- Registrado
- 12 de Mayo, 2017
Am I the only person here who enjoys and prefers a manual install?pacstrapdoes most of the work for you anyway.
It's not that I hate doing a manual install for Arch... it's the fact that there's no comprehensive resource that explicitly outlines both how to do something and why you're doing it anymore, let alone how to get yourself out of a text console and why you need stuff like Mesa. I've bootstrapped FreeBSD to a graphical environment multiple times, but it ain't like the FreeBSD handbook leaves you high and dry.
Ironically, I would argue that
pacstrap doing most of the work for me is, in itself, a bad thing because Arch is otherwise consistent and homogeneous enough with mainline Linux distros (re: anything with systemd) such that a true "full manual" install process would allow me to cultivate the skillset necessary to get Ubuntu, Debian, or even Fedora up and running from a minimal netinstall image.