- Registrado
- 17 de Feb, 2019
Yeah it is funny, that's why it's not punished by thread bans.
Take it with a grain of salt, not as a personal attack.
Sperg about race realism here - So we can stop shitting up the community watch thread
- Iniciador del tema ProgKing of the North
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Take it with a grain of salt, not as a personal attack.
- Registrado
- 2 de Abr, 2019
That's not how you get rid of the nips. It's like you've never watched Popeye before.
TL;DW: First you eat the spinach then you slap a Jap. Repeat as necessary.
Emperor Julian
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 20 de Dic, 2015
The fact I don't actually believe it or even care but it personally bothered you validated it whereas the race realism is either done to death unfunny edglord shit or you're talking to someone genuinly stupid enough to believe it.
Both of which are boring as fuck.
This is why blackfishing exists. She'd rather change her body than enter coitus with you.
Soon all the noble aryan women will be bootylicious. Her flesh and soul are clay Because she'd rather fuck Tyrone than nevil.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 2 de Ene, 2017
You're suggesting he remove the stick from his ass.
For someone who uses a phrase like "caremad", he sure does get angry that his pet cause is being mocked.
EDIT:
Dude, the mod told you to knock it off and you kept shitposting and trying to start internet fights with everyone else, including said mod. I'm sorry that you're used to Hiroshimoot's cucked moderation, but that's not how things work elsewhere on the internet.
- Registrado
- 17 de Feb, 2019
Also breeding through racial purity is for inbred jews.
SparklyFetuses
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 1 de Mar, 2017
> "She is protected by the Guardians of the Universe... The BLACK Men"
What the hell happened to the Gayniggers from Outer Space?
- Registrado
- 17 de Feb, 2019
They live, forever in our hearts.
- Registrado
- 30 de Jul, 2016
- Registrado
- 29 de Mar, 2019
Most human races are distant enough to be considered totally different sub-species. Blacks in particular are extremely distant from every other race. Blacks are predisposed to lower intelligence on account of various, specific genomes. Blacks under-perform on all testing, even when they are wealthy or whites are poor, and are genetically predisposed to violent activity. In fact, blacks are so violent they almost singlehandedly make the United States a dangerous place to live. What is considered "white" may be determined pretty reliably through genetic observation. A vast majority of human accomplishment in science & art made within the past several hundred years has been localized to a pocket of Europe. Mixed children most frequently inherit a majority of the black (read: negative) attributes, occupy an identical (read: poor) place in society and suffer from disorders far more than anybody else.
"Race realism" doesn't exist, science does. I'm not even white and I can accept that based purely on empirical data & study.
"Race realism" doesn't exist, science does. I'm not even white and I can accept that based purely on empirical data & study.
Ughubughughughughughghlug
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Mayo, 2019
Common sense tells that there are racial components to behavior.
Behavior is known to be partially based in genetics.
Races simply refer to large groupings of people with similar genetics.
Thus, it is reasonable to suppose that behavior is partially based in racially-associated genes.
The only question is in what specific ways, and to what extent. I believe it to be to a minor extent, not worth basing public policy off of and not sufficient to explain things like the differences between civilizations.
Behavior is known to be partially based in genetics.
Races simply refer to large groupings of people with similar genetics.
Thus, it is reasonable to suppose that behavior is partially based in racially-associated genes.
The only question is in what specific ways, and to what extent. I believe it to be to a minor extent, not worth basing public policy off of and not sufficient to explain things like the differences between civilizations.
NiggerFaggot1488
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 28 de Mar, 2018
Shut up nerd.
Kiwifarms isn't a hugbox for libs to snark about racists either.
SparklyFetuses
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 1 de Mar, 2017
@NiggerFaggot1488 Not related to the topic, but you do know that there's the "Edit" option to add more stuff (and quote more than 1 message), right?
- Registrado
- 13 de Jun, 2019
I'm too lazy to make a good post on this, but check out this podcast.
At around 30 mins in Sam Harris makes a great point that even broaching the topic of genetic inclination leading to the rise of civilization in certain areas is considered a serious taboo. The guy he's interviewing does not think it has anything to do with race, and still deals with criticism for trying to figure out why Africa for example has never made technological advancements.
The worst part about it? He mainly gets flack from the people that are supposed to be studying it: anthropologists.
The topic is taboo among anthropologists. That's absolutely insane to me.
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that white people are not allowed to be proud to be white, yet black people are encouraged to be proud to be black. Or that the vast majority of popular male musicians are rappers / hiphop? Anything like that?
At around 30 mins in Sam Harris makes a great point that even broaching the topic of genetic inclination leading to the rise of civilization in certain areas is considered a serious taboo. The guy he's interviewing does not think it has anything to do with race, and still deals with criticism for trying to figure out why Africa for example has never made technological advancements.
The worst part about it? He mainly gets flack from the people that are supposed to be studying it: anthropologists.
The topic is taboo among anthropologists. That's absolutely insane to me.
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that white people are not allowed to be proud to be white, yet black people are encouraged to be proud to be black. Or that the vast majority of popular male musicians are rappers / hiphop? Anything like that?
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 17 de Feb, 2019
That's why I love Sam Harris, there's not nor there should be any "taboo" while studying or researching anything, the issue is that this high profile "academics" are just PC fearful pussies.
And also there's a gigantic amount of actual racist manbabies that just want to validate their idea of other races as inferior to feel better about their small peepees because they need the group they are part of to carry them.
- Registrado
- 2 de Ene, 2017
It's taboo out of (justifiable) fear that the public will hear the phrase "there are genetic components to intelligence, and certain races have genes that make them more intelligent than others" as "X race ubermensch, Y race untermensch", when in reality that would make about as much sense as splitting society along the lines of other genetic traits that correlate with intelligence (like depression or schizophrenia).
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2019
That bitch looks like a potato with and without the nigger pay n spray.
- Registrado
- 23 de Abr, 2019
Lance Armstrong did nothing that every other fucking cyclist doesn't do as well and you wont change my mind.
- Registrado
- 7 de Mayo, 2019
Pardon the mild digression:
Has Sam been able to move past his habitual contempt for Trump and go back to putting on podcasts like he used to prior to 2016? I typically appreciate his perspective (and he could have been sperging about Mary Poppins for all I care about the "who" involved), but I just couldn't handle that obsessive nonsense littering topics that (should have) had little or nothing to do with Trump at all.
Has he calmed down enough to resume listening to him again, would you say?
- Registrado
- 24 de Mar, 2019