Sound Arguments from MrEnter?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
I think Mr. Enter is a little more acceptable when he doesn't take his reviews personally. That's why I think his positive reviews are his better works. He's a bit more critical and carries more valid arguments when there's a show/episode he likes. It's when he has something to complain about, he gets really obnoxious. His negative reviews bob between 'between legitmately disappointment' and 'turning into a whiny bitch and taking it too personally'. He almost sounded depressed over an MLP episode where Fluttershy gets aggressive, for crying out loud.
 
I think Mr. Enter is a little more acceptable when he doesn't take his reviews personally. That's why I think his positive reviews are his better works. He's a bit more critical and carries more valid arguments when there's a show/episode he likes. It's when he has something to complain about, he gets really obnoxious. His negative reviews bob between 'between legitmately disappointment' and 'turning into a whiny bitch and taking it too personally'. He almost sounded depressed over an MLP episode where Fluttershy gets aggressive, for crying out loud.

He actually WAS depressed over that episode. For three straight days.
 
Usually I agree with him whenever he does review something that is legitimately bad, like the Bubsy cartoon and the newer Spongebob episodes. But he tends to blow things out of proportion as others have said.
 
I agree with him about the whole "just because its for kids it doesn't have an excuse to be awful", but on the other hand I don't expect every cartoon to be or have Last Airbender or Gravity Falls levels of quality to consider it good.
 
As a fan of Westetrn animation, myself - I agree with Enter on only one thing - Kids don't deserve awful things like awful cartoons all the time. Too bad that's where it begins and ends for me - (without saying examples) not everything can be perfect. Every good cartoon has its flaws and not all unpopular stuff is as terrible as he and his fantards, or anyone else like him, make it out to be. THAT is why I can't agree with anything he says or does - he over-analyzes and over-criticizes far too much for his own good.

Having (high) standards is good and all - but setting them too high is a pretty stupid idea.
 
I don't have a problem with him pointing out flaws in something. He has proven in the past that he could do calmer reviews and I honestly thought his Ren Seeks Help was ironically one of his better ones. The issue for me is when he acts like these cartoons have murdered his whole family and uses that as a way to pad out the videos with the same kind of filler that he's often complained about before.
 
I will agree that the characters from Teen Titans Go! act like toddlers ("Toddler Titans"). There's times I've felt my IQ temporarily drop the times I've watched it.
I also agree with him how it doesn't really follow up on the actual show, and instead uses the characters for gags, without much character continuity.
 
From the Asexuality journal:

even if the guys were drawing pictures of dicks. I seriously don't get that. They call everything gay as an insult while being obsessed about dicks.
 
Allen Gregory was a supremely fucked up, unfunny show.
I feel like actual rocks have figured that out, though. Like, if you sent an undersea geological vessel to the lowest place in the ocean and pulled out a core sample that hasn't seen the sun since the Precambrian era, and then you showed it "Allen Gregory", the ancient sands would form themselves into the words FUCK YOU.
 
His stance on most adult cartoons that aren't that big is valid as well. However, I feel it's not simply because most of them don't take themselves seriously enough. What I'm getting at is in order for something to be funny, the actor must convey that it's something serious to the character. In other words, the actor must take the material seriously to an extent and not act like he knows it's funny.

I also agree with him in terms of comedy and brevity. This is best used in the musical A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum. The comedy in that not only works because of the writing, but it also works because the actor knows how to pace him or herself and jokes don't linger for two long. In fact, the next to last scene of the musical is simply a big chase with little jokes.

TL;DR: Comedy is about rhythm.
 
Sorry if me reviving a dead thread bothers anybody, but I did talk to him and he made a pretty good point about censorship here:
Some Wise Words from MrEnter.png
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo