Science Scientists warn the world's insects are undergoing "death by a thousand cuts" - So... maybe don't eat the bugs



The world's vital insect kingdom is undergoing "death by a thousand cuts," the world's top bug experts said. Climate change, insecticides, herbicides, light pollution, invasive species and changes in agriculture and land use are causing Earth to lose probably 1% to 2% of its insects each year, said University of Connecticut entomologist David Wagner, lead author in the special package of 12 studies in Monday's Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences written by 56 scientists from around the globe.

The problem, sometimes called the insect apocalypse, is like a jigsaw puzzle. And scientists say they still don't have all the pieces, so they have trouble grasping its enormity and complexity and getting the world to notice and do something.

Wagner said scientists need to figure out if the rate of the insect loss is bigger than with other species. "There is some reason to worry more," he added, "because they are the target of attack" with insecticides, herbicides and light pollution.

Co-author and University of Illinois entomologist May Berenbaum, a National Medal of Science winner, said, "Insect decline is kind of comparable to climate change 30 years ago because the methods to assess the extent, the rate (of loss) were difficult."

Making matters worse is that in many cases, people hate bugs, even though they pollinate the world's foods, are crucial to the food chain and get rid of waste, she said.

Insects "are absolutely the fabric by which Mother Nature and the tree of life are built," Wagner said.

Two well known ones — honeybees and Monarch butterflies — best illustrate insect problems and declines, he said. Honeybees have been in dramatic decline because of disease, parasites, insecticides, herbicides and lack of food.

Climate change-driven drier weather in the U.S. West means less milkweed for butterflies to eat, