🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[cmzng]

Ethan could ask Hila to do a rape review on Steven and check if it was IDF approved or haram.

 

[Blanked Out]

I saw the screenshot with the message, it's somewhere in the nearly 2000 pages of the thread. She did, in fact, claim her parents would never let her do something like that.

I looked through pages 1015 to 1100 (basically all of December), then went to 937 to see the message leaks. Still can't find it. I remember seeing something, but I'm starting to think I have it confused with something else. Does it predate page 937?

If anyone has the message with Rose talking about her parents not ketting her fly out, post it and/or link it.

 

[ERavenswood]

He denies having CP “ON HIS COMPUTER”.

He makes sure to always add that caveat. Probably because of some retarded technicality like “actually it’s on a usb stick”.

Um, actually it's on a publicly accessible Google drive that anyone can access with a link. Destiny is smart because he knows that means it's on the cloud and not actually on his computer

 

[Goonsmoker]

I looked through pages 1015 to 1100 (basically all of December), then went to 937 to see the message leaks. Still can't find it. I remember seeing something, but I'm starting to think I have it confused with something else. Does it predate page 937?

If anyone has the message with Rose talking about her parents not ketting her fly out, post it and/or link it.

So far all I have found is:

I don't know bros, there was like no indication that she might be a minor. It was simply impossible to know.

Ver archivo adjunto 7807021
I get that some parents are like that even if you are barely a legal adult.
But FOR FUCKS SAKE if the girl tells you "My mommy didn't let me visit you " and you don't stop and think that she might not actually be of age then it's on you.

Edit: Holy shit I might have made the same mistake. Scanned nearly 100 pages so far. I think DM quoted is where the parents thing comes from.

I'm actually retarded. Sorry for being a dumb faggot.

 

[dezazlop]

"The Joe Rogan of the Left" is too dumb to...

More like he is not willing to publicly prove and admit that rose was underage, which is smart considering his predicament.

He denies having CP “ON HIS COMPUTER”.

He makes sure to always add that caveat. Probably because of some retarded technicality like “actually it’s on a usb stick”.

Um, actually it's on a publicly accessible Google drive that anyone can access with a link. Destiny is smart because he knows that means it's on the cloud and not actually on his computer

Beat me to it. What is insane to me is that he makes it seems like he still has access to all of it. I doubt his lawyer would greenlight this kind of statement or behaviour, so i wonder if he is specifically hiding the reality that rose was underage from his lawyers.

 

[zomie]

So far all I have found is:



Edit: Holy shit I might have made the same mistake. Scanned nearly 100 pages so far. I think DM quoted is where the parents thing comes from.

I'm actually retarded. Sorry for being a dumb faggot.
Ver archivo adjunto 7841140Ver archivo adjunto 7841147

My memory is that solo is the one who said her parents wouldn't let her go, I don't remember it being an actual dm? He said it when he was mocking Destiny in the thread and vagueposting about the parts of the dms he didn't leak. I might be misremembering though and maybe it is that stuff

 

[StrangerMe]

On this Rose parents' DMs, I remember there existing a screenshot of when she tells him her parents wouldn't let her, but it's totally possible that it's just a faux memory. Sorry, I can't be bothered to look for it tho, I genuinely take Solo's word as gospel at this point, as I've continued to say, I do not think he ever lied about anything, and the things he got wrong he immediately corrected them.
Have you people looked inside of the html files? Haven't checked them myself but they could be there.

W

🤡 Goonclown Publicar en el tema 'Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg'

20 de Nov, 2024

These are all of the logs Solo leaked, but they removed alleged explicit info.

• Water In Times Like This?

Reacciones: x 7 x 3 x 2

These are all of the logs Solo leaked, but they removed alleged explicit info.

Btw, Ethan should unironically make a live reading of those DMs, as Destiny is PURPOSELY trying to call Rose "that Rose person", to try to distance himself from her, but those DMs show he was so close to this minor that he was talking about his affair with Lauren Southern to her.
Don't know if Ethan already sent his lackeys to look for dirt on Tiny, but that's a good one that attacks him on two fronts, his romantic proximity, not only sexual, with the minor, but also on his affair with Lauren Southern.

Catching up with some of the reactions to stuff, but want to take a detour to state this:
TommyC, do not let Kuihman gaslight you, I'm his #1 fan, and have been ever since he covered my Lauren Southern theory years ago, I donate half of my disability checks to him every month! When you think about it he really is just a twink british version of a Vtuber. (My disability is being black, fyi)

 

[ERavenswood]

DGGers lost the plot. They forgot that they're only able to criticize Ethan's past pedo jokes from the angle that he has no right criticizing Destiny's pedo jokes. They can't actually criticize his jokes because they defend Destiny's.

Ethan still has the upper hand in the fact that Destiny actually sexted a minor.

None of this matters though because it's hard to celebrate when your streamer can't even watch the entire Ethan video. Has Destiny even watched the willy video on stream or is he still hiding from that one too? Destiny is a coward and anyone who feels like he's currently winning needs to think about how scared Destiny really is when he prewatches these videos so that he knows which parts to skip on stream.

Any pride a DGGer feels right now is based on mental deficiency.

 

[Eventide]

On this Rose parents' DMs, I remember there existing a screenshot of when she tells him her parents wouldn't let her, but it's totally possible that it's just a faux memory.

No, I definitely remember seeing it too. I think it was posted somewhere on this thread.

 

[Viktor_Suvorov]

I wish you guys all the best of luck in grinding the remaining DGGers into the dirt. They badly deserve it, and I encourage you to remind them of the order of rank of man that we've long since lost as a result of two hundred years of liberalism.

 

[Kay878]

Looks like his fanbase is purely going to focus on Ethan Klein being a nonce on reddit to gaslight themselves into not looking into the gnome's allegations too hard. None of the bigger internet guys seem to want to touch the story.

I'm gonna peace out of the thread for now. It's Destiny so something new is always around the corner. See you guys sometime in the next year for the next scandal. Maybe he'll actually go to jail this time.

Regardless of what happens now, even if he gets away with everything, I'm happy with the knowledge his lawyer is raping him for $95k/month and his son can't stand him.

This thread deducted almost a million dollars from his coffers in lawyer fees. Here's to a million more.

 

[TheManBehindTheCurtain]

I checked the H3 subreddit and of course it's crawling with Destiny fans/brigaders making the usual bad arguments and deflecting with whataboutisms. Molestiny's fanbase are like literal cockroaches lol.

 

[wheel]

For The Next Time a DGJEET Says Destiny Didn't Commit Any Crimes​

Federal Law:​

18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) Coercion & Enticement​

What it prohibits: Using the mail, internet, phone, to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce an individual under 18 to engage in sexual activity or attempting to do so. 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), Cornell Law
But what if he didn’t know she was a minor?
Under § 2422(b), “knowingly” refers to the act of persuasion or enticement, not the victim’s age. The government does not need to prove the defendant knew the person was under 18; it is enough that the victim was in fact under 18. Courts also treat willful ignorance, ignoring red flags or deliberately avoiding confirmation of age, as equivalent to actual knowledge. A mistaken or unverified belief about age is not a defense. United States v. Daniels, 685 F.3d 1237 (11th Cir. 2012)
Attempts: The statute explicitly criminalizes attempts (“or attempts to do so”), and courts treat attempts the same as completed enticement.
18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)
Penalties: Mandatory minimum 10 years, up to life imprisonment.

Spoiler: Evidence of Destiny Committing The Crime

Repeated requests to fly her out: Courts have said that arranging or attempting to arrange travel with the goal of sexual activity is a “substantial step” toward enticement under § 2422(b). Even if the minor declines repeatedly, the adult’s persistence itself can be used to prove intent to persuade/entice.
Enticement via "free trip to Miami:"



When an adult sends sexually explicit material to a minor, federal courts treat that as “distribution to a minor” and it can trigger charges under enticement (§ 2422(b)), because the purpose is to persuade/entice a physical meeting. The Justice Department’s Criminal Resource Manual explains that § 2422(b) covers a wide range of behaviors, from messaging to sharing pornographic material as part of persuasion. Source Another Source

Enticement via distribution of sexual material:

We are all aware of the substantial evidence which prove he has sent dozens of sexually explicit videos which include; multiple videos of himself giving and receiving head, having a threesome, as well as 12 videos of himself masturbating (I've attached one of these instances above). All of which fall under the courts enticement descriptions.

18 U.S.C. § 2423 Transportation of Minors (Mann Act)​

§ 2423(a) – Transporting a minor for sex: Prohibits knowingly transporting a person under 18 across state or international lines with intent they engage in unlawful sex. 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a), Cornell Law
Even if no travel occurred, under § 2423(e) an attempt is punished the same as a completed act
But what if he didn’t know she was a minor?
§ 2423(a) is a strict-liability statute as to age. The government must prove only that the person was under 18; it need not prove the defendant knew this. Courts have held that deliberate blindness or disregard of a victim’s age does not excuse liability. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64 (1994); United States v. Daniels, 685 F.3d 1237 (11th Cir. 2012)
Penalty: 10 years to life imprisonment. 18 U.S. Code § 2423(a) – LII / Cornell Law

Spoiler: Evidence of Destiny Committing This Crime

§ 2423(b) – Traveling to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor: Prohibits traveling interstate/abroad with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct with someone under 18. 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b), Cornell Law
Even if no travel occurred, under § 2423(e) an attempt is punished the same as a completed act
But what if he didn’t know she was a minor?
For § 2423(b), prosecutors must prove the defendant intended to engage in “illicit sexual conduct.” Because that term includes sex with a 16- or 17-year-old when the offender is 24+ (under Florida law, § 794.05), liability attaches based on the victim’s actual age. Willful ignorance, such as ignoring signs she might be underage, or asking for ID but continuing despite refusal, is treated as knowledge. Most courts hold that deliberate avoidance of the truth does not provide a defense.
Penalty: up to 30 years imprisonment. 18 U.S. Code § 2423(b) – LII / Cornell Law

Spoiler: Evidence of Destiny Committing This Crime

§ 2423(e) – Attempts: Attempts to violate (a) or (b) are punished the same as completed acts. 18 U.S.C. § 2423(e), Cornell Law
How courts interpret “attempts”: The law does not require that the minor actually travel or that physical sexual activity ever occur. The crime is complete once the defendant takes a substantial step toward arranging the illegal conduct. Courts have consistently held that repeated efforts, such as offering to buy tickets, setting up meetings, or insisting on travel, demonstrate intent, even if the minor refuses every time. Source

Eight separate offers to arrange flights for a 17-year-old to travel to Florida for sexual activity constitute substantial steps within the meaning of § 2423(e). His repeated persistence despite clear denials, coupled with continuous sexually explicit messages, transmission of sexual videos of himself, requests for explicit videos from her, and detailed descriptions of intended sexual conduct in person, strongly corroborate his criminal intent. Under federal precedent, such conduct is more than mere preparation; it is sufficient to establish an attempt. Ignorance of the victim’s true age is not a defense, age is treated as a strict-liability element, and willful blindness, such as ignoring red flags or proceeding after she says no to showing identification, is treated as equivalent to actual knowledge.

Penalties:
A conviction under § 2423(e) carries the same punishment as the completed offense. Importantly, because each separate attempt can be charged individually, a defendant who made multiple attempts to travel a minor, even if the minor declined every time, could face multiple counts, each carrying severe penalties.

​

Federal Child Pornography Statutes

18 U.S.C. § 2251 – Production​

What it prohibits: Persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of creating a visual depiction.
Application here: By requesting and receiving explicit videos from someone under 18 years old, the adult can be charged with causing the production of child pornography, even if the minor filmed themself voluntarily. Federal law treats the request or encouragement as inducement.
But what if he didn’t know she was a minor?
Age is a strict liability element. It is enough that the person depicted was under 18, the defendant’s belief or ignorance about age does not provide a defense. Courts have also applied the doctrine of willful blindness, meaning ignoring red flags (e.g., messaging about the individual looking underage or asking for ID but continuing without confirmation) is treated as actual knowledge.
Penalty: 15–30 years imprisonment for a first offense.
18 U.S.C. § 2251, Cornell Law

Spoiler: Evidence of Destiny Committing This Crime

I've seen talk of Destiny requesting a video of Rose giving head but I could not find the screenshot.

18 U.S.C. § 2252 & § 2252A – Distribution / Possession of ​

What they prohibit: Transporting, mailing, distributing, receiving, or possessing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
Application here:
By receiving her explicit videos, he can be charged with receipt and possession of child pornography.
By sending multiple explicit videos of himself to her, prosecutors can treat this as distribution of sexual material to a minor, which strengthens enticement charges and may also support distribution liability if charged under § 2252/2252A.
But what if he didn’t know she was a minor?
These statutes are also strict liability as to age. If the person depicted is under 18, it does not matter whether the defendant believed otherwise. Courts consistently reject mistake-of-age defenses in child pornography prosecutions. Willful ignorance, such as refusing to confirm age despite doubts, can be used to show culpability.
Penalty:
Receipt/distribution: 5–20 years for a first offense.
Possession: Up to 10 years.
Repeat offenders: 15–40 years.
18 U.S.C. § 2252, Cornell Law
18 U.S.C. § 2252A, Cornell Law

Spoiler: Evidence of Destiny Committing This Crime

Destiny admitting to receiving multiple videos of her having sex:


By sending multiple explicit videos of himself to her, prosecutors can treat this as distribution of sexual material to a minor.
We are all aware of the substantial evidence which prove he has sent dozens of sexually explicit videos which include; multiple videos of himself giving and receiving head, having a threesome, as well as 12 videos of himself masturbating.

Florida State Law​

Fla. Stat. § 847.0138 – Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors by Electronic Device
Makes it a third-degree felony for an adult to knowingly send harmful/sexual material electronically to a person who reasonably should be known, to be under 18.
The law requires the adult either knew or should reasonably have known the recipient was a minor.
If there were red flags (e.g., logs of him doubting her age, asking for ID but not receiving it, yet continuing sexting), prosecutors may argue the “should have known” standard is satisfied.

---

"But Sar!! He won't be charged with anything! He didn't sleep with the teenager!!"
​

Criminal offences in relation to attempted meeting:
§ 2422(b) is about persuading/inducing/enticing a minor (not transporting); attempts are expressly covered and punished the same as completed enticement. Legal Information Instituteca11.uscourts.gov Each of the 8 attempts could be charged separately as “attempted enticement.”
Penalty: Minimum 10 years, up to life.
Mistake of age: Not a defense in the Eleventh Circuit. Legal Information InstituteCourtListenerU.S. Sentencing Commission
§ 2423(a) (transporting a minor) carries 10 years to life and does not require knowledge of age per multiple circuits; CourtListenerThird Circuit CourtOnline Sunshine
§ 2423(b) (traveling oneself) carries up to 30 years and does not require knowledge of age per multiple circuits;
§ 2423(e) Makes attempts to commit (a) or (b) punishable the same as if completed. Even if she never traveled, repeated attempts to set it up may qualify as “substantial steps.”. Legal Information InstituteThird Circuit Courtecf.ca8.uscourts.gov
Knowledge of age is not an element; multiple circuits reject a mistake-of-age defense.

Criminal offences in relation to sexting:
§ 2251 (Production): Persuading or coercing a minor to create/send sexually explicit images/videos.
Applies here if a 17-year-old sends explicit videos of themself. That would be treated as production.
Penalty: 15–30 years (first offense).
18 U.S.C. § 2251
§ 2252 & § 2252A (Receipt/Distribution/Possession): Receiving or possessing explicit material of a minor is a crime; sending explicit material to a minor can also count as distribution to a minor.
Penalties: 5–20 years (receipt/distribution), up to 10 years (possession), 15–40 years for repeat offenses.
18 U.S.C. § 2252 | 18 U.S.C. § 2252A
Mistake of age: Not a defense in federal child pornography cases (U.S. v. X-Citement Video, 513 U.S. 64 (1994)).

Florida Statute § 847.0138 – Transmission of Material Harmful to Minors​

Makes it a third-degree felony for an adult to send sexual material electronically to someone known, or who should reasonably be known, to be under 18.

 

[Shitoko]

My father watches this pozzed cock-sucking baggot cuckbull.
>But he fucks more people (no matter their gender) than his wife fucks people (also no matter their gender) therefore he's a totally based leftist bull gigachad
Only middle schoolers find this type of behaviour cool. No wonder his son is an alt-right chud.

Spoiler: nsfw

0:08

 

[oinko]

Btw, Ethan should unironically make a live reading of those DMs

He should have read this one

Ethan's made pedo jokes but Destiny actually gets off on the thought of training a "young person" to be a "little pleasure servant."
I'm sure the "young person" in his fantasy is 18 right?


The kid getting babysat is 18 right?

 

[dancantbreath]

My father watches this pozzed cock-sucking baggot cuckbull.
>But he fucks more people (no matter their gender) than his wife fucks people (also no matter their gender) therefore he's a totally based leftist bull gigachad
Only middle schoolers find this type of behaviour cool. No wonder his son is an alt-right chud.

Destiny sucking cock.webm

Pretty sure you need to spoiler nsfw content

 

[Shitoko]

Pretty sure you need to spoiler nsfw content

I forgot how to.

 

[For Scorn and Three Birds]

Brave Tiny ran away Bravely ran away!
When danger rears its ugly head Tiny turns his tail and fled.
lol he ran like a coward from Ethan kike lmfao
I am sure he is so intimidating with the constant scratching, coughing and tics.
DEBATE ME BRO!!!!!
NO NOT LIKE THAT!!!

 

[I HATE THE ANTICHRIST!]

Edit: Holy shit I might have made the same mistake. Scanned nearly 100 pages so far. I think DM quoted is where the parents thing comes from.

You are right, that's instagram so not the DM from Rose, my bad.
@Zoomie is correct, I conflated the instagram screenshot with this because it basically says the same thing that Solo was saying.

There was no offer of money to Rose.
Though @Blav might find this interesting, he offered to fly Rose out to him like 5+ times to "come stay a couple nights" because he supposedly has so many airline miles. He also got a bit upset when she declined because her parents wouldn't have allowed her to, he insisted she should be old enough to visit lol

 

[ERavenswood]

Their narrative is that Ethan is running away from debating Destiny by putting the condition that Destiny must watch the full video. They say he can't watch the full video or debate because it would be bad for his pxie case, while still saying Ethan is too cowardly to debate and would theoretically run away if Destiny could debate. Clearly a cope since Destiny has been openly talking about the case up until now, but such is the way of the DGGer.

Convenient excuse though. Destiny chose flight over fight. He's on the back foot. He's panicking. Comfort yourselves knowing that he will have many sleepless nights despite his supposed bravado. Even if the law doesn't dedicate any resources towards him, the thought of the law observing his actions and coming to pick up his hard drive at anytime will always be in the back of his mind.