dirtydeanna96
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 16 de Jun, 2018
Not for hurt feelings, for breach of contract.
Marriage is a legal matter
Última edición:
Should adultery be criminalized as a sexual offense? - Sexual Assault + Theft = 100% Legal?
- Iniciador del tema Nagibatel
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 DDoS attack. Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/.
🔎 Please read my article, How to Dox Anyone: A Liz Fong-Jones Story. (Xitter), (Substack). -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
Marriage is a legal matter
- Registrado
- 18 de Jun, 2019
No, of course it shouldn't be a crime, that's absurd.
It's up to couples to decide how to feel about a partner sleeping with another person, it shouldn't be a matter of government law.
It's up to couples to decide how to feel about a partner sleeping with another person, it shouldn't be a matter of government law.
- Registrado
- 8 de Abr, 2018
If someone has cheated on you, that means you had a relationship in the first place and your incel status is nullified.
Trauma is relative. One person could be completely fine after the initial shit hitting the fan when it comes to getting cheated on, another could be absolutely destroyed by it. I think PTSD is a bit of a strong way to describe the reaction most people would have emotionally to getting cheated on. If that's the reaction you have, you probably have a shit ton of other issues going on in your psyche that need sorting.
Most people can move on from a shitty spouse, maybe you get some trust issues but that's not the same as emotional abuse induced PTSD
calm down
- Registrado
- 11 de Oct, 2020
Lol no, I'm just a petty fuck and I will fuck a person over the most legally
Travoltron
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Ago, 2018
It needs to apply to spouses as well. I hate those bitches that whore around while their husbands are risking their lives to protect the country. Dear John letters can get a man killed.
- Registrado
- 6 de Abr, 2021
Whether or not it happens enough these days, making pariahs of them is enough.
If you begin to criminalize it you end up needing proof or "proof" and it's gonna make divorce proceedings even more fucking ridiculous if there's a fine or jail time to worry about.
"Why yes, your Honor, Richard McMoneybags slept with 6 million women while I was being a good housewife and raising his kids! I don't have proof, but, but...
"
I would wager the above already happens to some degree but with the addition of punitive measures there's no way it's not gonna be used for petty revenge.
If you begin to criminalize it you end up needing proof or "proof" and it's gonna make divorce proceedings even more fucking ridiculous if there's a fine or jail time to worry about.
"Why yes, your Honor, Richard McMoneybags slept with 6 million women while I was being a good housewife and raising his kids! I don't have proof, but, but...
"I would wager the above already happens to some degree but with the addition of punitive measures there's no way it's not gonna be used for petty revenge.
- Registrado
- 19 de Oct, 2019
Courts Martial never needs to apply to civilians for any reason whatsoever.
Kill a Troon for Pikamee
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 25 de Feb, 2021
Abrahamic religions do not differ in the approach to adultery from any other traditional society. Seeing adultery as a crime is based in natural law not in any revelation.
In fact if you read the Bible you might notice that there is a strict anti-adultery sentiment way before Moses is being given the Law from God. There are multiple cases of kings being afraid of accidentally fucking someone's wive, because they think it will bring misfortune. When one of Jacob's daughter is fucked by some dude without marriage, her brothers do some epic trolling and trick the entire tribe of the perpetrator into circumcising their dicks, and then when they sit there with bleeding cocks in their hands the Hebrews attack them and slaughter them all
All traditional societies scorn children born out of wedlock, being a bastard used to be considered being a second-class human. Again, it has nothing to do with "Abrahamism", in the Bhagavad Gita it's stated that "unwanted population is the source of all problems" etc.
The problem is that Christendom was psyoped into forgetting the difference between adultery and fornication. Adultery = fucking someone's wife/husband. This was punishable by death. Fornication = fucking a prostitute for example. This really wasn't a big deal, Judges chosen by God fuck prostitutes in the Bible, prophets fuck their slave girls ("servants") too and it's never suggested it was considered "wrong"
Prostitute/whore is another distinction that was psyop'd out of the Christian culture. All throughout the middle ages prostitution was perfectly legal, and cities and towns had legally operating brothels. Women who were not prostitutes by profession fucking with anyone other than their husband were considered whores and whoring was heavily scorned, unlike prostitution.
In fact prostitution is one of the last bastions of Tradition. With prostitution, a man can actually OWN a woman, at least for an agreed-on time, just as God intended. That's why marxists and other satanists always wanted to abolish prostitution, and replace both prostitution and marriage with turning all women into whores (which is already like 95% done in the west, and with shit like onlyfans etc. it will be achieved 100%)
- Registrado
- 25 de Ago, 2017
Nobody is getting court martialed over adultery, but the UCMJ shouldn't apply to civilians. I don't think anything punitive would matter anyway. Most of the time it's dumb kids marrying into what amounts to strange circumstances they can't appreciate. I thought about a way to combat it while I was in and watching buddies go through it, something like a civil agreement as part of the marriage to a servicemember requiring a spouse to payback any monetary benefits they received from government. Either during during the entire marriage period or after the infidelity. Even if some sort of punishment for spouses ever got legislated, it won't, I don't think it would do any good.
Marriage in the military usually involves immature kids signing up for something they don't understand and having to adapt as best they can while they are in it. Then you bring an equally immature and ignorant spouse into the situation. It's a recipe for disaster and boy are there are a lot of them.
- Registrado
- 19 de Oct, 2019
Pretty much agree, my girlfriend's husband is currently on deployment and I'm honestly not sure if they have anything whatsoever in common.
- Registrado
- 25 de Ago, 2017
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2020
>Adultery becomes a criminal offense when married
>Marriage rates plummet even more than they already have
>Even more kvetching about how we live in a society from the people who pushed this shit
>You still can't get a girlfriend
>Marriage rates plummet even more than they already have
>Even more kvetching about how we live in a society from the people who pushed this shit
>You still can't get a girlfriend
- Registrado
- 19 de Oct, 2019
Doesn't matter, I'm between jobs and it's not like internet assholes can call up and get us kicked off the BAS payment.
- Registrado
- 24 de Oct, 2020
Really, the only way to attempt to make marriages not end in the dumpster fires they are now is to have some kind of societal standard towards making marriages mean more to people than it does now.
We do though.
Good.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2020
Marriage is still operating on the framework that it's 1960, and people still think that marriage has anything to do with romance and love or whatever. People are having children later in life than they were in the late 1900s -- and the practical use of marriage is essentially an affirmation that you'll stick it out and not fuck over your kid even if you grow to not really like one another. It would make sense then for people to get married later in life, once they're ready for a kid.
Instead people think marriage is a Disney movie, so they rush into it and then half a decade later resent the person they're living with and realize they don't want to have the kid they already had with them. "We're married, aren't we supposed to be in lesbians?!" and the idea of the child's welfare is ignored. If your whole thinking was that marriage = love and you're not in love, why not go cheating? (This also explains why, like, everyone in the 60s had a fucking side hustle despite being married.)
Beyond the federal financial benefits, this is also why I don't understand the obsession with marriage from the gays. People want to believe that because you paid some money for a stupid ceremony, some voodoo magic will make your relationship last the long-run gamut. I guess people have a hard time using their words to say "let's stick this out, let's be done" and would prefer to spend tens of thousands on some cake and balloons to do it.
- Registrado
- 24 de Oct, 2020
How later in life are you talking?
As for the marriage contract, I see no point in the government giving benefits to them unless they're either running a population growth program or are a theocracy trying to impose a strict sense of rules and morals on people.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mayo, 2020
I personally think around 26-28 makes sense as a good time to think about it, but apparently this is already the case.
I guess it's just easier to see the young retards spazzing out on instagram and twitter when their disneyland marriage goes down in flames.
That's basically why the government gives those bennies, to encourage marriage so as to encourage more people to have and take care of their kids. It's why there's new homeowners' perks as well, since owning a home also aids in raising a kid.
- Registrado
- 14 de Nov, 2019
OP got cucked and wasn't man enough to get over it
dirtydeanna96
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 16 de Jun, 2018