Law Thomas Massie Promises To Expose More Names From Epstein Files - As it turns out, primarying somebody for trying to expose pedophiles in congress doesn't actually prevent them from exposing pedophiles in congress.

Original article/Archive

Representative Thomas Massie has promised to identify more individuals whose names were redacted from files connected to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Massie made the pledge during an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday, days after losing his primary bid for reelection to his seat in Kentucky's 4th congressional district to Ed Gallrein, President Donald Trump’s handpicked candidate, in the most expensive House primary election in United States history.

Trump sought to unseat Massie after Massie repeatedly broke with him on several key policies and issues, most notably to advance the legislation that forced the release of the Epstein files,

While Masse’s defeat demonstrated Trump’s ability to reshape Republican primaries, it further exposed a divide in Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. Several of the president’s biggest allies also broke with him on the release of the Epstein files, including former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Massie Around Until January​

massie.webp
UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 18: From left, Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., hold their news conference with survivors of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol on Tuesday, November 18, 2025.

Massie will remain in Congress unil his term ends in January. Without a Republican primary looming, he has several months left in office for further antagonize the president.

On Meet the Press, Massie was asked by host Kristen Welker if he would use his remaining time in Congress to identify individuals connected to Epstein on the House floor, as he has done before.

Welker noted that lawmakers are given wide protections from liability for comments made in the course of Congress under the "speech or debate" clause in the Constitution, which grants members of Congress legislative immunity, allowing them to talk about anyone or anything without fear.

“You have named names in the Epstein files in the past. Can we expect you to name more names in the coming weeks and months?” Welker said.

“Yes,” Massie replied.

Todd Blanche Accused Of 'Violating the Law'​

massie1.webp
Representative Thomas Massie speaks with supporters after his concession speech on May 19, 2026 in Hebron, Kentucky. Massie, who has served Kentucky's 4th Congressional District since 2012, conceded his loss after the most expensive US House Primary in US history against Trump-endorsed candidate Ed Gallrein

He accused Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche of “violating the law,” adding that there were still “millions of files” that have not been released. “We know the files have been over-redacted. I have released at least three names of billionaires who are implicated in this,” he said.

Massie added: “I’ve got seven more months to keep going against the grain, which means voting for principles and for people over party.”

The records related to the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) investigation into Epstein were released starting late last year in compliance with a bill passed by Congress and signed into law by Trump, who bowed to political pressure from his own party after initially resisting efforts to disclose more files.

Last month, the Justice Department’s internal watchdog announced a review of the department’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, focusing on how the the department collected, reviewed and redacted materials in preparation for their release, as well as its process for addressing concerns that arose after the files were made public.

Massie Says Breaking With Trump Was ‘Worth It’​

massie2.webp
(L) President Donald Trump speaks as he signs executive orders in the White House on March 06, 2025 in Washington, DC. (R) Representative Thomas Massie arrives at the Capitol on February 25, 2025 in Washington, DC.

When asked by Welker if it was worth it to break with Trump on key issues, Cassie said it “absolutely” was. As well as pushing for the release of the Epstein files, Massie has opposed the war with Iran and voted against Trump’s signature tax legislation last year.

"It was absolutely worth it for me,” he said. “Now, I don’t think it’s going to be worth it for the party.”

He said that some on the left “have Trump Derangement Syndrome. They call it TDS. But there’s a growing number of people on the right who have a form of TDS called Trump Disappointment Syndrome. I think what’s going to happen to the party this fall is they’ve disenfranchised a large portion of that constituency that Trump assembled to get us in the White House, in the Senate majority and in the House majority.”

He added: “I’m worried that in November this is going to cost the party a lot. But for me, it was completely worth it, and I’ve got seven more months to keep going against the grain, which means voting for principles and for people over party.”

Massie Doesn’t Rule Out 2028 Presidential Run​

Massie also signaled that his national political career may extend well beyond his upcoming departure from Congress.

“I will not rule out anything, and right now I’m not going to rule in anything,” Massie told Welker when she noted that some of his supporters had chanted “president” as he delivered his concession speech on Tuesday.

He added that he plans to take time before deciding his next move.

“I’ve been in Congress 14 years, fighting,” he said. “Every hour that passes, I get decompressed a little bit more. It’s like coming up from the bottom of the ocean. And I’ll take some time and decide what’s next. But I think I will stay engaged in some way or shape.”
 
Massie has only revealed the names of 3 billionaires who were already known to be connected to Epstein. He and Rohanna tease that they know the names of clients but the one time they've actually named people who weren't already known it turned out to be random innocent people in a lineup.


A California lawmaker dramatically read off six names in Congress he claimed were “wealthy, powerful men that the DoJ hid” in the bombshell Epstein files — turns out, four of them were just regular dudes who have absolutely nothing to do with the dead pedophile financier.

Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democrat who represents Silicon Valley, was blasted by the Department of Justice after reading off the names of the four men who just happened to get swept into an FBI photo lineup years ago.

Republican lawmaker, Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, also jumped on the bandwagon to unmask the men. “There’s millions of files, right? And in a couple of hours, we found six men whose names have been redacted, who are implicated in the way that the files are presented,” Massie said.
“Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Thomas Massie forced the unmasking of completely random people selected years ago for an FBI lineup — men and women. These individuals have NOTHING to do with Epstein or Maxwell,” a spokesperson for Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said, ripping the pair for their blunder.

One of the men unmasked by the politicians is Salvatore Nuarte of Queens, New York. He didn’t even know his good name had been dragged through the mud until the Guardian informed him. He then reached out to Khanna’s office and received an email back — blaming the DoJ for the mishap.

“I don’t know if they know what they are doing over there at the justice department,” Nuarte fumed to the newspaper. “How can I clear my name?”


