China’s main influence is two fold: they will do almost anything and they have entire cities built around single industries. The latter is highly important because prototyping a model in the USA would typically involve multiple plants in numerous states and the retooling process is severely delayed. Having one city that does the glass, the chips, the case, the assembly, etc makes it so much quicker to test new prototypes and make last minute changes to a final product much more manageable.
Yes and no. China has infrastructure, but they’re kind of retarded and basically have to steal almost everything. The USA is retooling a lot of stuff to get back into natural resources (great company to keep an eye on is Michigan Potash & Salt Co.) and also shift more manufacturing to friendlier territories like Cambodia and Vietnam.
China’s big weakness is that their military is, from an offensive stance, an absolute joke. Their navy is shitty repurposed cargo ships into battleships. Their Air Force is essentially scrap metal. Their special forces are completely untested and have zero real world experience as well as being under equipped.
The area where China really wins is that invading/attacking them is a complete nightmare. If the USA wanted, we could stop exporting pork and soy beans right now and there would be massive widespread famine in China within months. Because the retarded chinks spent so much time building manufacturing ghost cities and not on building large swaths of local agriculture.
-edit
I want to commend Tim on his Culture War podcast. I think the name is dumb, but the idea is sound. Current political stuff doesn’t have much pull beyond the immediacy. Having guests with long-standing topics allows for prolonged views for months and years down the road. It’s a really smart move to produce content that can perpetually go viral.