I have never herd of anyone saying whatever a "queer" person makes is "queer art" unless its something that's actually gay. Hell, I've seen more of these people calling every day activities someone (usually a fictional character) is into as "queer coded". Character likes ice skating? Queer coded! Character is vegan? Queer coded! To these people, most activities someone is into makes them "queer coded".
This much is true
Not SJW art, in my opinion. Post more brownwashed troons next time.
I am pretty sure the person who thinks people only have problem with degeneracies because nobody is declaring their own quirks as degenerate, is bound to be brainwashed. As for brownwashed troons, others post every one I see first.
They used to think washing your asshole was "queer coded," that's how "metrosexual" was invented.
It's so annoying when they do shit like "and the hateful human was gone," like ffs is the word 'person' a privilege you earn by being liberal? Fuck off. It's like that "black and brown bodies" thing from a few years ago, why are we all allergic to the word "person" now? Come on.
So much for "freedom is the right of all living beings".
I should check in here during Julay to see if there's any progressive seething over their month being over. May also go on the media sites themselves if I can stomach the "oh my god this comic is so valid xuys!" circlejerk at that time.
I found it interesting on all the 'trans' jokes (if you call them that) that
There was one show that introduced a nonbinary Transformer, but it's implied that they have a human view on gender because they were created on Earth instead of Cybertron.
I don't even know where this even comes from. I looked it up and the only thing I got was that because both groups were discriminated against, that means they share a history together. Bro, I'm so tired of this "Insert minority group" was oppressed, so therefore, this other minority group shares history with this group". Hell, being vegan is a choice, whereas being gay was something that we're told isn't a choice. The only thing I saw was some study claiming that 30% of vegans were LGBTQ, but even still, how does a character being vegan make them LGBTQ coded when 70% of them are at least aren't?
Wait until the 4th of July comes and you'll see the same progressives seething by making anti American art and saying "I'm not proud of this country because of what it did/does to minority groups".
If you're pretty much someone that's outside of how the majority of people act or believe in, you're queer. It goes back into what I said in that being "queer" nowadays has nothing to do with being gay. Like I said, "Vegan = queer", "autistic = queer", etc. People have become so desperate to be a part of a special group to now anything outside of what the majority of people do and act means you're special.
It's even worse because it's tattoo art.
If you define “queer” as meaning “overly online people who adopt microlabels to feel more special” rather than “not straight,” it makes a lot more sense. Vegans and autists are far more likely to fit in the former camp.
"Corporate needs you to find the difference between this picture, and this picture"
Is this just a more retarded version of "the boardroom where the guy with the
Something about these drawings makes me uncomfortable. Some of them look like they've been drawn by teenagers. God, if that's even true, someone guide those poor kids to a better place. They don't deserve these influences.
