Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema AJ 447
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Destacado
Shane_Yes_That_One dijo:
Wow good thing that contract was never actually broken and Vic suffered no damages. At least that is what the court ruled. Who am I to argue with them.
Presiona para expandir...
The contract was broken, they had to create a NEW one, Vic and the con had to pay for more security for people that didn't show up cause they did what they threatened him with.

Go back to sucking a wheezing slimy sack of shits dick.
 
Duke-Diggler dijo:
Cons are required to communicate with other cons to form schedules, events and other forms of activities in order to not clash with the schedules of other cons.

I know you like to make shit up and take arguments out of context, but you are not on twitter. You can't run back to your hugbox here, you creepy faggot.
Presiona para expandir...

You are still making stuff up. Cons don't do that either. Most cons have clauses that guests can't appear at other shows in X distance within X days.

It is up to the guest or agent to make sure there are no conflicts, not the con.
 
LawTwitter is Dumb dijo:
The contract was broken, they had to create a NEW one, Vic and the con had to pay for more security for people that didn't show up cause they did what they threatened him with.

Go back to sucking a wheezing slimy sack of shits dick.
Presiona para expandir...

I assume you have seen this "new" contract Vic signed that totally was not the old one he already signed?

jameshameson dijo:
you are literally referring to underage children as women you are fucking delusional.
Presiona para expandir...

You are referring to underage children as sexual beings. You are a sick fuck.

PrinceofAllCucks dijo:
You're equating "the outfits were inappropriate for their age" as "I thought those kids looked sexy." I know it's hard to get your head that far away from your ass, since it's so stuck in there, but that's an enormous difference. I guess you could just be intentionally saying it so that you can say that "KF is a harbor for pedophiles", but it's just making you look like more of an idiot that the only thing on your mind when people criticize you allowing inappropriate outfits on children is "you're fucking sick if you think that's inappropriate."
Presiona para expandir...

Do you go out on Halloween and stop parents in the street with the children and tell them their child is dressed inappropriately? Probably not. We don't do that at cons either, because the parents are still with them and generally helped them with their cosplay.

LawTwitter is Dumb dijo:
Who would want a show where little girls are allowed to dress in revealing clothing and have "shows" for sexiness, or at least a corner or spot for it?

Also pffft, "the world won't have you" Okay mr "im friends with Vic and everyone in the con scene" that literally no one knows about.
Presiona para expandir...

"little girls are allowed to dress in revealing clothing and have "shows" for sexiness"

That statement implies you think of a costume on a child as being sexual and revealing. Yeah you are one of the sick fucks I was talking about.
 
Shane_Yes_That_One dijo:
You are still making stuff up. Cons don't do that either. Most cons have clauses that guests can't appear at other shows in X distance within X days.

It is up to the guest or agent to make sure there are no conflicts, not the con.
Presiona para expandir...
Well your con is basically this by what I've seen people say that have gone to it have experienced
1573330120011.png

But why in gods name Shane would you not communicate about a potential rapist, or assaulter? Do you not care for others safety? or did it not actually happen and you just hate Vic cause idk, hes better looking then you?
 
Shane_Yes_That_One dijo:
Wow good thing that contract was never actually broken and Vic suffered no damages. At least that is what the court ruled. Who am I to argue with them.
Presiona para expandir...
You are so full of shit it's astounding. Slatosch wrote in his affidavit that that's exactly what happened, and that he had to create a new contract for Vic. Please jump off the cliff, you delusional lowlife.
 
Shane_Yes_That_One dijo:
I assume you have seen this "new" contract Vic signed that totally was not the old one he already signed?
Presiona para expandir...
shane everytime you decide to come here you keep ridiculing yourself, just stop you're embarrassing yourself.

it almost like you get off to people laughing at how stupid you are.
 
Shane_Yes_That_One dijo:
I assume you have seen this "new" contract Vic signed that totally was not the old one he already signed?
Presiona para expandir...
okay shane here is a real question.

if you are accused of the things vic was accused of what do you even do.

and dont just say take a break and reflect on yourself, when we have this email before vic filed suit having no clue what the fuck monica is even talking about
what do you actually do

1573330327641.png
 
LawTwitter is Dumb dijo:
Well your con is basically this by what I've seen people say that have gone to it have experienced Ver archivo adjunto 1003632
But why in gods name Shane would you not communicate about a potential rapist, or assaulter? Do you not care for others safety? or did it not actually happen and you just hate Vic cause idk, hes better looking then you?
Presiona para expandir...

I get the envy that none of you have a show, power, or really a say in anything. That is why you all hide out on the farms since the rest of the world won't have you.
 
Shane_Yes_That_One dijo:
You are referring to underage children as sexual beings. You are a sick fuck.
Presiona para expandir...
You're equating "the outfits were inappropriate for their age" as "I thought those kids looked sexy." I know it's hard to get your head that far away from your ass, since it's so stuck in there, but that's an enormous difference. I guess you could just be intentionally saying it so that you can say that "KF is a harbor for pedophiles", but it's just making you look like more of an idiot that the only thing on your mind when people criticize you allowing inappropriate outfits on children is "you're fucking sick if you think that's inappropriate."
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo