Culture The Cult of Thinness Is Making a Depressing Comeback

Link (Archive)

The Cult of Thinness Is Making a Depressing Comeback​

First, you would hand over your fiver, which was the price you paid for each session. Then you would go to sign in, which is where you collected the paper sheet which had your weekly weightlisted on it. Then came the moment to step onto the scales, in front of everyone else gathered between the cold, beige walls of the church hall or community centre.

You would wait all week for this moment: the warm glory of a few pounds off, or the tight-lipped, pitying smiles that accompanied the crushing disappointment of weight put back on. When you reached your goal weight, you would receive a special keychain, as an emblem of your “achievement”.

This, as 33-year-old textile designer Lottie des’Ascoyne, from Kent, remembers it, was the weekly routine of the Weight Watchersmeetings she attended as a teenager in 2005. “I was 14 or 15 when I started,” des’Ascoyne recalls. “There wasn’t a meeting near to where I lived at the time so I used to stay the night with my friend so we could go together. The meetings were sold on the idea of solidarity and support, but there was always something pretty vulnerable about it and people would be listening to see what your weight loss or gain would be.”

Like countless others her age, des’Ascoyne is part of a generation of women whose relationship to food, weight and self-esteem was impacted by the pervasive diet culture of the 2000s and early 2010s. This was the era of Slim Fast meals, “syns” and “points”, and Special K advising you to “drop a jeans size” by replacing two meals a day with a bowl of cereal. It was the era of Paris Hiltonand Nicole Richie, of whale tails and “nothing tastes as good as skinny feels” and of Kate Moss and Alexa Chung being photographed with wellies and “thigh gaps” at Glastonbury.

In some ways, society has come a long way since then, as the mainstreaming of fourth-wave feminism resulted in a re-examination of the broken attitudes towards women’s bodies. In the 2010s, we saw effective campaigns against extreme thinness on runways and magazine airbrushing, often sparked by young, internet-literate feminists (Tumblr was a particular hotbed for this type of activity). Change followed somewhat – we began seeing more images of non-skinny body types in the media, at least. In recent months, however, the old preoccupation with thinness has started to creep back into prominence.

Kim and Khloe Kardashian, once (not unproblematically, of course) seen as emblematic of fashion’s acceptance of a non-size zero body type, have flaunted their new, tiny frames; Margot Robbie appeared on a recent cover of Vanity Fair in an outfit highlighting her visible rib cage. In shops, too, the 2000s are back, with abs-highlighting, low-rise silhouettes making their return. And, where the industry itself is concerned, Hannah Tindle, fashion features director for ES magazine, tells me: “When I’m at fashion week I see young women on the runways cast for some of the biggest shows and they look no different to the way models did [in the mid-2000s].”

So, after a period of what felt like progress – on the surface at least – thin, it would seem, is back in. But for those of us who remember how that harmful pervasiveness affected our lives and senses of self growing up, this is a strange, confusing and frequently upsetting phenomenon. Having since lived through the “empowerment” era with all its sticky pros and cons, many of us are asking a very simple question: Aren’t we supposed to have moved on?

Though many thinkpieces over the last month or so have lamented this clear shift back to skinny, realistically this aesthetic has never actually been “out”, as Tindle explains. “I often read about how people who have lost significant amounts of weight get treated differently, and are received in a more positive light, even by total strangers, than they did when they were a bigger size,” she says. “I think that sadly speaks to a pervasive cultural obsession with thinness – no matter what spin the media puts on it.”

Indeed, over the last decade, as feminism and identity politics have been mainstreamed (and inevitably commercialised), “representation” has become a sticking plaster over more structural problems. One of the positive upshots of this where body types are concerned, though, is that skinny bodies are no longer the only ones we see in so-called aspirational industries (like modelling, influencing, acting, and music), and this acceptance – while going nowhere near far enough in terms of racial diversity, fat liberation or the de-centring of able bodies – has filtered down into culture at large.

But Tindle is correct to observe that thinness remains the default: It is ultimately what we see most of in the media. Weight loss is still viewed as a bizarre moral good that people “should” aim for. Weight Watchers, for example, still very much exists, with people filing into those chilly, blank meeting rooms to this day, though it has rebranded simply to “WW”, in what is a very on-the-nose representation of the way diet culture has changed in recent years – from a brash fact of life in Britain, propped up by women’s media, to something that now instead hides in plain sight.

While society’s love affair with thinness never disappeared, it is certainly jarring to see aspirational images of extreme skinniness emerging once again in popular media. Ione Gamble, author of the recent feminist essay collection Poor Little Sick Girls, and editor-in-chief of Polyester zine, a fashion and culture publication that emphasises bodies not traditionally centred by the mainstream media, tells me that the current situation is fuelled in part by “the Y2K reemergence, with the Miu Miu skirt, and all these hot ticket items which are these clothes that traditionally have only been worn by skinny people.”

“A lot of the body positivity stuff we’ve seen over the last five years has been all lip service in terms of size inclusivity on the runways, high street and fashion editorial,” she continues.

“It was such a conversation that it felt like there was a groundswell of movement even if that wasn’t very concrete. Now that rhetoric has shifted back to skinniness. Fashion isn’t even pretending to care about people that aren’t skinny anymore, they’re just like, ‘OK, well that’s over now, we can just go back.’”

What happens in fashion, however, always filters down onto the high street and into people’s daily lives, and many millennial women are all too cognisant of what things were like when skinniness was brazenly placed on a cultural pedestal. Lizzie Sheridan, 28, a special school teacher from Solihull, remembers this era well. She also started Weight Watchers aged 14, having already tried the GI diet and Special K diet as a younger teenager. At university, she “began to buy books of ridiculous diets, like the Dukan diet”. Now, she reflects, “these diets couldn’t be stuck to, as I wasn’t fuelling my body properly”.

Elisabetta Cordetta, a 35-year-old interior designer who now lives in London, tells me that growing up in Italy, “I remember my teacher having Slim Fast as a substitute for lunch in class, telling us she needed to lose weight and that 50 percent of us needed to do the same.”

Gamble recalls girls at school bringing in pieces of steak for their lunch because that was what the Atkins diet allowed; Tindle was model scouted in a Topshop store around the age of 13, and of the experience, says that “looking at it now, it’s kind of terrifying that I was scouted when my body hadn’t even fully developed. That was the body type they were looking out for”.

The impact of this particular time in culture, when weight loss was such an omnipresent topic, still has repercussions today. “I’m really sad that I struggled for so long to accept myself for who I am,” Sheridan tells me. “I enjoy eating food and I find it difficult to lose weight. I have a really bad relationship with food and I think that is because of my yo-yo dieting. I privately eat because I’m ashamed if I want something ‘naughty’ or eat more than my friends – diet culture has taught me I should be eating less.”

For des’Ascoyne, the pervasiveness of thinness in the 2000s feels like a rule she has been living by since she was 11. “The media can change its idea of what’s attractive at will but you can’t change the side-effects of growing up and developing in that climate,” she says. “I think that really it traumatised me in a way I didn’t really think about until recently when the media started highlighting thin again.”

All of this begs the question: Why, if this time is remembered as so painful, would it ever re-emerge? There are, ultimately, many reasons – the cyclical nature of trends, the Y2K fashion redux and culture’s continued fetishisation of youth are three of them, but there’s also an important sociopolitical element. It seems to be based around a rejection of liberal feminism – and by extension, the body positivity movement that it has co-opted – and its failures: namely, its dilution of feminist politics down to marketing campaigns and slogans on t-shirts made by exploited workers, and the “representation” narratives peddled as an answer to everything.

Fashion’s two-footed return to skinniness, then, as Gamble puts it, can be seen as “a pushback at body positivity which can be viewed through the same lens as how commercialised feminism has become, as a symptom of this liberal mindset towards social issues that don’t change things, which is absolutely true – but a lot of people’s reaction to that is ‘OK, let’s do the opposite, let’s be edgy, let’s be skinny, let’s not be this soft watered-down version of these politics.”

In 2022, however, we have to learn from the mistakes of the past. There are certainly ways to avoid replicating the culture that millennial women lived through in our formative years for a new generation. In her own life, for example, Sheridan has found that seeking out content on TikTok which shows “love for bodies of all shapes and sizes” has helped her begin “to overcome my hate for my body. The algorithm gives me videos about how diet culture has made us think badly about food.” This, she says, has helped her to build a more “positive relationship” with food and eating.

For Gamble, there is also a political response. “If you think body positivity is over-commercialised and embarrassing, then make it more radical and unpalatable,” she says, pointing particularly to the “rich history of fat liberation politics and movements”.

That said, the cult of thinness is protected by some very impenetrable walls – especially within the fashion industry. “It’s worth noting that thinness is often equated with aspirational wealth and status,” says Tindle. “The fashion industry is a business; it wants to sell things to wealthy people.”

Gamble agrees: “It’s so deeply ingrained, and there’s so much of fashion that is laced with classism and misogyny and desire that keeps upper-class, skinny white people at the top. To allow that to break would be to allow them to reduce their power.”

Consumers, however, have power too, and as millennials age, they are also beginning to assume positions of influence in industries – like fashion – that impact mainstream culture. And as the people who lived through the skinniness-next-to-godliness culture of the 2000s – the Adios tablets, the endless images of washboard abs, the immiserating fad diets – we can simply refuse to accept it, and seek out alternatives, whether that means manipulating our social media algorithms, or putting our money where our mouths are.

Gamble sketches out this possible future best: “The only way we’re really going to see it is if we start propelling the publications, models and designers that have operated from a place of inclusion of body types from day one,” she says. “You can’t build a new house on rotten foundations.”
 
I love how “diet culture” is referred to as an artifact of the 2000s.

We’ve been feeding amphetamines to fatties since the 40’s.

Weight Watchers of the 2000s was a pale imitation of its harsher first incarnations.

Before that we were cinching heifers into corsets. Soft millennial bitches, I swear.
 
You can cope all you want with the fat acceptance bullshit but deep down pretty much everyone knows that fatties are gross and most people are just naturally attracted to fit people. Even the most hardcore fat acceptance pushers at least subconsciously know this or there wouldn't be a need for articles like this. Nobody wants to see a fat bitch in a bikini on a magazine cover. Cope all you want fatties, this shit will never truly be a thing and deep down you know it.
 
This just proves that you cannot gaslight people into finding fatties (or trannies, or gross hoodrats) attractive. You can compel speech, you might even be able to compel some thought of weak-willed individuals, but you cannot compel their peepees to get hard.
 
Body Positivity is something that was for the disfigured, scarred, and birth defect sporting people.

Then fatties and black fat bitches did like they do everyting they want, and gobbled it up.

I'm weirdly more repulsed by the modern "BLARGH! ME EAT! ME FAT!" bullshit everywhere than I was with the Ally McBeale skeleton look of the late 1990's.

Can't we go back to the body diversity of the 80's and early 90's?
 
Body Positivity is something that was for the disfigured, scarred, and birth defect sporting people.
Maybe something of it started out that way, but that just became an excuse to co-opt it for fat and gross people who could help it if they wanted to.

It's like the trans stuff. They like to talk about intersex people and infrequent genetic abnormalities constantly to explain it, but it's not about those people.
 
Tl;dr: fatties mad.

The body positivity movement was invented to help anorexics and the disfigured be comfortable with who they are. It was not invented for landwhales to use as a bludgeon anytime anyone said anything about thier piss poor lode choices.

Edit: additionally the author is just mad that without hambeasts around she'll be the least attractive woman(?) in the room. Work on that RBF sweaty, you'll go up a few notches on the scale.
 
We are far too fat as a nation. I mean nobody wants legions of anorexics, and kids shouldnt be restricting food, they should be healthy and active until they grow into their weight . …but a bit of reality based shaming isn’t always a bad thing, for adults.
Fat acceptance is terrible. HAES is terrible. Being fat is bad for you. It’s weird how society has changed an observational judgment (being overweight is bad for your health) into a character judgement (you are bad.) yet more linguistic trickery.
I'm not certain but I don't think most things about models and fashion are directed at adults, unfortunately.
The only people who know or care about any of this are teenaged/young women, the main victims of anorexia.
Expect to see a fresh new batch of FTMs from this because that's the New Anorexia for teen girls. Usually also involves anorexia as well, to get the flat-chested, narrow hipped look.
 
"Fat acceptance" only cut one way anyways. If you're a fat woman you're a "plus sized queen" who "shouldn't settle for some fat loser manchild".
Cause men don't need fat acceptance. They are capable of making up for it by being, say, charming, or rich, or talented, or funny. Although many still choose not to be any of those things, the option is still there.

For women, it's either hit the treadmill or sit at home alone eating frosting from the tin while writing vice articles.
 
I'm weirdly more repulsed by the modern "BLARGH! ME EAT! ME FAT!" bullshit everywhere than I was with the Ally McBeale skeleton look of the late 1990's.
That's like comparing a skinny rescue puppy and an escaped feral hippo. Of course, the former is more agreeable than the latter. I've never had to be concerned about the Ana-Chans I know beating me up or emptying my fridge.
 
Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of adopting a body type which is the result of daily actions and diet.

Fat:
+lets you push around objects that are lighter than you and exert a suprising amount of force due to all the fat
-Long term health problems which includes diabetic complications and heart problems such as obesity and much more prone to disease
-Burn more money in food and medical expenses to counteract the issues above
-Vulnerable to falls because gravity

Thin:
+Optimal body functionality
+Better health, longevity and performance
+Save more money in medical and food

Sorry but there is practicality in being thin.
 
Why is it always one extreme or another? OMG 90 lbs. Instagram model vs. OMG 600 lb. McDumpster bitch.

You'd think the rising price of food would make them think but fuck that.
 
I'm weirdly more repulsed by the modern "BLARGH! ME EAT! ME FAT!" bullshit everywhere than I was with the Ally McBeale skeleton look of the late 1990's.
I remember the jokes and hate people sent to the actress for being thin and how much she was a bad example for girls, like it was her fault not being a whale. At least fatties can't complain that people are less prejudiced towards thin women because it's not true.
 
"how could something so AWFUL and HATED BY ALL be making a comeback?"

Yes, how indeed?

Warm up that half-a-peanut you call a brain and do a little thinking about causality, the only logical answers are that it either wasn't that bad, or people have seen your proposed alternative and declared it worse.
 
Fucking Weight Watchers? Seriously? I almost had to do a double take after the first paragraph. What a weak fucking pathetic specimen of a "person" you have to be to get bent out of shape over fucking Weight Watchers. That shit is honestly like the barest of the bare minimum of diet plans and based on everything I've seen it's typically old people and housewives and the occasional boomer guy with diabeetus who attend. How much judgment are those people levying? Weight Watchers isn't even really a diet so much as it is just a counting regimen because they eat whatever they want they just don't eat as much.

And that was too much for the writer. And that's not even considering that even among notorious assholes like myself it's actually not as common to mock people who are actually trying to lose weight. Like I'll mock some fatty gobbling down their 2nd big Mac any day of the week but if I see some fat person exercising or actually trying to make some changes, even if it's just diet, why mock them? They're at least trying, unlike the weirdo who wrote this article.

Oh well, good news fatties you'll all soon be enrolled in Uncle Joe's "lean times" diet.
 
Let's consider the advantages and disadvantages of adopting a body type which is the result of daily actions and diet.

Fat:
+lets you push around objects that are lighter than you and exert a suprising amount of force due to all the fat
-Long term health problems which includes diabetic complications and heart problems such as obesity and much more prone to disease
-Burn more money in food and medical expenses to counteract the issues above
-Vulnerable to falls because gravity

Thin:
+Optimal body functionality
+Better health, longevity and performance
+Save more money in medical and food

Sorry but there is practicality in being thin.
I guess having to support a tub of lard should make you strong in theory, but that requires them shuffling around in the first place.
 
I guess having to support a tub of lard should make you strong in theory, but that requires them shuffling around in the first place.
If you want fat being put to use with muscle, just look up Sumo wrestling. Those tubs of lard do have muscle built underneath it. Because those matches require endurance on top of force.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo