This biotech startup thinks it can delay menopause by 15 years. That would transform women’s lives


The ovary is the central command system of a woman’s endocrine system, controlling the hormones that send signals to essentially all of the other organs in the body. It’s a powerful force, impacting everything from immune function to metabolism to heart health. But it’s been the ovary’s fate to be pigeonholed as a solely reproductive organ.

To Piraye Beim, that’s a missed opportunity—and one she is looking to capitalize on. “The ovary isn’t just about babies,” says the founder and CEO of biotech startup Celmatix.

In fact, says Beim, “the real moonshot is menopause control.” The biotech CEO is helping to pioneer and define a new category that is attempting to expand ovarian health beyond fertility issues, which includes tackling painful conditions for women like endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome.

‘An extra 10 to 15 years’​

Delaying menopause—which has a huge market since it impacts 100% of all middle-aged women—would also delay all of the health factors associated with it, like heart disease and Alzheimer’s. “If we could buy women an extra 10 to 15 years of natural endocrine function, we’re talking about a huge boost in their vitality and their wellness at a critical stage in their life,” Beim says. “It will align us more with men, basically.”

Celmatix is creating a drug program that would effectively slow the depletion of a woman’s ovarian reserve, or how many follicles she loses each month. Beim equates a woman’s follicles—which have the potential to turn into eggs—with a bank account: Every woman is born with a different number, and she depletes it at a different rate, depending on everything from genetics to environmental exposure. For example, women who smoke deplete their ovarian reserve more quickly.

“You can actually put the brakes on that and create a more efficient process where if you use fewer per month, then your bank account lasts for longer,” Beim says. “We think we can shift the actual age of menopause from 50 out to 60 or 70.” The goal is to not just extend women’s fertility, but also hinder the health issues that coincide with the onset of menopause.

Just as birth control separated sex and reproduction, Beim views Celmatix’s drug program as separating a woman’s endocrine function from reproduction. And just like the birth control pill, women would need to come off of Celmatix’s drug when they want to have a baby. The drug works by mimicking anti-Mullerian hormone, which is key in regulating the ovary. The company plans to be in clinical trials in 2023, testing its drug on women who are undergoing chemotherapy—one of the most common causes of premature menopause.

Funding gaps lead to research gaps​

Beim got her start in health care working in oncology, where the ability to map the human genome was transforming the field. She saw an opportunity to apply that same playbook to women’s health, where huge funding gaps hadn’t led to the same revolution in precision and personalized medicine.

She founded Celmatix in 2009 to leverage genomics, big data, and artificial intelligence to try to help understand who was at risk for different health conditions. For example, by examining on a molecular and genetic level the profile of women who were having recurrent miscarriages, could they determine if it was a biomarker for a different underlying condition?

In 2016, the company partnered with 23andMe to use its genetic database to study women’s reproductive health and to launch a fertility research community—tracking 4,500 women across 18 months. But in 2019, Celmatix sued 23andMe, alleging that the DNA company breached its contract with Celmatix and interfered with its fundraising round. At the time, 23andMe said it would be “vigorously defending against the claim.”

“That disruption is definitely a chapter in our growth story,” says Beim. “But what the disruption forced us to do was accelerate our road map to getting to therapeutics.”

To date, Celmatix has received a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to work on nonhormonal contraceptives, since the side effects of hormonal birth control can prevent women from wanting to use it. In January 2020, the company also announced a partnership with pharmaceutical giant Bayer and drug discovery and development company Evotec, aimed at developing the first drugs for polycystic ovary syndrome. PCOS is one of the leading causes of infertility but also one of the most common endocrine disorders in women. Beim points out that even though the condition impacts about 15% of women globally, zero drugs have been developed for it to date.

An incentive to innovate​

Women’s health therapeutics have not seen any disruption or transformation in decades, says Beim, and are based on an understanding of biology that goes back 100 years. The drug classes first emerged in the 1920s, and there have essentially been no new drugs in years.

Pharma companies have not been incentivized to innovate in part because their current women’s health drug programs are extremely profitable businesses that in some cases make more than a $1 billion a year for a single drug franchise, Beim says. “They’re taking those dollars and investing them into R&D for other areas,” she says.

That, however, is beginning to change. Beim points to Bayer’s acquisition of women’s health biotech startup KaNDy Therapeutics for $420 million last year, and Pfizer’s $4 billion deal with Myovant for oncology and women’s health in December.

Beim says the driver is broader societal changes in the past 18 months—everything from the disproportionate impact that COVID-19 has had on women to the recognition of a lack of funding for female founders. Says Beim: “The broader cultural focus and shift in female empowerment is becoming loud and clear to pharma.”
 
That’s stupid and is like saying that there is a blue tax because men need more calories and therefore have to buy more food.
If you read the article, it gets worse.

They included both birth control and period supplies on that list. P sure birth control works by tricking your body into thinking you're already pregnant so you don't even get a period, that should cancel out all the other costs.

And, tampons, panty liners, and new panties? You shouldn't need new panties if you're using pads/liners. If you leak, just relegate your stained panties to shit tier period panties instead of buying new panties monthly. And if cost is an issue maybe you'll have to stick with pads or reusables instead of getting tampons plus liners.

But this might be the highlight of the article
Chocolate or sugary treats for cravings during PMS
This one may not affect everyone, but for this round up, we'll say that a woman buys one chocolate bar (or another kind of food she is craving) around the time of her period.
1 bar of chocolate per period x 456 periods x $2 per bar = $912

Be honest now. It's not only $2 of chocolate per month, is it? And it's not only during a period either.

Tldr their accounting is shit, they double dip counting items that cancel eachother out, and they include luxuries.

Saying it's like claiming "there is a blue tax because men need more calories and therefore have to buy more food" is being generous cause you're giving them the benefit of the doubt and saying their underlying math is valid. This is more like claiming there's a blue tax because men eat more calories, but your accounting includes a "Happy wife happy life" fee, both a paleo and keto diet, a "gay partner extra calorie" debuff, and you did the math using foie gras as a unit of measurement.
 
What is this bullshit? Holding off menopause gives you better resilience against heart disease; where men are more prone to it due to testosterone. We all get old and our bodies change and break down over time; what is this align with men shit?
The thought is most likely that men can technically have kids at any age so this will even the playing field so to speak. That 45-year-old+ businessman that decides he wants kids no longer has to chase the skirts of women old enough to be his daughter and can finally chose an older, more mature woman to bear his children. This will allow the older women to align themselves with men and compete with younger women on the dating market!
 
Delaying menopause—which has a huge market since it impacts 100% of all middle-aged women—would also delay all of the health factors associated with it, like heart disease and Alzheimer’s. “If we could buy women an extra 10 to 15 years of natural endocrine function, we’re talking about a huge boost in their vitality and their wellness at a critical stage in their life,” Beim says. “It will align us more with men, basically."
“It will align us more with men, basically."
Life-expectancy-at-60-mae-vs-female-in-years-factly.in_.png
???
 
Menopause is more than just not being able to make a baby anymore; Menopause symptoms suck ass and really fucks with women's hormones, causing weaker bones, mood swings, insomnia, slower metabolism, etc... my aunt is currently suffering from menopause symptoms and it's completely changed her personality.

If they can find a way to safely delay menopause then I'm all for it.
So, kind of like the period to end all periods, then.
 
Keeping perimenopause and menopause at bay sounds like it will fuck things up in the body. If there was a magical way to do it with minimal side effects, though, it'd be kind of amazing. Most mammals don't have anything like menopause and do fine. Menopause is associated with everything from osteoporosis to psychotic disorders and it can really fuck with women while they're going through it.
 
If there's one thing that as a uterus-haver I'm looking forward to is menopause. Imagine being well into your 60s, 70s and cramping up wtf.
My wife and I are at the age "The Change" hits and once she got past the initial crap, she loves it.

She says it's like a reward from life for making that far.

Menopause is more than just not being able to make a baby anymore; Menopause symptoms suck ass and really fucks with women's hormones, causing weaker bones, mood swings, insomnia, slower metabolism, etc... my aunt is currently suffering from menopause symptoms and it's completely changed her personality.

If they can find a way to safely delay menopause then I'm all for it.
Oof, your aunt caught the rough one.

My feels for her, man.
 
In all seriousness, I can't imagine trying to delay a natural body process is a good idea, or will even work as well as intended, if at all.
Disagree. That’s what testosterone replacement therapies TRT do for men. Delay a natural process that is. And that has risks (eg can be bad for the heart, that’s managed via dosage and discussions with a doctor) but restores quality of life for many men. I don’t know much about menopause in comparison to those issues for men, but from what I’ve seen recently delaying it safely if possible would have a similar good impact for women’s quality of life. I’d say menopause is worse than what a reduced testosterone production does to men as they age based on what I know right now.
 
Hmm I wonder if pharma suddenly desperately needing to reverse menopause has anything to do with pharma's last big $$ pet project causing odd menstrual issues, discovered AFTER it was mandated and pushed on well over half the population?

Nah I'm sure it's nothing.
 
Hmm I wonder if pharma suddenly desperately needing to reverse menopause has anything to do with pharma's last big $$ pet project causing odd menstrual issues, discovered AFTER it was mandated and pushed on well over half the population?

Nah I'm sure it's nothing.
It's unironically probably more related to trt clinics that just give people test, women are a significantly easier group to market to than men are, so why wouldn't pharma try to upset them too.
 
"Align us more with men"

Don't we live longer than men?

This honestly just sounds like an excuse to exploit women's bodies for profit. If this was legit it wouldn't be a start up company so soon, because a start up has to bring in money eventually. It would be a non-profit trying to fund research because that shit is YEARS away.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo