Science T cells from common colds can protect against coronavirus infection, study finds.

Imperial College London researchers warn "no one should rely on this alone" and insist people should still get vaccinated as the "best way" to protect against COVID.

People with high levels of T cells from common colds are less likely to catch COVID, according to a new peer-reviewed study.

Researchers said the findings could help provide the blueprint for the production of new vaccines which give longer-lasting immunity and would protect against current and future coronavirus variants such as Omicron and Delta.

Imperial College London researchers say the high levels of T cells and the role in fighting COVID is an "important discovery" - but warned "no one should rely on this alone" and insisted people should still get vaccinated as the "best way" to protect against COVID.

T cells are a type of white blood cell that help protect the body from infection.

Dr Rhia Kundu, first author of the study, from Imperial's National Heart & Lung Institute, said: "Being exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn't always result in infection, and we've been keen to understand why.


"We found that high levels of pre-existing T cells, created by the body when infected with other human coronaviruses like the common cold, can protect against COVID-19 infection.

"While this is an important discovery, it is only one form of protection, and I would stress that no one should rely on this alone.

"Instead, the best way to protect yourself against COVID-19 is to be fully vaccinated, including getting your booster dose."

The study started in September 2020 when most people in the UK had not been infected with COVID-19.

It included 52 people who lived with someone who had been exposed to COVID, which had been confirmed through a PCR test.

The participants did PCR tests at the outset and then at four and seven days later to determine if they developed an infection.

T cells target internal proteins

Blood samples from the 52 people were taken within six days of them being exposed to the virus to enable the researchers to analyse the levels of pre-existing T cells induced by previous common cold coronavirus infections that also cross-recognise proteins of COVID.

The researchers found that there were significantly higher levels of these cross-reactive T cells in the 26 people who did not become infected, compared to the 26 people who did contract COVID.

The study - published in Nature Communications - said the T cells target internal proteins within COVID, rather than the spike protein on the surface of the virus.

Current vaccines do not induce an immune response to these internal proteins.

Professor Ajit Lalvani, senior author of the study and Director of the NIHR Respiratory Infections Health Protection Research Unit at Imperial, said: "Our study provides the clearest evidence to date that T cells induced by common cold coronaviruses play a protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

"These T cells provide protection by attacking proteins within the virus, rather than the spike protein on its surface.

"New vaccines that include these conserved, internal proteins would therefore induce broadly protective T cell responses that should protect against current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants."

Article
 
Interesting stuff, I can't wait for the Muh Science TM crowd to immediately reject it and work to unperson the researchers for daring to post anything other than TAKE JAB NOW, PHARMA GOOD, OBEY
 
Imperial College London researchers warn "no one should rely on this alone" and insist people should still get vaccinated as the "best way" to protect against COVID.
I like how they have to immediately throw this in right at the start as an attempt to deflect from what people have been postulating before. Especially at this late stage, with this level of mutation. Unless you are 70-80 years old, or have several co-morbid issues, this is something that people should not be worried about.
 
I remember reading about this in spring 2020 before someone noticed and did a "they know, bury it!", good times.

I guess it's not quite as high of a level of dangerous info anymore now that we're learning to live with the virus.
 
Imperial College London researchers warn "no one should rely on this alone" and insist people should still get vaccinated as the "best way" to protect against COVID.
That's okay, I have a working immune system.
 
2020: NO! THIS NOT "JUST A FLU, BRO", YOU RETHUGLICAN MAGA NAZI CONSPIRACY THEORIST. YOU ARE LITERALLY KILLING GRANNY REEEEEEEE

2021: Of course cold viruses can help build immunity against other taxonomically similar viruses. They are both rhinoviruses after all. We've been saying this for months, sweaty. You still need to get jabbed to boost your immune system though. Unless you WANT TO KILL GRANNY REEEEE
 
2020: NO! THIS NOT "JUST A FLU, BRO", YOU RETHUGLICAN MAGA NAZI CONSPIRACY THEORIST. YOU ARE LITERALLY KILLING GRANNY REEEEEEEE

2021: Of course cold viruses can help build immunity against other taxonomically similar viruses. They are both rhinoviruses after all. We've been saying this for months, sweaty. You still need to get jabbed to boost your immune system though. Unless you WANT TO KILL GRANNY REEEEE
Don't forget late 2019 and early 2020 where they fucking denied the thing existed and then denied it was going global but leaks from china showed otherwise.
 
"These T cells provide protection by attacking proteins within the virus, rather than the spike protein on its surface.
"New vaccines that include these conserved, internal proteins would therefore induce broadly protective T cell responses that should protect against current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants."
Gee, maybe the immune system learning the whole virus instead of just one spike protein that the virus could evolve not to have would be helpful, wouldn't it? I wonder if anyone has ever tried making a vaccine like that before.
 
Gee, maybe the immune system learning the whole virus instead of just one spike protein that the virus could evolve not to have would be helpful, wouldn't it? I wonder if anyone has ever tried making a vaccine like that before.
The problem is that there are 400+ viruses lumped into the description "common cold", and while there are 90 or so coronaviruses in the category, those 90 only make up, at most, 15% of colds. Most cases are rhinoviruses. Some are enteroviruses more related to polio or hemorrhagic conjunctivitis than COVID. There are others, too.

Of those 90 or so, do they all do this? Is it just specific ones? The article is pretty barren to make a fairly clickbaity headline.

I'm sure the actual virologists involved have far more detail, but popsci articles aren't there to be detailed, they're there to be sensational.
 
The irony is this isn't anything new. People have known infections with similar, less dangerous pathogens can lead to resistance or immunity to others, even if they didn't understand the mechanism involved at the time. Case in point: back in the day they used deliberate cowpox infections as a means of boosting resistance to smallpox
 
Atrás
Top Abajo