In the land of California, the SJW wields great power, and with it they seek only to KILL!
To kill equality, the rule of law, and the dominion of reason.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/06/us/politics/judge-persky-brock-turner-recall.html
This article by itself is pretty damning, but take a closer look at some of the longer articles and this becomes an even more terrifying tale of a broken, bitter feminist SJW taking out her misandrist frustration at men (and her inability to raise kids that don't suicide) out on a public figure.
Our Source: Huffpost. Put on your gloves and a respirator, we're going in.
Here is our villain, Michele Dauber, professor at Standford Law. She's also a close personal friend of the family of 'Emily Doe', the alleged victim of the drunken alley hookup.
Despite Turner being convicted on multiple felonies and being placed on a sex offender registry for life, Dauber was not satisfied. She was convinced that someone had to suffer as much as poor 'Emily' had done - you know, after they emotionally tortured her by convincing her she was a ruined victim after the incredible violation of a drunk prom night fingerbang.
Despite getting tones of money, committing assault in front of police and getting away with it, she was so sad. All she wanted to do was ruin the life of an innocent man and replace him with a stronk, independent womyn that would pass sentences that Dauber approves of!
Much more sadly, people disagreed with her!
This issue, and this woman, is a fountain of terrible cringe - in part two, coming tonight, we'll get into her personal failings as a parent and her practice run at Stanford to turn an accusation into a kangaroo court.
To kill equality, the rule of law, and the dominion of reason.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/06/us/politics/judge-persky-brock-turner-recall.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/06/us/politics/judge-persky-brock-turner-recall.htmlAaron Persky, the California judge who drew national attention in 2016 when he sentenced a Stanford student to just six months in jail for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman, was recalled on Tuesday, according to The Associated Press. He is the first judge recalled in California in more than 80 years.
With nearly all precincts reporting on Wednesday, just under 60 percent of voters were in favor of removing Judge Persky from the Santa Clara County Superior Court, where he had served since 2003. Cindy Hendrickson, a prosecutor, was elected to replace him.
The recall stemmed from the case of Brock Turner, who sexually assaulted a woman near a dumpster in 2015 after she had blacked out from drinking. In March 2016, a jury found Mr. Turner, then 20, guilty on all three felony charges against him: sexual penetration with a foreign object of an intoxicated person, sexual penetration with a foreign object of an unconscious person, and intent to commit rape.
The maximum sentence in Mr. Turner’s case was 14 years, and Judge Persky had sentenced him to six months. Mr. Turner served only three months before being released in September 2016. (He also received three years of probation and was required to register as a sex offender, and Stanford forced him to withdraw and barred him from campus.)
“The voters of Santa Clara County are the winners of this election,” Michele Dauber, a law professor at Stanford who led the recall campaign, said in a statement. “We voted that sexual violence, including campus sexual violence, must be taken seriously by our elected officials, and by the justice system.”
LaDoris Cordell, a retired judge and a spokeswoman for Judge Persky, called the recall an attack on judicial independence and said it had “encouraged people to think of judges as no more than politicians.”
The judge said he thought Mr. Turner would “not be a danger to others” and expressed concern that “a prison sentence would have a severe impact” on him. He did not mention the impact of the assault on the victim, known publicly only as Emily Doe, who described her suffering in a more than 7,000-word statement that went viral soon after it was published by BuzzFeed. The CNN host Ashleigh Banfield devoted more than 20 minutes of airtime to reading it almost in its entirety.
Judge Persky was cleared of any official misconduct, but talk of a recall campaign began almost as soon as he handed down his sentence. Early this year, the Santa Clara County registrar announced that supporters of a recall — led by Ms. Dauber, whose daughter is friends with Emily Doe — had collected enough signatures to put the question on Tuesday’s ballot. Among the effort’s most prominent backers were Anita Hill and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.
In a statement filed with the county registrar in response to the effort, Judge Persky said he had a legal and professional responsibility to consider alternatives to imprisonment for first-time offenders.
“As a judge, my role is to consider both sides,” he said in the statement. “It’s not always popular, but it’s the law, and I took an oath to follow it without regard to public opinion or my opinions as a former prosecutor.”
Ms. Dauber said Tuesday’s result “demonstrated that violence against women is a voting issue,” and that “if candidates want the votes of progressive Democratic women, they will have to take this issue seriously.”
Opponents of the recall, including some who disagreed with Judge Persky’s decision in Mr. Turner’s case, argued that this electoral punishment would make other judges reluctant to be lenient in cases where leniency might be appropriate.
“They had a very emotional appeal: You say ‘rape, dumpster, six months,’ everyone goes ‘ahhh’ without looking at the facts,” Ms. Cordell said, arguing that Judge Persky had been unfairly targeted by people whose real complaint was with California law at the time of Mr. Turner’s sentencing.
In fact, the sentence, and the backlash to it, prompted California lawmakers to change the law. Within four months, they enacted mandatory minimum sentences in sexual assault cases and closed a loophole in which penetrative sexual assault could be punished less harshly if the victim was too intoxicated to physically resist.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/06/us/politics/judge-persky-brock-turner-recall.html
This article by itself is pretty damning, but take a closer look at some of the longer articles and this becomes an even more terrifying tale of a broken, bitter feminist SJW taking out her misandrist frustration at men (and her inability to raise kids that don't suicide) out on a public figure.
Our Source: Huffpost. Put on your gloves and a respirator, we're going in.
Here is our villain, Michele Dauber, professor at Standford Law. She's also a close personal friend of the family of 'Emily Doe', the alleged victim of the drunken alley hookup.
Emily and one of Dauber’s daughters had been “inseparable” friends in middle and high school, according to a letter Dauber wrote to the court. The two slept over at each other’s houses; Emily joined the family on vacation. Dauber described her as a “lovely, warm, talented, funny girl.”
So upset her darling little friend's daughter got wasted like any other college student and decided to hook up with a (hold in your barf) WHITE CISMALE in a back alley, well, she had to take that out on SOMEONE.The investigation and trial had shown that Turner and Emily met at a frat party, where they were both drinking. But while Emily’s memory goes black early in the evening, Turner claimed she had agreed to go back to his room. On the way there, he said, they slipped on the path behind the dumpster and started kissing. When the police found them, Emily was unconscious and partly naked. Turner’s pants were still on, but the rape kit showed that he had digitally penetrated her. Turner admitted this, but claimed that Emily Doe had consented before passing out, which Emily vehemently denied
Despite Turner being convicted on multiple felonies and being placed on a sex offender registry for life, Dauber was not satisfied. She was convinced that someone had to suffer as much as poor 'Emily' had done - you know, after they emotionally tortured her by convincing her she was a ruined victim after the incredible violation of a drunk prom night fingerbang.
Over the next year and a half, Dauber raised more than $1 million from over 5,000 donors...she mobilized scores of volunteers and won endorsements from local politicians, unions and prominent feminists, including Kirsten Gillibrand, Lena Dunham
and Anita Hill. This January, having accumulated nearly 95,000 signatures, Dauber got the recall on the ballot in Santa Clara County for the June 5 election.
To get the recall on the ballot, Dauber needed nearly 60,000 signatures—representing 20 percent of the votes cast in the last election for that seat. She was hiring professional signature gatherers, at a cost of around $5 a signature. Major donors to the operation included the founder of LinkedIn and the daughter of the co-founder of Intel. Joe Trippi, the veteran Democratic operative, offered some of his California-based communications staff as volunteers. “She has this ability to persuade people to help her,” observed her friend, the author Jon Krakauer, who said he too has gotten “sucked in.”
Dauber didn’t want her efforts to be dismissed as some obscure local matter, so she assembled a coalition that reached far beyond Santa Clara. Feminist Majority, a national advocacy organization, committed to raise $100,000. GRLCVLT, a feminist secret society on Facebook, hosted a Brooklyn fundraiser featuring indie bands and powerful speeches from the actresses Amber Tamblyn and Rose McGowan, along with merchandise like little clutches resembling female genitalia, down to the strategically placed brass knob. At the event, Dauber immersed herself in earnest conversations with young women—“I’ve become, like, a feminist icon to them,” she explained—and was buttonholed by an intense McGowan for a good portion of the evening.
To get the recall on the ballot, Dauber needed nearly 60,000 signatures—representing 20 percent of the votes cast in the last election for that seat. She was hiring professional signature gatherers, at a cost of around $5 a signature. Major donors to the operation included the founder of LinkedIn and the daughter of the co-founder of Intel. Joe Trippi, the veteran Democratic operative, offered some of his California-based communications staff as volunteers. “She has this ability to persuade people to help her,” observed her friend, the author Jon Krakauer, who said he too has gotten “sucked in.”
Dauber didn’t want her efforts to be dismissed as some obscure local matter, so she assembled a coalition that reached far beyond Santa Clara. Feminist Majority, a national advocacy organization, committed to raise $100,000. GRLCVLT, a feminist secret society on Facebook, hosted a Brooklyn fundraiser featuring indie bands and powerful speeches from the actresses Amber Tamblyn and Rose McGowan, along with merchandise like little clutches resembling female genitalia, down to the strategically placed brass knob. At the event, Dauber immersed herself in earnest conversations with young women—“I’ve become, like, a feminist icon to them,” she explained—and was buttonholed by an intense McGowan for a good portion of the evening.
By the time Dauber’s rally got going in front of the Santa Clara County jail in downtown San Jose on September 2, 2016, Turner was already en route to his family’s home in Ohio. Dauber addressed the crowd of about 100 protesters and the assembled media with a calm but forceful conviction.
At another point, an older man I'll call John Smith was spotted in the crowd. Smith had somehow figured out Emily Doe’s identity, even though Persky had ordered it to be redacted from the court records. He had been posting her real name on social media for several weeks. Dauber said she had enlisted her Silicon Valley connections to try and scrub the name from various websites. But now Smith was standing in full view of the cameras, holding up a dry-erase board with the victim’s name scrawled on it for everyone to see.
I asked John Smith why he was exposing Emily Doe’s identity. “She’s a prop,” he said.
Dauber quietly moved toward Smith and pounced. She tore his board from his hands and took off running toward the police. When they refused to intervene, Dauber became frantic. She had worked so hard to protect Emily's privacy. Dauber erased the name with her sleeve and gave his board to the police.
At another point, an older man I'll call John Smith was spotted in the crowd. Smith had somehow figured out Emily Doe’s identity, even though Persky had ordered it to be redacted from the court records. He had been posting her real name on social media for several weeks. Dauber said she had enlisted her Silicon Valley connections to try and scrub the name from various websites. But now Smith was standing in full view of the cameras, holding up a dry-erase board with the victim’s name scrawled on it for everyone to see.
I asked John Smith why he was exposing Emily Doe’s identity. “She’s a prop,” he said.
Dauber quietly moved toward Smith and pounced. She tore his board from his hands and took off running toward the police. When they refused to intervene, Dauber became frantic. She had worked so hard to protect Emily's privacy. Dauber erased the name with her sleeve and gave his board to the police.
Despite getting tones of money, committing assault in front of police and getting away with it, she was so sad. All she wanted to do was ruin the life of an innocent man and replace him with a stronk, independent womyn that would pass sentences that Dauber approves of!
Much more sadly, people disagreed with her!
Robert Weisberg, who teaches criminal law and describes himself as a progressive feminist, grew visibly angry when he spoke about Dauber. The recall, he argued, was “a gratuitous and vindictive campaign” and “an exploitation of the Me Too movement.”
This issue, and this woman, is a fountain of terrible cringe - in part two, coming tonight, we'll get into her personal failings as a parent and her practice run at Stanford to turn an accusation into a kangaroo court.
