The Coming Coup - A new article from Michael Anton.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Democrats are laying the groundwork for revolution right in front of our eyes.
As if 2020 were not insane enough already, we now have Democrats and their ruling class masters openly talking about staging a coup. You might have missed it, what with the riots, lockdowns and other daily mayhem we’re forced to endure in this, the most wretched year of my lifetime. But it’s happening.

It started with the military brass quietly indicating that the troops should not follow a presidential order. They were bolstered by many former generals—including President Trump’s own first Secretary of Defense—who stated openly what the brass would only hint at. Then, as nationwide riots really got rolling in early June, the sitting Secretary of Defense himself all but publicly told the president not to invoke the Insurrection Act. His implicit message was: “Mr. President, don’t tell us to do that, because we won’t, and you know what happens after that.”

All this enthused Joe Biden, who threw subtlety to the winds. The former United States Senator (for 26 years) and Vice President (for eight) has not once, not twice, but thrice confidently asserted that the military will “escort [Trump] from the White House with great dispatch” should the president refuse to leave. Another former Vice President, Al Gore, publicly agreed.

One might dismiss such comments as the ravings of a dementia patient and a has-been who never got over his own electoral loss. But before you do, consider also this. Over the summer a story was deliberately leaked to the press of a meeting at which 100 Democratic grandees, anti-Trump former Republicans, and other ruling class apparatchiks got together (on George Soros’s dime) to “game out” various outcomes of the 2020 election. One such outcome was a clear Trump win. In that eventuality, former Bill Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta, playing Biden, refused to concede, pressured states that Trump won to send Democrats to the formal Electoral College vote, and trusted that the military would take care of the rest.

The leaked report from the exercise darkly concluded that “technocratic solutions, courts, and reliance on elites observing norms are not the answer here,” promising that what would follow the November election would be “a street fight, not a legal battle.”

Two more data points (among several that could be provided). Over the summer, two former Army officers, both prominent in the Democrat-aligned “national security” think tank world, wrote an open letter to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in which they urged him to deploy the 82nd Airborne Division to drag President Trump from the Oval Office at precisely 12:01 PM, January 20, 2021.

About a month later, Hillary Clinton declared publicly that Joe Biden should not concede the election “under any circumstances.” The old English major in me interprets the word “any” to mean “no,” “none,” “nada,” “niente,” “zero,” “zilch” “bupkis”…you get the idea.

This doesn’t sound like the rhetoric of a political party confident it will win an upcoming election.

The Cover-Up in Plain Sight

These items are, to repeat, merely a short but representative list of what Byron York recently labeled “coup porn.” York seems to think this is just harmless fantasizing on the part of the ruling class and its Democratic servants. For some of them, no doubt that’s true. But for all of them? I’m not so sure.

In his famously exhaustive discussion of conspiracies, Machiavelli goes out of his way to emphasize the indispensability of “operational security”—i.e., silence—to success. The first rule of conspiracy is, you do not talk about the conspiracy. The second rule of conspiracy is, you do not talk about the conspiracy.

So why are the Democrats—publicly—talking about the conspiracy?

Because they know that, for it to succeed, it must not look like a conspiracy. They need to plant the idea in the public mind, now, that their unlawful and illegitimate removal of President Trump from office will somehow be his fault.

Never mind the pesky detail that the president would refuse to leave only if he were convinced he legitimately won. Remember: Biden should not concede under any circumstances.

The second part of the plan is either to produce enough harvested ballots—lawfully or not—to tip close states, or else dispute the results in close states and insist, no matter what the tally says, that Biden won them. The worst-case scenario (for the country, but not for the ruling class) would be results in a handful of states that are so ambiguous and hotly disputed that no one can rightly say who won. Of course, that will not stop the Democrats from insisting that they won.

The public preparation for that has also already begun: streams of stories and social media posts “explaining” how, while on election night it might look as if Trump won, close states will tip to Biden as all the mail-in ballots are “counted.”

The third piece is to get the vast and loud Dem-Left propaganda machine ready for war. That leaked report exhorted Democrats to identify “key influencers in the media and among local activists who can affect political perceptions and mobilize political action…[who could] establish pre-commitments to playing a constructive role in event of a contested election.” I.e., in blaring from every rooftop that “Trump lost.”

At this point, it’s safe to assume that unless Trump wins in a blowout that can’t be overcome by cheating and/or denied via the ruling class’s massive propaganda operation, that’s exactly what every Democratic politician and media organ will shout.

Stop the Presses

What then? The Podesta assumption is that the military will side with the Dems. There are reasons to fear they might. The Obama administration spent a great deal of political capital purging the officer corps of anyone not down with the program and promoting only those who are.

Still and all, determining the outcome of an election would be the most open political interference possible from our allegedly apolitical military, and it’s plausible that the brass won’t want to make its quiet support of the ruling class agenda that overt. The aforementioned Chairman has already stated that the military will play “no role” in the outcome of the election. That’s probably not a feint, but one wonders if it will hold given the obvious attempt to influence military thinking by people like Jeffrey Goldberg in his recent Atlantic essay.

Can the Dems rely on the Secret Service to drag Trump out? I have my doubts on this one. I’ve seen the Service up close; it really is (or strongly appears to be) apolitical. It has a job to do: protect the president, whoever that is. Officers take that job very seriously. If they don’t believe Trump lost, I don’t think they can be counted on to oust him. On the other hand, were they to believe he did lose and was refusing to leave—a scenario I find impossible to imagine but the Democrats insist is just around the corner—it’s possible the Service might act.

Barring all that, what’s left? Remember that phrase from the Dem war game: “street fight.” In other words, a repeat of this summer, only much, much bigger. Crank the propaganda to ear-drum shattering decibels and fill the streets of every major city with “protesters.” Shut down the country and allow only one message to be heard: “Trump must go.”

I.e., what’s come to be known as a “color revolution,” the exact same playbook the American deep state runs in other countries whose leadership they don’t like and is currently running in Belarus. Oust a leader—even an elected one—through agitation and call it “democracy.”

The events of the last few months may be interpreted as an attempted color revolution that failed to gain enough steam, or as a trial run for the fall. Is the Trump Administration prepared?

Here’s one thing they could do: play their own “war game” scenario so as to game out possibilities and minimize surprises. They should also be talking to people inside and outside of government whom they absolutely trust to get a clearer sense of who on the inside won’t go along with a coup and who might.

They also need to set up or shore up—now—communication channels that don’t rely on the media or Big Tech. Once the ruling class gives word that the narrative is “Trump lost,” all the president’s social media accounts will be suspended. The T.V. channels, with the likely exception of Fox News, will refuse to cover anything he says. Count on it. He’s going to need a way to talk to the American people and he has to find the means, now.

For the rest of us, the most important thing we can do is raise awareness. If there is a conspiracy to remove President Trump from office even if he wins, they’re telling you about it precisely to get you ready for it, so that when it happens you won’t think it was a conspiracy; you’ll blame the president.

Don’t be fooled.
 
The Babylon Bee already made this article. It's just as valid as anything written by Americanmind.org, and a much quicker read.


Democrats Reveal They Have Planted Dynamite All Around Nation And Will Blow It Up If Biden Isn't Elected
September 14th, 2020

1600156967127.png


U.S.—In an address to the nation written using letters cut out from a magazine and glued to paper, the Democrats are offering their most persuasive case yet for Biden's election. According to the letter, Democrats have planted booby traps rigged with dynamite all throughout the country, and they are set to explode if Biden is not elected president.

"Why so serious?" said Biden's running mate Kamala Harris. "It's just a little joke! The real joke is Trump, and we're just joining in all the fun! HEE HEE HEE HA HO HA HEE HO!"
"Vote for Biden, or the country you love will be blown sky-high -- HAHAHA!" cackled Nancy Pelosi. "If you don't want to see the Lincoln Memorial, shall we say, in a state of disrepair, you'd better vote for the old, senile man! Ha ha ha ha ha! HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAA... fnffff oh, do excuse me... ha ha ha ha ha! HEE HEE HEE HEE HEE HEE HEE... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!" Her heavy makeup smeared down her face as she cried in laughter, making her resemble a clown.
In a statement, Biden's teleprompter reiterated the point. "Threatening topline message: I'm not an agent of chaos," Biden's teleprompter said in a statement to the press. "But there are people out there who will create a lot of chaos if Trump is re-elected. Not that I want that to happen. I would hate to see something bad happen to this country. For your safety, I recommend voting for me. I'd hate for you to wake up with a horse's head in your bed, or a bunch of killer clowns surrounding your house. Just give us what we want. It's for your safety."
Senator Mitt Romney also issued a video statement in support of Biden, flipping a coin and shouting about how blowing up the country would be much better than the bad orange man before he turned to reveal half his face had been burned off in a recent peaceful protest. "You either die a Republican or you live long enough to see yourself become basically a Democrat."
Rep. Jerry Nadler revealed he has planted TNT all throughout the Capitol Building, as he wielded an umbrella and munched on some raw fish.
"A vote for Joe Biden is a vote to not die in an elaborately designed Rube Goldberg-style booby trap rigged with confetti and explosives," said Biden Director of Strategic Communications Kamau Mandela Marshall. "He's just trying to protect you. Let's not blow this out of proportion."
"Madness is like gravity. All it takes is a little push!" Marshall then said as he attempted to push over a statue of Columbus, though it proved to be too heavy.



Anyway... I see only two things happening if Trump wins a second term...
1. A bunch of criminals will use it as an excuse to loot, pillage, and rape, much like they are already doing, but this time Democrat mayors and governors will do even less to stop them. But, since it's all happening in predominately Democratic areas, it won't bug most conservatives...
4ckunm.jpg


2. And there shall be a great cry throughout all the land of Egypt America, such as there was none like it, nor shall be like it any more.
chitown-12.png
1600156257931.png
1600156374825.png

1600156677767.png
 
Última edición:
I don't like the implications of both sides convincing themselves that if their guy doesn't win, it must be because of cheating or a coup.

How about we all agree that there will be some level of cheating as there has always been but for the most part the election results will be just as accurate as they have been in prior elections and not go around killing our political opponents on November Third?
 
I would not at all be surprised if America is in a state of civil war by the end of the year.

I don't like the implications of both sides convincing themselves that if their guy doesn't win, it must be because of cheating or a coup.

How about we all agree that there will be some level of cheating as there has always been but for the most part the election results will be just as accurate as they have been in prior elections and not go around killing our political opponents on November Third?

This is the thing I'm thinking is that regardless of who wins the election, some serious shit is probably going to go down after it.

America is at an impasse, Democracy can't work when the two sides see each other as nothing more than an enemy to be destroyed.
 
There's nothing "Civil" about war, and far from it. Mark my words: The winner of a Neo Civil war wouldn't be either of the sides you're thinking of. I've got this theory that other rival countries with less than good intent for the U.S. are pulling strings behind the scenes to get American's at each other's throats. The Japanese General in WWII said that U.S. invasion is infeasible because "behind every bush is an American with a gun".

The best way to topple a seemingly insurmountable military is indirectly. If we turn those guns on each other, we won't have the organization or separated power to stop the advance of several foes and we will be divided, vulnerable, and distracted by inner turmoil. The real winners will be countries like China, Russia, Iran, NK, and anyone who moves in to clean up the weakened 'victors' of any civil war. It's not like the last time where they are separated by thousands of miles and weeks of travel to do that. We have civil war, I believe we will see several countries descend on us under the guise of 'restoring stability' as was America's excuse in the past for foreign interference.

Mark my words, no one will win any civil war except those with vested interest in making their rivals kill each other.
 
I don't like the implications of both sides convincing themselves that if their guy doesn't win, it must be because of cheating or a coup.

Yeah, democratic elections only work when both sides agree to abide by whatever the outcome is. Unfortunately a lot of people now do that up until the point they lose then it's "protests" and accusations of cheating.

A lot of this is from internet and media echo chambers "what do you mean Trump beat Hilary? Everyone on my twitter voted against him and the media said she would win. It must have been rigged". We saw the same here with the last election, Labour voters dumbfounded by how they lost in a landslide. I saw a few people commenting that it had to be rigged because everyone they know voted Labour.

It is quickly reaching the point where it's all going to boil over unless the people hitting the accelerator pedal ease off and say "well shit we lost but that was the result and we accept it" but we all know that ain't going to happen.
 
I don't like the implications of both sides convincing themselves that if their guy doesn't win, it must be because of cheating or a coup.

How about we all agree that there will be some level of cheating as there has always been but for the most part the election results will be just as accurate as they have been in prior elections and not go around killing our political opponents on November Third?
Considering Democrats have already tried a political coup against Trump (see: Ukraine,) they don't get the benefit of the doubt.
 
Yeah, democratic elections only work when both sides agree to abide by whatever the outcome is. Unfortunately a lot of people now do that up until the point they lose then it's "protests" and accusations of cheating.

A lot of this is from internet and media echo chambers "what do you mean Trump beat Hilary? Everyone on my twitter voted against him and the media said she would win. It must have been rigged". We saw the same here with the last election, Labour voters dumbfounded by how they lost in a landslide. I saw a few people commenting that it had to be rigged because everyone they know voted Labour.

It is quickly reaching the point where it's all going to boil over unless the people hitting the accelerator pedal ease off and say "well shit we lost but that was the result and we accept it" but we all know that ain't going to happen.
America going get burned by a fit of narc rage. Oh lordy lord.
 
I don't like the implications of both sides convincing themselves that if their guy doesn't win, it must be because of cheating or a coup.

How about we all agree that there will be some level of cheating as there has always been but for the most part the election results will be just as accurate as they have been in prior elections and not go around killing our political opponents on November Third?

That would be fine, if it weren't overwhelmingly one side that seems to mysteriously find boxes upon boxes of ballots that lean their way after they lose elections.
 
We can only hope the the winner is elected by a landslide.

Any close result will end up in riots and will just deepen the rift already tearing America apart.

The worst result would be a small Trump win on election night then a slow but steady Biden win through mail in ballots.

That would be the sure fire way to set off some serious problems.

My other guess would be a comfortable but not massive Trump wins then the DNC slaves will start rioting again and Biden drags Trump through the courts in hope of some kind of victory that way.

Either way the DNC slaves will riot but if Trump gets a win he can deal with the riots easily by calling out the guard. It's his 2nd term so he won't have to pull his punches this time round.
 
There's nothing "Civil" about war, and far from it. Mark my words: The winner of a Neo Civil war wouldn't be either of the sides you're thinking of. I've got this theory that other rival countries with less than good intent for the U.S. are pulling strings behind the scenes to get American's at each other's throats. The Japanese General in WWII said that U.S. invasion is infeasible because "behind every bush is an American with a gun".
The Dems are not in it to win it, they like Chaos and just wanna kill people...
 
The libs are saying openly that WHEN they topple Trump they will literally junk the Constitution and write a new one that forever preserves "majoritarian rule", meaning rule by the far left. Basically BIPOCs and young leftards will have all the power and most Whites who aren't sufficiently left enough, including all White Menemy, will be persecuted and destroyed.

Beyond that they seem to suffer from the same problem that most Marxists have throughout the philosophy's history, namely that they don't really have a clue what the new antibigotry majoritarian People's Democratic Republic will look like. When the "blow up the system and worry about the rest later" philosophy was tried in Russia they wound up with Josef Stalin as dictator.

Stalin was the guy who, after taking command of a platoon of Russian soldiers in Poland, created a big uncovered flank that allowed the Imperial German Army to force the Russians out of Poland. And now he was running the place, his word was law and everybody who disagreed got shipped to Siberia, and after he ran out of those he started working his way up the ladder until millions of people were murdered simply because they were named as "accomplices" by other captives.

I think that a lot of the hardcore extreme left would like a Stalinist Purge in America to once and for all get rid of those pesky freedom lovers and all Whites. They don't seem to realize that after they kill off all the farmers they would all starve.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo