🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.

Doe v. Bonnell 1:25-cv-20757 — District Court, S.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    1:25-cv-20757
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. Florida
  • Filed
    17 de Feb, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    440 Civil Rights: Other
  • Cause
    28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Defendant
  • Last Filing
    29 de Jun, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Steven Bonnell, II, Jane Doe

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 367)

# Date Description Filing
280 29 de Jun, 2026 PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby SET before the undersigned on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra (drn) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
29 de Jun, 2026  
29 de Jun, 2026 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 279 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (2213918)
29 de Jun, 2026  
29 de Jun, 2026 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 281 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (766837)
Destiny filed a motion in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion In Limine (the one where they try to exclude improper arguments and evidence from the other's side)

Motion

  • What it is: Defendant Steven K. Bonnell II opposes Plaintiff’s motion in limine and asks the court to deny it in full. He argues Plaintiff is trying to use an evidentiary motion to keep out core defense evidence rather than address clearly inadmissible material.
  • Main argument: The opposition says evidence of consent, implied consent, and Bonnell’s state of mind goes directly to multiple claims and defenses, so it should not be excluded before trial.
  • On CARDII: Bonnell argues the federal statute still makes his knowledge/recklessness about consent relevant, so Plaintiff is wrong to claim that implied-consent evidence is categorically barred.
  • On Plaintiff’s sexual-conduct arguments: The opposition says Plaintiff’s request to exclude evidence of her “sexual behavior or predisposition” is too vague and overbroad, and that Plaintiff herself put parts of that conduct at issue through her allegations and prior testimony.
  • On Bonnell’s documents: He argues his records and communications are sufficiently authenticated through sworn declarations, and that Plaintiff’s attack on them as “self-generated” or unauthenticated lacks merit.
  • On spoliation: The brief says Plaintiff cannot use a motion in limine to raise spoliation/discovery complaints now because discovery is closed and she never timely pursued a motion to compel or spoliation sanctions.
  • On the video recipient (“Solo”): Bonnell argues evidence about the recipient, location, and date format in the Discord logs is crucial because it supports his position that the transmission occurred in April 2022, before CARDII’s effective date.
  • Bottom line: The opposition frames Plaintiff’s motion as an improper attempt to strip out highly relevant evidence on consent, intent, timing, and authentication, and asks the court to deny the motion entirely.

1776102419404.png
Lawyers are funny. Here's from Destiny's In Limine motion:
1776102564474.png

1776102969548.png
"Implied consent." Reminder that this is the definition of consent in CARDII:
1776103042100.png

1776103124718.png
Again, reminder:
1776103228970.png

There are other counts than CARDII, and this is about something being allowed as evidence, so this I assume they will be able to use this in court, but Destiny is surely going to read this on stream and pretend like "implied consent," or "Pxie was a whore," actually matters.

They even bring up the provision above:
1776105016239.png
- I fail to see how it doesn't apply? Nothing in the provision says it doesn't apply if the "person alleged to have violated [CARDII]" was in the video. Are they saying if Pxie sent the video to her boyfriend, with consent (Pxie claims so - while Destiny has testified that he doesn't remember - and Destiny sent the video to Melina), that removes the provision saying it doesn't automatically mean Pxie consented to further disclosure?
- Destiny has said he didn't know about Pxie sharing it with her boyfriend (while also testifying he can't remember any talks about consent to share the video), so it couldn't have been part of his consideration. It doesn't matter if Destiny discovered years later that Pxie shared the video without his consent in terms of whether he had consent to share the video.
- They didn't do "the exact same thing." Pxie shared it with her boyfriend, while Destiny shared it with his then-wife...and a 17yo sex worker with a 2-days-old Twitter account...oh wait, he got catfished! That's how much vetting he did about the people he shared sex tapes of other people with.
 

Archivos adjuntos

They even bring up the provision above:
1776105016239.png
"Dear jury, before you decide whenever or not my client is guilty, have you considered the fact that the plaintiff also did something similar?"

This is the exact type of shit jury should be shielded from. It's completely irrelevant to this case, if you think Pixie did something wrong then sue her faggot(Oh wait, you can't because you admitted that you were ok with that!).
 
"Dear jury, before you decide whenever or not my client is guilty, have you considered the fact that the plaintiff also did something similar?"

This is the exact type of shit jury should be shielded from. It's completely irrelevant to this case, if you think Pixie did something wrong then sue her faggot(Oh wait, you can't because you admitted that you were ok with that!).
Gentlemen of the jury...women today...AMIRITE???
 
Destiny's bothered by kiwis calling his community "dggjeets"
It is true tho.

Dggers also hate women, 70% virginity rate and are all extremely autistic, so either they are indians in the west or just the worst of white people.

Its just so funny, I started putting destiny's streams on the background again, its just destiny listening to a bunch of liberal more mainstream politics podcasters/writers talking about if they should embrance hasan on the democratic party, you literally can't beat the obsession talking point right now, destiny is literally watching every single libtard give their opinion on it and seethe about it like a sperg with the same talking points, @Code Cave posting hasan being one of the most used words recently just shows how obsessed these people are, in the past you could argue it was a hasan talking point to say that, but it is undeniably true now, honestly its kinda unbearable, I can only stomach hasan content for so long.
 
Última edición:
I can only stomach hasan content for so long.
Get over your weak stomach! There are whickTV panels every night to watch about how Hasan is also the enemy! Right now you have a panel right now with NSE and Stacy Cay explaining why a focus on Israel is bad for the party and why they should focus on better policies like expanded trans rights.
 
Get over your weak stomach! There are whickTV panels every night to watch about how Hasan is also the enemy! Right now you have a panel right now with NSE and Stacy Cay explaining why a focus on Israel is bad for the party and why they should focus on better policies like expanded trans rights.
I was going to say that in my post too but it would be too long.

Whick is legit obsessed with jews. I think it was during soypill's debate with destiny where he asked whick what are the most damning things Hasan said, and whick just went "everything about jews" or something like that. Whick really thinks Hasan being a china apologist, russian simp and hate for america is less damning than saying orthodox jews are inbred(even destiny doesn't care about that)

He literally is the goy that was promised, a total simp for kikes.

Erudite is just retarded, this picture alone shows it.
1776126134899.png
 
Última edición:
Destiny's bothered by kiwis calling his community "dggjeets"
A few funny bits of context about that clip:
1) The video Destiny is watching is about an 18-year-old girl who was paralyzed after drinking a roofied drink at a party. Destiny's reaction to hearing this showed a disturbing level of curiosity: "Is this possible?!" and "Oh, it's just for one night?!"
2) The indian Destiny is talking about was actually a caller from yesterday who confronted Destiny about his court case, his alleged pedophilia, and his sexting with a minor. Destiny was flustered by this. So, today's cope: it was actually he, Destiny, who wanted to "address" the "bad talking points going around" about his court case. Remember, Destiny did NOT come off as a bumbling r-slur when confronted.

>After finding out Roses age, why did you keep the child porn to yourself?
>Heh, well, doesn't JSTLK also have child porn on his computer then, too 😏
>Has there been any precedent where the pedophile kept the child porn on his own personal computer for "evidence"?
>Heh, it sounds like you're the child porn expert here, so you tell me 😏


So, with his mocking tone, is Destiny implying here that he is, in fact, a child porn expert (unlike the caller) and knows (unlike the caller) how to store child porn correctly? After all, he says, the FBI did raid his house "like fives times" and were not able to locate the child porn because he stored the porn correctly (?).
 
Última edición:
On Bonnell’s documents: He argues his records and communications are sufficiently authenticated through sworn declarations, and that Plaintiff’s attack on them as “self-generated” or unauthenticated lacks merit.
On the video recipient (“Solo”): Bonnell argues evidence about the recipient, location, and date format in the Discord logs is crucial because it supports his position that the transmission occurred in April 2022, before CARDII’s effective date.
Maybe, molestiny making all of those streams where he did infact fabricate dates was a poor decision. Only time will tell.
 
This is the exact same argument for the abby stuff, right? I'm glad they agree it's for a jury to decide!
>After finding out Roses age, why did you keep the child porn to yourself?
>Heh, well, doesn't JSTLK also have child porn on his computer then, too 😏
>Has there been any precedent where the pedophile kept the child porn on his own personal computer for "evidence"?
>Heh, it sounds like you're the child porn expert here, so you tell me 😏
I keep saying this, but Destiny is constantly admitting he had bespoke CSAM now and nobody even blinks. Also last time I checked, JSTLK didn't have a video of him cranking his hog and moaning a 17 year olds discord handle!
Editted down the gropestiny as much as I could.
If Destiny admits he sexually assaulted Mia Rose by honking her titties, this is a thousand times worse lmao.

An absolute BANGER of a filing from Joan Peters (PBUH).

AI summary:
The plaintiff argues that the defendant’s motion is improper because it tries to:
  • Exclude evidence about the defendant’s communications with a minor (“Rose”) — Plaintiff says this is a disputed factual issue for the jury, not something to decide pretrial. The evidence is relevant to the defendant’s knowledge, intent, and conduct.
  • Exclude “Abbymc” evidence — Plaintiff contends the defendant failed to properly pursue the subpoena and cannot now blame plaintiff’s counsel or seek exclusion as a sanction.
  • Bar the plaintiff from using a pseudonym at trial — Plaintiff notes the court already granted anonymity (ECF 7) under the CARDII statute due to privacy and harassment risks, and Eleventh Circuit precedent supports it.
Highlights:

1776165828622.png

Mentioning "Rose" seen some of the videos Destiny sent, and was aware filmed content was being made for and shared with him. She admitted to seeing some of the videos but she doesn't know Pxie enough to say if it was her video or not:

1776166002509.png

Pxies team are saying the catfishing angle is unsubstantiated
1776166152595.png

1776166262464.png

Abby was homeless for a while:
1776166372250.png
Destiny didn't use any of the courts methods for forcing Abby to testify, objected to discovery being extended and didn't depose her:
1776166439935.png
They say Abbys evidence is authenticated and is being used to corroborate her sworn statement
1776166517536.png
1776166596754.png

Talking about Destiny harassing Pxie
1776166708607.png
Destiny destroyed his own reputation:
1776166760024.png
Andy B is citing cases that don't exist:
1776166793675.png

Destiny seething:
1776166991229.png
"harass my ex-wife in Sweden" - Pxies ex was deposed by Destiny, I don't see why its so INSANE that Melina does too? Also "abusing a mentally ill homeless woman" - he sure does have a type!

Seething in DGG, says Joan is lying on her filings and calls Pxie an "e-girl bimbo whore"
bottom up
1776167707693.png

destiny:
>mfw all of my canvassing and literally everything I'm doing politically is put on hold so this e-girl bimbo whore can call me a pedophile over and over again in court filings https://i.imgur.com/YBKvZbN.png
1776167792845.png
:story:
 

Archivos adjuntos


Interesting short from the molested one. So the logic here is drinking alcohol while pregnant is only immoral if the woman doesn't murder her baby sometime before she gives birth.


Edit: Added a screenshot of some of the comments. DGJeet isn't sending their best.
Original link
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • 1776186312646.png
    1776186312646.png
    1.3 MB · Vistas: 173
Última edición:
destiny abortion.mp4
Interesting short from the molested one. So the logic here is drinking alcohol while pregnant is only immoral if the woman doesn't murder her baby sometime before she gives birth.


Edit: Added a screenshot of some of the comments. DGJeet isn't sending their best.
I'm pretty sure getting an abortion will very much also affect the child in the future by killing them.
Immoralololo.jpg
This one stuck out to me.

And notice how they ALL harp on his use of "intuitive" while sidestepping the point entirely? All the sudden, fetuses are "future people" when the mother wants them, but then they aren't "future people" when the mother doesn't want them.
 
Última edición:
destiny abortion.mp4
Interesting short from the molested one. So the logic here is drinking alcohol while pregnant is only immoral if the woman doesn't murder her baby sometime before she gives birth.


Edit: Added a screenshot of some of the comments. DGJeet isn't sending their best.
Our logical juggernaut implies mistreatment/abuse is permissible as long as there is a planned end to that person's life. Now I can see why he capes for Israel.
 
Our logical juggernaut implies mistreatment/abuse is permissible as long as there is a planned end to that person's life. Now I can see why he capes for Israel.
Also a further entailment of this retarded logic, is it is perfectly acceptable to rape someone in their sleep then murder them before they wake up, because it is only immoral if it causes them some kind of harm in the future. According to Stephens demented worldview a sleeping person isn't conscious, they are just like fetuses, and you can do whatever you want to a fetus as long as you kill it before it wakes up.
 
Also a further entailment of this retarded logic, is it is perfectly acceptable to rape someone in their sleep then murder them before they wake up, because it is only immoral if it causes them some kind of harm in the future. According to Stephens demented worldview a sleeping person isn't conscious, they are just like fetuses, and you can do whatever you want to a fetus as long as you kill it before it wakes up.
Just to fully derail, ofc tiny is of the mind that a baby is only human as they exit the womb at full term. Forget premies, or the fact that those particular cells are the only type that make a human, or that we don't finish developing until mid twenties.

Philosophers have argued about consciousness forever but tiny has this one settled. Forget that babies in the womb kick and punch and listen to their mom and music and tug on their umbilical cords. Unconscious.

So he'd argue anything we said isn't his view because those are all humans but a fetus is a collection of rAnDoM cells.

I'd have more respect for him if he was morally consistent and agreed with all our above absurd examples. Kinda like how bill marr said it's ok to kill healthy postnatal babies.
 
This is a very big and gay video, but not having to watch the full 5 1/2 hours of "Being the 4th wheel on Destiny's second date with Hasan and Andy Milonakis" is the one silver lining to it. If you can watch this video and still believe Steven has a genuine "political" axe to grind with Hasan; you're full on prep pill gay.


Hasan1.mp4
Hasan2.mp4

Steven's just got no fucking rizz, trying to take this nigga to FootLand for a second date? It's over bro, you groped your last turk roach and he's not gonna give you that third date no matter how much you alog him.
Destiny being a repressed homosexual (repressed in the sense that he copes about being bisexual) is the funniest thing about him. Imagine being such a degenerate freak that getting rejected by a turk completely altered and ruined your life.
 
Get over your weak stomach! There are whickTV panels every night to watch about how Hasan is also the enemy! Right now you have a panel right now with NSE and Stacy Cay explaining why a focus on Israel is bad for the party and why they should focus on better policies like expanded trans rights.
Just want to point out that Whick once again has a stream with yet another tranny on to discuss why Hasan and anti-Israel sentiment is the main threat to Democrats.

1776206906742.png
 
Atrás
Top Abajo