- Registrado
- 11 de Mar, 2019
Turn the Other Cheeks:
![homophobic-christianity-political-cartoon[1].png](https://kiwifarms.pa/attachments/homophobic-christianity-political-cartoon-1-png.1912727/ "homophobic-christianity-political-cartoon[1].png")
"Do unto others..." The second coming...
"Do unto others..." The second coming...
💰 Grifter StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)
- Iniciador del tema Pointless Pedant
- Fecha de inicio
-
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack).
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 17 de Ago, 2018
How would this go if he was a fundamental Muslim?
- Registrado
- 27 de Ene, 2014
Part of turning full lolcow is turning the attention on the "real you", this is the mistake Mumkey and so many "content creators" have done.
Can't have a fire without an oxygen source.
- Registrado
- 8 de Nov, 2017
Nigger Foreskin Chewer
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Oct, 2019
Maybe it's just me, but this one feels kind of weak.
- Registrado
- 17 de Mar, 2018
I liked it well enough. It shows how the wokescolds will first try shaming your religion, then try appealing to it when shaming fails. I've seen it a lot, actually. They'll go from "Lol, why would you listen to a 30 year old virgin?" to "Wouldn't Jesus want you to be nice to faggots and trannies because of these Bible quotes I'm cherrypicking?" once they realize they're dealing with someone who can't be controlled by calling them a phobe or ist, or that mockery only drives them deeper into their belief system.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 25 de Feb, 2019
Does that YouTube link even work?
I tried typing that thing in like 50 fucking times and got nothing.
(I know I'll most likely regret finding out what the video actually is, but I simply need to know)
- Registrado
- 6 de Jul, 2015
Amogus
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2019
It's just a "I am SILLY" without being as wordy.
- Registrado
- 8 de Nov, 2017
Yeah except it's literally a thing they try to do, and they do it often.
The less obtuse version is the Ant-Christian people who try to say Jesus was a black communist refugee so Christians need to shut up forever. It's the original bad-faith argument except it's made by people who have no understanding of the thing they're trying to tear down. It would be like someone trying to say Harvey Milk didn't like black people so that means gay men shouldn't be able to adopt, it's just disjointed nonsense but in this case they keep doing it.
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2019
I agree, but the comic just kinda meh.
wtfNeedSignUp
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 17 de Dic, 2019
I also immediately thought of this comic. I think the old version is better despite more text.
In general there seems to be a weird notion that God needs to be a benevolent harmless being rather than a hardass who will fuck you up for going against his teaching.
- Registrado
- 6 de Sep, 2018
The issue he's trying to address is that liberals will paint Christianity as homophobic in an attempt to get pro gay Christians to be anti Christian, while painting Christianity as pro gay to get Christian homophobes to be pro gay. The second panel doesn't really show this enough, it paints the character as a Christian apathetic to homophobia instead of actually homophobic. He would have done better to have had the guy in the srcond panel respond with a proud "yes" or "exactly", which would have made the backtracking of the liberal more realistic while being equally hypocritical.
- Registrado
- 2 de Feb, 2019
Yes is agreeing, it's fundamentally different, than saying "ok, you think that" essentially.
It would end up making a different point than this one: that the guy is just looking for a verbal fight.
- Registrado
- 6 de Sep, 2018
Yeah but its more accurate and has a deeper meaning. The left isn't just looking for a fight, the left is looking to destroy ideologies that oppose it, using any slimy argument it can.
Apparently antifa's newest anti-stonetoss campaign is to just edit "amogus" into his comics for whatever reason. I have no idea how they think this will hurt him. Its amusing none the less.
- Registrado
- 26 de Nov, 2016
At least they improved on the wording. It's not just a huge pile of shit copied from Wikipedia requiring a fucking microscope to read.
Illegally squatting, based.
I fail to see the point, worst would be a Romeo and Juliet case? Wouldn't it make more sense to make the word "Drmocrat" blue?
- Registrado
- 8 de Jun, 2019
Stonetoss and his fans actually love those edits someone just made a fake tweet which went viral of him saying he didn't.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
You're talking to a literally retarded pedophile. The shit he says makes sense only to him.
- Registrado
- 24 de Feb, 2019
Some dude inspect elemented one of his tweets into "please stop putting amogus in my comics", which they all ate up. This is also why every stonetoss tweet has a bunch of stupid antifas saying amogus, because that owns him. Or something.
Given that the "call him a nazi" strategy didn't work, you can already bet this'll go away in a month tops.