Culture The Secret History of Dune - Frank Herbert’s “Dune,” an enduring science fiction classic, owes much of its mythology to “The Sabres of Paradise,” an undeservedly forgotten history.

Link / Archive

By Will Collins - September 16, 2017

FRANK HERBERT’S Dune (1965) is a science-fiction classic in part because it’s such brilliant pastiche. Drawing inspiration from the midcentury United States’s nascent environmental movement, European feudalism, Middle Eastern oil politics, and Zen Buddhism, Herbert created a universe that is at once exotic and familiar. Not all of the book’s success is a result of inspired borrowing, but much of the richness and depth in Herbert’s imagined future of religious fanaticism and aristocratic intrigue can be traced to its creator’s talent for appropriation.

Melange, the hallucinogenic drug at the heart of Herbert’s book, acts as a prerequisite for interstellar travel and can only be obtained on one harsh, desert planet populated by tribes of warlike nomads. Even a casual political observer will recognize the parallels between the universe of Dune and the Middle East of the late 20th century. Islamic theology, mysticism, and the history of the Arab world clearly influenced Dune, but part of Herbert’s genius lay in his willingness to reach for more idiosyncratic sources of inspiration. The Sabres of Paradise (1960) served as one of those sources, a half-forgotten masterpiece of narrative history recounting a mid-19th century Islamic holy war against Russian imperialism in the Caucasus.

Lesley Blanch, the book’s author, has a memorable biography. A British travel writer of some renown, she is perhaps best known for On the Wilder Shores of Love (1954), an account of the romantic adventures of four British women in the Middle East. She was also a seasoned traveler, a keen observer of Middle Eastern politics and culture, and a passionate Russophile. She called The Sabres of Paradise “the book I was meant to do in my life,” and the novel offers the magnificent, overstuffed account of Imam Shamyl, “The Lion of Dagestan,” and his decades-long struggle against Russian encroachment.

Anyone who has obsessed over the mythology of Dune will immediately recognize the language Herbert borrowed from Blanch’s work. Chakobsa, a Caucasian hunting language, becomes the language of a galactic diaspora in Herbert’s universe. Kanly, from a word for blood feud among the Islamic tribes of the Caucasus, signifies a vendetta between Dune’s great spacefaring dynasties. Kindjal, the personal weapon of the region’s Islamic warriors, becomes a knife favored by Herbert’s techno-aristocrats. As Blanch writes, “No Caucasian man was properly dressed without his kindjal.”

Herbert is ecumenical with his borrowing, lifting terminology and rituals from both sides of this obscure Central Asian conflict. When Paul Atreides, Dune’s youthful protagonist, is adopted by a desert tribe whose rituals and feuds bear a marked resemblance to the warrior culture of the Islamic Caucasus, he lives at the exotically named Sietch Tabr. Sietch and tabr are both words for camp borrowed from the Cossacks, the Czarist warrior caste who would become the great Christian antagonists of Shamyl’s Islamic holy warriors.

Herbert also lifted two of Dune's most memorable lines directly from Blanch. While describing the Caucasians’ fondness for swordplay, Blanch writes, “To kill with the point lacked artistry.” In Dune, this becomes “[k]illing with the tip lacks artistry,” advice given to a young Paul Atreides by a loquacious weapons instructor. A Caucasian proverb recorded by Blanch transforms into a common desert aphorism. “Polish comes from the city, wisdom from the hills,” an apt saying for a mountain people, becomes “Polish comes from the cities, wisdom from the desert” in Dune.

Dune’s narrative, however, owes more to The Sabres of Paradise than just terminology and customs. The story of a fiercely independent, religiously inspired people resisting an outside power is certainly not unique to the Caucasus, but Blanch’s influence can be found here, too. The name of Herbert’s major villain, Baron Vladimir Harkonnen, is redolent of Russian imperialism. Meanwhile, Imam Shamyl, the charismatic leader of Islamic resistance in the Caucasus, describes the Russian Czar as “Padishah” and his provincial governor as “Siridar,” titles that Herbert would later borrow for Dune’s galactic emperor and his military underlings.

There are even some interesting echoes of Blanch’s writing style and tendencies in Herbert’s book. Both authors traffic in evocative descriptions of stark, unforgiving landscapes and equally unforgiving peoples. And their shared tendency to describe their protagonists in raptor-like terms may not be a coincidence. (For Blanch, the Caucasus was a land of “eagle-faced warriors” and Imam Shamyl was possessed of “handsome eagle features.” Naturally, the Atreides are also notable for their “hawk features.”) Even Dune’s colors owe something to Blanch’s history. The banners of House Atreides are green and black. The first is, of course, the color of Islam and the second was adopted by Imam Shamyl’s Murids, holy Islamic warriors pledged to fight Russian imperialism to the death.

Why is Blanch’s influence on Dune worth recognizing? Celebrating Blanch is not a means to discredit Herbert, whose imaginative novel transcends the sum of its influences. But Dune remains massively popular while The Sabres of Paradise languishes in relative obscurity, and renewed public interest in Blanch’s forgotten history would be a welcome development.

Great travel writing makes no pretense of objectivity, and The Sabres of Paradise owes more to Blanch’s background as a travel writer than any traditional history. Blanch traveled and wrote extensively about the Middle East and Russia, and she doesn’t bother hiding her affection for her subject matter. She was clearly captivated by the culture and peoples of the Caucasus, and it’s difficult not to be swept away by her enthusiasm.

The history she produced is a minor masterpiece, an unabashedly romantic account of a conflict that continues to inform religious and political tensions in the Caucasus to this day. (It’s no accident that Chechnya was the geographic core of Imam Shamyl’s movement, or that the Murids’ austerely militant Islamic faith recalls the theology of modern fundamentalists.) Blanch was not a professional historian, and one suspects that an academic would have produced an altogether less satisfying account of this period. The climax of The Sabres of Paradise, a tension-fraught exchange of hostages between the Russian army and the insurgents, would probably be relegated to a few dry paragraphs in an academic tome. For Blanch, it occupies an entire chapter — a magnificent account of the trade of three Georgian princesses, kidnapped in a daring Muslim raid, for Shamyl’s firstborn son, captured as a boy and raised to manhood in the court of the The Great White Czar.

In strategic terms, this entire episode held little importance: the audacity of Shamyl’s raiders and the drama and pageantry of the exchange would not change the fact that the Russians had more men and more guns. Indeed, the comparative insignificance of the Caucasus campaign is thrown into stark relief by the fact that the implacable Russian advance was barely slowed by the disastrous Crimean War. But Blanch’s account, aside from being brilliantly written, captures the essential tragedy of Imam Shamyl’s struggle. Just as his son was overawed and then seduced by the Czarist court, only to wither away in one of his father’s mountain citadels after reluctantly returning to the land of his birth, Shamyl’s support among the Caucasian tribes was gradually being eroded by a combination of overwhelming force and strategic conciliation. It was only a matter of time until the Russians prevailed.

Occasionally, The Sabres of Paradise creaks under the weight of its author’s ambitions. While the story remains unfailingly interesting, Blanch’s detours into the habits of the Russian aristocracy and European power politics, and the memorable personalities that populate the period occasionally detract from the book’s narrative momentum. Of course, a ruthless editor may have also excised Blanch’s wonderful asides about Pushkin and Tolstoy’s connections to the Caucasus. These narrative detours give testament to the staggering research required for such a comprehensive history. Blanch was no academic, but her command of military facts and her impressive array of primary sources, including her interviews with Shamyl’s exiled great-granddaughter, should disabuse skeptics of the notion that she didn’t do her homework.

Science fiction and fantasy have always been syncretic genres. The extravagant world-building that fires the imagination of so many readers would be nearly impossible if authors refused to seek inspiration in our own histories, religious traditions, and myths. Isaac Asimov’s Foundation trilogy was famously inspired by Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. J. R. R. Tolkien’s background in medieval languages helped shape the mythology of Middle Earth. Frank Herbert’s Dune is no different, and rediscovering one of the book’s most significant influences is a rewarding experience. At a time when our most popular science fiction sagas have been reduced to cannibalizing themselves, we would do well to celebrate genre pioneers who were more ambitious in their borrowing.
 
Science fiction and fantasy have always been syncretic genres. The extravagant world-building that fires the imagination of so many readers would be nearly impossible if authors refused to seek inspiration in our own histories, religious traditions, and myths. Isaac Asimov’s Foundation trilogy was famously inspired by Edward Gibbon’s Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. J. R. R. Tolkien’s background in medieval languages helped shape the mythology of Middle Earth. Frank Herbert’s Dune is no different, and rediscovering one of the book’s most significant influences is a rewarding experience. At a time when our most popular science fiction sagas have been reduced to cannibalizing themselves, we would do well to celebrate genre pioneers who were more ambitious in their borrowing.
You just want to celebrate a woman for being referenced in the writing. Issue is that Dune is more famous for the scifi concepts than the occasional line of texts and Savage Worship setup.
 
The only people who care about Frank Herbert plagiarizing stuff are either fake Dune fans or those who haven't read that much. The plot of Dune is a such blatant ripoff of Hamlet and The Man Who Would Be King that it's impossible not to notice. The references are all intentional and part of fully enjoying the story.
 
One of my professors (who was, himself, a science fiction author) said those were some of the worst science fiction he'd ever read
My oldest nephew has been getting into the books and I actually had a "there are only six Dune books," moment. If the kid's going to start reading, I'm going to make sure he does it right.

So Excalibur is a look at what LOTR would have looked like if it were made in the 70s
So, like an LSD and cocaine fueled fever dream? It could have been entertaining.
 
Oh, it's another one of those articles where we all pretend women actually contributed to, well, anything.

The only surprising things here is that neither the journo, nor the literal-who is writing about, are Jewish.
 
yeah afaik Frank was very big on the feminist flavoraid of the day
Brian too

funny thing I caught as an interchange between an interviewer and Brian talking about The Time He Found Frank's Discs
"and so my mother's spirit led me to them"
"ah, like, your memories of her drove you onward"
"no I mean her spirit led me to them"
"...okay ... so the new book is called "
Brian's story how he found his father's notes of The Rest Of Dune on old floppies is literally "ghost mom"
 
I know on an intellectual level that Dune is different in many ways, just as the author says, but this explicit and implicit plagiarism sours my perception of the book a lot.
Maybe I'm just old (and am not going to do a deep dive on this shit), but there are fundamentally only a handful of stories, and they get told the same way, because we kind of accept certain things as universal truth. If a story I like is strikingly similar to the point of plagiarism, well, I'm not nearly as bothered as I would have been 20 years ago.

The plot of Dune is a such blatant ripoff of Hamlet and The Man Who Would Be King that it's impossible not to notice.
I was once on an 8-hour flight about two years ago and decided I would pick three movies to watch from the in-flight entertainment selections if I couldn't sleep. The three I picked were: The Godfather, Dune, and KGF Part 2.

I was shocked when I realized I have a type of movie I like: "Guy who comes from modest to okay upbringing becomes the most badass leader over his particular sphere of existence because circumstances".

Point being: despite variations, a good story needs to hardly be original to be worth telling.

Feminists' obsession with stolen valor in all of its forms is always a sight to behold. I can only envy the inability to feel shame or self-awareness that the estrogenated are blessed with, so that they may act in such a repellent fashion while simultaneously feeling smugly self-righteous while doing so.
It's the blatant need for points-scoring. Women have advanced a lot in terms of societal status in only the last 100-150 years. It's feminists that sit there and go, "well, we always were as good as we are now" that just decide they're going to blatantly ignore reality instead of taking the most recent wins.

Have never read Dune. Have never read any of the Lord of the Rings books. Just don't work for me.
Dude, people are shocked when I tell them I've never read Dune. I've got the general feel for it by osmosis, and I'm an adult with way too much shit to do and too much ADHD to bother.

Oh, and LOTR? I quit at Tom Bombadil, and I regret nothing.
 
It's fantasy in space. I'd argue that Star Wars is also fantasy in space. Neither predicts future technology in a Jules Verne sort of way or grapples with the implications of that technology. Dune only does the latter in its lore building with the Butlerian jihad
Precisely my point.

Now thinking about it, Spice us allegory for LSD. Except that all LSD does is make you high for 12 hours and repeated use will not make you a god, just high again, and if you're unlucky will fry your brain.
 
Dune is more interesting to talk about than it is to read. The book can be a slog, especially after Paul and Jessica go into the desert.
A Dune wiki(take your pick) is more fun to read the books, it's truncated and the interesting ideas and concepts persist. You can even have a good time reading the plot synopsis of the books in order via their standard Wikipedia pages on a slow work day, I recommend it.
 
Precisely my point.

Now thinking about it, Spice us allegory for LSD. Except that all LSD does is make you high for 12 hours and repeated use will not make you a god, just high again, and if you're unlucky will fry your brain.

Herbert was using and growing mushrooms (psychedelics) in the 1960s when he wrote dune. LSD was big around that time as well, but there is no evidence that Herbert was using in the early 1960s.

At that time and in that era, there was a widespread (stupid) belief reflected in the Herbert novels that LSD could make people into gods.
 
Like Kurt Cobain, if Frank Herbert had been around today, he would have become an odious twitter faggot with stock-standard views from the Right Side of History Buffet and Vegan grill.
Frank Herbert was a rectionary conservative republican. He was McCarthy's cousin that he called "Cousin Joe", he loved both nixon and reagan and he was against welfare for making people dependant on the state, he hated soviets and he was anti war.

Dune's primary concern is literally the divine right to rule by just philosopher kings as well as "Blood and Soil". The main villains are literally the neoliberal world order that only cares about GDP and trade. The fremen themselves are literally just massive preppers.

To say that frank would have been a twitter faggot is so unbelievably profoundly wrong and inaccurate I can't even come up with an exagurated example to mock it with because that is the most far fetched bullshit you could ever say to begin with.
 
Maybe I'm just old (and am not going to do a deep dive on this shit), but there are fundamentally only a handful of stories, and they get told the same way, because we kind of accept certain things as universal truth. If a story I like is strikingly similar to the point of plagiarism, well, I'm not nearly as bothered as I would have been 20 years ago.
Being a writer myself, I'm definitely not immune to letting scenes and ideas from other books slip into my own work. I have no illusions that I'm writing brand new genres of story, just variations on themes. I'm just continually surprised at the willingness of authors of this era to just straight up rip shit off. I was always taught that plagiarism is the worst sin you can commit as an author (direct plagiarism, no one can escape their influences.)
 
Wow. Seeing this kinda floored me. I've loved Dune since I was a kid, but I'd never even heard of The Sabres of Paradise. Comparing sections and seeing some straight up lifted from another work like this is... disillusioning. I know on an intellectual level that Dune is different in many ways, just as the author says, but this explicit and implicit plagiarism sours my perception of the book a lot.
You shouldn't feel that way. Plagiarism is reddit cope shit. Ask a hundred redditors what is the difference between plagiarism, adaptation, and homage, and you'll get a hundred different answers. Especially in this instance with 500+ page books which have obvious differences. You have a stronger case with some dumbass youtube videos or essays.
 
You shouldn't feel that way. Plagiarism is reddit cope shit. Ask a hundred redditors what is the difference between plagiarism, adaptation, and homage, and you'll get a hundred different answers. Especially in this instance with 500+ page books which have obvious differences. You have a stronger case with some dumbass youtube videos or essays.
I've thought about it more since seeing the article and concluded I had a kneejerk reaction based on a little leftover naivete about something that helped me get into writing. The greater substance of the book is original and the way Herbert uses Sabres of Paradise doesn't come from a plagiaristic place.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo