- Registrado
- 23 de Jul, 2024
I view it differently as in "straight" and "gay" are points along a spectrum to say who you are willing to date or fuck. The labels serve a practical purpose. If a man is a masochist and wants to get fucked in the ass by a man because he'd hate it, I would still call him a faggot.As for "straight", "gay" etc. They're just labels at the end of the day to describe people's main attraction. AGPs main attraction are to women, it's just that they've got erotic target location error and turns that back to themselves, which messes everything up in their brains.
Sex is one of the greatest gifts nature/god/life/whatever you want to call it has given us.
Sex isn't just about procreating- for humanity it's a tool of emotional connection as well, be it positive or negative
Let me put it this way. This is how you view sex because you enjoy it and your brain is wired towards it (or you might be virgins and just stating the conventional view of sex, I can't know).
I view sex differently (purely physical). I've never felt like it was connecting me to someone emotionally. I would keep trying to force myself to feel a "spark" or some special pleasure I was missing due to views like yours, and that's what caused heartache for me personally.
That boy's case is different from mine and yours, because his body will never have the capacity for sex. You can say that mine or his view is wrong with whatever philosophical or religious backing. You could argue that the boy's body was mutilated and thus it's bad, but that wouldn't prove your view of sex right, only that his view is "damaged". You're creating additional suffering out of nothing, and I think that's bad.
There are better reasons not to butcher children like bone and other health issues, the fact that they can't consent, the fact that the surgeries leave them with chronic pain etc...
I view sex differently (purely physical). I've never felt like it was connecting me to someone emotionally. I would keep trying to force myself to feel a "spark" or some special pleasure I was missing due to views like yours, and that's what caused heartache for me personally.
That boy's case is different from mine and yours, because his body will never have the capacity for sex. You can say that mine or his view is wrong with whatever philosophical or religious backing. You could argue that the boy's body was mutilated and thus it's bad, but that wouldn't prove your view of sex right, only that his view is "damaged". You're creating additional suffering out of nothing, and I think that's bad.
There are better reasons not to butcher children like bone and other health issues, the fact that they can't consent, the fact that the surgeries leave them with chronic pain etc...
EDIT: Consider the difference between the statements "rape is bad" and "rape kills your soul and you might as well die"
Thats what I meant to convey.
Última edición:

