🌟 Internet Famous The Mysterious Mr. Enter / Jonathan Rozanski's "Growing Around" - IndieGoGo Campaign Failed, John going off the deep end, "Turning Red" is ignorant about 9/11 (later retracted)

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema LN 910
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
Funny enough Mr. Enter work ethic would make him undesirable even before this step unable to be ever considered for animation work.

Case and point two animators who used to be youtubers documented their entire journey to get their show on the air (they made Disney's newest show "Space Chickens in Space") and they had to give a pitch and even have a place to work on their project on their own dime because they couldn't travel back and forth to work every day.

Aka just one of many real-life factors I know for a fact Enter never considered that he might have to actually travel for this occupation.

Here is the playlist it is a very good insight for anyone to know what you actually need to do to get your foot in the door even if you know no one in the industry.

What you will see from this that Enter definitely will have a dumpster fire on his hands if he doesn't fix, account for, or learn to to do
1. No real pitch bible he can readily talk about (He needs to figure that shit out because that is his pitch to the network and that want they done before anything else)
2. Communication skills he would need to convince the network they will make the investment back, if no return good luck getting the show
3. Ability to travel because this isn't a sit at home job
4. Ability to work in groups because this is not a one-man job and no industry wants another John K
5. Money to pay for food or possible living quarters to do said job.
6. Ability to write and work quickly, these showrunners had to write basically a season in a few weeks, no way in fuck would a network allow 5 years for one season.
7. A consistent and focused idea on what the show is and what the characters are because the network does not want to waste time and spend more money on people than it has too.
8. Be willing to change elements for the network, because if you can't work to them say goodbye to your shit
9. No fucking pilot, if they can't see what the project even is other than concept, then they will ask you to get out the door

The list goes on but these are the very basics you need for a job in this industry because it is one of the most demanding and uncompromising jobs out there and if you can't do this basic shit, you are definitely fucked.
Enter doesn't understand any of that, he's opposed to working with a network because he thinks real show runners are idiots who will drag him down.
 

New video, I just skipped to the end and his political compass is exactly what I would expect:
54B7B977-6A8F-466F-A33C-D4CF0D31676E.jpeg

I do find it funny though how at the end he blames the us governments debt on student loans. The issue is a lot bigger then just student loans lol.
 
Remember, this is a Growing Around server; not a general Mr. Enter server. Questions about "has Mr. Enter seen this show, is he going to review x" are not forbidden, but this is not the proper place to ask them and they generally will go unanswered here. It's also not really a direct line to talk to me about general chitchat.

This is going to end up like every server for something in dev hell - the original purpose is gonna be lost and it's gonna be nothing but shitposting
 
I'm not sure if anyone else has brought this up, but the thing that really startled me about this guy just from watching his reviews was his unique ability to completely and utterly miss the point of whatever he was watching. I remember he made a review of Twelve Ounce Mouse where all he talked about was how shitty the animation is, even though it was obvious that it was part of the show's humour and fit the tone of the writing quite well.

He also gave a negative review of a show called King Star King and complained that it was too surreal and chaotic for him, but you could easily tell that was what the show's creators were going for. I just think it's bizarre that someone with an interest in animation could have such rigidity of thought, since one of the benefits of animation is that it allows for more creativity.
 
I'm not sure if anyone else has brought this up, but the thing that really startled me about this guy just from watching his reviews was his unique ability to completely and utterly miss the point of whatever he was watching. I remember he made a review of Twelve Ounce Mouse where all he talked about was how shitty the animation is, even though it was obvious that it was part of the show's humour and fit the tone of the writing quite well.

He also gave a negative review of a show called King Star King and complained that it was too surreal and chaotic for him, but you could easily tell that was what the show's creators were going for. I just think it's bizarre that someone with an interest in animation could have such rigidity of thought, since one of the benefits of animation is that it allows for more creativity.
12oz Mouse was too intelligent for him. Besides, the art style is 100% explained by the twist in the story. But that would mean Enter would have to watch the entirety of a serialized drama disguised as a stoner show that only aired at 3 A.M. on weekdays, which he doesn’t have the patience for
 
12oz Mouse was too intelligent for him. Besides, the art style is 100% explained by the twist in the story. But that would mean Enter would have to watch the entirety of a serialized drama disguised as a stoner show that only aired at 3 A.M. on weekdays, which he doesn’t have the patience for
For what it's worth, Enter actively regrets that review and has wanted to cover the whole series, though it's clearly not a high priority for him. https://www.deviantart.com/mrenter/journal/Top-10-Least-Favorite-Videos-Part-2-704382225
 
For what it's worth, Enter actively regrets that review and has wanted to cover the whole series, though it's clearly not a high priority for him. https://www.deviantart.com/mrenter/journal/Top-10-Least-Favorite-Videos-Part-2-704382225

This is his response to it:

You see, when I was making this review, I knew that I was going to get comment upon comment stating that "you just don't get it" no matter what I said about 12 Oz Mouse, so I tried my damnedest to "get it" and I treated it like some kind of avante garde high art thing. This is why you can't get 12 Oz Mouse. Because there's nothing to get. Sometimes I go too over-the-top with being mean to something, but oddly enough this is one of the times I regret doing the opposite.

If you're wondering what "taking something too seriously" looks like... it'd probably be this kind of review. Is it postmodernist? The answer is yes and no because anything you say about postmodernism is inaccurate because postmodernism is the school of thought that there is no objective truth so there is no way to know objectively whether or not 12 oz Mouse is postmodernism. The better question is "does it even matter"?

12 Oz Mouse is a enigma. I can't pretend I know why anyone enjoys this, unless they're drunk or high or something. I'm still almost sure that it's a joke. The humor you get out of this show is watching other people struggling to figure out why you like it. I'm not saying that I should have been meaner or whatever, but I should have had a lot more focus in what I was trying to do and what I was trying to say.

I'm still planning on doing a re-review of this show, but... the DVD ain't getting cheaper, and I kind of need that.

Honestly, he still didn’t get why he was too dumb to understand it. The joke isn’t that it’s high art, it’s the opposite actually. 12oz Mouse is literally
the fever dream of a drunk guy trapped in virtual reality in an attempt to fish information out of him. The reason it’s so nutzo and out of whack is because his mind is constantly being toyed with. It’s funny because there’s this incredibly serious plot hidden in the stupidest show possible. It’s actively designed to redpill stoners watching at 3 in the morning while simultaneously fucking with alleged intellectuals who try to take it at face value. The show it’s trolling in the best possible sense.
Explaining a joke is idiotic, but I’ll do it here Incase Enter ever reads this(he won’t). The show worked best in its original airing because of how lowbrow and borderline psychedelic the humor is. It’s very much an anarchy driven show. It’s about mind control and mental manipulation by a business shark and a corporate square all trying to get information from a simple man, a mouse. But, because it looks the way it does and the actual humor is so dry, only stoners and drunk people awake at 3 A.M. would be able to pay attention. So they would get this serious plot and start questioning reality, meanwhile the high brow folk and the Enters of the world would watch one episode and write it off as a stupid show that makes no sense. Get it? The show is intentionally designed to weed out alleged smart people who it knew would be too stupid to understand the plot anyway while empowering the drunk and the stoned who are usually seen as useless or idiotic by said “smart people.” The stoners aren’t dumb, they’ve just slowed down, they have patience to see that the wacky cartoon about a drunk mouse might actually have a deeper meaning.

Also, as someone who owns the DVD, it doesn’t add enough new scenes to justify requiring it to revisit the series, He’s just being stupid(as if judging a serialized show with a complex plot by one episode wasn’t stupid already)
 
Última edición:
More concept art for the "girls rule the world" episode (Because nobody but Enter's calling this a screenshot)
800210


edit: To Mr. Enter's artists; if you have enough time to make artwork for an episode that won't even start production until Season 3, you should have enough time to finish a storyboard for the pilot. Where are your priorities?
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo