💪 Tough Guys @Shanley Kane of @ModelViewMedia

Destacado
Holy shit, I didn't know she was this bad:
You have a magic wand. What are the first three things you would change about technology?

I think I would take Twitter away from Marc Andreessen. Well, I mean, honestly, I’d like to take Marc Andreessen from power in every way; but the broader point is that I would like these old, rich, white male thought leaders to stop being the center of our field. There are brilliant, diverse technologists that aren’t being given a chance to speak.

The second thing that I would change is that we have the worst tech media ever. TechCrunch is pages and pages of press releases; PandoDaily is so consumed with their writers’ narcissistic petty dramas that it’s just an incoherent mess; and so on. So I’d love to see like 10 new independent tech media companies that have more integrity, courage, and critical thought.

And the third thing I’d like to change is money. Changing the way money flows in Silicon Valley is critical. VCs will give a startup run by women $100,000, but then the company that is run by privileged men gets $500 million. So I would change the allocation of venture capital. What if we said that we are not going to invest in cisgender, heterosexual white men for the next 10 years, and we’re going to fund a diversity of technologists instead?.
Presiona para expandir...

Not only a website like this exists, but is FUCKING TAKEN SERIOUSLY enough to warrant interviews in big sites. Holy shit!
 
MiloWuCollusion dijo:
Is okay as this?: https://archive.today/0Q7zt
Presiona para expandir...
Oh, boy. There is all kinds of crazy in that article, so I'll just pick a couple of examples:
You’ve denigrated what you call “corporate feminism,” as espoused by Sheryl Sandberg in her book Lean In. Why do you object to the ideology?
One of the fundamental objections is that it tends to ignore broader systems of sexism, racism, queer-phobia, trans-phobia, and these structural oppressions are the root of why women don’t succeed in technology. Instead of talking about that, Lean In says, “You need to work harder and smarter, and you personally need to become very successful,” which promotes exceptionalism rather than structural change. You know, many women are already working harder and smarter than everyone around them. Imani Gandy has a great post on how black women are already leaning in.
Presiona para expandir...
So people should be hired because they make onlookers happy, not because they're most qualified for the job?
But you leaned out, Shanley. You stepped away and decided to do something else. You created your own business.
Well, I had that option because, as a white woman, I had a lot of financial privilege and a lot of opportunities.
Presiona para expandir...
Wait, all white women are rich?
 
Positron dijo:
LOL these people don't know where money comes from. They have as much financial knowledge as Chris.
Presiona para expandir...
Less I'd say, at least Chris knows his comes from the government because he can't hold a job. Shanley just gets hers from a crowd of sycophants and wannabe activist journalists. The only upside is that eventually all of these people will screw up and get eaten alive by the hypersensitive hordes that pay them
 
So that first article that was linked (here's an archive.today of it) had this at the end:
Someone who's never happy dijo:
This work is licensed under the Decolonial Media License 0.1.
Presiona para expandir...
Click that link. Go ahead. It's gold. It's just a Creative Commons license, with a bunch of extra Tumblr shit tacked on. Oh, and it's written by the same person (Kẏra, no last name) who wrote that article. She used her own license. Let's look at it, shall we?
the Decolonial Media License dijo:
You are free to:
  • Use — to make any use of this work, which includes (if relevant) performing it
  • Study — to examine this work as well as how it was made, and apply knowledge gained from it
Presiona para expandir...
Oh, I'm free to use it, study it, and apply that knowledge. Thank goodness I got permission, otherwise I'd have to keep anything I read a secret forever.
Why?
We recognize that private ownership over media, ideas, and technology is rooted in European conceptions of property and the history of colonialism from which they formed. These systems of privatization and monopolization, namely copyright and patent law, enforce the systems of punishment and reward which benefit a privileged minority at the cost of others’ creative expression, political discourse, and cultural survival.
Presiona para expandir...
The first line is flatly untrue. The specific laws may be new, but private ownership of ideas and technology predates European colonialism by thousands of years, as even the most cursory reading of, say, Chinese history will tell you. Fun fact: the author is Chinese-American.
Commercial use
Counter-intuitively, preventing commercial use retains a commercial monopoly on all rights associated with a work. The misleading name confuses many non-commercial projects into thinking this is an appropriate license, but permitting commercial use rejects those monopoly rights while copyleft protects it from being appropriated into a private work.
Presiona para expandir...
Anyone else wanna handle this one? Commercial use is allowed (so as not to look like a monopoly), but not "[appropriating] into a private work"?

Oh, and you may have noticed that license is posted at freeculture.org, a website you might remember as actually being cool once. Well, from the same author as that license comes this. I don't feel like picking that one apart right now, but it looks like Shanley could be a cow-collector on par with Kengle.
 
Handsome Pete dijo:
So that first article that was linked (here's an archive.today of it) had this at the end:

Click that link. Go ahead. It's gold. It's just a Creative Commons license, with a bunch of extra Tumblr shit tacked on. Oh, and it's written by the same person (Kẏra, no last name) who wrote that article. She used her own license. Let's look at it, shall we?

Oh, I'm free to use it, study it, and apply that knowledge. Thank goodness I got permission, otherwise I'd have to keep anything I read a secret forever.

The first line is flatly untrue. The specific laws may be new, but private ownership of ideas and technology predates European colonialism by thousands of years, as even the most cursory reading of, say, Chinese history will tell you. Fun fact: the author is Chinese-American.

Anyone else wanna handle this one? Commercial use is allowed (so as not to look like a monopoly), but not "[appropriating] into a private work"?

Oh, and you may have noticed that license is posted at freeculture.org, a website you might remember as actually being cool once. Well, from the same author as that license comes this. I don't feel like picking that one apart right now, but it looks like Shanley could be a cow-collector on par with Kengle.
Presiona para expandir...
So she's also a Sovereign Citizen?
 
Shanley is at it again. I hate to admit, but Milo is right as she DIDN'T REFUTE ANY SINGLE CLAIM. Hell, she even admitted that she did questionable stuff in the past and now is saying that "ALL IS LIES" in the most unspecific manner possible.

https://archive.today/5ZWgE

Again, if she already knows that Milo and Weev are assholes (not only that, assholes that feel that don't have nothing to lose)... why did she need to have a very public meltdown were she confirms the relantioship and the NeoNazi connection? She could have ignored it and many people would have belived her (thought some still are, shamefull enough)
 
Randall Fragg dijo:
An ex-neo nazi SJW?

Get the popcorn, this gonna be good.
Presiona para expandir...

She's not the only one...

HITLERCHEONG.png
 
https://archive.today/6lvbu

When it comes down to the reality of defending a woman's rights to have a sex life without being terrorized, people vanish like rats.
Presiona para expandir...

Nobody is complaining about your sex life, girl, they are complaining about a pretty sordid past, and you need to still try to be in the moral highground. Did you expect that social and political activism is just another pitch in a marketing class, that is a easy peasy ride to success?
 
And I thought she was some anti-gamergate individual who doxxed Milo. To see what she says about cops, one would like to see her call for help from police when she actually gets some sort of trouble. One can only wait and see what else will come out of her mad ravings on Twitter.

Atlas 95 dijo:
Less I'd say, at least Chris knows his comes from the government because he can't hold a job. Shanley just gets hers from a crowd of sycophants and wannabe activist journalists. The only upside is that eventually all of these people will screw up and get eaten alive by the hypersensitive hordes that pay them
Presiona para expandir...
Don't forget, the crowd of sycophants and wannabe's are able to pay people like Shanley or Wu because they have some sort of Patreon. If Patreon was somehow able to change it's rules so as not to be partial to these sort of people, Shanley would lose the money she gets from the sycophants until they found some alternative. Even then, it's as you say, they will eventually mess up and get devoured by the hordes that pay them.
raymond dijo:
She's not the only one...

HITLERCHEONG.png
Presiona para expandir...
One could wonder if they'd be a match. They did hold these sort of views.

MiloWuCollusion dijo:
https://archive.today/6lvbu



Nobody is complaining about your sex life, girl, they are complaining about a pretty sordid past, and you need to still try to be in the moral highground. Did you expect that social and political activism is just another pitch in a marketing class, that is a easy peasy ride to success?
Presiona para expandir...
With how one could get money by crying oppression and such, it would be for some of these people. Even then, one would wonder if they try to say there is some conspiracy of the Patriarchy trying to take them down via feminist that don't agree with them.
 
I think I genuinely experienced a Nam-style flashback when I clicked on this thread and was greeted by this bitch's smug face. She seems to pop up everywhere and you can't get away from her.

I honestly thought Shanley was a troll for the longest time because I refused to believe that a real human being could be stuffed with so much straw. But then the reality dawned on me: This woman is completely serious. Someone this crazy and stereotypical actually exists. Not only that, she gets paid to be crazy and stereotypical. And she still has the audacity to shriek and cry about being oppressed when she has the easiest job ever known to man.

This has to be my absolute favorite Shanley moment. She's fighting with Christina Hoff Sommers (aka "Based Mom" to many), a very well-known and well-respected feminist who is recognized for being extremely critical of the modern feminist movement, which she believes has degenerated into a group of shrieking, self-victimizing idiots who don't truly care about equality. Luckily, Shanley is here to prove her wrong.
3y0tDHS.jpg

Christina: I think you may have a chip on your shoulder and purposely create chances to victimize yourself.
Shanley: WOW FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU GET THE FUCK AWAY FROM ME DON'T EVER TALK TO ME AGAIN YOU ARE NOT WELCOME NEAR ME FUCK OFF GO AWAY OH AND BY THE WAY YOUR FACE IS STUPID

Clearly Shanley is a glowing beacon of equality shining for proud womyn everywhere in a bleak, patriarchal first world country.
 
Última edición:
Oh damn, she's the one who fought with Christina Hoff Sommers? I've seen that conversation around a lot and had no clue this person was such a lolcow.

It's pretty disgusting that SJWs accept someone who was once so openly against SJW beliefs but hey, that's why they're SJWs.
 
Gensdupays dijo:
Oh damn, she's the one who fought with Christina Hoff Sommers? I've seen that conversation around a lot and had no clue this person was such a lolcow.

It's pretty disgusting that SJWs accept someone who was once so openly against SJW beliefs but hey, that's why they're SJWs.
Presiona para expandir...

I dont think that is a bad think defacto. Is just that the same SJW group that decry defense of Milo (thought he IS scumbag) because "changing sides at a whim" but have no problem with a abrasive and confrontonial person as Sharlane while not even attempitng to apologize for her past pre SJW.

Milo and Weev are enjoying this because they are self aware and have nothing to lose given that their kayfabe is already transparent. The SJWs are doing the shit thing of denying and deflect stuff and beliving that "HARASSMENT CARD" is enough to deflect any stuff. And later some of them they ask themselves why Gamergate is still alive 5 months afte que Zoe fiasco.

And apology can do wonders, ask PC Magazine (I was surprised on how well KiA managed it). And they didn't had to apologized for the PC Master race drama (neither should they). But the issue with Ubisoft was real and they addresed it.


Shanley is now saying that it had nothing to do GG so why she was a target... never mind that she is/was a figure in Silicon Valley, in San Francisco where most american oriented game journalism also resides. Many videogame journalist also have opted for saying that they work in tech than "mariogames", her followers are THE SAME GUYS THAT BITCH ABOUT ANYTHING SJW-GAMERGATE RELATED.
https://archive.today/jbZkU
But at least she didn't murder someone!
https://archive.today/DrLp4

Jesus, can she just make a apology with cocodrile tears, like every single savvy person would do? It would feel more real...
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo