The India Menace - Street shitting, unsanitary practices, scams, Hindu extremism & other things

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
We should start using jeets as training dummies for small children to learn how to fight hand to hand. Since they have 0 strength to the point a weak white woman can overpower one it's the best use for em.
 
This+feels+too+swift_ba4712_13208079.jpg
 
Right, but in this scenario, who is Hannibal and who is Rome?
The Romans were an ideologically concise, highly motivated military power, willjng to take massive losses amounting to gigantic components of their population to achieve their ends, which were survival. Carthage was a disparate and diverse sea power (led by child-sacrificing cannabalistic caananites) with their only real motives being financial, with zero martial culture or racial cohesion.


Who is who in this scenario?
Americans = Carthage.
Americans practice human sacrifice with their unborn babies so they may have the privilege of earning shekels. Americans are also becoming more and more diverse as the days go on. It’s harder and harder to define an American.

Pajeets = Rome.
Jeets are ethnically homogeneous and will racially collectivize. We see it frequently when they take over HR departments and hire exclusively Pajeets, like that Cisco ceo that literally just fired 5k Americans to import 2.5k h1-b jeets. They will also rally around jeets that murder Whites claiming “he did not do anything saaaar, do not ruin life for no rayson saaar.”

I’d say both sides are willing to send millions to their deaths for even the weakest pyrrhic victory.

At least that is how I see things.
 
Americans = Carthage.
Americans practice human sacrifice with their unborn babies so they may have the privilege of earning shekels. Americans are also becoming more and more diverse as the days go on. It’s harder and harder to define an American.

Pajeets = Rome.
Jeets are ethnically homogeneous and will racially collectivize. We see it frequently when they take over HR departments and hire exclusively Pajeets, like that Cisco ceo that literally just fired 5k Americans to import 2.5k h1-b jeets. They will also rally around jeets that murder Whites claiming “he did not do anything saaaar, do not ruin life for no rayson saaar.”

I’d say both sides are willing to send millions to their deaths for even the weakest pyrrhic victory.

At least that is how I see things.
Jeets are cowards by nature and will not engage in organized violence (despite their willingness to partake in DISorganized violence). They have no martial culture and no "dog in the fight". The moment they are no longer able to abuse our systems for profit, and feel truly unsafe and targeted in the US, helped by the media spinning up stories of "rising hatred", they will go somewhere else, sort of like the homeless from that one episode of South Park, or a bunch of termites leaving a house all at once.
They are only here because the US is an ECONOMIC ZONE.

Regarding my earlier analogy, we have two parallel societies in the United States which hate each other. The MIXED LEFT is Carthage, the WHITE RIGHT is early Rome.
Pajeets are not Africans, they do not practice insurgency and they do not create warlords. In this case, an enemy-centric tactic is actually very applicable and useful.
In the case of the Jeet, we are not Rhodesians fighting infinite, insane, and vicious tribesmen, who truly believe whatever voodoo hoopajoop they were dtod before consuming cocaine mixed with gunpowder, in an endless bush war.
We are attempting to deter millions/billions of lazy, secular, parasitic, weak, and cowardly people from a heterogenous, opportunistic, pseudo-ascetic culture, and get the ones that are here to leave.
In this case, an enemy-centric tactic is the best (and possibly only) option.
Not to imply that such a thing wouldn't synergize with political tactics.
 
Última edición:
The Romans were an ideologically concise
No they weren't lol this was largely why Hannibal was able to solo the shit out of Rome for as long as he did while the Roman statesmen were bickering about "muh military bravery, charge straight at him, running is for pussies". It took Scipio coming in to buck break the geriatrics in leadership to let him try something more complex than "run straight at Hannibal for maximum glory"

This is a trend through their history too. They tended to bicker amongst themselves.
 
No they weren't lol this was largely why Hannibal was able to solo the shit out of Rome for as long as he did while the Roman statesmen were bickering about "muh military bravery, charge straight at him, running is for pussies". It took Scipio coming in to buck break the geriatrics in leadership to let him try something more complex than "run straight at Hannibal for maximum glory"

This is a trend through their history too. They tended to bicker amongst themselves.
Maybe I didn't word that correctly. They had "philos".
 
This dedication plaque commemorating the Rajneeshee invasion and bioterror attack of 1984 is one of the few things that gives me hope that we can fight off the current Pajeet invasion.

Resist the Pajeet invasion.png
Dedicated to those of this community who throughout the Rajneeshee invasion and occupation of 1981-1985 remained, resisted and remembered.... "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

I'll continue to remain, resist and remember. Will you?
 
Maybe I didn't word that correctly. They had "philos".
I mean thinking on how you worded it I think I'm willing to have my mind changed. The Roman ideology was war, and their oldhead senators were concise in the short, simple idea of "charge straight at him, win with sheer numbers and brass balls". They were inflexible in changing this approach after the Nth time of it not working whatsofuckingever. They lost entire navies and armies to this narrowmindedness. So I suppose from a point of view I agree with you on that.
 
I remember reading about the most dangerous man-eating animals, as in individual animals not kills across the entire species, and the ones who managed to rack up kills in the dozens, if not hundreds, were always from India. One tigress in particular killed so many jeets they had to get some Englishman born in the Raj to hunt it down. What's even funnier is the story behind the tigress. She got wounded and more or less got crippled, in the sense that she would basically starve to death if she hunted her usual prey as she lost her right canine teeth. So of course like any rational animal she chose easier prey - the jeet.
The Maneater of Champawat. Her estimated killcount was over 400. She would stroll into villages in the middle of the day, choose her jeet and drag them off while the rest of the villagers ran away screaming, She was a good kitty.
 
No they weren't lol
not until the end of the republic era

the system where they had two consuls sharing power is inherently prone to not getting anything done


cuz if the consuls disagree, there's no tiebreaker to make a decision

also each of em can veto the other, which makes things even more stagnant
Indian music is exceptionally awful on the ears. I don't think it's close minded when I say that Indians make shit music because I can think of music from all sorts of foreign countries that sounds alright, Indian music is just noise pollution


There is always jeets and jeetas driving around here with the windows rolled down blaring some music that legitimately just sounds like a woman shrieking
hindi in general is a disgusting-sounding language
 
Are you saying jeets are too weak for ceramics or do you wear steel?
Yes. It's not just the armor plates, it's all the other shit that goes on a plate carrier too. Magazines in their pouches, IFAK, radio in its pouch, maybe a Camelbak, admin pouch, other miscellaneous bits of kit...and it's not just the weight, it's also the physical bulk of it all.
With how skinny(fat) the average jeetlet is, and how low their bone density and muscle density is, do you think they'll physically be capable of wearing 20+ pounds of equipment (on the lighter end!) that is bulky as shit and requires getting used to moving around in?
Jeets are cowards by nature and will not engage in organized violence (despite their willingness to partake in DISorganized violence). They have no martial culture and no "dog in the fight". The moment they are no longer able to abuse our systems for profit, and feel truly unsafe and targeted in the US, helped by the media spinning up stories of "rising hatred", they will go somewhere else, sort of like the homeless from that one episode of South Park, or a bunch of termites leaving a house all at once.
They are only here because the US is an ECONOMIC ZONE.
Spot-fucking-on. They don't sincerely call the USA "home", this is just their current exploitation spot. They have no real attachment to this place, and thus, they'll abandon it when shit really gets rough.
 
They have no real attachment to this place, and thus, they'll abandon it when shit really gets rough.
I have to rate you optimistic on this part. They'll only abandon the US when its as difficult to live in as India is, which is a long way to go. The occasioanl jeet jab isnt enough, but maybe a large uptick in interracial violence will be.
 
I have to rate you optimistic on this part. They'll only abandon the US when its as difficult to live in as India is, which is a long way to go. The occasioanl jeet jab isnt enough, but maybe a large uptick in interracial violence will be.
I agree here; jeets don't just leave when public opinion turns. They're about as moved by your displeasure as a tick would be. They show up to whatever landscape hasn't yet been turned into a polluted, crowded hellscape, then they rip it, strip it, and leave for the next. The only thing that can get them out is just straight up violence, but our justice system doesn't treat them as an invading force (they are) because there are no jets/tanks/navies, so it would be up to a completely imaginary militia to start killing them off. This isn't possible, however, because the second your average people organize and get armed the government would swoop in to stop it. You'd be imprisoned for decades if not outright shot in the act.

The only way a violent removal occurs is if our government completely ceases to function, beyond the point it can organize its military, which lol not happening.
 
The only way a violent removal occurs is if our government completely ceases to function, beyond the point it can organize its military, which lol not happening.
Never say never. It doesn't need to completely cease to function, it just needs to become fragmented and ignorable, which is already underway.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo