- Registrado
- 30 de Mayo, 2024
I made a funny.
Última edición:
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Look when Africa. And the sub 60 Ike African can realize. Big steel thing will kill me if I stand in front of it.
Congratulations to juicystar1908 for finally being granted permanent residency.
Ver archivo adjunto 9048010
Your pic is good, and you didn't say this but the AI said this, and I just want to remind everyone:
Jeets would be especially awful soldiers and peacekeepers because none of them follow orders.If the United States were to collapse and somehow fall under the tutelage of the mighty Saar Empire, I'd give it like 3 days at most before the newly-installed Pajeet regime collapses due to jeet treason, corruption, incompetence, poopjeet forces being overpowered by locals and administrative chimp outs over illegal poo-in-loo jokes being uttered by schoolchildren.
Bloody bastard gets blown up. Because he has his phone set on active GPS. Half of his platoon of fellow Indians gets blown up. They all try to claim 100% disability.Jeets would be especially awful soldiers and peacekeepers because none of them follow orders.
>'Okay saar, you patrol here'
>'Okay saar, I patrol here'
>Soldierjeet disobeys, calls his cousins on Whatsapp and jeet babbles instead
>'Soldierjeet saar why are you not at the town, get back on patrol'
>'Okay saar, I patrol there'
>Soldierjeet disobeys again
>'SOLDIERJEET YOU BLOODY BENCHOD GET ON PATROL'
>'Okay saar, I patrol there'
>Soldierjeet disobeys once again
Since your average jeet is much, much physically weaker and smaller than the average White man, I can say the following with confidence:Jeets would be especially awful soldiers and peacekeepers because none of them follow orders.
>'Okay saar, you patrol here'
>'Okay saar, I patrol here'
>Soldierjeet disobeys, calls his cousins on Whatsapp and jeet babbles instead
>'Soldierjeet saar why are you not at the town, get back on patrol'
>'Okay saar, I patrol there'
>Soldierjeet disobeys again
>'SOLDIERJEET YOU BLOODY BENCHOD GET ON PATROL'
>'Okay saar, I patrol there'
>Soldierjeet disobeys once again
I was about to say Indian perverts don't do as much damage as Asylum speakers or Mujeets, but it's not a "either or" question, we're getting stuck with both.When will enough be enough? Normal day to day activities are now becoming high risk scenarios for women and child in modern day Britain
what state is this property in?One owner was from California.
And unlike other less than stellar peacekeeper forces, they don't have the awareness of their own inability to drive them to avoid shit. You just know the guy who refuses to wear his helmet because it messes with his hair, and stealthly ditched the plates for his carrier so he could look like a strong badass without tiring out will also be the guy who see's the tiniest hint of militia activity and charges in thinking he's fucking rambo.There's no way that a jeet "peacekeeping force" would be anything but target practice and lootboxes on legs for even American militias, let alone proper American troops.
They're the dumbasses that will fall for traps even some poor nigglet child soldier in Africa would spot in half a second. How much do you wanna bet they'd happily dive into a pile of cowshit with a Punji stake pit underneath it it, or try to loot an iPhone that's been rigged to explode, or drink out of a water source that's obviously been poisoned?And unlike other less than stellar peacekeeper forces, they don't have the awareness of their own inability to drive them to avoid shit. You just know the guy who refuses to wear his helmet because it messes with his hair, and stealthly ditched the plates for his carrier so he could look like a strong badass without tiring out will also be the guy who see's the tiniest hint of militia activity and charges in thinking he's fucking rambo.
Here's a fun thought, how long will TPD take?
These terms and the underlining assumptions reflect an approach to sexual violence that is not concerned with the infringement of a woman’s physical or mental integrity or autonomy, but instead with what is perceived as an assault on honour – the honour of the woman, her family, and her community.
Instead of promoting concern for the dignity, health, and emotional and physical wellbeing of the woman, they reflect the belief that a woman’s involvement in sex outside of marriage – with or without her consent – has “shamed” her.