The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

IMG_0268.jpeg
 
List of non-European countries that have more gold medals than India. Updated from this post.

Jamaica (island nation with 2.8 million people) won 27 Olympic gold medals.

Georgia (former Soviet country with a population of 3.9 million) has won 13 Olympic gold medals.

Cuba (population of 10.9 million) has won 86 Olympic gold medals.

Kazakhstan (population of 20.5 million) has won 16 Olympic gold medals.

North Korea (population of 26.6 million) has won 16 Olympic gold medals.

Uzbekistan (population of 38 million) has won 19 Olympic gold medals.

Argentina (population of 46.6 million) has won 22 Olympic gold medals.

South Korea (population of 51.6 million) has won 145 Olympic gold medals.

Kenya (population of 54.2 million) has won 39 Olympic gold medals.

Thailand (population of 71.5 million) has won 11 Olympic gold medals.

Turkey (population of 86.1 million) has won 41 Olympic gold medals.

Iran (population of 93.3 million) has won 27 Olympic gold medals.

Japan (population of 122.4 million) has won 211 Olympic gold medals.

Mexico (population of 133 million) has won 13 Olympic gold medals.

Ethiopia (population of 138.9 million) has won 24 Olympic gold medals.

Brazil (population of 213.6 million) has won 41 Olympic gold medals.
 
For reasons I don't understand, normies seem perfectly fine with hordes coming in from third world countries and turning the West into a shit hole.
Normies are fine with the *concept* of third-world migrants because letting them in is seen as being "kind" or "empathetic".

The actual reality of dealing with 3rd world migrants is totally different and even normies can't tolerate it.

In past decades they didn't say it outright, but whenever too many of a minority would move into a place, normies would move elsewhere and use excuses like "better schools" and "safer streets" so they didn't need to think about why they moved. This is starting to change.

I really think this phenomena will be studied long before I'm gone. Are there instances of mass migration on this level and nature happening in previous societies?
Fall of Rome, Viking settlement of Britain, arguably the English conquest of Wales.... Not trying to be a doomer, I don't think the present situation has progressed that far, but those are comparable.

The distinction between those past events and the current situation, is that the migration was numerically overwhelming at the beginning, and the groups mixed within a relatively short time, whether peacefully or forcefully. The current situation is more of a slow demographic timebomb in comparison, and the cultural differences are even greater than the aforementioned examples. I think something akin to the segregated South could be a possible outcome, where whites mostly separated themselves from nonwhites physically and socially. If past history is evidence of future behavior, I simply don't see the majority of whites willingly mixing with nonwhites- some will, but many won't. Certainly not when those particular nonwhites are pajeets.
 
Última edición:
Here's another clip regarding the video I was talking about earlier.. 1500 shitjeets that are trying to scam their way into our Country.

"We are very hard to survive..." 💩🚽


jeet.mov
"Its berry hard to survive without jobs", then go the fuck home, jeet. Read the writing on the wall, or have an actually competent Canadian do it for you and explain what it means.

11969.jpg
 
When you think about it, Britain's actions in india were just anti-colonial results of ancestral memories of danegeld.

Denmark should've paid more reparations to the UK.
11 pages later..
I'm sowwy, what can we pay in reparations to make all of this shit go away? Do you want us to give you a runestone? Some viking longboats? We can fix this, together.
 
I'm pretty sure "desi" refers to the South Asian diaspora (aka jeets living outside the Indian subcontinent). Wikipedia tells me it's actually a Sanskrit word meaning something along the lines of "native." I agree with @FILTH Tourist that it beats "South Asian" as a term for that ethnicity in general. It's technically true that the subcontinent is located in the southern portion of Asia, but anyone hearing "Asian" in the media is going to think Chinese, Japanese, Korean, etc.
We already have a perfect term for them: Subcontinentals.
 
Fall of Rome, Viking settlement of Britain, arguably the English conquest of Wales.... Not trying to be a doomer, I don't think the present situation has progressed that far, but those are comparable.

How are they comparable?

The English conquest of Wales was the standard conquest of the time in which the aristocratic/warrior class was removed or subjugated.

Don’t listen to those moronic sheepshaggers and their continuing blame of England for their underperformance.

Viking settlement altered the DNA a bit, but didn’t fundamentally change the make up.
Plus, they did tend to settle in places which were not exactly settled previously.

It’s more comparable to the settlement of the American west, as in a population moving in over a depopulated area.

The fall of Rome was also a product of its time. It happened over a relatively wide span of time and was not simply a major depopulation event.

I know where you are trying to draw comparisons, but unfortunately this is a tad unprecedented.

Even the claim that tikka masala was invented by indians in glasgow is dubious; it was most likely invented in London, at the end of the 19th century.

I have heard jocks claim that it’s absolutely true because it was confirmed on QI.

Not sure why they are so keen to cling onto it, but I suppose it beats deep fried mars bars and Irn Bru.
 
Telling this Foxtrot fag to calm down won't do anything, let it seethe.

Anyone that understands basic geography knows what we're on about.
You will never be a real Asian. You have no epicanthal fold, no centuries-old bureaucracy, and no history of conquest. Behind your back all the other races laugh at you. You wake up every morning saying "saar we are South Asian saar", and seethe when you are ignored and people tell you why you are wrong.......

I don't even care enough to finish the copypasta. Not worth the effort when it's about Indians.
 
You will never be a real Asian. You have no epicanthal fold, no centuries-old bureaucracy, and no history of conquest. Behind your back all the other races laugh at you. You wake up every morning saying "saar we are South Asian saar", and seethe when you are ignored and people tell you why you are wrong.......

I don't even care enough to finish the copypasta. Not worth the effort when it's about Indians.
Native Americans are more Asian then Indians are. Which is rather ironic now that I think about it. Pure blooded feather Indians do in fact have the epicanthal fold. They actually look alot like Ainu, Mongols and Koreans.
1784764181670.png
 
You will never be a real Asian. You have no epicanthal fold, no centuries-old bureaucracy, and no history of conquest. Behind your back all the other races laugh at you. You wake up every morning saying "saar we are South Asian saar", and seethe when you are ignored and people tell you why you are wrong.......

I don't even care enough to finish the copypasta. Not worth the effort when it's about Indians.
1784764137062.png

1784764183863.png


Remember, everyone, this faggot admits he's a jeet. He's pretending to be one of the "good ones", but don't let his bullshit fool you.
 
Native Americans are more Asian then Indians are. Which is rather ironic now that I think about it. Pure blooded feather Indians do in fact have the epicanthal fold. They actually look alot like Ainu and Koreans.
Ver archivo adjunto 9309859
Been awhile since I learned about them, but IIRC the Ainu and Native Americans are actually related, which makes sense given the Bering land-bridge migration from north-east Asia.
 
You will never be a real Asian. You have no epicanthal fold, no centuries-old bureaucracy, and no history of conquest. Behind your back all the other races laugh at you. You wake up every morning saying "saar we are South Asian saar", and seethe when you are ignored and people tell you why you are wrong.......

I don't even care enough to finish the copypasta. Not worth the effort when it's about Indians.
This notion that I want to be seen as Chinese is ridiculous, and if other South Asians are labelling themselves as South Asian to 'fool' white people into thinking they are East Asian, then they must think that white people are pretty retarded.
 
It's not a gotcha, don't you see the blatant humour in someone talking about their intellectual horsepower while they use that to spend their time on a forum that isn't discussing the topics that actual intellectuals discuss?

No. No, I do not see the humor in it. The "actual intellectuals" you speak of are the same "experts" than insist that men can be totally real women and there's nothing wrong with them sharing locker rooms with little girls at the pool. They're the same people pushing DEI and critical race theory. They're the same people who insist the real threat to society are Nazis and Fascists, all while failing to acknowledge Leftist terrorism. Holding a position in academia these days is no longer an indicator of actual intelligence or expertise. Higher education these days is just indoctrination.
 
This notion that I want to be seen as Chinese is ridiculous, and if other South Asians are labelling themselves as South Asian to 'fool' white people into thinking they are East Asian, then they must think that white people are pretty retarded.
You're playing word games. Nobody is saying you want to be seen as Chinese or Japanese or Korean or whatever.

Indians use the term "South Asian", often shortened to "Asian" in the UK and Canada, to put themselves in the same category as Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans, thinking people will like Indians better if they are associated with real Asians.

Nobody is buying it, because besides the geographical differences that others already mentioned, Indians do not look or act Asian.
 
LOL, I don't know anyone who says that Indians are "Asians," it's usually the the collective label for Japanese/Chinese/Korean/Thailanders/Vietnamese/Malaysians/Filipinos.

India being the shithole of Asia is a more appropriate term.
 
Asian in the UK in particular is less a language game and more that India's the Asian country they've historically had the most contact with. If there was some migrant in the UK from the continent of Asia, it was probably someone from the subcontinent rather than someone from Korea, China, Japan, Vietnam, Laos, island nations, etc. They called what we in America would colloquially think of as Asians Orientals instead, and I think they still do. I think ascribing malice to that may be getting a little too lost in the sauce.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo