Crime Student eats AI art in UAF gallery protest, arrested

Article Archive

By Lizzy Hahn

On Tuesday, January 13, University of Alaska Fairbanks undergraduate student Graham Granger was detained after he had been found “ripping artwork off the walls and eating it in a reported protest,” according to the UAF police department. Granger was chewing and spitting out images pinned to the wall; this artwork was made by Masters of Fine Arts student Nick Dwyer in collaboration with artificial intelligence. Granger claimed that he destroyed the artwork because it was AI generated, according to the report by university police. Police estimated that at least 57 of the 160 images up on the wall were ruined. Granger was arrested for criminal mischief in the 5th degree and booked at the Fairbanks Correctional Center.

Dwyer said that he started using AI in his art around 2017/2018 but had been making art without the use of AI prior to this. In his artist statement for the exhibit that was destroyed, Dwyer says that his work “explores identity, character narrative creation and crafting false memories of relationships in an interactive role digitally crafted before, during and after a state of AI psychosis.” Dwyer explained that he himself fell into AI psychosis – a troubling new phenomenon defined by the Cognitive Behavior Institute as “individuals experiencing psychosis-like episodes after deep engagement with chatbots” – after working with AI for many years. He goes on to explain that “this highlights and embodies a growing trend that can be dangerous or unpredictable which you are not immune to.”

“When you make art, you become vulnerable and so the artwork is vulnerable and that's something that makes it seem more alive or more real or in the moment,” Dwyer said on Wednesday reflecting on the prior day’s protest.

The current exhibit features the artwork of five UAF Masters of Fine Arts candidates Sarah Dexter, Nick Dwyer, Amy Edler, Iris Sutton and Matthew Wooller.

Granger is a student in UAF’s film and performing arts program. His court date is scheduled for next Tuesday, January 20.
 
Student eats AI art to prove AI art is AI art and worthless, but eats AI art to ensure is noticed to ensure AI art continues to be AI art that the eater of AI wants.
 
The supposed bad guy in this has a name that was destined for some kind of notoriety, getting in the news and he chose to go small and early when he should have been taking his time building his shack. The victim in the story has a name synonymous with eating 357s which is something I'd suggest he do.
 
Really helping the cause of showing Artists to be a sane group and not crazy grifters realising their time is up. Always remember this post:
Ver archivo adjunto 8422381
Things like that are why AI output can be passed off as art in the first place. It's just an even more effortless form of autofellatio in clay.
Artists are a more heterogeneous group than they are often given credit for, granted that the author of the post was also an artist and I doubt he actually gave it up. Despising other artists is, after all, quite common.
 
tenor.gif
 
Lotta people gonna make AI art of someone suffering from AI derangement eating AI art now.
 
Dwyer says that his work “explores identity, character narrative creation and crafting false memories of relationships in an interactive role digitally crafted before, during and after a state of AI psychosis.” Dwyer explained that he himself fell into AI psychosis – a troubling new phenomenon defined by the Cognitive Behavior Institute as “individuals experiencing psychosis-like episodes after deep engagement with chatbots” – after working with AI for many years. He goes on to explain that “this highlights and embodies a growing trend that can be dangerous or unpredictable which you are not immune to.”

“When you make art, you become vulnerable and so the artwork is vulnerable and that's something that makes it seem more alive or more real or in the moment,” Dwyer said on Wednesday reflecting on the prior day’s protest.
After reading this the Cops arrested the wrong man. They should have arrested the artist for crimes of pretentious artistic stupidity.
 
Just gonna leave this here.


Still, its a travesty what art has become at least in high society. To them, globohomo art is the ideal along with red room bullshit.

1751774782211.webp 1717639790987794.jpg

And if your choice is between flat Bahaus trash and a robot rendering something that at least makes you pause even for a second, its not difficult what people will choose.
 
Just gonna leave this here.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=9Hkov3QcCpQ
Still, its a travesty what art has become at least in high society. To them, globohomo art is the ideal along with red room bullshit.

Ver archivo adjunto 8443947 Ver archivo adjunto 8443952

And if your choice is between flat Bahaus trash and a robot rendering something that at least makes you pause even for a second, its not difficult what people will choose.
First of all "high society" has always been composed almost exclusively of psychopaths, secondly they don't actually like art, they just use it as a form of money laundering and investment. You should feel reassured that they don't like the same things you do.
 
Art education is in a very poor state so nobody produces anything worth looking at.
So true. I'm not a massive art geek but I go to Museums and the amount of modern art that is pure trash is astounding. A coiled rope, a hanging weight, a light switch and the stupid one color cavnases are just 4 of the many egregious examples of shit that isn't even art. Speaking of shit, I went to an art exhibit in Barcelona by an artest who made sculpters out of shit. They used different kinds for different textures. It was pretty terrible IMHO (especially when it was a few blocks away from a Gaudi house. Even that was MILES ahead of what most people produce.
 
In fairness I think "Autofellatio in Clay" next to supposedly serious art is the kind of artistic statement I can support. It worked wonders here, drove someone away from being an artist entirely. Good things happen when would-be artfags put down the paintbrushes.

I don't know how serious it was... I've the weirdest perspective on that post because I was there at the time. I am fairly certain I even met the shitposter.

The snake sculpture was extremely basic. Outside of its head it had a simple uniform pattern going down its body. It didn't really have any sort of style of its own nor was it a expression of skill.

Was it better then the statue of the guy suckling himself off? Yes but the vibe I got was the guy got a rightfully deserved C over being upset about themes.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo