- Registrado
- 14 de Mar, 2014
We should harvest fat. Like let people eat out and then do liposuction to get all that fat and then turn it into biofuel.
Should Fat People Be Given More Accommodations? - Hear me out...
- Iniciador del tema The Lizard Queen
- Fecha de inicio
-
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 14 de Ene, 2019
There should be a "large" seating area, not purely a fat one.
I've sat next to really built guys on a train before and they take up about as much room like a fat person, and probably weigh about the same if not more while taking up room someone else has paid for. Not deliberately, they're just big.
Not everyone is 5ft something, I think it's a good idea.
I've sat next to really built guys on a train before and they take up about as much room like a fat person, and probably weigh about the same if not more while taking up room someone else has paid for. Not deliberately, they're just big.
Not everyone is 5ft something, I think it's a good idea.
- Registrado
- 29 de Nov, 2018
I’ll give you a deep thoughts answer here.
Yeah, fat people are very unpleasant and affects those around them, be it physical space or tax dollars in disability. It’s a “big” problem in the US and other countries.
One approach, your approach, is to accept that this is the new standard, and adapt to it. I disagree with this, because this approach scratches the surface. In fact, I’d argue that this will make this worse.
First, people aren’t becoming fat because of “genetics”. If that was the case, and 2/3 of the US population is overweight, then we need to bring back eugenics. The truth is that people are, be it inherited or raised to be, lazy and selfish. They gorge themselves out because of the pleasure eating brings, with no regard to personal care and health. As the consequences show, they begin to hate themselves for their image (rightfully so). As the adipose affects their thinking, they go to eating to bring back the feeling of pleasure and good vibes. Overeating is, effectively, a kind of drug.
Which brings me to the second part. If we decide to accommodate these irresponsible people, we are merely enabling their behavior to gorge out and continue to be lazy and selfish. This is the equivalent to giving an alcoholic larger drinks for a reduced price for the same feeling they had when they started. Or, it’s like giving a heroin addict more to reach that first high. We would be destroying these people. I care for the people around me, but showing love is not the same as being empathetic and making someone feel good.
What we need to do is correct what we as a society have failed to do in developing the character of these people. We must take away accommodations that make their lives easier for their problems. These can be simple as refusing to make things bigger for them. We can make disability conditional by mandating counseling. Whatever the case is, enabling them by just making things bigger is the worst approach to this issue.
Yeah, fat people are very unpleasant and affects those around them, be it physical space or tax dollars in disability. It’s a “big” problem in the US and other countries.
One approach, your approach, is to accept that this is the new standard, and adapt to it. I disagree with this, because this approach scratches the surface. In fact, I’d argue that this will make this worse.
First, people aren’t becoming fat because of “genetics”. If that was the case, and 2/3 of the US population is overweight, then we need to bring back eugenics. The truth is that people are, be it inherited or raised to be, lazy and selfish. They gorge themselves out because of the pleasure eating brings, with no regard to personal care and health. As the consequences show, they begin to hate themselves for their image (rightfully so). As the adipose affects their thinking, they go to eating to bring back the feeling of pleasure and good vibes. Overeating is, effectively, a kind of drug.
Which brings me to the second part. If we decide to accommodate these irresponsible people, we are merely enabling their behavior to gorge out and continue to be lazy and selfish. This is the equivalent to giving an alcoholic larger drinks for a reduced price for the same feeling they had when they started. Or, it’s like giving a heroin addict more to reach that first high. We would be destroying these people. I care for the people around me, but showing love is not the same as being empathetic and making someone feel good.
What we need to do is correct what we as a society have failed to do in developing the character of these people. We must take away accommodations that make their lives easier for their problems. These can be simple as refusing to make things bigger for them. We can make disability conditional by mandating counseling. Whatever the case is, enabling them by just making things bigger is the worst approach to this issue.
- Registrado
- 20 de Abr, 2016
That's an unsafe load distribution that will make the bus do a wheelie and go careening off the road.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 15 de Ene, 2017
No. Not being able to fit into seats etc should be a wake up call to lose weight as it is. Further widening seats to accommodate deathfats (have you ever seen a bariatric toilet?) is just further feeding denial. Of course for many people obesity related health problems isn't motivation enough. Still.
- Registrado
- 12 de Abr, 2016
No it would qualify as a demolition tool considering it would utterly demolish any ceiling they tie it to.
- Registrado
- 10 de Mayo, 2017
*ahem*
FATPHOBIC REEEEE
DIET CULTURE REEEEEE
BIGOT REEEEEEE
HAES REEEEEE
Congratulations, you are now the worst person in the world.
Skin and Bones
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 13 de Ene, 2019
No. If they're uncomfortable taking up so much space, they can lose the weight.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
Only if you're allowed to throw things at them and laugh at them and call them fat.
- Registrado
- 20 de Oct, 2018
No, I propose to give them less accommodations.
Smaller seats everywhere, lower weight capacity on elevators, no electric stairs. Maybe that way they can stay locked up like the miserable piles of shit they are or finally lose some weight.
Smaller seats everywhere, lower weight capacity on elevators, no electric stairs. Maybe that way they can stay locked up like the miserable piles of shit they are or finally lose some weight.
- Registrado
- 3 de Jun, 2016
It depends. There are some people who fall on hard times and become fat, and for the most part, it's a normal coping mechanism. But people who are willfully fat like Amber Lynn should be told to take a flip.
- Registrado
- 28 de Dic, 2014
But nowhere they could accidentally smash actual people to death.
- Registrado
- 10 de Nov, 2015
Only if its not a choice they are fat and only if they are over 350 pounds
- Registrado
- 18 de Ago, 2018
"Fatphobic" is one of the most ridiculous current year terms to me, since it implies fatsos are a suppressed minority.
- Registrado
- 21 de Ago, 2018
Most of them don't really feel shame, that's the point. Opting for the Bariatric life is a choice and they claim/take away facilities and initiatives from those who are truly crippled or handicapped. The only thing they have to do to cure their condition is to stop fucking eating everything they lay their hands on.
