Tattoos are cringe now - "not bussing fr fr on god" for any zoomers here.

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
They used to be kinda cool when they signified criminals, biker gangs, or musicians who played shit like punk or metal. Or had a centuries old tradition behind them like Maori tribal tattoos. But at this point they definitely are cringe since every normie has them, and lots of them. I mean look at this cringe shit.
1676867251108.jpeg
I guess it's because normies are so desperate for individualism, they want something that in the past used to be unique and signified an artistic person, some badass outlaw, etc. But they forgot that the tattoos didn't make those people who they were, it was who those people were who made the tattoos cool. It's the same thing with blue hair/weird hair colors--used to just be something musicians did, now it's normie shit.

If you really want to be individualist and authentic, don't get any tattoos at all. Don't get any piercings for that matter, unless you're a woman getting her ears pierced once. Sometimes I wonder if I'm on a watchlist because I'm fit, have no tattoos, no facial hair, and don't wear my hair in some faggy zoomer undercut/whatever millennials are supposed to have. It's probably the equivalent of someone of a brown-skinned bearded man wearing robes and a turban at the airport in October 2001. How ironic that looking like you're a quick combover from going to the Baptist Church to preach a sermon is now among the most distinct looks.
 
Sometimes I wonder if I'm on a watchlist because I'm fit, have no tattoos, no facial hair, and don't wear my hair in some faggy zoomer undercut/whatever millennials are supposed to have.
Back in '90s America, one had to be clean-shaven, have no visible tattoos or freakshow piercings, and not have a clownish hairstyle like the "Zoomer undercut" - if one wanted to look professional and presentable for work. That sure changed in the Current Year USA.
 
Última edición:
How did tattoos get so popular seemingly overnight in Current Year America?

Like I said in another thread, it seems tattoos in America used to be pretty much just a biker, prisoner, and sailor thing.
Yeah, tattoos decades ago used to mean war or prison. I don't see the point in getting a tattoo to represent your ideology when you're a young person, if at all. Because are you still going to be pro tankie in 10 years? That hammer and sickle on your shoulder is going to make you look stupid then. On the flipside, I don't get these skinhead prison gangs that get swastika tattoos, especially since you claim to support an ideology that hates tattoos.
 
Don't know why millennials and zoomies love these random tattoos that resemble something you'd doodle while on the phone. There's no thought to the placement and how it will look on your body, so it makes you look bruised and dirty from afar. Miley Cyrus and Pete Davidson come to mind.
I can appreciate large and well-made tattoos but small "knick-knack" tattoos are something I despise.
 
If a person likes owls or anchors or whatever, why not get a picture of it and hang it on your wall? Why must it be permanently etched into the skin? Because other people do it...I have yet to hear a deep, interesting tattoo story, and I've sat through lot of them.
 
I can appreciate tattoos in their old timey role as tough guy things that you get across your chest, back, or biceps, associated with people like servicemen, sailors, and bikers.

When basic bitch women start getting tattoos it is well and completely dead. I hate them and you can call me an incel or whatever but if a woman has tattoos it genuinely disgusts me, and the smaller/less prominent they are actually the more it disgusts me, because it marks them out as that sort of trend-chasing sheep instead of having the stones to just go all out with it. That goes somewhat for men too, but less so. I might well prefer a fat chick to a woman with tattoos.

The one type of tattoo I'd consider for myself, but I don't think I'd ever go for it, would be complex floral motifs (like creeping vines, berries, fruits, flowers, leaves) on my arms, and a huge polar rose on my chest or back. Geometric designs in general I think are much more tasteful than cartoony stuff you see on people (unless it has specific meaning, and I don't mean "I really like Boba Fett," I mean "this was the pinup girl on my warplane that I flew sorties over Germany in."

Now rate me Mad at the Internet.

Rose-rhodonea-curve-7x9-chart-improved.svg.png
 
I got a somewhat big blue rose on my forearm, which I mostly keep covered. As I don't like the sun hitting skin I easily can cover up. Btw, the sun is a major reason as for why the colours of tattoos fade away and get ugly.

Small tattoos tend tend to look like a glob after some years, so it's recommended to have some size on it.
Areas that see a lot of wear and tear. Well, they're going to wear away faster.
White turn into yucky white/yellow, so never use white ink.

I immediately say nope if a guy got a nose piercing, so I understand why some would turned off by a tattoo
 
They've always been a little gay; gang members might have tattoos, but if you look at the guys on top those types of organizations they don't.
The guys at the top likely have them too, they just cover them up well. Think about it, the guys at the top didn't start out at the top. They had to work their way up, but they started at the bottom just like any other hood.
 
On the flipside, I don't get these skinhead prison gangs that get swastika tattoos, especially since you claim to support an ideology that hates tattoos.
A couple months ago I went to Five Guys and this skinhead came in with swastikas and 1488 all over his head. But yeah, the Aryan Brotherhood aren't exactly known for actually giving a shit about Nazi ideology in practice, shocker. They'll sell hard drugs to their own people and not even come up with some bullshit like "ackshually it's secret eugenics to weed out the week minded/addictive types" or even "it was good enough for der fuhrer"
 
In my opinion, to get a tattoo you've got to have something that you will still hold value even after decades of life. When I was a teen many got ink and I wanted to get one too but I never knew what exactly. General shit like quotes or symbols were just too dumb to even bother. Like ok, you are doing a "love" kanji or cross on your ass, but what the fuck does it mean for you? Love for what exactly? Love is temporal shit. I ended up with no ink and now I know I was right. Nothing that I considered as a tattoo seems worthy to me right now. And in a decade it would be the same. I will just look at "super clever spergy symbolic shit" ink on my hand and think that the person who did it aka the current self was unbelievably cringe.
 
Tattoos have always been cringe faggotry, never understood how anyone thinks they look attractive or "artistic". People who get cartoons or fucking memes inked on their body is fucking peak autism.
 
This tattoo idea is interesting.
Actually, maybe the new trend will be something like belly button removal. It is a useless knot of scar tissue, and by getting it removed, somebody can brag that they are ridding themselves of surface imperfections.

I am sure that it would cost thousands of dollars, as a plastic surgeon would have to go all the way down into the abdominal muscles to cut out the scar tissue, but who knows what the new trend will be for idiots with more money to burn than sense.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo