The General Antisemitism Thread

[The Tall Man]

Nah, he didn't plagiarise. Citing wasn't standard and he wasn't really "in" the scientific community back then. Lots of theories were built on Lorentz and so on, it's an expansion, not plagiarism. Nowadays the methods are more refined, like citations.

There are multiple essays, books and articles written by contemporary physicists calling him out about his behavior of slightly reframing discoveries of physicists and claiming them as his own. They also called him out for colluding with his friends in science publishing.
This also goes for the thing he got the Nobel price for, the photoelectric effect, it is believed that he stole this from yet unpublished works of Philipp Lenard while working at the patent office.

Einstein was not taken serious by his contemporaries and the reason he became synonymous with the smartest man in the World is because of a certain nepotistic people that control publishing of scientific literature and school books.

 

[H.S. Chamberlain]

Scientific advances can only be made if a Jew can profit off of it.

 

[prollyanotherlurker]

This might be a hot take, but Jews. I'm not a huge fan.

 

[prollyanotherlurker]

This gave me a chuckle.

Oh man. They're about to make the list.

 

[Disruptive Poster]

0:17

 

[Wraithdolf the White]

Hell, that's dour.

Hell, that's dire.


Hell, that's demonic.

 

[I'm a Silly]

This gave me a chuckle.

Ver archivo adjunto 9110494

Where is that from?

 

[prollyanotherlurker]

Where is that from?

some anti-zionist protest in albania That's all i know about it.

 

[Nice Stick]

Hell, that's demonic.

Contrary to what you hear in the Jewish media, WP mostly just makes lots of white smoke for marking and smoke screens. It doesn't really burn very intensely and there were no WP burn victims reported in Lebanon so far.

 

[Bonesjones]

Contrary to what you hear in the Jewish media, WP mostly just makes lots of white smoke for marking and smoke screens. It doesn't really burn very intensely and there were no WP burn victims reported in Lebanon so far.

"White phosphorus is not universally banned, but its use becomes a war crime when it is deployed to target civilians or fired indiscriminately into populated areas, causing severe, lifelong injuries or death."

Yeah man its just a gentle burning, no real harm done. Its just like someone putting out a box of matches on you, no big deal.

 

[DocAwe]

"White phosphorus is not universally banned, but its use becomes a war crime when it is deployed to target civilians or fired indiscriminately into populated areas, causing severe, lifelong injuries or death."

Yeah man its just a gentle burning, no real harm done. Its just like someone putting out a box of matches on you, no big deal.

It's a mostly peaceful melting of the flesh.

 

[Wraithdolf the White]

Contrary to what you hear in the Jewish media, WP mostly just makes lots of white smoke for marking and smoke screens. It doesn't really burn very intensely and there were no WP burn victims reported in Lebanon so far.

If a tool or weapon is in the hands of someone of moral, they will use it as intended.
If a tool or weapon is in the hands of jews who worship the devil or other Middle Eastern ancient demon dogs... children gonna burn.
I am not afraid of a loving wife in the kitchen making me meatloaf.
I am afraid of my last ex girlfriend in a kitchen wanting to make me meatloaf.
In both second examples, souls are going to burn.

 

[Nice Stick]

If a tool or weapon is in the hands of someone of moral, they will use it as intended.
If a tool or weapon is in the hands of jews who worship the devil or other Middle Eastern ancient demon dogs... children gonna burn.
I am not afraid of a loving wife in the kitchen making me meatloaf.
I am afraid of my last ex girlfriend in a kitchen wanting to make me meatloaf.
In both second examples, souls are going to burn.

It's not a question of morality, but one of effectiveness. WP just isn't very effective at burning people.

 

[corvuscorax]

You guys have been posting books, so I thought I'd ask. Do any of you have a legitimate reputable source on what the 33rd Degree of Freemasonry entails? What secrets do they learn at the top? Being such an old organization in the Internet age, I'm sure this is already out there somewhere.

Also, is there any merit to the conspiracy theory that sodomy (as in rape) is one of the rites of Freemasonry? The Bohemian Grove, another secret org for rich people, has been rumored to be pretty gay. And sexual abuse is one of the ways MKUltra used to control people. There seems to be a ritualistic occult element to Jewish sexual degeneracy, and the pornographer Jews very heavily pushed for the normalization of heterosexual anal sex in pornography. Crowley's O.T.O. organization recruited gay men because one of his membership degrees involved anal.

I am way late, but the gentleman that runs 1/2 of this channel is a Freemason, a professional historian, and a Christian. He uses verified sources whenever possible, which he provides. Hopefully this [albeit very long] video answers any of your questions. I found it interesting and have never known him to make shit up, or use poor sources whenever possible. He's always upfront when a source is questionable.

TL;DW
33rd degree is just a fancy title. You don't actually get anything special from it. It's a formality for older members.

 

[cigint]

WP just isn't very effective at burning people.

And? Jews use it for torturing, disfiguring and poisoning civilians. Whether or not it burns people more or less effectively on a per-dollar basis than, say, napalm, is a complete red herring of a conversation.

 

[prollyanotherlurker]

the devil or other Middle Eastern ancient demon dogs... children gonna burn

I really have no love for islamists, but it seems like the Muslims "on our side" tend to be a lot worse than the others.

Like if you look into what we did in Afghanistan, and what they were doing before we "spread democracy" to their country. They were going after people that were human trafficking boy sex slaves. The people we were fighting were trying to stop the human traffickers, and pedos. They literally had death squads to go around killing these faggot pedophiles. (Probably the most justified death squad I've ever heard about, in fact I imagine most people here would cheer it on if we had those in america), and we used the fact that they were going around and killing these pedophiles as a reason we needed to go in and overthrow them. Not to mention banning opium production, and us going in and getting them to start producing opium again.

So we go in, and we put the literal child fuckers back in power. They were our ally during that war. They had to tell our soldiers "its just their culture". Meanwhile we were fighting against the people that tried putting that to an end. (Image why they call us the great Satan, that was truly evil, not to mention all the torture and killing of civilians causing chaos etc.).

My point being it seems like the worst of the Muslims are always the ones we want to take power....

 

[Nice Stick]

Not to mention banning opium production, and us going in and getting them to start producing opium again.

In a complete coincidence, Jewish owned pharmaceuticals were ramping up production of opioids at the time.

 

[I'm a Silly]

I really have no love for islamists, but it seems like the Muslims "on our side" tend to be a lot worse than the others.

Like if you look into what we did in Afghanistan, and what they were doing before we "spread democracy" to their country. They were going after people that were human trafficking boy sex slaves. The people we were fighting were trying to stop the human traffickers, and pedos. They literally had death squads to go around killing these faggot pedophiles. (Probably the most justified death squad I've ever heard about, in fact I imagine most people here would cheer it on if we had those in america), and we used the fact that they were going around and killing these pedophiles as a reason we needed to go in and overthrow them. Not to mention banning opium production, and us going in and getting them to start producing opium again.

So we go in, and we put the literal child fuckers back in power. They were our ally during that war. They had to tell our soldiers "its just their culture". Meanwhile we were fighting against the people that tried putting that to an end. (Image why they call us the great Satan, that was truly evil, not to mention all the torture and killing of civilians causing chaos etc.).

My point being it seems like the worst of the Muslims are always the ones we want to take power....

It's always like that. White Americans [and the rest of the world] are being preyed upon by grifters who promise either
A: freedom from jewish hegemony or
B: freedom from jewish hegemony that never ended after the Cold War

Politicians, influencers, and big accounts on X will never offer both.

So you get [this is just one example] "based Thomas Massie," who rebukes all zio-shilling and AIPAC, but shills [for free?] when it comes to Kremlin talking points. Russia is still just as infested with jewish oligarchy as ever, despite claims to the contrary, and just as globo-homo as every other nation, and the *home* of Chabad Lubavitch. Additionally, there are genuine far-left red-diaper babies like Caleb Maupin and "socialists" like Bernie Sanders who love Russia as-is. All the based-and-trad talk is founded on Putin's weird fetish for not prosecuting wifebeaters and shit like that. Meanwhile, their military is held together by a daisy chain of anal rape.
And these are the people who claim a 'moral duty' to "de-nazify" the countries and regions they invade.

This is why National Socialism is the only way: nationalism for my people, socialism for my nation. If anything, we need "re-nazification."

 

[Disruptive Poster]

0:11

 

[prollyanotherlurker]

So you get [this is just one example] "based Thomas Massie," who rebukes all zio-shilling and AIPAC, but shills [for free?] when it comes to Kremlin talking points. Russia is still just as infested with jewish oligarchy as ever, despite claims to the contrary, and just as globo-homo as every other nation, and the *home* of Chabad Lubavitch. Additionally, there are genuine far-left red-diaper babies like Caleb Maupin and "socialists" like Bernie Sanders who love Russia as-is. All the based-and-trad talk is founded on Putin's weird fetish for not prosecuting wifebeaters and shit like that. Meanwhile, their military is held together by a daisy chain of anal rape.
And these are the people who claim a 'moral duty' to "de-nazify" the countries and regions they invade.

for Massie. At least when trying to look at what he did that was pro-russia. I don't think it's anything too crazy. At least in my opinion.

• Voted against the 2022 resolution supporting Ukraine, citing concerns that sanctions could escalate the conflict and hurt Americans.
• Opposed multiple Ukraine aid packages in 2022, 2023, and 2024, and voted against suspending normal trade relations with Russia.
• In 2017, voted against reaffirming NATO's mutual defense pact and against a sanctions package targeting Russia.
• In 2019, was the sole member of Congress to vote against a measure refusing to recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea.
• Introduced legislation in late 2025 ("NATO Act") to withdraw the U.S. from NATO, explicitly citing Russian security grievances and Putin's 2007 Munich speech.

Especially when you think about what the Ukraine is. It's not like it's "based" Ukraine. vs kiked russia. It's kiked ukraine vs kiked russia. Russia just tried using especially gay talking points against ukraine as a justification. (or at least I remember hearing them try using those talking points, but it was pretty obvious they weren't the real reason for the war).

I personally don't think we should be paying for Ukraine, and I don't think we should be trying to sanction Russia. If NATO/the EU want's to sanction Russia, sure let them do that. I just don't care. I would love for the United states to move away from the world police position personally. I think if we took a completely different tact with foreign politics at the very least from the point the Soviet Union fell we would be much better off right now. I'm definitely not one of those people that thinks russia is "based" I'm about as neutral on it as someone can be. I just really couldn't care less, other than I'm not sure enforcing sactions and constantly funding proxy wars is actually helping us (i'm pretty sure it's the opposite).

to me his stances above seem about in line with his Israel stances. I would say at least right now, or in the recent past Ukraine was kind of our Israel of Europe (except it didn't have it's hooks into our political system the way Israel does).

I definitely don't see Russia as the kind of threat I see Israel as to our country. Like if you look at that recent "merge" of our military with the IDF. After learning more about what is actually being voted on with that, it's one of the most concerning things I've seen in recent times. From the looks of it, if that passes it basically guarantees Israel will continue getting funding from us for the next decade, even with the MASSIVE drop in popular support for Israel. Which is potentially going to make it politically impossible for them to otherwise continue getting money they way they did. That's bad enough already (typical underhanded jew shit), but then what makes it even worse. Is this will also essentially grant them access to our military advancements in a way that is unprecedented among any other country. They will have access to developments we make, to intelligence, and worse of all to our massive military budget. And if that isn't horrifying to you, then I'm not sure what would be. I pray that this get's shot down in either the house or the senate, because I have no faith Zion Don is going to veto it. I don't think I can properly express how fucked this would be if it makes it through.

The level our government has been compromised by Israel is just insane, it's why I just don't care that much about Russia in comparison.