Should Kiwi Farmers use ChatGPT to write threads?

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

should Kiwi Farmers use ChatGPT to write threads?


  • Total de votantes
    60

Timothy McGay

kiwifarms.net
Registrado
14 de Mayo, 2026
I have been reading Kiwi Farms for many years and can't help but notice very few new lolcow threads come out these days. One reason I blame is the extremely high standards for making Kiwi Farms threads that are inaccessible for the vast majority of people, but ChatGPT and AI narrow that gap because anybody can copy and paste the specifications people want for Kiwi Farms threads into ChatGPT.

So my question is, should Kiwi Farmers use ChatGPT to write threads?
 
Look — I’m going to say no. Forum posts should not be created with ChatGPT. A forum is supposed to be a place for actual people to talk to each other — not a vending machine for polished sludge. It’s not just about “efficiency,” it’s about sincerity. It’s not just words on a screen, it’s a conversation between human beings. When every reply starts sounding like it came out of the same algorithmic blender — full of sanitized enthusiasm and suspiciously balanced phrasing — the entire point of a community starts to evaporate.

Forums are supposed to be places where real people exchange ideas, frustrations, stories, jokes, opinions, and experiences. It’s not just information, it’s personality. It’s not just communication, it’s connection. When somebody writes a post themselves — even if it’s messy or imperfect — you can usually feel the human being behind it, and that matters more than people realize.

The problem with AI-generated posting is that it slowly turns conversations into something artificial and strangely empty. It’s not just about accuracy, it’s about authenticity. A forum filled with machine-generated replies may look active on the surface, but the sense of actual community starts to disappear. People stop reacting to each other as individuals and start reacting to polished blocks of generic language. The awkward phrasing, the emotional honesty, the occasional rambling tangent — those things are part of what make online communities feel alive instead of manufactured.

That doesn’t mean AI tools are inherently evil or useless — obviously they can help brainstorm ideas or organize thoughts — but there’s a big difference between assistance and replacement. It’s not just using a tool, it’s outsourcing your voice. If somebody wants to participate in a forum, they should participate as themselves. Even a short, imperfect, genuine response means more than a flawless paragraph generated by a machine that has never actually lived a human life.

And yes — before somebody jumps in with “but AI can help organize thoughts” — that’s exactly the problem. It’s not just assistance, it’s substitution. It’s not just spellcheck, it’s outsourcing your personality. Forums become unbearable when every post reads like a corporate memo wearing jeans and pretending to be your friend. Half the fun of online discussion is seeing imperfect opinions expressed imperfectly — weird phrasing, dumb jokes, strong feelings, moments of insight that weren’t generated by statistical prediction software. Once people stop writing for themselves, the place stops feeling alive.

If somebody genuinely can’t tell the difference between a human post and an AI-generated one anymore — that’s not progress, that’s decay. Communities survive because people bring their own voice, their own experience, their own awkwardness. It’s not just content, it’s identity. And the second everyone starts feeding prompts into a machine instead of speaking directly, you no longer have a forum — you have a landfill of synthetic agreement separated by avatars.

And separately — sincere congratulations on your decision to come out as homosexual. Seriously. That takes courage, honesty, and a willingness to be vulnerable in front of other people, and I think that deserves real respect. It’s not just a personal announcement, it’s an act of trust. A lot of people spend years feeling pressured to hide parts of themselves, so choosing openness and authenticity is genuinely meaningful. I hope the people around you respond with the care and support you deserve.

In a strange way, I think those two topics are connected. Forums are healthiest when people show up honestly — not as algorithms, not as masks, not as carefully optimized synthetic personalities. It’s not just about producing content, it’s about being real with other human beings. Whether someone is sharing an opinion, telling a story, or opening up about their identity, sincerity is what gives conversations value. That’s why I’d rather read something imperfect and human every single time.

I just want to say how proud I am of you for having the courage to live openly and honestly as a gay man. Coming out takes real strength, and I hope you know how loved and supported you are — not because of who you love, but because of the kind, genuine, funny, thoughtful person you’ve always been.

The world can be harsh sometimes, but you deserve happiness, acceptance, and the freedom to be fully yourself without fear or apology. I’m grateful to know you, Timothy, and I’ll always be in your corner. Proud of you today and every day. ❤️
 
Última edición:
One reason I blame is the extremely high standards for making Kiwi Farms threads that are inaccessible for the vast majority of people

I've been sneeding here for nearly a decade (has it really been that long?) and I've seen new lolcow threads fail for the following reasons:
  • They're thinly veiled personal army requests
  • They're attempting to incite trolling attacks (a la Patrick Tomlinson)
  • They don't explain why the person in question is funny
  • The subject in question is only funny when they're provoked (in violation of our "don't tip the cows" rule)
  • They're hamfisted attempts at manipulation by the Feds
  • They're failed attempts at trolling the Farms
  • The creator wanted Kiwi Farmers to do the hard work for them
Kiwi Farms is not the problem. If you want a personal army or trolls on demand, go to the Sharty or ONA.

I have been reading Kiwi Farms for many years
I doubt this very much. You have a pink join date and don't know anything about the site's culture or why new threads fail.

can't help but notice very few new lolcow threads come out these days.
It's hard to find new content. Donald Trump broke people's brains so thoroughly that classic lolcows like Chris-Chan are drowned out by the latest retard screaming "BUT BLUMPH!" or "DONALD DID NUFFIN WRONG!"

So my question is, should Kiwi Farmers use ChatGPT to write threads?
No. ChatGPT/Grok/Claude/whatever AI you use will get things wrong and it will make up lies to satisfy you. They're useful tools but they won't replace old-school researching and archiving.
 
Extremely high standards? Genuinely what are you talking about?
Here's the link to the "Guide to Writing Threads." Do you not think this is too complicated for the average user? Who wants to download hours' worth of videos to make a video on a random internet celebrity? And if you ask somebody else for help, you get told to do it yourself, like everybody has the time and storage to download and clip live streams.
I've been sneeding here for nearly a decade (has it really been that long?) and I've seen new lolcow threads fail for the following reasons:
  • They're thinly veiled personal army requests
  • They're attempting to incite trolling attacks (a la Patrick Tomlinson)
  • They don't explain why the person in question is funny
  • The subject in question is only funny when they're provoked (in violation of our "don't tip the cows" rule)
  • They're hamfisted attempts at manipulation by the Feds
  • They're failed attempts at trolling the Farms
  • The creator wanted Kiwi Farmers to do the hard work for them
These are definitely problems with new threads and a big part of the new lolcow drought, but I have noticed many different people who probably deserve threads, like Howard Stern, Professor Dave, or Mark Hamill, never got out of the prospering grounds because either the original OP wasn't that good and people didn't make a new one or use it as a starting ground like old threads, or people complained that "it's not funny." Like, does every single person have to be funny to be talked about? Don't we have a thread about public figures like Donald Trump? Why does everything have to be funny to have a thread? Do people really think all the threads about zoophiles are funny? I think the whole "you have to be funny to be talked about" rule is dumb, same with the "we can't give people attention" rule because that could disqualify literally every new lolcow.

The other thing worth mentioning is old Kiwi Farms. OPs were very basic, and besides, the unarchived YouTube videos were suitable at the time because they were a starting point for a new thread. There wasn't a "where's the funny" and "not a lolcow" in the replies. Instead, old OPs served as a way to start discussion, and it snowballed from there. That's how it should be. You could start with a basic thread, and then if someone turns out to be entertaining, people can rewrite the OP to be more detailed. like the whole OP rewriting project instead of demanding complicated essays filled with hours of downloaded footage just to start a discussion about a new lolcow.

The Kiwi Farms thread writing process is too intimidating for new kiwifarmers, and even if you try, you will be spammed with replies of people claiming your OP sucks and that your lolcow isn't funny because you didn't use perfect grammar or download literally every single link and video in your OP as if other kiwifarm users are incapable of doing that. This is the reason most new lolcows usually come from places like Twitter. Nobody cares about KiwiFarms anymore. This isn't the new lolcow place anymore. Kiwifarms is always late to the party. Kiwi Farms could be one of the top websites and sources of information for lolcows, but because of the gatekeeping of old users and too high standards, I mentioned new lolcows rarely come from Kiwi Farms.
 
Half the fun of stalking lolcows is people writing up autistic analysis of every tiny thing they do for others to read and reply to.


If we outsource that to a machine, it becomes less organic and thus less enjoyable. The interaction between a writer and the comments section is a large part of why people congregate on a site like this. I want to discuss petty bullshit with other people. I don't want to read the same AI slop I see everywhere else online.
 
I will concede that there are higher standards for writing OPs these days, but I think this is a good thing in general; higher standard = higher quality, which is something we should all strive for.

So my question is, should Kiwi Farmers use ChatGPT to write threads?
Perhaps you could use it as a starting-off point for research, but I don't think ChatGPT could ever write an OP. I tested it on ChatGPT and Grok with the prompt "Write a Kiwi Farms style OP on Zengo Oshiba" (who is a lolcow I wrote the OP for): ChatGPT couldn't even start (telling me it couldn't help with a "harassment-style 'Kiwi Farms OP'"), and Grok did give me something but IMO it's not very good (doesn't help that Grok interprets "Kiwi Farms OP" as "sarcastic/snarky", which I don't like and don't think fits here). Grok's response is text-only, so you have to go out of your way to get the attachments, and Grok is not going to archive for you; if you have to do all of this you might as well write the OP too.
1780001967454.png 1780002103192.png 1780002118279.png

but I have noticed many different people who probably deserve threads, like Howard Stern, Professor Dave, or Mark Hamill, never got out of the prospering grounds
The last part of the process of getting an OP out of Prospering Grounds usually consists of requesting staff review of said OP (which you should know if you've been "reading Kiwi Farms for many years" like you said), none of these examples you gave seem to have had anyone request that those OPs leave Prospering Grounds.
 
AI is useful for organizing topics, ideas and points, fleshing out and summarizing events. When I get stumped or have trouble articulating a point because it sounds retarded or too verbose, I turn to AI and ask it for five ways to truncate or explain what I am trying to convey, then copy and paste the sentence or blurb in my writing.

If you use it to write entire pages and paragraphs, you're going to be swimming in a sea of slop. AI is useful, but its not a crutch for being a lazy nigger.
 
All lolcow threads should be just as much about being a passion project for the OP as it is entertainment for the rest of us.
If you need to rely on AI to make a thread, you shouldn't be making threads (or posts) in general. All it tells people is that you're lazy or don't really give a shit about the topic at all if you're just gonna push it on a chatbot.
 
I've experimented with AI for posts that require way less effort and research than a standard OP, and the results have always been awful. I wasted most of my time wrestling with the damn thing to get what I wanted out of it, and if I didn't already know about the topic I was writing about, the end result would have been full of hard-to-spot errors. Archiving and formatting are a no-go nine out of ten times. Asking for help on very specific or obscure topics or events is one of the few useful use cases of AI when documenting a Lolcow, for example, when you only have a vague recollection of an event or piece of media but don't have enough pieces of the puzzle for a normal Google search. Making a whole-ass OP with it sounds like a recipe for disaster and would probably encourage more people to post PA requests.
If a cow doesn't have the autism magnetic pull to attract at least one dedicated user to waste their time properly documenting it, it probably isn't worth getting a thread (yet) anyway.

Tools to expand and edit the OP without too much fuss would be more useful; a voting system to suggest adding posts to the OP, for example, ways to grant limited editing rights to certain users, or allowing multiple users to contribute and edit an OP. I see more problems with outdated OPs that were written 2000 pages ago than with standards being too high. Such a system may allow us to start with a more modest (but well done, don't be fucking lazy) OP and add to it as the situation develops, without the need to completely rewrite OPs and give Null more headaches. Maybe with Sneedforo?
 
Última edición:
The question of whether Kiwi Farmers should use ChatGPT to write threads does not have a simple yes-or-no answer. Like most tools, its value depends on how it is used. In many online communities, the quality of discussion matters more than the method used to draft a post. If ChatGPT helps users organize their thoughts, improve grammar, or communicate more clearly, then it can genuinely improve conversations. People who struggle with writing, are not native speakers, or have difficulty structuring long posts may find AI especially useful as a drafting assistant.

At the same time, forums are built around authentic human interaction. Readers usually visit forums because they want personal experiences, opinions, expertise, and genuine discussion. Problems arise when users rely so heavily on AI that their posts become generic, repetitive, or emotionally empty. Many AI-generated threads sound polished on the surface but lack the specificity and personality that make forum discussions interesting. Communities can quickly become flooded with bland content if users simply paste generated text without editing or contributing original insight.

Another concern is trust. Forums often function because users believe they are talking to real people sharing honest perspectives. If someone uses ChatGPT to fabricate experiences, imitate expertise they do not have, or mass-produce engagement bait, that can damage the credibility of the community. Some forums may eventually develop stricter rules about disclosure or AI-assisted posting if low-quality content becomes a problem. In that sense, the issue is not AI itself, but whether the technology is being used to support communication or to replace genuine participation entirely.

There is also a practical middle ground that many users already follow. Instead of asking ChatGPT to write an entire thread from scratch, they use it to brainstorm titles, improve readability, summarize technical points, or clean up rough drafts. This approach keeps the core ideas human while using AI as an editing and productivity tool. In many ways, this is similar to using spellcheckers, grammar tools, or templates—except more advanced.

Ultimately, Kiwi Farmers probably should use ChatGPT carefully rather than avoid it completely. Communities thrive when people contribute original thinking, lived experience, humor, disagreement, and personality. AI can help users express those things more effectively, but it should not become a substitute for having something meaningful to say. The healthiest forums will likely be the ones where AI assists communication without overwhelming the human voice that made online discussion valuable in the first place.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo