Stop Killing Games (EU edition) - Moldman vs. Publishers

[Hermiöne Granger]

Looks like we will be hitting 1,400,000

https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public

 

[We Are The Witches]

Looks like we will be hitting 1,400,000

https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public

Ver archivo adjunto 7654084

Let's go!

 

[Breadbassket]

 

[Hermiöne Granger]

Ubisoft CEO addresses Stop Killing Games after overseeing the deaths of The Crew and XDefiant: "Support for all games cannot last forever"

Ubisoft is sweating and tugging on their shirt collars

 

[ZMOT]

There's a report of another MEP supporting Stop Killing Games, Kathleen Van Brempt.

there's a chance she's a bit more tuned in, belgium (and netherlands iirc) banned lootboxes for example, so she might know a bit more about the shit publishers are up to.

 

[The Wise Shaman]

Ubisoft CEO addresses Stop Killing Games after overseeing the deaths of The Crew and XDefiant: "Support for all games cannot last forever"

Ubisoft is sweating and tugging on their shirt collars

They're scared, and they think by lying they can turn gamers against SKG.

They don't want their players to keep playing their old games by releasing the necessary software for running them, because these old games would become their very own competitors.

They release a bad sequel? People are no longer forced to migrate to the new title because the old one became unplayable. No more easy profits.

If SKG succeeds, it will force them to make better games, or people will just mod the shit out of old ones while they go bankrupt. A win-win either way!

 

[DefinitelyNotMe]

Looks like Actman will be interviewing Ross soon

 

[Hermiöne Granger]

If SKG succeeds, it will force them to make better games

I doubt the games will improve that much, but it will ruin Ubisofts 'own nothing and be happy' online games. Since Ubisoft wants all their games to be online now, even their singleplayer games.

 

[StacticShock]

Since game publishers wants all their games to be online now, even their singleplayer games with discount for their own retarded shitty security store fronts because they know people will want it on steam instead.

FTFY.

 

[Fellen]

Looks like Actman will be interviewing Ross soon
Ver archivo adjunto 7667488

The Act Man sucks, but more eyes can't hurt.

 

[fuckingIncredable]

do libertariancacas really?

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

It's pretty ironic that if Jason had simply never referred to the campaign at all, then it would have probably died down completely. This is a hallmark of a true cow.

Ver archivo adjunto 7668229
do libertariancacas really?

"Communism is owning the right to things you buy."

 

[Gossip Avoider]

What libertarians don't understand, the government isn't a person on a side but the rope.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

What non-libertarians don't understand is libertarianism
Either way, this might be interesting for those who are genuinely curious about philosophical content and an intellectually honest conversation exchange of ideas, as opposed to mere shit-flinging

Like, by that I mean, it's not some debate bro bullshit, it's really more like a highly interesting conversation between two people who have thought about shit

 

[lamppost]

14 MILLION

 

[Bukke Bruse]

Ross is live right now with ""ActMan" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnRXpP0guXo

They saw the counter reach 1.4

0:26

 

[Frightened Rabbit]

Let us hope this covers for all the boogus signatures.

 

[Measured Kong]

Ver archivo adjunto 7668229
do libertariancacas really?

No, they don’t. This is just a common contrarian shit post on 4chan. You really should pay it no mind.

 

[Hermiöne Granger]

It did just hit 1,400,000 signatures, and it keeps going!!

https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/

 

[lamppost]

What non-libertarians don't understand is libertarianism
Either way, this might be interesting for those who are genuinely curious about philosophical content and an intellectually honest conversation exchange of ideas, as opposed to mere shit-flinging
https://youtube.com/watch?v=-jzaMn-jG64
Like, by that I mean, it's not some debate bro bullshit, it's really more like a highly interesting conversation between two people who have thought about shit

Read a few comments to get a gist of how this went, seems most thought it was an interesting, respectful conversation. This peak lolbertarian made me laugh though...

Just want to point out that he argued that without IP the game creator won’t be able to make money, but also implied that financial incentive corrupts the artistic pursuit of game development. But by that logic, making game development unprofitable would improve the quality of games put out because the only creators left would be the ones who want to make fun games regardless of profitability