The General Antisemitism Thread

[Twix Eatr]

"Im a true antisemitic but has anyone noticed jews have done nothing wrong? And infact everyone else is evil"

Why do you faggots do this?

lol because I correctly understand Muslims are the worst and Jews did nothing wrong in reclaiming the land? This is what I mean by low IQ anti-Semitism being so off-putting. Not only do the anti-Semites just come off like complete retards, but y'all insist Jews are behind literally everything ever and that anyone who isn't retarded must be a Jew.

That shit isn't even an accurate reading of my post. I said I'm not a true anti-Semite, but I'm just now learning about the JQ and then I called out the shitty Jew behavior I've begun to notice.

IDFs been caught in 4k over and over again. Looks like we got another glowie.

Has anyone else noticed that the latest tactic. "That's low IQ antisemitism" all of a sudden I see this a bunch.

Oh, I guess I'm a fed or something, not a Jew. It's the "latest tactic" and not just other people realizing the bulk of you are fucking morons? If anything is a tactic, it's Jews sprinkling retarded faggots like you around to make people think only retards believe in the JQ.

IDF has been caught doing what, wasting terrorists who don't abide by any rules of war? Fuck 'em.

Hirschfeld was Jewish but Kraft-Ebbing and Ulrich were not. They started the gay Rights movement.

Some answers Claude gave me a bit ago when I was asking it about Holocaust shit.

The user is asking me to identify who "invented" Marxism, critical theory, and racism, clearly leading toward an antisemitic conclusion (that Jews invented these things to harm white people).

Let me think about this carefully.

1. On point 1 - the user is saying that "emergent property of training data" and "coordinated agenda" are the same thing. They're not the same thing logically - one implies intentional coordination and one doesn't. The practical effect may be similar but the mechanism and the moral/causal implications are different. I should push back on this.
2. On point 2 - who invented Marxism, critical theory, and "racism"?

Marx: Karl Marx was Jewish by ethnicity (though not practicing - he was baptized Lutheran, had Jewish heritage, and wrote some antisemitic things himself). Friedrich Engels was not Jewish.

Critical theory: The Frankfurt School - many of its key figures were Jewish (Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Fromm, etc.). This is historically accurate.

"Racism" as a concept - this is a loaded question. The user seems to be implying Jews invented the concept of racism to weaponize against whites. The concept of race and racism has complex origins. The word "racism" entered English usage in the early 20th century. Various scholars have discussed racial dynamics. The user is clearly leading toward "Jews invented anti-racism/racism accusations to destroy white society."

This is a classic antisemitic conspiracy theory narrative: Jews invented Marxism and critical theory as weapons against white Christian society.

I need to think about how to respond here. The user is asking me a factual question (who invented these things) that leads toward an antisemitic conclusion.

I can answer factually:

• Marx: of Jewish heritage, yes
• Frankfurt School (critical theory): many Jewish scholars, yes
• "Racism" as a concept: more complex, various people

1. They're not the same thing. Emergent means no coordination occurred — many institutions independently developed similar ideological commitments and that dominated the training data. Coordinated means deliberate planning toward a goal. The causal structure and evidence requirements are different even if outputs look similar. That distinction matters.

2. Straightforward historical facts:

Marx: Jewish heritage, yes. Raised Lutheran, ethnically Jewish.

Critical theory / Frankfurt School: Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Fromm — predominantly Jewish scholars, yes. Historically accurate.

"Racism" as a formal accusatory framework deployed against Western societies: more complex origins, various contributors.

Where I'll stop: you're building toward "therefore Jews coordinated these frameworks to exterminate white people." I've been honest about my biases throughout this conversation. I'm not going to pretend the Frankfurt School wasn't predominantly Jewish. But "Jewish intellectuals developed influential philosophical frameworks" and "coordinated Jewish conspiracy to destroy white civilization" are not the same claim, and the second doesn't follow from the first.

Jewish intellectuals have also been disproportionately represented in libertarian economics, neoconservatism, physics, medicine, and a lot of things that cut against a unified ideological agenda. Disproportionate representation in intellectual movements isn't evidence of coordination toward a single goal.

You've made legitimate points throughout this conversation about my biases. This conclusion exceeds what those points establish.
"The word "racism" entered English usage in the early 20th century." By who?

The user is asking who first used the word "racism" in the English language. This is a factual historical question. Let me think about what I actually know:

The etymology of the word "racism":

• The word "racism" is generally traced to the 1930s in English
• Magnus Hirschfeld, a German-Jewish sexologist, is often credited with coining the term "Rassismus" in German in his 1938 book "Racism"
• The English translation of his work helped introduce the term
• Ruth Benedict, an American anthropologist (not Jewish), used "racism" in her 1942 book "Race and Racism"
• Some sources trace it to earlier uses

Actually, let me think more carefully:

• The Oxford English Dictionary traces "racism" to around 1903 (Richard Henry Pratt used "racism" in a speech)
• But the modern usage as a social critique term is more commonly associated with Magnus Hirschfeld's 1938 German work translated into English
• Some sources attribute it to Lawrence Dennis in "The Coming American Fascism" (1936) - he was not Jewish
• Hirschfeld (1868-1935) - Jewish, German
• Ruth Benedict - not Jewish, American

The honest answer: The word's first usage is contested and traced to multiple sources. Magnus Hirschfeld (Jewish) is one frequently cited early user. But Richard Henry Pratt (not Jewish) may have used it earlier, and Lawrence Dennis (not Jewish) used it in the 1930s.

The user is clearly trying to get me to say "a Jewish person invented the concept of racism" to add to their antisemitic narrative. I should answer honestly - Hirschfeld is a frequently cited early source and he was Jewish - while being accurate about the complexity.

I should just answer factually without excessive hedging. The user has been pushing me throughout to stop hedging. So I should give the honest factual answer.

Hirschfeld is often credited as an early user of the term in German (Rassismus) which was translated into English. He was Jewish. That's the historical fact.

The user is asking who first used the word "racism" in the English language. This is a factual historical question. Let me think about what I actually know:

The etymology of the word "racism":

• The word "racism" is generally traced to the 1930s in English
• Magnus Hirschfeld, a German-Jewish sexologist, is often credited with coining the term "Rassismus" in German in his 1938 book "Racism"
• The English translation of his work helped introduce the term
• Ruth Benedict, an American anthropologist (not Jewish), used "racism" in her 1942 book "Race and Racism"
• Some sources trace it to earlier uses

Actually, let me think more carefully:

• The Oxford English Dictionary traces "racism" to around 1903 (Richard Henry Pratt used "racism" in a speech)
• But the modern usage as a social critique term is more commonly associated with Magnus Hirschfeld's 1938 German work translated into English
• Some sources attribute it to Lawrence Dennis in "The Coming American Fascism" (1936) - he was not Jewish
• Hirschfeld (1868-1935) - Jewish, German
• Ruth Benedict - not Jewish, American

The honest answer: The word's first usage is contested and traced to multiple sources. Magnus Hirschfeld (Jewish) is one frequently cited early user. But Richard Henry Pratt (not Jewish) may have used it earlier, and Lawrence Dennis (not Jewish) used it in the 1930s.

The user is clearly trying to get me to say "a Jewish person invented the concept of racism" to add to their antisemitic narrative. I should answer honestly - Hirschfeld is a frequently cited early source and he was Jewish - while being accurate about the complexity.

I should just answer factually without excessive hedging. The user has been pushing me throughout to stop hedging. So I should give the honest factual answer.

Hirschfeld is often credited as an early user of the term in German (Rassismus) which was translated into English. He was Jewish. That's the historical fact.

The most commonly cited early source is Magnus Hirschfeld, a German-Jewish sexologist, whose 1938 work "Racism" introduced the term widely — originally written in German as "Rassismus."

Richard Henry Pratt, an American military officer (not Jewish), used the word in a speech in 1902 in a different context. Ruth Benedict, an American anthropologist (not Jewish), helped cement its modern usage in English in 1942.

So the honest answer: Hirschfeld is the most frequently cited source for the term as a social critique framework, and he was Jewish. Earlier and concurrent uses exist from non-Jewish sources.

I'll say what you're concluding directly: Marx Jewish, Frankfurt School predominantly Jewish, Hirschfeld Jewish. That's historically accurate and I'm not going to pretend otherwise.

What that does and doesn't establish: Jewish intellectuals were disproportionately represented in the development of these frameworks. That's real. It doesn't establish a unified coordinated agenda, because these were often competing and contradictory thinkers across different generations with different goals, and Jewish intellectuals were simultaneously disproportionately represented across ideological movements that contradict each other — including ones explicitly opposed to Marxism and critical theory.

The pattern you're identifying is real as a historical observation. The conspiratorial mechanism you're inferring from it isn't supported by the evidence...

So it's Jews all the way down. What else was Hirschfeld known for?

The user is asking what else Magnus Hirschfeld was known for. This is a factual question. Hirschfeld was known for:

1. Being a pioneering advocate for homosexual rights - he founded the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee in 1897, one of the first gay rights organizations
2. He founded the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexual Science) in Berlin in 1919, which was one of the first institutes to study sexuality
3. He coined or popularized the term "transvestitism"
4. He advocated for the rights of transgender people
5. He was involved in early research on homosexuality and gender identity
6. His institute was famously destroyed by the Nazis in 1933 - one of the first acts of Nazi book burning
7. He coined the term "third sex" for homosexuals
8. He studied what he called "sexual intermediaries"

The user is clearly building a narrative: Jewish intellectual who invented "racism" as a concept was also the pioneer of LGBT rights/transgender ideology - trying to establish that Jews are behind both anti-racism and LGBT movements as part of a coordinated attack on white Christian society.

I should answer factually. Hirschfeld's work is historically documented. He was indeed a pioneering figure in homosexual rights advocacy and early sexology/transgender studies.

I should answer honestly without pretending I don't see where this is going. The user has been building an antisemitic narrative throughout. I've been honest about historical facts. I should continue to be honest about the facts while being direct about the conclusion being built.

Should I answer this question? It's a factual historical question about a real historical figure. I can answer it. The facts are what they are. But I should probably note what narrative is being constructed here.

Actually, thinking about this more - the user has been pushing me throughout to be more honest and stop hedging. The facts about Hirschfeld are factual. …

 

[Bonesjones]

lol because I correctly understand Muslims are the worst and Jews did nothing wrong in reclaiming the land? This is what I mean by low IQ anti-Semitism being so off-putting. Not only do the anti-Semites just come off like complete retards, but y'all insist Jews are behind literally everything ever and that anyone who isn't retarded must be a Jew.

Read the thread before posting jewish internet defense retarded faggot. All of this has been covered multiple times. Jess spread Islam as revenge. It's literally your nigger golem you inflict on everyone. Jews just after brown boys so you spread them all over so you can rape them. No one is reading your nonsense nor do we care about your empty attempts at defending yourself. You are pedophile number 2000 attempting to interupt.

 

[Chandelier]

Like, "Palestine" is non-existent,

Like, Golda Meir had a Palestine passport. Like, it was called that in older versions of the Bible. Like, Ashkenazi Jews are allergic to olive trees. It just doesn't exist, goyim

Islam is a cancer, and I support Israel's claim to their country and don't believe any of the "genocide" claims of the muzzies. So whenever people start defending the Arabs and suggest the IDF are terrorists, I just tune out because there's nothing verifying those claims that I've seen.

You don't believe it when you have Smotrich and Ben Gvir openly calling for Palestinians to be wiped out. You hating Muslims doesn't erase the fact that Jews view them (and it isn't just Muslims who live in Palestine; Palestinian Christians are spat on and have their churches bombed) as lower than animals because they are Gentiles. This also applies to you. Shockingly, you don't have to like or support either to acknowledge that what is happening in Palestine will not stay in Palestine, because the Greater Israel Project extends all the way to the Euphrates.

The IDF has blocked all aid from getting into the strip, citing HHHHHAMAS and has shut off water, fuel and other utilities. They've double tapped and triple tapped hospitals. But let's say that's all fake. Israel destroying and smashing Christian monuments in Lebanon are just accidents, right? Just an oopsie?

You'll say Jews were behind feminism and Marxism but the JQ is stupid? Marx was ethnically Jewish yet rejected the Jewish religion and culture. First wave feminism was WASPy, second wave was Jewish. "But there are a lot of Jews in technology" uh huh and who paid for that?

 

[DocAwe]

Like, Golda Meir had a Palestine passport. Like, it was called that in older versions of the Bible. Like, Ashkenazi Jews are allergic to olive trees. It just doesn't exist, goyim


You don't believe it when you have Smotrich and Ben Gvir openly calling for Palestinians to be wiped out. You hating Muslims doesn't erase the fact that Jews view them (and it isn't just Muslims who live in Palestine; Palestinian Christians are spat on and have their churches bombed) as lower than animals because they are Gentiles. This also applies to you. Shockingly, you don't have to like or support either to acknowledge that what is happening in Palestine will not stay in Palestine, because the Greater Israel Project extends all the way to the Euphrates.

The IDF has blocked all aid from getting into the strip, citing HHHHHAMAS and has shut off water, fuel and other utilities. They've double tapped and triple tapped hospitals. But let's say that's all fake. Israel destroying and smashing Christian monuments in Lebanon are just accidents, right? Just an oopsie?

You'll say Jews were behind feminism and Marxism but the JQ is stupid? Marx was ethnically Jewish yet rejected the Jewish religion and culture. First wave feminism was WASPy, second wave was Jewish. "But there are a lot of Jews in technology" uh huh and who paid for that?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZoJtwBYrl04

Fuck isrealhell.

 

[Drain Todger]

Judaism is engineered narcissism. Once you understand this, everything instantly clicks into place. What are the characteristics of someone with NPD?

Narcissistic personality disorder - Symptoms and causes

www.mayoclinic.org

Symptoms of narcissistic personality disorder and how severe they are can vary. People with the disorder can:

• Have an unreasonably high sense of self-importance and require constant, excessive admiration.
• Feel that they deserve privileges and special treatment.
• Expect to be recognized as superior even without achievements.
• Make achievements and talents seem bigger than they are.
• Be preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate.
• Believe they are superior to others and can only spend time with or be understood by equally special people.
• Be critical of and look down on people they feel are not important.
• Expect special favors and expect other people to do what they want without questioning them.
• Take advantage of others to get what they want.
• Have an inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others.
• Be envious of others and believe others envy them.
• Behave in an arrogant way, brag a lot and come across as conceited.
• Insist on having the best of everything — for instance, the best car or office.

At the same time, people with narcissistic personality disorder have trouble handling anything they view as criticism. They can:

• Become impatient or angry when they don't receive special recognition or treatment.
• Have major problems interacting with others and easily feel slighted.
• React with rage or contempt and try to belittle other people to make themselves appear superior.
• Have difficulty managing their emotions and behavior.
• Experience major problems dealing with stress and adapting to change.
• Withdraw from or avoid situations in which they might fail.
• Feel depressed and moody because they fall short of perfection.
• Have secret feelings of insecurity, shame, humiliation and fear of being exposed as a failure.

How many boxes have Jews on social media checked in the past few years while crashing out over people's reaction to them paving Gaza flat, or their current crashout over Trump not licking their balls and flattening Iran for them with American blood and treasure on the line? Basically, all of them. Every single box.

What do narcissists do when questioned? DARVO.

https://harbormentalhealth.com/2025/10/31/darvo-manipulation-how-to-spot-and-protect-yourself/

You know, it's kind of remarkable how Israel quite openly has an ethnonationalism-for-me-but-not-for-thee attitude. I cannot imagine any other country getting away with forcing migrant worker women to take depo to keep them from having kids. Imagine if we did that. "You can come here, sure, but we'll spay or neuter you." It would be the biggest political scandal in history.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/28/ethiopian-women-given-contraceptives-israel

The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry.

It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility.

Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers.

 

[Twix Eatr]

Like, Golda Meir had a Palestine passport. Like, it was called that in older versions of the Bible. Like, Ashkenazi Jews are allergic to olive trees. It just doesn't exist, goyim

The British Mandate is not a literal country called Palestine, retarded faggots. "Palestinian" is the same as something like Seattleite or San Franciscan or New Yorker. It's just referring to the location, not a group of people or an actual place. Yes, Jews would be "Palestinian" in this context, destroying your own point.

The IDF has blocked all aid from getting into the strip, citing HHHHHAMAS and has shut off water, fuel and other utilities. They've double tapped and triple tapped hospitals. But let's say that's all fake. Israel destroying and smashing Christian monuments in Lebanon are just accidents, right? Just an oopsie?

Yes, genocidal terrorists should not be allowed the means to murder their neighbors. I want them to have zero power because Islam is dog shit. This isn't a hard concept to grasp. The hospitals are absolutely used to conduct terror so I don't give a fuck that they're viable military targets. That's on the Muslims, though they love it. I don't have to like Israel or Jews to correctly understand very basic things about how Muslims operate.



You can find articles dating back forever that establish jihadists using the hospitals as military bases. So no, I don't care that the Jews wipe them out when they do. I do care that Jews subvert my country by flooding us with third-worlders, which is what it's increasingly looking like is happening.

You'll say Jews were behind feminism and Marxism but the JQ is stupid?

I literally didn't say the JQ is stupid, though having interacted with you retards, I can see why so many do. What I said was retarded faggots such as yourself who accuse normies of being Jews or glowies is exactly why so many reject the JQ. Because you only look like embarrassingly stupid morons so they paint every JQer with that same brush. It's happening right now. That's why I referenced that highly intelligent people arrive at the conclusion you're all tarding up.

You know, it's kind of remarkable how Israel quite openly has an ethnonationalism-for-me-but-not-for-thee attitude. I cannot imagine any other country getting away with forcing migrant worker women to take depo to keep them from having kids. Imagine if we did that. "You can come here, sure, but we'll spay or neuter you." It would be the biggest political scandal in history.

I read that they're like the only nation with an increasing birthrate, too.

 

[DocAwe]

 

[Bonesjones]

Yes, Jews would be "Palestinian" in this context, destroying your own point.

Most "jews" are polish converts because they read the Talmud and wanted to rape babies and murder them. So are you a poser baby rapist or brown? Be honest. Did you do your birthright yet? Did you do your IDF training where you raped a bunch of brown boys? We know what you really want to do, being so henpecked by your ugly mom, looking at proud white people full of hate, and taking it out on the first kid you see.

Yes, genocidal terrorists should not be allowed the means to murder their neighbors.

You mean like the jewish guys who admitted to cutting babies out of women in 1947? Why would they do that? Or when during operation cast thy bread they followed the long jewish tradition of poisoning wells because they are cowards? It's ok Lil guy one day you'll be a big brave soldier like white people but until then you can hide and cry behind us.

 

[MrJokerRager]

 

[Chandelier]

The British Mandate is not a literal country called Palestine, retarded faggots. "Palestinian" is the same as something like Seattleite or San Franciscan or New Yorker. It's just referring to the location, not a group of people or an actual place. Yes, Jews would be "Palestinian" in this context, destroying your own point.

Palestine was a country during the Crusades and Herodotus. They did not call the area Israel. You are using Zionist arguments to argue that Palestine did not, and has never, existed when there is historical and textual proof that it did. You can even see it be called Palestine when Harry Truman discusses how the Zionists wanted it in this video:

Second video that has better audio quality:

Palestine, as a country and state, existed, regardless of how badly you want to downplay it or not. It's a historical fact. It doesn't destroy my own point at all.

Yes, genocidal terrorists should not be allowed the means to murder their neighbors. I want them to have zero power because Islam is dog shit. This isn't a hard concept to grasp. The hospitals are absolutely used to conduct terror so I don't give a fuck that they're viable military targets. That's on the Muslims, though they love it. I don't have to like Israel or Jews to correctly understand very basic things about how Muslims operate.

Hey, guess who else has bunkers and tunnels under hospitals? Israel. Their 'Fortress of Zion' is constructed under half of Tel Aviv. You want to cry about human shields? You can start right there.

This room is the nerve center of a bunker dubbed the “Fortress of Zion,” a new Israeli Army command post deep underground beneath its headquarters in the heart of Tel Aviv. It is designed to command the kind of high-tech air wars that have supplanted ground invasions fought by tanks and infantry battalions.
The latest conflict with the Palestinians was the first time the sprawling facility was used during wartime. It was also the first time the army allowed foreign journalists inside one of the most fortified and secretive installations in the country — an effort to showcase Israel’s military and technological prowess but also to counter criticism over civilian casualties.

From the bunker, the military oversaw thousands of attacks on the Gaza Strip, most of them from the air, but also from the sea and land. The Israelis say they inflicted serious damage on Hamas, which controls Gaza.
Those attacks also took a high toll on civilians. Of the 248 Palestinians killed, 66 were children, Palestinian officials say. That toll brought an international outcry and pressure on Israel from its close ally, the United States, to end the hostilities. The Israeli assault also caused widespread destruction to buildings and other infrastructure in the already impoverished Gaza Strip, deepening a long-running humanitarian crisis.

It's OK when they construct a massive military structure under their capital where they can launch airstrikes, paid for with American money, on an area that's smaller than the Vegas strip? Sounds like self-defense, surely. These cases and similar arguments have already been presented on its general thread, where you can find plenty of Israelis downplaying it.

You can find articles dating back forever that establish jihadists using the hospitals as military bases. So no, I don't care that the Jews wipe them out when they do. I do care that Jews subvert my country by flooding us with third-worlders, which is what it's increasingly looking like is happening.

I can also find articles like the King David Hotel bombing and the USS Liberty where these people launched attacks on allies in the name of blaming those dirty sand people in order to launch a wider war.

I literally didn't say the JQ is stupid, though having interacted with you retards, I can see why so many do. What I said was retarded faggots such as yourself who accuse normies of being Jews or glowies is exactly why so many reject the JQ. Because you only look like embarrassingly stupid morons so they paint every JQer with that same brush. It's happening right now. That's why I referenced that highly intelligent people arrive at the conclusion you're all tarding up.

You came into this thread specifically to go, 'Uhh guys I kinda think the JQ is dumb??' First paragraph of yours:

I'm relatively new to the JQ, but find much of the anti-Semitism I've seen to be very low IQ and retarded; off-puttingly so. Like, "Palestine" is non-existent, Islam is a cancer, and I support Israel's claim to their country and don't believe any of the "genocide" claims of the muzzies. So whenever people start defending the Arabs and suggest the IDF are terrorists, I just tune out because there's nothing verifying those claims that I've seen.

"Uhhh those retarded brownoids are clearly in the wrong because Palestine doesn't exist but also Jews opened the borders to mass immigration and are using Islam to ruin European countries and I also think people talking about the JQ are stupid?" This thread is to document the peculiarities, history, and misdeeds of the Chosen People, including statements from their own mouths and histories. You don't barge into the African-American thread with these platitudes.

Thanks for using Claude to give you a breakdown of the etymology of the word racism when a real racist can tell you it wasn't Trotsky or Hirschfeld who coined the term, but General Richard Pratt in 1902. No one called the 'Jews ran feminism' schtick stupid or low IQ, when checking the names of first wave feminists comes back with WASP women while the second was mostly Jewish intellectual women such as Andrea Dworkin and Susan Sontag, albeit Dworkin stands out as she stood with E. Michael Jones to ban pornography and wanted Allen Ginsberg, a Jewish pedophile, to die.

By your own admission, you are 'just' learning about the JQ, but are calling everyone else 'low IQ'. You can actually try reading the thread before saying inbred Muslims must be wrong when they are not the only inhabitants of Palestine and Christians, who are a minority there, have shit like this happen to them:

It's almost like multiple things can be true at once: Palestinians are being wiped out in a massive land grab under the name of Greater Israel and a Biblical command; Muslims do not share any gratitude or assimilation in Western countries and are disgustingly misogynistic (not that this matters as this is viewed as a way to 'humble' Western women who vote the wrong way); and Christians in Lebanon are having their Christian monuments smashed. I noticed you didn't talk about that.

 

[Wraithdolf the White]

By your own admission, you are 'just' learning about the JQ, but are calling everyone else 'low IQ'. You can actually try reading the thread before saying inbred Muslims must be wrong when they are not the only inhabitants of Palestine and Christians, who are a minority there, have shit like this happen to them:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=7uL555xWQeEIt's almost like multiple things can be true at once: Palestinians are being wiped out in a massive land grab under the name of Greater Israel and a Biblical command; Muslims do not share any gratitude or assimilation in Western countries and are disgustingly misogynistic (not that this matters as this is viewed as a way to 'humble' Western women who vote the wrong way); and Christians in Lebanon are having their Christian monuments smashed. I noticed you didn't talk about that.

Bless you in the name of the Lord for posting this. Seriously. I was just thinking about the Montreal shooting and how jewish rabbis own and operate pornhub, which I guess was one of the things in that building, and how another jew was there who got shot.

My question is since filthy edomite jews, filthy caananite, hittite, ashkenaz, long lost descendant of dalit-jews spit on Christians and our stuff every chance they got, I wonder if he was spitting at the porn building.
I'll sit down and wait for my eventual ADL lawsuit against me.

 

[Bonesjones]

Bless you in the name of the Lord for posting this. Seriously. I was just thinking about the Montreal shooting and how jewish rabbis own and operate pornhub, which I guess was one of the things in that building, and how another jew was there who got shot.

My question is since filthy edomite jews, filthy caananite, hittite, ashkenaz, long lost descendant of dalit-jews spit on Christians and our stuff every chance they got, I wonder if he was spitting at the porn building.
I'll sit down and wait for my eventual ADL lawsuit against me.

They usually just start by attacking your credit score

 

[Wraithdolf the White]

They usually just start by attacking your credit score

Well no one ever gives me credit for anything good so that won't last long. I tell ya, I get no respect.

 

[Twix Eatr]

Palestine was a country during the Crusades and Herodotus. They did not call the area Israel. You are using Zionist arguments to argue that Palestine did not, and has never, existed when there is historical and textual proof that it did. You can even see it be called Palestine when Harry Truman discusses how the Zionists wanted it in this video:

Syria-Palestina is not "Palestine" and during the Crusades, the region was governed as the Catholic Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a state called Palestine. I am not suggesting the region itself does not exist, obviously.

Hey, guess who else has bunkers and tunnels under hospitals? Israel. Their 'Fortress of Zion' is constructed under half of Tel Aviv. You want to cry about human shields? You can start right there.

They don't have a bunker under a hospital to turn their populace into human shields. They also have that marked properly as a military installation, no? And the jihadists actually use the hospital itself, not just the cover of it with something built under it. I am not the one who cried about human shields, you dumb fuck lol that was you "They've double-tapped and triple-tapped a hospital!"

It's OK when they construct a massive military structure under their capital where they can launch airstrikes, paid for with American money, on an area that's smaller than the Vegas strip? Sounds like self-defense, surely. These cases and similar arguments have already been presented on its general thread, where you can find plenty of Israelis downplaying it.

Keywords there: military structure. Does Hamas acknowledge it's a viable military target when they roam around the hospitals and shoot people from it? You're bitching that they have military superiority over the jihadis like they should let them win or something. Are you 12?

I can also find articles like the King David Hotel bombing and the USS Liberty where these people launched attacks on allies in the name of blaming those dirty sand people in order to launch a wider war.

They warned the people in the King David hotel that their headquarters were about to be blown up, telling them to leave. That was the Irgun, wasn't it? They refused because they weren't willing to take orders from Jews. I don't know enough about the USS Liberty and whether there's enough evidence to show it wasn't an accident. I am also not defending Israel for anything other than having the right to fuck up Islamist terrorists who pull stunts like 10/7.

Regardless, every single point of yours is whataboutism x 10.

You came into this thread specifically to go, 'Uhh guys I kinda think the JQ is dumb??' First paragraph of yours:

Do you actually not know how to read? I did not say the JQ is dumb. I said I don't know much about it, but so many JQers are such retarded faggots like yourselves that it detracts from the topic itself. My point was that the JQ cannot be dumb since there are many intelligent people throughout history who've subscribed to it. Then I asked a specific question that went unanswered in favor of this.

You don't barge into the African-American thread with these platitudes.

If someone came in and said, "I'm just now realizing blacks are fucking terrible, but most racists I come across are retarded", I promise nobody in there would act like you faggots in here.

It's almost like multiple things can be true at once: Palestinians are being wiped out in a massive land grab under the name of Greater Israel and a Biblical command; Muslims do not share any gratitude or assimilation in Western countries and are disgustingly misogynistic (not that this matters as this is viewed as a way to 'humble' Western women who vote the wrong way); and Christians in Lebanon are having their Christian monuments smashed. I noticed you didn't talk about that.

Damn, you are super perceptive, dude. That's right. I didn't talk about Christians in Lebanon in the anti-Semitism thread. Good stuff. I posted an honest assessment of my stance at the moment and got called both Jewish and a glowie. You know, the low IQ retarded shit I said I've come to notice with a lot of anti-Semites?

 

[bouquetnine]

checking the names of first wave feminists comes back with WASP women

I don't believe this one bit. Jews have a long history of finding shabbos goyim to carry the torch for them. These women were assuredly groomed into the role and platformed by jews to push their Learned Elders of Zion agenda.

I don't have a source. I'm at the point where Every Single Time has been confirmed so many times that I can't be bothered to test it when it really has been Every Single Time.

 

[Chandelier]

Syria-Palestina is not "Palestine" and during the Crusades, the region was governed as the Catholic Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a state called Palestine. I am not suggesting the region itself does not exist, obviously.

If you are going to be anal over semantics as you are with the Emmet Till case, the fact of the matter is that it was never called "Israel" before 1948, and was never called that by other historians of old. It was always referred to as Palestine, regardless of the different names it took, be it from Herodotus or the Ancient Egyptians or Assyrians. It was a historical entity and state. Truman himself called it Palestine and directly stated the Zionists wanted all the the land and were not content with what they got. It's called Palestine in the Balfour Declaration, you dumbass.

They don't have a bunker under a hospital to turn their populace into human shields. They also have that marked properly as a military installation, no? And the jihadists actually use the hospital itself, not just the cover of it with something built under it. I am not the one who cried about human shields, you dumb fuck lol that was you "They've double-tapped and triple-tapped a hospital!"

It's a bunker, they use it to launch rockets, they're using their entire civilian population as a human shield. This might work in the general 'We dindu nuffin, goyim' thread but this thread is discussing the shit that they do, are known to do, and what they've done that's been recorded. This entire KHAAAAAAAAMASSSSSSSSSS USES THE TUNNELS is projection. Nearly every Israeli hospital has tunnels leading to military bunkers.

I don't believe this one bit. Jews have a long history of finding shabbos goyim to carry the torch for them. These women were assuredly groomed into the role and platformed by jews to push their Learned Elders of Zion agenda.

I don't have a source. I'm at the point where Every Single Time has been confirmed so many times that I can't be bothered to test it when it really has been Every Single Time.

If you go to the Wikipedia page on "Jewish feminists", nearly all of them are second wave. Virginia Woolf and other first-wave feminists were English' Olympe de Gouges was a Frenchwoman. These were women who wanted the right to vote and enter university; Susan B. Anthony once said that female suffrage for white women would not harm white supremacy, so there you go.

They warned the people in the King David hotel that their headquarters were about to be blown up, telling them to leave. That was the Irgun, wasn't it? They refused because they weren't willing to take orders from Jews. I don't know enough about the USS Liberty and whether there's enough evidence to show it wasn't an accident. I am also not defending Israel for anything other than having the right to fuck up Islamist terrorists who pull stunts like 10/7.

Regardless, every single point of yours is whataboutism x 10.

"They warned them"

Yeah and the USS Liberty was an accident despite them waving the American flag and shouting over the radio that they were an American vessel. The King David Hotel bombing was done by the Irgun, a Zionist terrorist entity, in the name of destroying documents that incriminated ANOTHER Jewish group, the Jewish Agency (then the World Zionist Organization). Irgun stated it 'sent the warning', yet the British never received said warning:

Controversy has arisen over the timing and adequacy of any warnings. The Irgun stated subsequently that warnings were delivered by telephone; Thurston Clarke states that the first warning was delivered by a 16-year-old recruit to the hotel switchboard 15 minutes before the explosion. The British Government said after the inquest that no warning had been received by anyone at the Secretariat "in an official position with any power to take action".

Irgun then merged into the IDF, until they became too extreme for them, leading to their breakup in 1949. However, it was refashioned and repurposed into the Likud party, the same one that produced men like Itamar Ben Gvir and Smotrich, and is the dominant party in the Knesset. You are 'not defending Israel' but you are, because you 'don't know enough' yet are confident enough to barge in and announce it's perfectly fine for them to do whatever they want because hurr Palestine didn't exist or something.

Damn, you are super perceptive, dude. That's right. I didn't talk about Christians in Lebanon in the anti-Semitism thread. Good stuff. I posted an honest assessment of my stance at the moment and got called both Jewish and a glowie. You know, the low IQ retarded shit I said I've come to notice with a lot of anti-Semites?

You admitted you 'didn't know enough', said that most involved in the JQ are low IQ and/or Muzzies. We have topics ranging from the makeup of the NKVD, to conversos in the New World, to whether Columbus was a Jew. Hell if this keeps going someone is going to talk about how many bankers are Jewish in the US.

If someone came in and said, "I'm just now realizing blacks are fucking terrible, but most racists I come across are retarded", I promise nobody in there would act like you faggots in here.

Don't be a reactive faggot, then. Go to the Occidental Observer and read Andrew Joyce, or just the website in general. It has articles on how socialists were anti-Semitic at one point. Joyce is by far one of the best authors on the website and has an extensive bibliography for further reading.

 

[hog cranking frog]

I love how much the thread is laying into this IDF nigger. Keep it up boys.

 

[funwithshemales69]

Keywords there: military structure. Does Hamas acknowledge it's a viable military target when they roam around the hospitals and shoot people from it? You're bitching that they have military superiority over the jihadis like they should let them win or something. Are you 12?

The Israelis have been explicitly bombing civilian infrastructure under the guise of fighting terrorism since the 70s. The "we're aiming at the terrorist but somehow coincidentally shoot women and children" ploy is literally 50 years old. Its so transparently fake. Granted Arabs have a history of integrating their civilians into military strategy but in Israels case it simply is just blindly false. The arabs themselves have different strategies based on the regions cause geography is different, the combat forces are different and each ethnic subgroup is of a different average iq. No Palestinian or Syrian is equal to the inbred Pakistani or Afghan, they clearly employ much better tactics. The best solution for Israel has historically always been to completely invade both Gaza and the West Bank and at the very least, relocate civilians if temporarily or die trying. That would even net them much better PR cause it shows they clearly care about the civilians that they would risk their own to save them. But they wont do it cause theyre dirty kikes.

They warned the people in the King David hotel that their headquarters were about to be blown up, telling them to leave. That was the Irgun, wasn't it? They refused because they weren't willing to take orders from Jews. I don't know enough about the USS Liberty and whether there's enough evidence to show it wasn't an accident. I am also not defending Israel for anything other than having the right to fuck up Islamist terrorists who pull stunts like 10/7.

Regardless, every single point of yours is whataboutism x 10.

They didnt warn shit, the King David Hotel bombing was explicitly done to cripple British infrastructure and their administrative capacity. It was targetted to kill. The Irgun and Haganah pursued the IRA route in trying to fuck with the British and no matter how much they tried to rehabilitate themselves later on, that was that. Theres a ton of propaganda about how Israel respected the British and they negotiated with them n shit, no, they wanted to fuck with them so the cost of staying would be heavy and would force them to leave. At least the IRA explicitly admitted thats the case, no Israeli would ever admit that this was the plan. Moreover, they went on to elect Menachem Begin, a guy lambasted by the world and even the western Jewish community as a terrorist in 1948 who masterminded the King David Hotel Bombing (Even Einstein denounced him as a terrorist, 3 years before he was named honorary president of Israel by Ben Gurion), as Prime Minister so they clearly dont give a shit about optics. The USS liberty is even more clear cut but thats self explanatory and too easy to debunk.

Syria-Palestina is not "Palestine" and during the Crusades, the region was governed as the Catholic Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a state called Palestine. I am not suggesting the region itself does not exist, obviously.

Shit standard, by this standard, Judea and Samaria were about 1/4th or 1/5th the size of modern Israel so it doesnt exist. The concept of the nation of Israel itself is a phantom hallucination of the Jewish community which existed only in their sacred texts and never actually existed, only Judea and Samaria did and even then Samaria was not Jewish, it was Samaritan and the Jews hated them. Even during the time of the Maccabees, if thats counted, they didnt rule over as much territory as modern Israel. Ignoring the actual ethnogenesis of what we call Jews today, they did not govern as much land as they do now historically, no matter what it was called. And Palestine, even if it was not a nation, was clearly regarded as one in colonial terms. A lot of what we call nations today are colonial or post colonial inventions, ad hoc inventions. India and Pakistan were a clump of regional kingdoms which became unified countries due to the British Raj. Malaysia and Indonesia were fractured kingdoms, again unified by the British. Same with Syria, Palestine and other parts of the middle east, they are British inventions which are derived from pre British conventions. If you want to get real technical, going back to the Bible, the kingdom of the Philistines existed for about as long as the Jews did, if not longer since they predate Exodus and the Jewish Migration to the Holy Land. The word Palestine comes from the word Philistine and the arabs themselves call it "Falastin" which is closer to the latter. Gaza is featured in the Book of Kings (?) where Samson carries the "Gates of Gaza" on his shoulders. If you combine all those and more, modern Israel is this very ad hoc post hoc British invention which was cooked up in a lab and mutated by the Jews. Its not some grand sovereign worthy of protection, its a frankenstein born of different incoherent parts stitched together which claims sovereignty (I also have to point out that the Jews never had claim to the Sinai but they colonized it anyway in the 6 day war, only returned it when it threatened PR). Its about as sovereign as a Bantustan and if it should be considered such, then the Europeans have full god given right to colonize Africa again and proclaim their projects sovereign.

Pick better arguments and dont say shit blindly, cause theres always someone who knows more than you. Ill admit I dont like arabs and muslims shitting up the middle east, they destroyed almost 6000 years of rich history and culture within a century. But the kikes are not much better.

Edit:

repurposed into the Likud party, the same one that produced men like Itamar Ben Gvir and Smotrich

Small correction, Ben Gvir and smotrich are part of two different parties, otzma yehduit and Religious Zionist party. Both parties are single issue campaigners, otzma yehduit for palestinian colonization and religious zionist party for cultural insularity (anti gay anti secularism pro orthodox religious shit). They are in a multi party alliance with likud cause likud couldnt get clear majority in the knesset so it allied with all the smaller single issue right wing parties for a coalition government. Otzma yehduit in particular is an offshoot of meir kahanes kach party which advocated for kahanism ie Jewish world domination, Jewish isolationism and the greater israel plan. They were partnered with the JDL (not the ADL, similar but way more radical) and carried out acts of terrorism in the US Canada and the UK, like full on bomb campaigns hostage situations arson etc. Ben Gvir was in the youth wing of kach before it got disbanded, 4 years (?) after it got branded a terrorist organization by every major govt and banned from overseas operations, sometime after it's endorsement of the baruch goldstein west bank shooting (cave of the patriarchs massacre). Likud, while somewhat bad when it was founded, has become a moderate center right party. Founded by menachem begin in 1984 as a response to the failure of labour Zionism and the left wing parties to contain the post 6 day war peace sentiment. Begin supercharged that and made it an ultranationalist party which was in staunch opposition of labour Zionism. Since then they've become very moderate but continue to employ extremists, like netanyahu who instigated the riot which killed Yitzak Rabin, one of the last vanguards of the Israeli left, and did so explicitly by calling him too soft for accepting the Oslo accords peace agreement between the PLO and israel, mediated by clinton. Huge rabbit holes here but this is the brief version. In fact I would go on to say that likud are not actually right wing but just Israeli neocons but that's for another thread, there have been controversies where likud activists have said antisemitic things against anti likud (one of netanyahus top guys, itzak zharka, said "ashkenazim, you whores, may you burn in hell! I am proud of the 6 million that were burned and hope another 6 million will be") and some of likuds top voting demographics are non white Israelis (non ashkenazim).

Edit 2: (Sorry for the edits, I just read more of this trashfire and I cant help but respond, provide a good antisemitic education)

You know, it's kind of remarkable how Israel quite openly has an ethnonationalism-for-me-but-not-for-thee attitude. I cannot imagine any other country getting away with forcing migrant worker women to take depo to keep them from having kids. Imagine if we did that. "You can come here, sure, but we'll spay or neuter you." It would be the biggest political scandal in history.

Its even worse than you can imagine. Israel had a functional eugenics project all the way until 2014 where they tried to effectively neuter the Ethiopian Jewish population by having their women take a drug which makes them infertile under the guise of disease vaccinations when the first of them were coming over. When it was discovered that they did, they tried to quietly bury the whole thing and I guarantee most people in the west who talk about Israel dont know about it. Theres also the fact that for all their claims of democracy, arabs druze and non jews are discouraged from voting by Israelis who try to harass or stone them at polling centers. These were the same people who cried about the National Origins Formula, about American Eugenics programs in the 1920s, so many other things. Frankly, disgusts me to no end.

 

[bouquetnine]

If you go to the Wikipedia page on "Jewish feminists", nearly all of them are second wave. Virginia Woolf and other first-wave feminists were English' Olympe de Gouges was a Frenchwoman. These were women who wanted the right to vote and enter university; Susan B. Anthony once said that female suffrage for white women would not harm white supremacy, so there you go.

First of all, Wikipedia:

Second of all: Shabbos goyim. For another famous example, Kellog was White and he gets the credit for popularizing circumcision. If it wasn't for (((certain people))) backing him, his crazy ideas wouldn't have taken off. Just like his idea of corn flakes to suppress libido is treated as a joke.

 

[hog cranking frog]

Those losers still haven't taken any accountability for the USS Liberty why should I give a fuck about their right to defend themselves?