Soyjak.Party / The Sharty - The altchan born from the ashes of /qa/; also a containment thread

[Jättineekeri]

One of my complaints would be that they started testing out the line between what is allowed and what is not. I don't care about the babyjak thing as much as the mexiaryan pedophile but both of these things have been done with the intentions to change the site's culture and relax things around these rules of what's allowed and not.

Of course i also hate karma's plan of turning the site from a soyjak booru to a general social media site where users post memes and talk on forums. To me that signals the death and loss of soybooru and sharty.

>relax things around these rules of what's allowed and not.
Except they did the opposite

 

[bromanhoser]

This has never happened

Homocaust?

 

[ESPer]

If you can't see them yourself you might just be blind or retarded. Either way they happened gradually after and honestly even before they released the recode

Shining glistening projecterald

 

[Israel Light]

This has never happened

They're literally doing this blatantly now though there was a more subtle change of attitude over time

Publicar en el tema 'Soyjak.Party / The Sharty'

15 de Jun, 2026

​

Referendums coming to the Booru.​

Due to the outrage of Cobblestone allowing implicit pro-pedophilic posts as shown here, she has allowed the booru userbase to create referendums.
Also you can turn pedophiles into gigachad now, despite Cobblestone saying you cannot do that because "it's not traditionally considered something you mock someone with as opposed to mexiaryan." [source]

"What did xhe say?"​

>polls are...​

• goldjak

Reacciones: x 9 x 1 x 1

 

[ESPer]

Hey what did I do personally?
I want to use this account more often i’m getting old for soysphere stuff

Don't take it personally kid

 

[frutiger aero]

>relax things around these rules of what's allowed and not.
Except they did the opposite

Both things can be true at once. They relaxed things they shouldn't have relaxed and did the opposite with other things.

So NOTHING changed then

And 5 of you told me i was a moron for not knowing about the nothing that changed
kek?

Please bait somewhere else.

 

[Israel Light]

>relax things around these rules of what's allowed and not.
Except they did the opposite

Both things can be true at once. They relaxed things they shouldn't have relaxed and did the opposite with other things.

This

 

[ESPer]

Homocaust?

What about it??????

 

[pina coalada lover]

He can keep his admins on better leash for example.

wouldn't that just be rulecucking but for admins, they are told to enforce the rules they best they understand it, everyone interprets things differently, sometimes poorly, punishing someone for doing what they're told is nonsensical

Maybe not give admin powers to literal shitskin mudslime immigrants/bpd girlies

and give it to who? as far as i can tell you all consider sharty users to be the stupidest people on the internet (i agree sometimes)

Why hire imperfect admins? With how hard it is to be a janny on Quote's sites he must do better than that.

because nobody is perfect, a perfect admin would be would read people's minds and ban them when they have bad intentions, nobody knows what the other person actually means when they say or post something

The admins he hired are doing the exact opposite, and so would he if he was active.

and so what would you like him to do, step down and give or sell the site to someone potentially completely unknown who he knows none of their intentions to the site? this already happened and it didn't go well

Another thing, if it's a hobby to spent 80$ on three sites you can't or don't want to manage you must have very bad financial decisions or have too much money to care.

he clearly cares about the site or when he got it from froot he would've jsid or sold it, but he's still hanging on to it despite everything, nobody has time to do everything they want, if quote was paid to go full time on the sharty for the rest of his life i doubt he'd pass the opportunity

obligatory wordswordswords

 

[Jättineekeri]

wouldn't that just be rulecucking but for admins, they are told to enforce the rules they best they understand it, everyone interprets things differently, sometimes poorly, punishing someone for doing what they're told is nonsensical

and give it to who? as far as i can tell you all consider sharty users to be the stupidest people on the internet (i agree sometimes)

because nobody is perfect, a perfect admin would be would read people's minds and ban them when they have bad intentions, nobody knows what the other person actually means when they say or post something

and so what would you like him to do, step down and give or sell the site to someone potentially completely unknown who he knows none of their intentions to the site? this already happened and it didn't go well

he clearly cares about the site or when he got it from froot he would've jsid or sold it, but he's still hanging on to it despite everything, nobody has time to do everything they want, if quote was paid to go full time on the sharty for the rest of his life i doubt he'd pass the opportunity

obligatory wordswordswords

>give it to who

Jcla

 

[frutiger aero]

wouldn't that just be rulecucking but for admins, they are told to enforce the rules they best they understand it, everyone interprets things differently, sometimes poorly, punishing someone for doing what they're told is nonsensical

I'm not saying admins shouldn't do anything but i think all of the admins should still be on the same page as to what's allowed and not. And this is a blatant attempt at normalizing things that shouldn't be normalized.

 

[ESPer]

They're literally doing this blatantly now though there was a more subtle change of attitude over time

Publicar en el tema 'Soyjak.Party / The Sharty'

15 de Jun, 2026

​

Referendums coming to the Booru.​

Due to the outrage of Cobblestone allowing implicit pro-pedophilic posts as shown here, she has allowed the booru userbase to create referendums.
Also you can turn pedophiles into gigachad now, despite Cobblestone saying you cannot do that because "it's not traditionally considered something you mock someone with as opposed to mexiaryan." [source]

"What did xhe say?"​

>polls are...​

• goldjak

Reacciones: x 9 x 1 x 1

How is hosting referendums 'catering to hunkys'?

This also sounds like a bad idea, given how mindless the userbase is sometimes

 

[Israel Light]

How is hosting referendums 'catering to hunkys'?

This also sounds like a bad idea, given how mindless the userbase is sometimes

>how is giving the mindless hunky majority referendums they could use to ban what they don't like catering to them

 

[ESPer]

Please bait somewhere else.

If you think that one account spamming babyjak posts is 'major administrative changes' then you are infact, baiting ME.

 

[Day Of Liberation]

Everyone here is autistic.

 

[Coberald]

wouldn't that just be rulecucking but for admins, they are told to enforce the rules they best they understand it, everyone interprets things differently, sometimes poorly, punishing someone for doing what they're told is nonsensical

Actually I think Quote should run the sharty like a plantation with the jannies as his niggers where he abuses, fires, and doxes them for the slightest failure.

 

[Jättineekeri]

I'm not saying admins shouldn't do anything but i think all of the admins should still be on the same page as to what's allowed and not. And this is a blatant attempt at normalizing things that shouldn't be normalized.

Yeah it's really funny when 1 admin doesn't give a fuck about a post i make and another bans me over it (Totally not a personal thing). Even funnier when that same admin goes around posting funny pedophile flag aryans (idgaf about that but the hypocrisy is off the charts)

 

[frutiger aero]

If you think that one account spamming babyjak posts is 'major administrative changes' then you are infact, baiting ME.

"one account" posting these wouldn't be bad. HOWEVER. That one account is karma's friend. It changes a lot then doesn't it?

 

[Jättineekeri]

Everyone here is autistic.

"All of us are autistic"

 

[Andrew Cobson]

1:05

generalgoldencat is shiwi culture