Culture The 'clunky' BBC casting of ethnic minority actors - Mixed-race actor playing Isaac Newton on Dr Who is highlighted in report urging corporation to avoid 'tokenistic' roles

Link/Archive
1769775548274.png
The BBC has been accused of 'clunky' casting choices in a new report that highlighted ethnic minority actors appearing in period dramas and historical episodes of shows including Doctor Who.

The broadcaster was warned of a need to ensure casting is 'authentic' and 'not tokenistic or forced' following a string of roles in shows including Great Expectations and Murder Is Easy by a damning independent report into the corporation's content.

Elsewhere, the BBC was told it needs to improve coverage of the working class, with themes currently focussing too much on crime and addiction, and women over 60.

It must also take steps to reduce its reliance on London for content creation, casting and news broadcasts, the report found, and instead focus on areas outside of the south of England and the devolved nations.

The review follows criticism over 'preachy' casting in a string of dramas, and ruled the need for 'a smattering of diversity in every programme' risks ethnic minority actors ending up in inappropriate settings that 'look clunky'.

It picked up on the casting of mixed-race Nathaniel Curtis as Sir Isaac Newton in the 60th anniversary episode of Doctor Who, as well as an adaptation of Charles Dickens's Great Expectations.

In this series released in 2023 mixed-race actress Shalom Brune-Franklin plays Estella despite the story taking place in the early to mid-19th Century.

The report acknowledged the Doctor Who role was 'less of a stretch' given the science-fiction focus of the show and questioned whether the aim of fictional programmes should be to be 'historically accurate' or accept it is a realm of 'fantasy'.

1769775569001.png

It also homed in on Murder Is Easy, the BBC's 2023 adaptation of an Agatha Christie novel, which saw David Jonsson star as Luke Fitzwilliam in the mid-century story set in a country village.

'Audiences are particularly unforgiving of this if it challenges their expectations of what they have switched on to see,' the review said.

'If there's an Agatha Christie murder mystery over the Christmas period, they won't expect to be taken into anti-colonial struggles alongside the country house murder.'

But it added: 'All adaptations change the original text to a greater or lesser degree and we are after all in the world of fiction.'

The review questioned whether casting ethnic minorities in certain settings served to ignore the historic plight of certain groups in a way which would not be the case for white actors.

'In depicting an anachronistic historical world in which people of colour are able to rise to the top of society as scientists, artists, courtiers and Lords of the Realm, there may be the unintended consequence of erasing the past exclusion and oppression of ethnic minorities and breeding complacency about their former opportunities,' the review added.

But it also pointed out that without so-called 'colour-blind casting' for historical programmes, the 'range of roles available to actors of colour would be severely restricted, in a way which would not be the case for white actors.'

The authors added solely casting white actors in period pieces also risks ignoring the presence of ethnic minority people in Britain at the time: 'People sometimes assume that the history of the British Isles was entirely white, without recognising that some degree of ethnic mix has always existed.'

The report brought up a contemporary example of crime drama Shetland which cast Tanzanian, Sri Lankan and Jamaican/Irish actors to play the Procurators Fiscal.

1769775616885.png

Three police officers during the series were played by actors of Nigerian heritage, while several families also included ethnic minority actors.

The report pointed out ethnic minorities make up just 3.2 per cent of senior law officers and one percent of police across Scotland and the numbers for rural Shetland are likely to be far lower.

But it also said it's 'clear' that the series is not attempting 'to give an accurate depiction of life on the islands' and highlighted that the protagonist and other leading characters are white.

Elsewhere, the document criticised the BBC's portrayal of white working class men and women, stating it is 'less positive', especially when looked at 'cumulatively' across the corporation.

'Portrayal of working class communities can often rely on the themes of poverty, crime, addiction and deindustrialisation with an absence of role models,' the authors said.

They raised the one-off drama series Denmark, set in Blaenau Gwent in southeast Wales, in which the 'white working class characters are portrayed as hopeless and the locality as a trap'.

'One character says, "So you never got out then?" implying life is much better elsewhere,' the report added.

The review was conducted by former Bafta chairwoman and ex-BBC exec Anne Morrison, and independent media consultant Chris Banatvala.

The duo spoke to more than 100 executives, commissioners, programme-makers and media experts, as well as 4,500 members of the TV-watching public.

They found perceptions of the BBC are often lower among those demographics who are also less likely to be satisfied with how they are represented and portrayed.

The review said power in the organisation is still too concentrated in London and recommended more key decision makers should be located outside the capital.

'Our audience research found that the perception of the BBC remains that it is skewed towards the middle class and is London-centric - and that the power in the organisation still lies in the UK capital,' the report said.

'We found that this has consequences for portrayal and representation.

'Genuine production, rooted in the location, made by people who understand it in depth was described to us as fundamental to on-air authenticity. We agree.'

The report found content makers in Scotland, Wales and northern Ireland lack opportunities due to the 'concentration of editorial power' in London, even when programmes are very popular or relate to huge regional stories.

It raised documentary The Ice Cream Wars, which was commissioned for BBC Scotland but turned down for national screens.

The show did so well on iPlayer it was eventually shown on BBC Two some time after, where one million people tuned in, before being bought by Netflix, where it landed in its top ten documentaries.

The Ice Cream Wars has subsequently been purchased by BBC Select in North America and Amazon UK too.

Accusations of the BBC being too London-centric extend to news content too, with flagship programme Newsnight coming under fire.

Newsnight restructured in May 2024, becoming completely studio based - in London - without external packages.

'Inevitably, this means that we see less out and about in the UK and hear more from London-based interviewees,' the report states, adding Newsnight has been reduced to a 'sofa-based show' which is 'looking, being and feeling very London-centric'.

The review added the BBC's key decision makers 'must understand the audience and what will appeal to them - whoever and wherever they are' and that bosses need to devise a 'new set of diversity characteristics specifically for measuring portrayal and representation which would include class and geography'.

In order to facilitate these changes, it said that senior editorial staff and TV genre commissioners should be located outside London.

The review noted that, while there has been some improvement, there are still more men than women featured in BBC news, nations and factual programming, and this is particularly prevalent among older people.

The report said: 'We would like to see a renewed effort to achieve gender balance in content for contributors and reporters in news and factual programmes.

'In addition, we found that male presenters significantly outnumber female presenters in the older age groups.

'The BBC has not been making full use of the data it holds to keep track of this issue. We believe that women on air ought to be able to have as long a career at the BBC as their male counterparts.'

Responding to the review, BBC chairman Samir Shah said: 'It is vital the BBC authentically reflects the lives of all the communities, classes and cultures across the UK.

'Decision-making must happen closer to audiences if we want to ensure that everyone feels represented and that the BBC remains an engine for growth within the creative industries.

'The board welcomes the challenge set out in the report and the actions the BBC Executive want to take in response.'

The BBC Executive said it has committed to strengthening how the BBC measures the ways in which different audiences are portrayed and represented in its output.

The organisation also said: 'The BBC welcomes the authors' recognition that significant progress has been made in how it represents all the communities of the UK, including through increased regional investment, a broader and more representative range of voices on and off-air, and a stronger focus on authentic portrayal in commissioning decisions.'
 
The broadcaster was warned of a need to ensure casting is 'authentic' and 'not tokenistic or forced' following a string of roles in shows including Great Expectations and Murder Is Easy by a damning independent report into the corporation's content.

Elsewhere, the BBC was told it needs to improve coverage of the working class, with themes currently focussing too much on crime and addiction, and women over 60.

It must also take steps to reduce its reliance on London for content creation, casting and news broadcasts, the report found, and instead focus on areas outside of the south of England and the devolved nations.

The review follows criticism over 'preachy' casting in a string of dramas, and ruled the need for 'a smattering of diversity in every programme' risks ethnic minority actors ending up in inappropriate settings that 'look clunky'.
Classic British Broadcasting Corporation. Caring about ethnic minorities too much even when their inclusion makes no sense, spitting on the working class and thinking the world revolves around London.
 
Última edición:
In the US white people get to be on TV in commercials playing the idiot consumer of the inferior competitor brand product.

Look at him dropping all those containers all over the floor just trying to put a lid on one! He's bald too lol!
 
The review questioned whether casting ethnic minorities in certain settings served to ignore the historic plight of certain groups in a way which would not be the case for white actors.

80% of the white population of England were serfs to the 20% Norman Lords.

Ethnic minorities in the UK right up until a hundred years ago were mostly Spanish mercenaries, Irish laborers, and Italian glass makers, not to mention the ever-present Jewish money lenders. We had the guild system for hundreds of years, which enforced ethnic nepotism in certain areas. Massive trade docks introduced Greek and Dutch families, a handful of Chinese, a handful of Indians, and about the same tiny number of African dockers, but that's really recently in the scope of English history.

Then in the 1948 Transport For London refused to pay employees working unsociable hours the modern equivalent of £2 an hour more to cover the cost of a taxi home, and instead shipped in Caribbean scab indentured labor. We now call this corporate crime Multiculturalism.

Now fuck off and stick your TV loicense request up your arse.
 
'If there's an Agatha Christie murder mystery over the Christmas period, they won't expect to be taken into anti-colonial struggles alongside the country house murder.'
We are pretty sick of being re-written out of our own stories, being replaced by people that hate us, and said stories being changed to include a humiliation ritual about how "evil" our ancestors were and we in the present should somehow expect to pay for their crimes.

But it also said it's 'clear' that the series is not attempting 'to give an accurate depiction of life on the islands' and highlighted that the protagonist and other leading characters are white.
More state mandated nigger worship.
 
Happens in the US, too.

It's a problem with all the "creatives" living in the same three or four cities where whites are 25% of the population, so when said creatives go to a place that's 85% white, 10% Native American, and 5% "other," they literally cannot handle it, like they have no frame of reference for it. Like there must be a glitch in the matrix that there are so many natural blonds.

I don't mind seeing a diverse ethnic mix in shows, but I want it to feel authentic.

"Bosch" or "The Pitt," where a lot of the cast is non-white? Great, I'm there for it. I don't even care that Irving was white in the books because Lance Reddick is just that able to own the character.

"Robin Hood" where the man has a random Moorish sidekick? Get the fuck out of here, Morgan Freeman.

I've sperged about this before, but it's like this: If you want to tell an 800-year-old story about a legendary figure and you don't want everyone to be white, there are wholeass cultures out there with legendary figures WHERE NOBODY IS WHITE. Did I blow your fucking mind?????

And even crazier, THERE ARE OLD BOOKS FULL OF THESE STORIES.


But making the lead character of a Danish fairy tale a black chick makes no sense. If that thing popped up in my toilet, I'd flush it.
 
When it comes to a community players society kind of thing I don't mind they only have a small number of people to chose from, or a uni or something like that for the same reasons. But the national broadcaster of record with the almost unlimited budget for genuine arthouse setting pictures to do this sort of thing regularly is beyond any form of justification.

While I don't agree with stuff like content warnings like "This program was originally aired in the 1960's and reflects certain social an cultural attitudes of that time that may be offensive to some people, we have chose to air this with them included as this work is a product of its time but also culturally important..." I can kind of understand the logic for that sort of thing even if I don't agree with it.

As I said I can understand for small productions by amiture actors, etc but when you have a duty to the public because that is who pay's you, There is a duty you have to get it as accurate as you possibly can. And as I said there is a resource cap I can accept and I can also see it done as "bit" like think the 90's sitcom Goodness Gracious Me done by Indian Commics and was and still is regarded as a bit of a touch stone greats of an era filled with greats, and they did a special but of something like A Christmas Carrol or Romeo an Juliet or The Canterbury Tails etc.

Now imagine that as a reverse of the main joke Going out for a Indian, that was such a great joke an trope flipped on it's end an made quite the bit of a stir between two communities that had been standoffish for a while, the whole show was like that and everybody laughed and got along a little better for it, and I could see them doing a Christmas Special of them doing there stuff but as a Panto Speical.

Having said all that, this is now too deep in the cultural DNA of the media industry so we will never go back to how it was or a realistic how it should be there will always be needless race an gender swaps and the BBC will still do a lot of it but I hope this will be a wakeup call to them to do it less of it, but hope in one hand shit in the other an see what one fills up first, I guess.

The thing is the BBC could an should be great but it's constantly knecapped by it's own ego and by legislation at times, and due to the shear inertia the BBC has in the UK entertainment industry the ramifications of leaning too hard one direction is going to hurt them and also wider culture for a long time yet even if they fixed all there problems today.
 
But it also pointed out that without so-called 'colour-blind casting' for historical programmes, the 'range of roles available to actors of colour would be severely restricted, in a way which would not be the case for white actors.'
Okay. And? You aren't any more entitled to be an actor than I'm entitled to be a backup dancer. Welcome to the arts. You can always pick up an actual skill if this privileged and nonproductive work is too scarce for your tastes.
 
It's a problem with all the "creatives" living in the same three or four cities where whites are 25% of the population, so when said creatives go to a place that's 85% white, 10% Native American, and 5% "other," they literally cannot handle it, like they have no frame of reference for it. Like there must be a glitch in the matrix that there are so many natural blonds.
I've never had to worry about being culturally enriched where I'm from. I hope they stay the fuck away. Even the 5% "other" live here because they know it's safer around white people.
 
Okay. And? You aren't any more entitled to be an actor than I'm entitled to be a backup dancer. Welcome to the arts. You can always pick up an actual skill if this privileged and nonproductive work is too scarce for your tastes.
And they tend to suck anyway. Either the casting business is scrambling for minorities to fill roles and they just don't have the quality to feed the current zeitgeist or there's something else going on.

I've been around a lot of different kinds of black people and they simply do not act the way a black actor does in what's clearly a role written for a white actor. Doesn't even have to be a historical piece. You can just tell the screenwriter had a white person in mind. Even the biggest oreo on the planet doesn't act like that. It's fucking uncanny. It feels like an alien that's trying to mimic my own self to me. Even in an otherwise good movie or show I'm disengaged because it's creepy. I will watch stories that have no white people in them and find them perfectly entertaining, so that's not the problem.
 
I hate seeing non whites. I want Zulu but everyone is white and the Zulu are portrayed by tanned Italians
Eventually? The BBC will produce a version of Zulu where all the heroic soldiers are black and all the natives are white...a giant, amorphous, irresistible force of savagery and evil descending on all that is good and British......
 
Happens in the US, too.

It's a problem with all the "creatives" living in the same three or four cities where whites are 25% of the population, so when said creatives go to a place that's 85% white, 10% Native American, and 5% "other," they literally cannot handle it, like they have no frame of reference for it. Like there must be a glitch in the matrix that there are so many natural blonds.

I don't mind seeing a diverse ethnic mix in shows, but I want it to feel authentic.

"Bosch" or "The Pitt," where a lot of the cast is non-white? Great, I'm there for it. I don't even care that Irving was white in the books because Lance Reddick is just that able to own the character.

"Robin Hood" where the man has a random Moorish sidekick? Get the fuck out of here, Morgan Freeman.

I've sperged about this before, but it's like this: If you want to tell an 800-year-old story about a legendary figure and you don't want everyone to be white, there are wholeass cultures out there with legendary figures WHERE NOBODY IS WHITE. Did I blow your fucking mind?????

And even crazier, THERE ARE OLD BOOKS FULL OF THESE STORIES.


But making the lead character of a Danish fairy tale a black chick makes no sense. If that thing popped up in my toilet, I'd flush it.

Dragging out the same handful of fairy tales for a remake is getting stale anyway. I really wish they'd adapt stories from some less represented cultures instead.

And Robinhood: Men In Tights also had the Moorish sidekick though. It's not something relegated just to Prince Of Thieves.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo