The Real Gay Agenda? - Frogs r gay

[Spud]

Now (((Ben Shapiro))) is associated with faggotry and pedophilia?

Well... he is Jewish.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Well... he is Jewish.

True, and he's not as conservative as people think, but regardless, his arguments are usually pretty good and that's one of them.

 

[JaneThough]

So to the white knights, why are you so ardently defending obvious fags who are trying to grift you? How much have you donated to “billionaire” Trump, “millionaire” Tate? How do you like Twitter Blue? Did you buy Barbies just to burn them too?

In other news, Musk got cucked by his own fact checking lol

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

It'd be better if he went and pushed it on little kids, you support that after all.

You're the one who defends Republicans who want to make it legal to force 12 year olds to marry adults.

I don't know if that's because you're a pedo or you just can't bring yourself to criticize your elderly, obese waifus that you have such lust for. I hope it's the latter, although given your projection that "all gay people are pedos" and this new revelation that you're deep in the closet, I am thinking my hope is not the answer.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

How much have you donated to “billionaire” Trump

Imagine still having TDS in 2023, they really need to find a cure aside from hot lead.

You're the one who defends Republicans who want to make it legal to force 12 year olds to marry adults.

It's not defending them to point out that you're lying about them wanting adults to marry minors, least of all little kids, and it doesn't change that I support marriage at 18.

Of course, a minor being sexually mutilated is far worse than them marrying each other, but you support transgender surgery for them because you trust The Science™, so you have no room to criticize literally anyone's politics.

You know, everyone here likes to delude themselves into thinking you're just trolling with a gimmick account, but "lol im just joking about being a groomer" isn't exactly a good look either bud. There's some shit you shouldn't joke about, but I know you're earnest anyway so it's a moot point.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

It's not defending them to point out that you're lying about them wanting adults to marry minors, least of all little kids, and it doesn't change that I support marriage at 18.

Of course, a minor being sexually mutilated is far worse than them marrying each other, but you support transgender surgery for them because you trust The Science™, so you have no room to criticize literally anyone's politics.

You know, everyone here likes to delude themselves into thinking you're just trolling with a gimmick account, but "lol im just joking about being a groomer" isn't exactly a good look either bud. There's some shit you shouldn't joke about, but I know you're earnest anyway so it's a moot point.

It's not what they were doing, though. The law was going to make it illegal for children to get married, period. The way that the pedos you support were trying to get the law was to keep it legal for children to be forced to marry adults. You defend that stuff. If you are against pedos and want the marriage age to be 18, why do you defend Republicans who said that 12 year olds being married is totally cool, even when it's forcing them to marry adults? I know you have debilitating autism, and thus see things in black and white only and your diseased brain sees everything Republicans do as good, but it's okay to call someone from your own political party a pedo, even when they're a bible thumping boomer like yourself.

Eris, you're the one defending child marriage laws and pedophiles that are Republicans. You said a 40 year old Republican trying to bang a 17 year old girl was no big deal. When I brought up Josh Duggar, you said he did nothing wrong. When I brought up Joel Koskan, you defended him until I showed you a Fox News article saying he was found guilty. You didn't believe any other source. And even then, you didn't insult him, you just shut up about it and would dodge it. You are incapable of ever criticizing your theocratic political party. You are also a religious zealot who is obsessed with grooming kids. It makes me want to find out what megachurch you to go to so I can tell the pastor to not allow you near the youth of the church, particularly the boys given your views and projections

It's cool you're into males, but please, don't hurt or groom any kids.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

The way that the pedos you support were trying to get the law was to keep it legal for children to be forced to marry adults. You defend that stuff.

That's not what their stated intentions were (which I also disagree with). You can call them liars if you want and I won't bother to argue whether or not their intent is genuine, but what you're saying is not factual.

No, I don't "defend that stuff", how many times do I need to tell your retarded ass I support marriage at 18 across the board? I oppose those Republicans on that issue no matter how you slice it. Unlike you I'm not afraid to disagree with my side (and it's only a minority of them to begin with).

If you are against pedos and want the marriage age to be 18, why do you defend Republicans who said that 12 year olds being married is totally cool, even when it's forcing them to marry adults?

Your TDS addled autistic mind is incapable of interpreting nuance, nothing I said constitutes a defense, merely accuracy. You shouldn't have to lie about them wanting adults to marry 12 year olds, if you think what they actually want is so bad you wouldn't need to make things up to sound worse. Just condemn it like I do, no need to fabricate scenarios to score political points on a forum.

You said a 40 year old Republican trying to bang a 17 year old girl was no big deal. When I brought up Josh Duggar, you said he did nothing wrong.

You know the drill, quote me or shut the fuck up.

When I brought up Joel Koskan, you defended him until I showed you a Fox News article saying he was found guilty. You didn't believe any other source.

I didn't defend anyone. I'm sorry that you need to prove your claims and that it hurts your feelings to not be believed, but since you're a known liar you have zero credibility.

Remember you said Gaetz was guilty, but he wasn't? Accusations aren't proof, that's what I told you, but you insisted he was guilty like a good NPC until charges were dropped, now you stopped bringing him up.

You are also a religious zealot who is obsessed with grooming kids.

You're literally projecting, you're a religious zealot faithful to Wokeism who supports grooming kids into the transgender sex cult for mutilation. Why do you support that just because a doctor says it's good? You're a mindless degenerate.

 

[AgendaPoster]

Imagine still having TDS in 2023, they really need to find a cure aside from hot lead.

MAGA people have not addressed a single blumpf criticism in an honest manner. Sure you can dismiss people that are progressives for terminally hating on blumpf, but you cannot dismiss the people on the actual right that want things blumpf lied about.
Your attitude cannot be "if you criticize the orange buffoon you are an idiot/kike/etc.". That behavior is being in a cult. Sure, you can go "what about the X cult of leftoids", OK, but you are still in a cult too.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

MAGA people have not addressed a single blumpf criticism in an honest manner. Sure you can dismiss people that are progressives for terminally hating on blumpf, but you cannot dismiss the people on the actual right that want things blumpf lied about.
Your attitude cannot be "if you criticize the orange buffoon you are an idiot/kike/etc.". That behavior is being in a cult. Sure, you can go "what about the X cult of leftoids", OK, but you are still in a cult too.

Nobody pretends Trump is perfect, there's plenty criticism of him on the right. It's just not politically useful to focus on criticizing the best (albeit imperfect) presidential candidate. If you want a perfect president then good luck.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Nobody pretends Trump is perfect, there's plenty criticism of him on the right. It's just not politically useful to focus on criticizing the best (albeit imperfect) presidential candidate. If you want a perfect president then good luck.

Plenty of you bible thumping boomers do lol. Hell, on here people tried to get me banned for not loving Republicans and Trump with all my heart, mind and soul. Hell, you yourself are literally incapable of criticizing any Republicans. Even when they're pedos, you can't bring yourself to say anything bad about them. I'm sure it's due to your autism, but it's still concerning

@SSj_Ness Lol it's not a minority opinion among Republicans. Many states have had Republicans try and block attempts to get child marriage banned. They just hide behind "MAH HIGH SCHOOL SWEETHEARTS", even though they could just wait until they're 18. There's no reason to support child marriage, and your defense of politicians who disagree with that is very concerning. The law they were trying to block would make it illegal for children to marry, including marrying adults. Right now, that practice is perfectly legal. So why are they so against that? Because high school kids can't get married? lol even for someone whose admitted to having autism, you're very gullible.

Most marriages involving children are children being married to adults (86%). I know this link isn't Fox News so you won't believe it, but: https://populationmatters.org/news/2021/04/child-marriage-in-the-us-where-is-the-outrage/

The report titled United States’ Child Marriage Problem by Unchained at Last, which combats forced and child marriage in the US, reveals some shocking and poorly known facts. About 300,000 children with a few as young as 10 were married in the US between 2000 and 2018. Not surprisingly, most are girls (86%) married to adult men – clearly an injustice rooted in gender inequality and patriarchy. What makes this crisis worse is that these marriages are lawful.

Yet you're defending politicians who want to keep this. You're sick, Eris

I'd look up the quotes of you defending those Republicans, but it'd be a waste of time. You'd just deny it happened like you always do. Besides, you're in this thread defending Republicans who want to keep child marriage legal. It's obvious that you don't actually care about kids but instead try to project being a pedo onto Democrats because you're a bible thumping boomer who wants a theocracy, and your crippling autism has made it so you believe 1950s propaganda about gay people all being pedos.

But that's off-topic, it's super obvious now that you're into dudes. There's no other reason for someone to be so defensive about defending everything Republicans do. I just hope that your labeling of all gay people as pedos isn't you confessing to something. I really think you should tell me who your pastor is so I can tell him to not let you near the young boys of your church since you are really coming off as a groomer here, even by Republican standards

 

[AgendaPoster]

It's just not politically useful to focus on criticizing the best (albeit imperfect) presidential candidate. If you want a perfect president then good luck.

Yeah, well, this is where we might disagree.
I consider him a complete danger for the right, and I think I have very good reasons. Imperfect? That's putting it kindly.
Let's start with what he has going for him (please add if you have more).
- he triggers the libs
- he can be occasionally funny, or used to be when the US still had debates and he had Twitter
- if you are rich/a celebrity, or some Zionist Jew, he probably did good things for you
The negative aspects are too many to enumerate IMO. The dude is LGBTQ friendly, and was even a decade ago when the clintons and obamas were barely making their transition towards accepting fag marriage. This to me is an immense red flag. He lies, and lies and lies, he literally makes shit up as he goes. He does not have an actual ideology that can be followed, he has no policies, just emotions, hype, image selling and posturing.
Gonna keep it short cause I don't wanna post like it's a personal attack on you, cause it's definitely not.
If he is to win, I am afraid that it will pacify the right for yet another 4 more years of descent into complacency, Qnaon, libtard ownage as politics and riding the slippery slope towards grugness and stupidity.
I don't expect perfection, I expect policies. Also I want an intellectual right, able to create culture and sustain institutions.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Plenty of you bible thumping boomers do lol. Hell, on here people tried to get me banned for not loving Republicans and Trump with all my heart, mind and soul.

Please, he used to be a fucking Democrat and it shows, it's just that the left has become so extreme that an old school left-leaning boomer looks like a conservative by today's standards. If conservatives think a guy who was soft on LGBT and pandered to niggers is actually the rock-ribbed conservative we deserve rather than just settling the best we can get then they're too far gone to save.

Lol it's not a minority opinion among Republicans. Many states have had Republicans try and block attempts to get child marriage banned.

I doubt that very much.

Right now, that practice is perfectly legal. So why are they so against that? Because high school kids can't get married? lol even for someone whose admitted to having autism, you're very gullible.

I'm not gullible at all. I do believe them, and you only don't because you're a political hack. I just happen to also think what they want is unnecessary, and they should concede, no need to get into conspiracy theories about their "true intentions", especially since we can condemn their actual stated intentions well enough.

It's obvious you just want to make Republicans seem worse than they are, you fool nobody.

I'd look up the quotes of you defending those Republicans, but it'd be a waste of time.

Of course it would be a waste of time, I agree, because you're lying

you believe 1950s propaganda about gay people all being pedos.

They're not all pedos any more than all niggers are criminals, but a disproportionate amount of both are guilty.

Letting a fag babysit your kid is like letting a nigger borrow money, odds are your kid and wallet are ruined.

it's super obvious now that you're into dudes.

The blatant projection is off the charts here.

I really think you should tell me who your pastor is so I can tell him to not let you near the young boys of your church

Do you really have time for that, don't you have kids to be grooming into trannies?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

I doubt that very much.

It's true. It's happened in many states. You are fine with it, though, because you are incapable of ever saying anything bad about any Republican. Even when they're pedos who support laws that allow adults to marry children.

I'm not gullible at all. I do believe them, and you only don't because you're a political hack. I just happen to also think what they want is unnecessary, and they should concede, no need to get into conspiracy theories about their "true intentions", especially since we can condemn their actual stated intentions well enough.

You're either incredibly gullible or you're pro-pedophile. Your choice, Eris.

It's obvious you just want to make Republicans seem worse than they are, you fool nobody.

It's hard to make them seem worse than they are because they're pretty much pure evil.

Of course it would be a waste of time, I agree, because you're lying

Nah, I've posted your receipts multiple times, you just go into a meltdown and deny it. As I said, in this very thread you're defending politicians who want to make it legal for adults to marry children. Are you denying that now, too?

They're not all pedos any more than all niggers are criminals, but a disproportionate amount of both are guilty.

Letting a fag babysit your kid is like letting a nigger borrow money, odds are your kid and wallet are ruined.

Church officials have a high risk of child sex abuse, too, yet you are a die-hard religious zealot who wants to turn the US into a theocracy. I guess you're admitting to your lust of young boys here, now. Please, get help before you hurt a child, Eris.

The blatant projection is off the charts here.


Do you really have time for that, don't you have kids to be grooming into trannies?

As I've said before, you're the one who defends pedophiles, as long as said pedophiles are bible thumping Republicans like yourself. You said 40 year old Matt Gaetz trying to fuck a 17 year old girl would be no big deal. You admire Matt Walsh, who is pro-child marriage and defends Josh Duggar. You are defending politicians who want to make child marriage legal in this very thread.

Your homosexuality is off the charts, Eris. Just come clean about who you are. We get it, you have a lust for men. It's cool. Just be yourself and don't hurt any children. I know it's hard for religious zealots like yourself, but go for men your own age.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

@Hollywood Hulk Hogan Remind me why you support transgender surgeries for minors, groomer.

The dude is LGBTQ friendly

I know, but at least to a lesser or equal degree to anybody else who has a shot. This is just a problem on the right in general now, we basically gave up and let the left win on the fag issue, sad to say.

He lies, and lies and lies,

Sure, but that's politicians for you. Dig up Honest Abe if that's your concern, because this is how politics is now.

he has no policies

Definitely not true, he just didn't or couldn't fulfill his promises. He is strongly anti-abortion and need I remind you of the wall? He's tough on crime too (I think he wanted to bring back firing squads and execute drug dealers, if I recall correctly), and that's something we need if you haven't noticed, because crime under Biden has been high.

Also I want an intellectual right, able to create culture and sustain institutions.

That's something I want too, but that's probably the most unrealistic expectation you have. The left has taken over education, science, media, you name it. I don't even know how you'd go about wresting power back at this point just short of pure authoritarianism, which isn't gonna happen.

 

[AgendaPoster]

I know, but at least to as lesser or equal degree to anybody else who has a shot. This is just a problem on the right in general now, we basically gave up and let the left win on the fag issue, sad to say.
Sure, but that's politicians for you. Dig up Honest Abe if that's your concern, because this is how politics is now.
Definitely not true, he just didn't or couldn't fulfill his promises. He is strongly anti-abortion and need I remind you of the wall? He's tough on crime too (I think he wanted to bring back firing squads and execute drug dealers, if I recall correctly), and that's something we need if you haven't noticed, because crime under Biden has been high.
That's something I want too, but that's probably the most unrealistic expectation you have. The left has taken over education, science, media, you name it. I don't even know how you'd go about wresting power back at this point just short of pure authoritarianism, which isn't gonna happen.

You are basically rationalizing why he is to be supported regardless of all these, which amounts to "I could shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters".
From the start, I know very well I am not convincing anyone here. People are deeply, deeply entrenched into this Dem/Rep conflict (which I consider somewhat superficial), and are absolutely rabidly supporting their team to the point where we've come to this situation where at the same time all these are true:
- Trump likely engaged in crimes and if justice, law and order are a thing, he should be prosecuted
- the Dems are obviously trying to remove him from the race and literally waited and built their case so it will fit with the election season. That's indeed banana republic level of politics, which is just sad for the US.
- the Clintons, Bidens etc. have engaged and probably still do engage in outrageous levels of corruption too, but mostly nobody outside the MAGApede circles gives much of a damn, and most accusations are dismissed. Even as the special DA or w/e it's called thing for the Hunter case is a step up, it's probably not going to lead to much, because the admin state does not want instability and for now Dems are good allies.
This is a huge mess, I think we both agree on it.
It's also highly dangerous, because the Dems have decided to test how far they can go. Will the MAGA base become radicalized and revolt with Trump locked up? Will they be put down like rabid dogs and the country descend into some sort of authoritarian rule? Possibilities are numerous.
I think we should refuse to give up on principles and make peace with corruption because it's the current year.
I'd disagree with tough on crime. He had ONE opportunity to show how much law and order matters, in 2020. He literally allowed cities to burn. That's INSANE. I've never been as disappointed politically in my entire life.
There were thousands of lunatic criminals looting and burning in the streets, largely unopposed. Should've been arrested or put down after a few warnings.
I think accuracy and truth should come above team loyalty. If you want a TL;DR, this is it. It doesn't matter the progressives lie about things, most obviously about biological sex these days. Reality is superior to everything political and will crush post-modern lunacy, left or right, the only question is how much time we are willing to waste accepting propaganda and lies as truth. If my team becomes retarded, I'm not gonna associate with them. Sure I am quite reactionary, but I have standards. Does that mean I'll switch teams? Nope, I'm not gonna associate with people that are OK with changing demographics and promote diversity. Ever. Not a tragedy.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

@SSj_Ness This thread is about you homosexuals and your lust for elderly, obese men. Well, at least I hope that's what you lust for and it's not children. Given your projection that all gay people are pedos and the obvious fact that you're deep in the closet, I am worried

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

@SSj_Ness This thread is about you homosexuals and your lust for elderly, obese men. Well, at least I hope that's what you lust for and it's not children. Given your projection that all gay people are pedos and the obvious fact that you're deep in the closet, I am worried

Trannies are homosexuals so it's on topic.

Have you changed your stance on supporting the mutilation of children or not? You can only avoid the question so many times.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Trannies are homosexuals so it's on topic.

Have you changed your stance on supporting the mutilation of children or not? You can only avoid the question so many times.

If the child's psychiatrist and doctor think it's going to prevent the kid from killing themself, then sure, why not? Although I'd prefer they wait until the person is in their 20s to make sure that's what they really want, I am not an expert in that field and will yield to those who are. Unlike yourself, I don't think that listening to Tucker Carlson makes one an expert in every subject.

Why are you so obsessed with trannies and hating gay people? It's so obvious you're projecting something here, Eris.

Now, why do you support Republicans that are pro-child marriage and that diddle kids? You've never, ever criticized a Republican. Even when they turned out to be pedophiles. Why is that? Is it your debilitating autism you've told us about, or is it something else?

 

[JaneThough]

100% totally straight Elon Musk cries about how dare the Zuck take away his right to flaunt ancient Roman culture:

Zuck is silent and Elon won’t shut up. What a fag:
Ver archivo adjunto 5277309
Ver archivo adjunto 5277313

 

[The Last Stand]

Today my gay agenda is staying the fuck indoors cause it's too fucking hot outside

You make ME want to be gay, crazy baby hating motherfucker.