💰 Grifter StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

Apparently now "free speech advocate" Elon Musk is banning anyone who mentions Stonetoss's real name and made doxing against the terms of service (before it was specifically allowed)
How is this a change? So-called "deadnaming," without even any actual dox like addresses, has been an instaban for over a decade.

Sounds like some little bitches are just complaining that the rules they've applied to other people are suddenly now being applied to them. And I have no problem with so-called REEEEEEE DAAAAAAWKSING as free speech but it's supposedly not been allowed ever, despite SJWs being allowed to do it with absolute impunity while merely pointing out that Brianna Wu is actually a man named John Walker Flynt has been an instaban for forever.
I do wonder how long it'll take for it to retroactively affect existing dox posts, since there are probably countless others buried throughout the site over the years.
I hope people test it out. Just probe around the boundaries of this retarded Musk policy, because obviously he has no clue what he's doing and is probably stoned out of his mind.
 
How is this a change? So-called "deadnaming," without even any actual dox like addresses, has been an instaban for over a decade.

Sounds like some little bitches are just complaining that the rules they've applied to other people are suddenly now being applied to them. And I have no problem with so-called REEEEEEE DAAAAAAWKSING as free speech but it's supposedly not been allowed ever, despite SJWs being allowed to do it with absolute impunity while merely pointing out that Brianna Wu is actually a man named John Walker Flynt has been an instaban for forever.

I hope people test it out. Just probe around the boundaries of this retarded Musk policy, because obviously he has no clue what he's doing and is probably stoned out of his mind.
Interesting, I didn't know about this. Seems like it got reversed (thankfully) once Elon took over. https://mashable.com/article/elon-musk-x-twitter-changes-anti-trans-harassment-policy

Apparently Libs of Tiktok and Andy N(ig)go(r) "dox" people (post their real names) all the time but they're allowed because Elon is personally a fan of them lmao

The fuck kind of a western world do you live in??
For real lol, it's mainly only Americunt shit

Stonetoss is cute and I WOULD have sex with him
I also have a chubby latino fetish, except for women and not men
 
Última edición:
Is talking about releasing a Stonetoss branded sex toys to own the alogs supposed to be winning? Is he doing a 180 from "ELON BAN THESE PEOPLE" to "Haha I can laugh about my severe psychosexual body dysmorphia too haha"?

The WIRED article in question:
Yeah Hans must have never heard of the Streisand Effect. Hans alone was not prominent enough to get actual media outlets to cover the story. But when Hans went on Twitter to beg Elon to intervene, now it was, because Elon IS prominent enough, especially when what Hans was begging for goes against Twitter's actual written rules which state that name and workplace are not considered personal information.

That was enough to get Wired to cover the story and name him, and of course there were people chomping at the bit to immediately create a Wikipedia article using the Wired article as the key reference. This was predictable as soon as Stonetoss released the statement asking Elon by name to take action, I don't really understand what the thought process was behind that statement.
 
ow is this a change? So-called "deadnaming," without even any actual dox like addresses, has been an instaban for over a decade.

Sounds like some little bitches are just complaining that the rules they've applied to other people are suddenly now being applied to them. And I have no problem with so-called REEEEEEE DAAAAAAWKSING as free speech but it's supposedly not been allowed ever, despite SJWs being allowed to do it with absolute impunity while merely pointing out that Brianna Wu is actually a man named John Walker Flynt has been an instaban for forever.
No, Elon specifically had the new terms of service say that doxing someone (their real name) was allowed. Now it's not allowed since Stonefatty got doxed. Then again, Elon is a lolcow too so...
 
No, Elon specifically had the new terms of service say that doxing someone (their real name) was allowed. Now it's not allowed since Stonefatty got doxed. Then again, Elon is a lolcow too so...
Except doxing isn't just saying someone's real name. So yes, Musk is a hypocrite for doing that, just in a different direction than previous management. My guess is he's a fan of Stonetoss. I wouldn't go so far as to say fan but I like a fair amount of his comics and think his hit/miss ratio is better than most webcomics. There are some I think are retarded repackaged /pol/ memes that aren't very creative, some that I think are funny even though I don't agree with them, and some that are dead-on accurate, e.g. "Burgers?" which is an absolute classic.
 
Except doxing isn't just saying someone's real name. So yes, Musk is a hypocrite for doing that, just in a different direction than previous management. My guess is he's a fan of Stonetoss. I wouldn't go so far as to say fan but I like a fair amount of his comics and think his hit/miss ratio is better than most webcomics. There are some I think are retarded repackaged /pol/ memes that aren't very creative, some that I think are funny even though I don't agree with them, and some that are dead-on accurate, e.g. "Burgers?" which is an absolute classic.
I'd say doxing is saying someone's name if they're an anonymous account. If your Twitter name is something like JohnSmith12345 then it's obviously not, but if it's MAGAPatriot1488 then it would be

Although it'll be funny to see people who dox trannies now get banned/suspended and then cry about it because Elon is assblasted that Stonetoss got doxed
 
If this gets that weird tranny freak caraballo banned I will personally buy one of his retarded flurk plushies from his website.

Elon Musk’s X bans transgender Harvard lawyer for naming a neo-Nazi​

Alejandra Caraballo, a transgender attorney and clinical instructor at Harvard Law School’s Cyberlaw Clinic, has apparently been permanently banned from X (formerly Twitter) for amplifying news of an alleged neo-Nazi’s identity, adding to questions about the platform’s stance on content moderation under Elon Musk’s ownership. The development has fueled ongoing discussions around free speech, hate speech, and the treatment of far-right ideologies on the platform.

Caraballo confirmed the permanent suspension Tuesday morning. Over the weekend, she was temporarily suspended after she changed her profile name to include that of a right-wing extremist notorious for producing content laden with racist and anti-Semitic themes.

Related: Elon Musk and Libs of TikTok Team Up on Transgender Harvard Law Instructor

The extremist, who produces comic illustrations under the name StoneToss, was allegedly unmasked to be a 34-year-old former security guard and IT worker from Texas named Hans Kristian Graebener by a group of activists, Anonymous Comrades Collective and Late-Night Anti-Fascists on March 12, Wiredreports. Critics note that StoneToss’s content is often anti-Semitic, transphobic, racist, homophobic, and otherwise bigoted. Shortly after the group posted the person’s name and photo online, some users on X reported being suspended.

Journalist Steven Monacelli commented on the unusual nature of the enforcement against Caraballo, noting, “Alejandra Caraballo’s account has been put into containment and her display name was changed so it doesn’t include the name of the neo-nazi cartoonist Stone Toss. I’ve never seen this sort of enforcement before. It seems Musk is pulling out all the stops to protect Stone Toss.”

Monacelli further remarked, “Alejandra Caraballo has been suspended. Her account is no longer accessible. All for posting the name of the racist and antisemitic cartoonist Stone Toss.”

Another X user criticized the platform’s decision, writing, “Alejandra Caraballo @Esqueer_ has been suspended again, this time indefinitely for talking about publicly available information naming a Nazi. X is going full fascist. There is only freedom of speech if Elon agrees with you.” This sentiment reflects growing apprehensions over X’s direction under Musk’s stewardship, particularly regarding content moderation and political discourse.

“Elon is personally directing Twitter to protect StoneToss,” Caraballo told The Advocate. “It’s clear through the over-the-top implementation that it’s haphazard and reactionary.”

X’s private information policy explicitly states that mentioning someone’s name is considered publicly available information and does not violate its guidelines. The actions taken against Caraballo have prompted questions about the consistency and objectivity of X’s policy enforcement, especially concerning sensitive political content.

“The fact that Twitter explicitly protects neo-Nazis is morally reprehensible,” Caraballo said, noting that "the person behind the neo-Nazi StoneToss comics personally appealed to his followers with a direct line to Elon. They listened and Twitter cracked down on anyone mentioning the name.”

After the alleged name of the creator spread on social media, StoneToss took to X, calling upon his followers and directly addressing Musk, voicing his stance against what he perceives as efforts to silence him and others on the platform. He declared, “One of you has a direct line to @elonmusk - and you need to use it,” he wrote. He also claimed, “This is about others I know personally. There is a whole ecosystem of artists out there who cannot (or have stopped) making art because of people on Twitter organized to punish them IRL for doing so.” He suggested that minor policy updates could improve the situation for far-right creators who have been chased off of other platforms.

Caraballo shared a screenshot from a violation notice that indicated that her account was suspended for violating X rules on abusive behavior after a user report. According to the notice, changing one’s profile name in a way that the company deems targeted harassment is a violation of the rules.

“I’m not surprised that they did this,” Caraballo said. “They look for any reason to ban people Elon dislikes, and that in particular includes trans people,” adding, “Andy Ngo has been personally trying to get me suspended, and Elon follows him now.”

Musk has previously made derogatory comments about Caraballo, calling her “crazy” in response to a post by Chaya Raichik, the creator of the anti-LGBTQ+ hate account Libs of TikTok.

Caraballo’s ban comes amid broader debates on X’s policies under Musk’s ownership, particularly concerning the treatment of LGBTQ+ users and the platform’s approach to hate speech. Caraballo had been vocal in criticizing X’s handling of far-right content and policy changes that she argued were harmful to the transgender community.

In early March, X faced significant backlash for reversing its policy on anti-trans hate speech. The policy had been designed to reduce the visibility of posts that misgendered or deadnamed users if reported by the targeted individual. The policy reversal, influenced by complaints from right-wing users and influencers, highlighted the platform’s wavering commitment to protecting LGBTQ+ users from harassment. Critics, including advocacy groups and individual users, condemned the change, underscoring a broader concern about X’s policies under Musk’s leadership.

According to GLAAD’s Social Media Safety Index, X is the worst platform for LGBTQ+ user safety.

In search of further insight, The Advocate reached out to the figure known as StoneToss but did not receive a response. When approached for a comment regarding Caraballo’s ban, X responded, “Busy now, please check back later.”

However, late Tuesday night, in response to a post from Libs of TikTok, Musk claimed he didn’t know why Caraballo had been suspended.

“I’m not sure why this account was suspended, but, under our new policy, permanent suspensions are extremely rare and would require many repeated illegal actions (unless obviously just a spam/scam account),” he wrote.

Four hours later, Musk responded to another Libs of TikTok tweet, writing, “The team just informed me that there were several doxxing violations by this account, despite repeated warnings. The suspension is just for a few days, but the suspension time will increase with each repeated violation.”

Caraballo said her suspension is detrimental to her work in bringing national attention to untold stories and coverage of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation but that her work will go on.

“I still have other platforms, so I’ll keep going regardless. Twitter has lost most of its relevancy anyways as it has descended into a cesspit of hate and spam bots,” Caraballo said.

aig yoda laugh.jpg
Look at them bitch about how impotent their doxxing was. They thought they really had something. lol.

No one cares. Stonetoss wins again, you lose.
 

Elon Musk’s X bans transgender Harvard lawyer for naming a neo-Nazi​



Ver archivo adjunto 5849236
Look at them bitch about how impotent their doxxing was. They thought they really had something. lol.

No one cares. Stonetoss wins again, you lose.
Stonetoss was revealed as not the 8.5/10 chad he claimed he was, but instead a fat, dumpy nerd that you retards think looks all studly because he is a fat, terminally online incel like yourself and he makes retarded comics that your diseased brain finds funny. Stonetoss definitely lost here

BTW, I realize you're a newfag rapefugee from /pol/, but coming into a lolcow thread to defend the lolcow, no matter how seething mad you get that we're laughing at Stonetoss for being a fat dumpy nerd, is against the rules.
 
You're always welcome to use the report feature to report things that are against the rules, instead of also shitting up the thread being the yin to their yang
Or you alt-right manlets could not come in here and screech about us mocking Stonetoss because he makes retarded comics that your diseased, autistic brain finds funny
 
Stonetoss was revealed as not the 8.5/10 chad he claimed he was, but instead a fat, dumpy nerd that you retards think looks all studly because he is a fat, terminally online incel like yourself and he makes retarded comics that your diseased brain finds funny. Stonetoss definitely lost here

BTW, I realize you're a newfag rapefugee from /pol/, but coming into a lolcow thread to defend the lolcow, no matter how seething mad you get that we're laughing at Stonetoss for being a fat dumpy nerd, is against the rules.
I don't get the cult of personality stonetoss has, in either direction. He makes cartoons that I chuckle at when I see them reposted, he's not the destroyer of worlds nor some brilliant fountain of wisdom, he's racist family circus
 
Atrás
Top Abajo