Jon K. Meyer, to conduct his own study.
“To say that this type of surgery cures psychiatric disturbance is incorrect. We now have objective evidence that there is no real difference in the transsexual’s adjustment to life in terms of jobs, educational attainment, marital adjustment and social stability. My personal feeling is that surgery is not a proper treatment for a psychiatric disorder, and it’s clear to me that these patients have severe psychological problems that don’t go away following surgery.”
John Money disagreed but his attempts to do a follow up study failed due to lack of funding, mostly because by the late 70s everyone was creeped out by him insisting that paedophilic incest was based.
 
Well-known French Catholic saint Jeanne d'Arc/Joan of Arc was a "sapphic queer icon" who would best be suited to be played by: a tranny (Hunter Schafer, obviously he's first on the list), a they/them woman (Amandla Stenberg or Bella Ramsey) or a black/swarthy hispanic woman (eight or nine out of 15 actresses on the list including Stenberg), in order to keep the casting in the family.
media-GX7BkNlWQAIkU2D.jpg
https://www.pride.com/gay-celebrities/young-queer-actresses-joan-of-arc#rebelltitem13
Baz Luhrmann is a director whose work always gets us buzzing. From Romeo + Juliet to Moulin Rouge, and The Great Gatsby, his films are the definition of a visual feast — and there is an innate queerness that runs through them all. They are a spectacle, in the best sense of the word. So when news dropped that his next project, Jehanne d’Arc, would focus on the famed historical heroine Joan of Arc, well let's just say we went into a bit of a sapphic spiral.

Jehanne d’Arc according to Warner Bros. will focus on a young French peasant girl who comes to believe that she has been chosen to save her country during the Hundred Years’ War. You know, the story of Joan of Arc, who successfully led her army to victory in 1429, and would later be burned at the stake as a heretic and for crossdressing (wow, bigotry really hasn’t changed in 600 years has it?).

The question is who can bring this iconic character to life now? The casting call has gone out and the studio is reportedly looking for a young female lead for “the ultimate teenage girl coming of age story, set in the Hundred Years’ War." Already names are being bandied about including Jenna Ortega who once called Joan of Arc her “dream character” to play as well as Cailee Spaeny who is having a MOMENT with her roles in both Civil War and Alien: Romulus this year.

Listen, we love them both, but Joan of Arc has long been claimed as a Sapphic icon and we are not ready to give her up!

Baz if you're reading this, this is our open letter to you to keep the casting in the family. After all, there are SO MANY incredible queer women and nonbinary actors working right now that could absolutely eat this role up. No crumbs. And no hets. Need some inspo? Good news, we have lots of thoughts and feelings regarding who we’d love to see don Joan’s armor. In no particular order here are 15 queer actors we’d let lead us to war — well ok, not to WAR, but definitely to the box office.

Hunter Schafer
Hunter Shafer is a modern it-girl and her roles in both Euphoria and Cuckoo prove that she has the acting chops for the role and the charisma to lead an epic film.

Amandla Stenberg
Amandla Stenberg will always make us swoon. Not only did they rule a galaxy far, far away in The Acolyte, but their roles in My Animal and Bodies Bodies Bodies have us excited to see whatever they do next.

Bella Ramsey
Bella Ramsey has already shown they can lead an army to victory in Game of Thrones and they remain one of the most poignant and talented actors working, just look at The Last of Us for proof.

Jasmin Savoy Brown
Scream and Yellowjackets star Jasmin Savoy Brown is one of the most compelling up-and-coming stars in Hollywood. She exudes old soul energy making her perfect for Joan.

Dove Cameron
Dove Cameron's ethereal beauty would inspire stained glass windows! But her innate strength would make for a great Joan, plus she could sing the theme song.

Ruby Cruz
Ruby Cruz served up tomboy warrior energy in the all-too-short-lived series Willow and we'd love to see her back in the armor as Joan.

Myha'la
Myha'la is currently busy crushing her role as Harper Stern on Industry, but we'd love to see her clear her busy schedule to bring a new vision of Joan to life.

Brianna Hildebrand
Brianna Hildebrand first stole our hearts as the angsy, queer teen superhero Negasonic Teenage Warhead in the Deadpool movies and now we're ready to see her take her heroism to the next level as Joan. I mean, look at those cheekbones, they were made to rock a chainmail coif.

Alice Kremelberg
Alice Kremelberg has been climbing our girl crush ranking with roles in Orange is the New Black, The Sinner, and most recently Renegade Nell (still not over that cancellation!) so we would love to see her blow up as Joan next!

Malia Pyles
There is nothing "mousey" about Pretty Little Liars: Original Sin star Malia Pyles. She's not only out, proud, and talented she's got chops to really eat up the role of Joan!

Lee Rodriguez
Never Have I Ever star Lee Rodriguez got to explore the rollercoaster of being a teen on that beloved show, which will come in handy in this coming-of-age tale — now we want to see her kick some ass, too.

Isabella Ferreira
Isabella Ferreira has proven to be incredible in supporting roles in Love, Victor and Grey Matter — now we wanna see her step into the spotlight she deserves in a true leading role!

Midori Francis
Midori Francis is already making waves in hit series like The Sex Lives of College Girls and Grey's Anatomy, but we want to see her enter action girl era. We can, and want to see her in a full suit of armor leading a charge on horseback. I mean, wouldn't you?

Aleyse Shannon
Aleyse Shannon has the kind of eyes you get lost in — which when you're trying to get a bunch of dudes in 1400s France to follow you into bloody battle, couldn't hurt. The actor is best known for her roles in Black Christmas and Leverage: Redemption but now we want to see her on the biggest screen possible. IMAX minimum, please. Is there something bigger? If so, that.

Isabelle McCalla
Isabelle McCalla is a bit of a dark horse pick, as she best known for her Broadway performances, but honestly, she's such a star we'd love to this become her big break-out cinematic role!
Though TBF, maybe the writer was thinking of a different Joan of Arc since her original name is spelled as JeHanne d'Arc twice
 
Atrás
Top Abajo