🐮 Lolcow Timothy "TJ" Church / Cowlick - Failed Literotica Writer &/or Null's Best Friend

[Cowlick]

Another case where just because you say something doesn't mean it's true.

By the way, how can you understand the golden rule so poorly? That shit is taught to 5 year olds, and they seem to grasp it just fine.

1] Just because I say something doesn't make it true, but the fact I say it likewise doesn't make it untrue. Thirdly, the fact so many say I am misunderstanding the rule doesn't make it true.

 

[KingofManga420]

1] Just because I say something doesn't make it true, but the fact I say it likewise doesn't make it untrue. Thirdly, the fact so many say I am misunderstanding the rule doesn't make it true.

What the fuck does that anti logic doublethink gibberish even mean?

 

[Cuck Norris]

1] Just because I say something doesn't make it true, but the fact I say it likewise doesn't make it untrue. Thirdly, the fact so many say I am misunderstanding the rule doesn't make it true.

Where the fuck is number 2?

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

What the fuck does that anti logic doublethink gibberish even mean?

He's trying to cite the idea that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" but he's not intelligent enough to explain it clearly.

 

[Cowlick]

What the fuck does that anti logic doublethink gibberish even mean?

That question means you are describing what I wrote as several things it is not, which means you must be misunderstanding it, the same way so many of you are a long-standing, admittedly-easy-to-understand rule.

 

[The Knife]

That question means you are describing what I wrote as several things it is not, which means you must be misunderstanding it, the same way so many of you are a long-standing, admittedly-easy-to-understand rule.

I have never known more about what someone doesn't mean than I do right now.

 

[Cowlick]

He's trying to cite the idea that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" but he's not intelligent enough to explain it clearly.

More misstatements, like the claim I am the idiot misunderstanding the Golden Rule.

Oh, & Monkey, in your head next to your s__t for brains.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

same way so many of you are a long-standing, admittedly-easy-to-understand rule.

Says the person who doesn't thinks that the golden rule gives you permission to act like a dick if that person was a dick to you first.

How does that feel, knowing that you can't understand something that even you admit is "easy to understand."

 

[KingofManga420]

More misstatements, like the claim I am the idiot misunderstanding the Golden Rule.

Oh, & Monkey, in your head next to your s__t for brains.

Prove the Golden Rule works how it you say it does then Teej.

 

[XH 502]

 

[KingofManga420]

He's trying to cite the idea that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" but he's not intelligent enough to explain it clearly.

Oh I know but good lord his wording. Even for him that was atrocious.

 

[Cowlick]

Says the person who doesn't thinks that the golden rule gives you permission to act like a dick if that person was a dick to you first.

How does that feel, knowing that you can't understand something that even you admit is "easy to understand."

I was referring to how you all claim it's easy to understand, which it is despite the fact you don't seem to actually understand it.

Oh, so I guess you can answer both questions: The one you asked me, & how a person "doesn't thinks" something.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

like the claim I am the idiot misunderstanding the Golden Rule.

It's not a "claim." We know you don't understand it because of the following quote:

but made the mistake of assuming you all did too, which made me feel the need/right (both true) to treat you as you were treating me.

(emphasis added)

[EDIT]

I would explain it for you, but I like watching you flounder with something so simple.

 

[Cowlick]

It's not a "claim." We know you don't understand it because of the following quote:



(emphasis added)

[EDIT]

I would explain it for you, but I like watching you flounder with something so simple.

Feel free to watch me if & when I flounder (you all love pointing-out my mistakes, often simultaneously making those & others far worse). However, you refuse to even admit when it is you making the mistake.

 

[Cuck Norris]

Feel free to watch me if & when I flounder (you all love pointing-out my mistakes, often simultaneously making those & others far worse). However, you refuse to even admit when it is you making the mistake.

But you just admitted you will flounder. You are truly a master of the English language.

 

[Cowlick]

But you just admitted you will flounder. You are truly a master of the English language.

I said "if & when", which is saying it's possible, not definite.

 

[Cuck Norris]

I said "if & when", which is saying it's possible, not definite.

That would be "if or when". Ironically, you could have even used your patented &/or and been right.

 

[HipstrsGonnaHip]

That would be "if or when". Ironically, you could have even used your patented &/or and been right.

Now watch him refuse to admit he made a mistake.

 

[Cowlick]

That would be "if or when". Ironically, you could have even used your patented &/or and been right.

And also been mocked... There can be no time (when) if something never happens... Look at the Mayans: Expected end of world over 2 years ago!

 

[Cuck Norris]

And also been mocked... There can be no time (when) if something never happens... Look at the Mayans: Expected end of world over 2 years ago!

Uh no? There are other calendars that go far beyond the calendar referenced for that prophecy.

EDIT: A prophecy based purely on speculation by modern people.