Soyjak.Party / The Sharty - The altchan born from the ashes of /qa/; also a containment thread

Destacado
Citizen Kane (Easton) dijo:
NAS. Kamalajak is missing the stubble and glasses, which is primarily why only guys are drawn as 'jaks.
Presiona para expandir...
'riants no longer need stubble and glasses to be IAS. Look at Chud and Amerimutt -- both of them mock soyboy behaviour (and therefore soyboys), but they don't have the stubble and glasses. 'riants also don't have to be traced off a soyboy; Perrojak is an extremely underrated gem, and he wasn't traced off a stereotypical soyboy.
Jonny Greenwood dijo:
Then again, the Mexican wojak also has neither
Presiona para expandir...
Meximutt is a dead 'riant. It was created to mock one specific person, and now that he's no longer active, we don't need that 'riant anymore. If we want to mock crass and uninformed Mexican behaviour, we need a new 'riant.
 
Space Police dijo:
'riants no longer need stubble and glasses to be IAS. Look at Chud and Amerimutt -- both of them mock soyboy behaviour (and therefore soyboys), but they don't have the stubble and glasses. 'riants also don't have to be traced off a soyboy; Perrojak is an extremely underrated gem, and he wasn't traced off a stereotypical soyboy.

Meximutt is a dead 'riant. It was created to mock one specific person, and now that he's no longer active, we don't need that 'riant anymore. If we want to mock crass and uninformed Mexican behaviour, we need a new 'riant.
Presiona para expandir...
As an experienced and respected soyical scholar, I deny everything this man claims.

pig says.png >b-b-ut appeal to authority fallacy

Fallacy fallacy! I'm right.
 
soy woah jaque dijo:
You have some of the dumbest takes in the thread nigga
Presiona para expandir...
Most of the soyquotes and OCs I've seen with Meximutt are coal. The only time it's not coally to use that 'riant is when you're specifically mocking Satoko_Houjou_Fan. The main enduring legacy of Meximutt/Satoko is "o algo" because it's a good way to make people you're quoting look confused; the rest shouldn't be used if you're not mocking Satoko_Houjou_Fan.
 
Punished Derich dijo:
Lmao what did @aseroknbgerj do to get perma'd
Presiona para expandir...
No idea, I personally had nothing to do with this, because while he was annoying, I didn't personally find anything relatively rule breaking more than the usual sharty poster here. I was satisfied in just having his posts hidden from my view.

Typically, bans around here are handed out because of a few things.
1. Being a massive fucking faggot outside of your containment pen (most likely case)
2. You're an alt of someone who was already banned, or of a lolcow. (also likely)
3. You've posted something that was extremely illegal (also likely)
4. You're under a certain age with evidence (also likely)
5. You're a known person of interest who is trying to find refuge or infiltrate here. (also likely)
E.g. Osama Bin Laden has a Kiwifarms account, if we find out he's literally Osama Bin Laden, he's probably going to get banned.
There are some other reasons, that I don't know, because I'm not a moderator/admin/janitor; this is just what I see as regular user.

I wouldn't be personally surprised if someone would get banned because they sent 20+ images of Shoveldog.gif to Null, or a moderator.
Edit: Decided to look over it, and came to this possible conclusion. "Was most likely an alt of a user that came from Skibidifarms, because the ban happened around the same time as the Moat nuke happened, and we've been dealing with SF fags trying to falseflag via sock raids since the 31st ever since their thread went up."

That's my best guess, it could be something simpler like "Dude posted 50 different images of anime cunny in a DM to Null."
I really have no clue, but the timing of the nuke, along with his places he posted kind of make it make sense.
>But Detective Sue! He was saying he hates Foodists, and calling them trannies and such or algo.
Yes, that is true, however, could've been a fail op, and again, this is just my working theory. It could've been something much more simpler or irrelevant to the current issue at hand.
 
Última edición:
Suenonym dijo:
>But Detective Sue! He was saying he hates Foodists, and calling them trannies and such or algo.
Yes, that is true, however, could've been a fail op, and again, this is just my working theory. It could've been something much more simpler or irrelevant to the current issue at hand.
Presiona para expandir...
He came across as a Foodist derailer to me. Isn't it really common for Foodists to disparage Foodists in their gayops?
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo