- Registrado
- 22 de Mar, 2023
That still makes you a pedophile, so your point here is completely moot
Good luck with that, retard
🐮 Lolcow Todd Daugherty / N9OGL / Fox Smith / Doc Dot - Domestic terrorist, ham radio sperg, self-described hikikomori, confirmed pedophile
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
That still makes you a pedophile, so your point here is completely moot
Good luck with that, retard
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
It's just standard sub-par IQ retard behavior, hurling every imaginable childlike denial imaginable. "No no noooooo reeeee the warrant was invalid, plus plus I wuz HAAAAAAX0R3D and it wasn't even CP anyway, and anyway there was only one CP image!"
Absolute retard shit. This is why lawyers tell you to shut the fuck up if you're being criminally prosecuted because all saying dumb shit like this does is incriminate you even more and give the prosecutor something to cross examine you about.
This dumb retard should be more concerned with the actual court that is deciding his fate than moronically making his "legal arguments" to a bunch of people who already know he's a complete and utter kid diddling pedo.
- Registrado
- 22 de Mar, 2023
The most hilarious thing about this is that he can't even keep his excuses and story straight
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
He's too retarded. I don't think he is even smart enough to remember what he said five minutes ago.
- Registrado
- 23 de Ago, 2018
N9OGL dijo:
I'm pretty sure this meets all the requirements of the DOST test, which apparently is what you are being charged with. You are welcome to PROVE me wrong and not just "it was said in court".
- Registrado
- 18 de Jun, 2018
Their federal, not state. This is state case, not a federal one. In Illinois they are required to use the DOST test. Secondly that image is NOT what the files say, nor is what the state trooper testified before court that it was. That warrant is not valid because the image they are describing is not the image that was accounted by the state and the state trooper who was the state's main investigator.
- Registrado
- 23 de Ago, 2018
Unless you prove otherwise because you are an established liar, we believe what our eyes see. In other words, no one here can believe a word you say.
You download pictures of 3 to 5 year old children having adult penises forced in their mouths. The question is, is that you doing it to one of your neices/nephews or just something you downloaded off the web? And you are homosexual. Those are facts and are indisputable.
So, prove the picture are you being charged with is not the picture mentioned in the federal search warrant. Mind you, in any scenario, you are sick, degenerate pervert.
You download pictures of 3 to 5 year old children having adult penises forced in their mouths. The question is, is that you doing it to one of your neices/nephews or just something you downloaded off the web? And you are homosexual. Those are facts and are indisputable.
So, prove the picture are you being charged with is not the picture mentioned in the federal search warrant. Mind you, in any scenario, you are sick, degenerate pervert.
Lloyd the Timelord
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 15 de Mayo, 2024
Goddamn you are a sick little fat fuck Toad. I hope they give you 30 years and you are ass raped every damn day of it.
- Registrado
- 9 de Ago, 2019
Just a couple of pages of exactly this had me hooked. Todd is such a massive retard that instead of just SHUTTING YOUR FUCKING MOUTH while under criminal indictment, he instead comes here to argue with people who are just posting more evidence that he's an unrepentant pedophile. It's retardation as an art form and the court and sentencing arc hasn't even begun yet.
Cumbot
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 9 de Abr, 2024
You sick little shit. Will you just admit you are a sick pedophile. All those years people thought that it was Akins who was posting those sick images on Nimbusters, 4Chan, and F2. But the truth is it was you. It was bad enough the shit you posted under your own name. The cartoon porn you posted supposedly to "protect the first amendment". You are going to prison Toady. No amount of lying is going to change that.
Última edición por un moderador:
Lloyd the Timelord
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 15 de Mayo, 2024
The description itself is pretty telling, several years ago that image and very similar ones were posted all over Nimbusters and F2. It was of a man who was molesting a small boy. It was thought at the time that it was posted by another pedophile named Steven Akins who was posting pictures of his own daughter. Akins always denied it and said that he didn't post it but no one believed him because he is a hibitual liar much like N9OGL.
No one suspected Todd at the time because he was posting lolicon or whatever he called his "cartoon porn" and lying Todd even blamed it on Akins who is even easier to hate than Todd Dougherty. I am going to write the DA and suggest that they get other warrents for N9OGL's other computer and his parents computer. I'm willing to bet they'll find all kinds of sick shit.
From this brief description I am 90% sure that this is a series of images that were posted on Nimbusters and F2 years ago. At first N9OGL was even blamed, because some posters thought that it looked like him in the pictures (the adults face wasn't shown in the pictures only his body) but since N9OGL posted "cartoon porn" the blame was placed on another pedophile named Steve Akins. Akins is as disgusting as Todd because he would post pictures of his 12 year old daughter in the shower.
I wonder if the DA has thought of getting another warrent? Maybe we should write him. I would be willing to bet that Todd has many more images on his other computer and/or his parents computer. There was at least 10 other variations of the picture in that description that were posted on Nimbusters/F2 and probably 4Chan.
- Registrado
- 20 de Feb, 2017
This literal retard sure loves digging his own grave.
- Registrado
- 17 de Abr, 2019
Word of advice, Toad. Your future fellow inmates won't care about the warrants or differences between your state and federal cases and will simply want to know why those pictures were on your computer. Pro-tip: Even they aren't dumb enough to believe someone hacked it.
- Registrado
- 7 de Jul, 2015
The only thing that could make this whole thing even more of a shit-show would be for yet another loser in the genetic lottery like Lardass Lloyd to involve himself.
FYI, I don't know what version of Hate and Flame you were following, but I don't ever recall it hosting any form of CSAM... I do recall you being at the forefront of falsely accusing Akins - another lolcow - of publishing such things online [without proof] to deflect from your own cowishness. You pulled the same sort of nonsense with Woger Wiseman back in the day and, frankly, he humiliated you in response. Which is kinda funny considering that yourself, Todd, Akins, Woger and all of your critics are pretty much the same degree of lowlives.
mean girl
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Mayo, 2024
Does that say they charged the prepubescent girl for taking the photo of herself?
- Registrado
- 23 de Ago, 2018
We don't care. Do the local daycare centers know about how you brag about downloading these kinds of files, which you no longer deny doing by the way????
Does your brother and sister know what the federal warrant says? Was that you putting your penis into the mouth of one of your nieces/nephews?
Does your brother and sister know what the federal warrant says? Was that you putting your penis into the mouth of one of your nieces/nephews?
- Registrado
- 7 de Jul, 2015
I'm reading it as "the perpetrator" is the "her" they're referring to as being charged and being a different "her" from the victim.
Also, are these documents referring to the same case? Todd appears to be being charged for the image of a girl mentioned in post #1,533 [which says nothing about a penis in the mouth], yet earlier there is a snippet regarding someone from the FBI looking for proof that Todd made the threat to commit a mass shooting just happened to stumble over what would unquestionably be "child sexual abuse material" [
] in the form of an image of a "3 to 5 year old 'child'" previously referred to as a "boy" with a penis in his mouth.It makes no sense whatsoever to charge him over an image that could potentially be argued wasn't in a prurient interest as opposed to one that is indisputably prurient.