SF reparations office on hold due to budget cuts

SF reparations office on hold due to budget cuts

Archive

San Francisco’s first-ever Office of Reparations is among the programs gutted by Mayor London Breed’s budget cuts.
Funding for the office, which was set to launch this year, was erased as part of Breed’s $75 million cuts to the The City budget in preparation for a major deficit in 2024.

Though it’s just one of several planned programs that will no longer be funded, the Office of Reparations is noteworthy because its establishment came after a widely followed, yearslong process that ended in accepting a reparations plan.

The decision to pull back funding comes after Supervisor Shamann Walton fought to secure money in the budget for the office earlier this year.

Though he called the cuts “disheartening” in a statement to The Examiner, Walton didn’t dispute the mayor’s logic behind the reductions as The City faces a prolonged economic reckoning.

“I understand the importance of no cuts to existing programs, but the Black community will continue to pursue justice and equity through reparations here in San Francisco,” Walton said. “My hope is that the city’s deficit is eliminated quickly so that we can fund the Office of Reparations and fulfill the commitment made to address the historical injustices and inequities that have persisted for generations for Black San Franciscans.”

Sheryl Davis, executive director of the San Francisco Human Rights Commission, told The Examiner that despite the cuts to the office of reparations, The City continues to work on several of the reparations plan’s recommendations.

Those efforts include locating a satellite campus of one of the nation’s historically Black colleges and universities in San Francisco and collaborating with The City’s economic development staffers to utilize vacant storefronts.

“A lot of the work, it’ll be tight but we’ll leverage some of the funding we had in our budget,” Davis said.

The Office of Reparations was viewed as a key step in implementing the reparations plan, which was drafted by the African American Reparations Advisory Committee and accepted by the Board of Supervisors earlier this year. The $2 million would be used to hire staff who would begin to form and fund programs enumerated in the plan.

The plan recommended a sweeping suite of reparations and programs, such as support for Black-led housing cooperatives and Black entrepreneurs.

City leaders expressed a commitment to reparations in concept but have yet to forge a practical path to carry them out.

Walton initially requested $50 million be set aside in this year’s budget for the creation of an Office of Reparations, then narrowed that request to $10 million and ultimately secured $2 million.

Now, the $2 million is gone not only from this year’s budget, but in each of the next two years, as well.

“It’s a loss, but every department in the city is making hard decisions,” Davis said.

These are the types of choices we need to start making to ensure the current and long-term financial sustainability of our city,” Breed wrote in a letter to department heads explaining the cuts last week.

Though it was readily accepted by the Board of Supervisors, the plan outlined by the advisory committee received some pushback, particularly from conservatives in San Francisco and nationally.

The most controversial aspect of the plan was the $5 million cash payments it proposed to be paid to each eligible Black resident. However, the plan also contained a broad array of reparations that did not involve cash payments.

Breed had never actually committed to establishing the Office of Reparations, even after Walton won funding for it in the budget. Breed has repeatedly held that reparations are an issue not to be tackled on the local level.

The City’s budget deficit is expected to exceed $1 billion by 2027, prompting Breed to deliver mid-year budget cuts in what she called a “down payment” to help lessen the blow in future years.
 
i remember a few years ago talking to my friend about reparations bills that were getting turned down in california i think. at the time it sounded like such an utterly retarded idea. it seemed so insanely far fetched to think people would be ok with flushing millions of dollars down the toilet just to appease the poor helpless niggers.

i really cannot understand the implication of reparation programs beginning to be implemented in certain areas. would wide spread adoption be enough to finally cause a race war?
 
The City’s budget deficit is expected to exceed $1 billion by 2027, prompting Breed to deliver mid-year budget cuts in what she called a “down payment” to help lessen the blow in future years.
Reminder, SF pays 580+ million dollars every year on the debt they racked up through issuing bonds. This was back in 2021 before they even established these retarded reparations departments.

I get its Commiefornia, but how the fuck did anyone look at those debt payments and think the reparations were ever going to actually come?
 
I get its Commiefornia, but how the fuck did anyone look at those debt payments and think the reparations were ever going to actually come?
I suspect damn near everyone at the top knew that this was going to happen from the moment it was set up. The only people shocked by this are "advocates" and low level government employees. Reparations has always been political theater.
 
So that's how they're doing it.
When these reparations were announced, I knew it would never happened and I've waited for them to give an excuse why it won't happen.
Here's the excuse.
Moving on.
 
Mark your calendars, Democrats have noticed that being millions in debt means it's unwise to add millions more..... wow, never thought I'd see the day.
 
I suspect damn near everyone at the top knew that this was going to happen from the moment it was set up. The only people shocked by this are "advocates" and low level government employees. Reparations has always been political theater.
This. They were never going to issue reparations. Issuing reparations is a retarded idea that even SF doing this alone would destroy the US economy. This idea was never seriously entertained. It was just a carrot dangled for only the dumbest of niggers to keep them voting blue. That's all reparation talk ever was. A ways to keep them on the plantation and from having actual chimp outs.
 
they didnt look at it as debt you mean. theres always hope the federales come and bail them out.
I'd laugh more at California's financial self-destruction if I didn't know deep down that when it really reaches a crisis point, they'll just go crying to Uncle Sam for a bailout, and barring a massive shift in political will in this country, they'll get it.

And like banks after 08', they'll just get even MORE liberal with the spending, knowing that now there's precedent to give the bill to someone else when they run out of other Californian's money.

Unless things change, I fully expect to see California passing $1 Trillion "budgets" in my lifetime.
 
Última edición:
This. They were never going to issue reparations. Issuing reparations is a retarded idea that even SF doing this alone would destroy the US economy. This idea was never seriously entertained. It was just a carrot dangled for only the dumbest of niggers to keep them voting blue. That's all reparation talk ever was. A ways to keep them on the plantation and from having actual chimp outs.
The blacks are going to get it, there's no way they aren't, if the dems dont give it to them some cuckservative will. votes are votes
 
The blacks are going to get it, there's no way they aren't, if the dems dont give it to them some cuckservative will. votes are votes
San Francisco doesn't have very many blacks, only 5.3%.

It's 34% Asian.

If I were the political leaders there, I would worry way more about the Asian votes than the black votes.
 
San Francisco doesn't have very many blacks, only 5.3%.

It's 34% Asian.

If I were the political leaders there, I would worry way more about the Asian votes than the black votes.
How many are actual citizens who can vote? i'm guessing less than a quarter of 34% but i don't have any articles or data on asian citizens in SF because all anyone wants to talk about is the total pop.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo