Since the money that the somalis (not just from the daycares) have been scamming has been going back to Al-Shabaab, I don't think it would be unreasonable to charge people involved with treason. Waltz and his administration need to quite literally hang for this. He can go meet his school shooter friends in hell.
When looking up Al Shabaab up, I saw that progressive liberalism rubbing off on Al-Shabaab
:
Ver archivo adjunto 8361551
Even 3rd world terrorist groups are cleaner than Indians....
Point of Autism: Treason was so utterly over-abused prior to the founding of the US that treason itself is one of the few crimes with an explicit and extremely narrow definition in the US Constitution itself.
US Constitution Article III §3 ¶1 dijo:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.
Link
Given further paragraph 3 of Section 2:
US Constitution Article III §3 ¶3 dijo:
The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed.
Link
...which requires trials for crimes to he held in the state the crime was committed, getting any conviction for anything connected to this pile of bullshit is going to be an uphill battle.
Juries are
supposed to be randomly selected from the area in which the crime was committed. Prosecution and Defense both have only a limited ability to tweak the composition of the jury to attempt to counter biases. So, given the current demographic makeup of Minnesota, it is likely that one or more Somali, Muslims, libshit sympathizers, or any combination thereof ends up on that jury. It is particularly likely if they are motivated to conceal their intention to make sure their Muslim Somali brethren escape the kaffir's persecution. Look up Taqiyya. That will
severely reduce any chances at conviction, despite how plainly clear the evidence may be.
Prosecution for any crimes connected to this must be strategic and surgically precise, with overwhelming evidence that would leave the jurors afraid to even think about nullification.
So while I sympathize with the sentiment, treason itself is off the table. Fortunately, we have laws on funding terrorists and money laundering that can be brought to bear, and are hopefully more likely to successfully used.