- Registrado
- 6 de Ene, 2020
So I have not paid any attention to the trial for a couple weeks what is the unbiased take on will the cop get off or is he gonna get hung in the town square? Is it looking good for the cop or bad?
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
its a toss up.So I have not paid any attention to the trial for a couple weeks what is the unbiased take on will the cop get off or is he gonna get hung in the town square? Is it looking good for the cop or bad?
I could be totally off here, but there could be a difference between asphyxiating because there's not enough oxygen in your blood and asphyxiating because there's not enough oxygen going to your brain.
The former automatically means the latter, but the converse doesn't necessarily hold.
There is no unbiased take.So I have not paid any attention to the trial for a couple weeks what is the unbiased take on will the cop get off or is he gonna get hung in the town square? Is it looking good for the cop or bad?
I think it bears repeating:A mistrial might actually be the worst possible outcome here.
Mistrial is the funniest outcome, so this gamesmanship from the prosecution is an excellent sign.
Well it was a womanwith the cop woman who shot a nig dead i can actually see a murder charge sticking. "i accidentally grabbed my gun instead of my tazer and didnt notice the difference" just sounds too retarded to me.
I think a brawl in the room where the jury was deliberating is about the only way this could really get any more insane.Anyone have the jury coming to blows during deliberation?
The prosecution won't ask for a mistrial on their own error, and defense may try to get a not-guilty and then if they don't get it request a mistrial on appeal? I have no idea how this stuff works.So have we confirmed one way or another that we won't wake up tomorrow to a Mistrial announcement? Because it's not gonna happben but christ it'd be funny if it did.
Me too, amigo.> Argue throughout trial that defendant killed victim via asphyxiation.
>Last day of trial after defense rests bring up hidden data showing victim had so much oxygen in his blood he may have been high off it.
I love everything about this trial.
It matters in regards to reasonable doubt, and at this point nobody can even agree on what killed him.I feel like the 98% levels or whatever don't mean much in this case because of the ventilation he received on the way to the hospital. I tried looking at journal articles on asphyxiation's effects on oxygen levels in the blood, but I found nothing on levels after attempted resuscitation and whether or not it even matters.