Screenshot_20260526-104115.png

You have to be brain damaged to think Massie/Kahanna have anything at this point, otherwise they would have been able to compare the 4 men's names to the list and spot that they were innocent.
 
He doesn't have the same legal protections in the media that he does on the floor of congress. So he can't name names until the floor opens for him to speak. The article explains this.
This is bullshit as already shown by Rohanna naming those 4 innocent men. The floor of Congress is incredibly general and any congressman can hold a hearing for anything as shown by Nancy Mace holding a hearing to libel her ex in the congressional record.
 
If he's right, its not defamation.
It wouldn't be defamation if he named names to the media anyways. These names are legally redacted by the Trump administration. Naming them outside of congress where these restrictions don't apply would result in federal charges.

Congressmen have much wider berths during actual debate for obvious reasons. He's merely going to make use of that to expose the pedophiles the Trump admin is protecting. He already named 3 billionaires (all jewish by the way).

He specifically named Les Wexner, Leon Black, and Jes Staley. All having extensive ties with Epstein and Israel. Again, there's a reason why Trump redacts every jew in the files. And there's a reason why he turned on Massie after he started noticing who is actually in charge.
 
He specifically named Les Wexner, Leon Black, and Jes Staley. All having extensive ties with Epstein and Israel. Again, there's a reason why Trump redacts every jew in the files. And there's a reason why he turned on Massie after he started noticing who is actually in charge.
All three of those people. Were already known. He also named four innocent people and using. Is congressional immunity as a cover to be morally grandstanding faggot?
Massey lost his primary election due to the fact that he. Became memorial grandstanding faggot and insulted his own voters by saying they voted for the Epstein candidate.
This month's come to a shock to a lot of people, but people from Kentucky in his district, which is a memorial part of Kentucky. Do not care. About. Israel or Jeffrey Epstein? To the extent. Thomas Green's standing homosexual mass he does.
 
It wouldn't be defamation if he named names to the media anyways. These names are legally redacted by the Trump administration. Naming them outside of congress where these restrictions don't apply would result in federal charges.

Congressmen have much wider berths during actual debate for obvious reasons. He's merely going to make use of that to expose the pedophiles the Trump admin is protecting. He already named 3 billionaires (all jewish by the way).

He specifically named Les Wexner, Leon Black, and Jes Staley. All having extensive ties with Epstein and Israel. Again, there's a reason why Trump redacts every jew in the files. And there's a reason why he turned on Massie after he started noticing who is actually in charge.

On Meet the Press, Massie was asked by host Kristen Welker if he would use his remaining time in Congress to identify individuals connected to Epstein on the House floor, as he has done before.

Welker noted that lawmakers are given wide protections from liability for comments made in the course of Congress under the "speech or debate" clause in the Constitution, which grants members of Congress legislative immunity, allowing them to talk about anyone or anything without fear.

“You have named names in the Epstein files in the past. Can we expect you to name more names in the coming weeks and months?” Welker said.

“Yes,” Massie replied.

The article never mentions going to the media and solely talks about doing it in Congress. You can't read at all.

Jewsperging broke your brain hard.
 
How has this quisling not necked himself yet ?
 
All three of those people. Were already known.
No. They weren't. That's why Trump had their names redacted. It would be pointless to do so otherwise.

He also named four innocent people
He named nobody that was innocent. Just because Trump says that all the kiddie diddlers he's protecting are innocent doesn't mean they are. Would you accept Biden redacting all the names of the Democrats and claiming they were innocent? You wouldn't.

Is congressional immunity as a cover to be morally grandstanding faggot?
Literally, yes. Because people in power could otherwise declare it illegal to criticize them or make information necessary to the public good actually public.

Massey lost his primary election due to the fact that he. Became memorial grandstanding faggot
No, he lost it because jews bought the election. This is well known and you can easily google how much AIPAC gave to the gallrein campaign as well as their celebrations and openly claiming they bought a seat for Israel.

his own voters by saying they voted for the Epstein candidate.
You mean boomer zionist protestants who will thankfully die within the next few decades and then find out that Christ doesn't actually like them replacing him with the nation of Israel?

This month's come to a shock to a lot of people
Nobody is shocked. We are saddened that you people carry water for jewish pedophiles though. It really shows a lack of both intelligence and basic morals and shows why we can't have you in any coalition going forward. You have to be removed and excised from our people if we are to live in peace and prosperity.

but people from Kentucky in his district, which is a memorial part of Kentucky. Do not care. About. Israel or Jeffrey Epstein? To the extent. Thomas Green's standing homosexual mass he does.
You care. You're very clearly angry that he's going to keep naming names and keep exposing Trump for protecting them. But this all goes away in January. Along with Trumps majority and ability to govern.
 
Nobody is shocked. We are saddened that you people carry water for jewish pedophiles though. It really shows a lack of both intelligence and basic morals and shows why we can't have you in any coalition going forward. You have to be removed and excised from our people if we are to live in peace and prosperity.
You obviously don’t care about anything besides your Witch Hunt. Just eat the crow and move on.
 
It wouldn't be defamation if he named names to the media anyways. These names are legally redacted by the Trump administration. Naming them outside of congress where these restrictions don't apply would result in federal charges.

Congressmen have much wider berths during actual debate for obvious reasons. He's merely going to make use of that to expose the pedophiles the Trump admin is protecting. He already named 3 billionaires (all jewish by the way).

He specifically named Les Wexner, Leon Black, and Jes Staley. All having extensive ties with Epstein and Israel. Again, there's a reason why Trump redacts every jew in the files. And there's a reason why he turned on Massie after he started noticing who is actually in charge.
Has he named Israeli intelligence yet? Les Wexner isn't really new, not sure about the other two.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo