The Trial of Derek Chauvin - Judgement(?) Day(?) has arrived!

Outcome?

  • Guilty of Murder

    Votos: 75 7.6%
  • Not Guilty of Murder (2nd/3rd), Guilty of Manslaughter

    Votos: 397 40.0%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 221 22.3%
  • Mistrial

    Votos: 299 30.1%

  • Total de votantes
    992
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
They live in another society, on another planet, with different everything. They have absolutely no understanding or context for anything that isn't spoon fed to them through their preferred media sources.
I just feel vindicated over my feelings on these people. Mainly the feeling of "if you oppose them even slightly on anything or don't go with them 100% of the time, then they'll declare you an enemy"
 
Im getting annoyed at that judge constantly fixing his mask. Regardless of your feelings on mask, why the fuck can't you get a properly fitting one when you know you need to wear it regularly?

Beyond that he's seems pretty based. Here's to hoping he doesn't Chupp it up
 
Shit, I'm starting to think this judge may be legit. Of course no one on Twitter will care though, he's a white man so if he rules anything in Chauvin's favor that's just systemic racism in action.
 
its like normies and twitter trannies live on an entire different world
pararell universe .png
 
You were right about the replies, holy shit
Ver archivo adjunto 2043668
These replies use Q anon levels of logic: "Durrr, if an authroity figure does something I don't like then they must be part of some evil political cabal run by satanists / Nazis"
I'm pretty sure rightoids think all judges are communist puppets after all of Trumps voter fraud lawsuits got thrown out. Judges can't catch a break. We all know the culture war will get way worse regardless of the outcome.
 
Conservafags being anti-rioting is just as retarded as them being anti-trans-sports. Real "Dems R the real racists!" energy.

I want trans women in women's sports as female athletes are all liberal hoes and deserve to get their heads beaten in by 6'4 troons on the field/court.

I want Chauvin, a bitch cop, to get off not because of some gay "no it wasn't murder" legal reason, but because City Shitters deserve to to have their corporate stores burned out by nog riots
 
These replies use Q anon levels of logic: "Durrr, if an authroity figure does something I don't like then they must be part of some evil political cabal run by satanists / Nazis"
I'm pretty sure rightoids think all judges are communist puppets after all of Trumps voter fraud lawsuits got thrown out. Judges can't catch a break. We all know the culture war will get way worse regardless of the outcome.
*Fourth Turning intensifies*
 
I just feel vindicated over my feelings on these people. Mainly the feeling of "if you oppose them even slightly on anything or don't go with them 100% of the time, then they'll declare you an enemy"
Their level of delusion is insane, and I don't even know if they realize it. The #1 defense the media's using right now in convicting Chauvin is there'll be riots if he's not found guilty. They're literally endorsing mob rule.
 
Mad props to him for daring to stick up for Chauvin.
"An advocate, in the discharge of his duty, knows but one person in all the world, and that person is his client. To save that client by all means and expedients, and at all hazards and costs to other persons, and, amongst them, to himself, is his first and only duty; and in performing this duty he must not regard the alarm, the torments, the destruction which he may bring upon others. Separating the duty of a patriot from that of an advocate, he must go on reckless of consequences, though it should be his unhappy fate to involve his country in confusion." Henry Peter Brougham, 1st Baron Brougham and Vaux, PC, QC, FRS.
 
Their level of delusion is insane, and I don't even know if they realize it. The #1 defense the media's using right now in convicting Chauvin is there'll be riots if he's not found guilty. They're literally endorsing mob rule.
The media should be careful because that can cut both ways. Just saying.
 
It just hit me that she said she'd delete the photo(s), and that she didn't post them.

In the instance that there is a leak, could she face anything? Whether it be lying to or disobeying a judge?
I would assume so if the photo does leak. Don't think the judge would be as forgiving the next time someone pulls that shit.
 
after all of Trumps voter fraud lawsuits were denied the right to even get to evidentiary presentation, in districts where being appointed the role of a judge is a political flex, not a legal one
Fixed that for you, you snivelling millennial progtard.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo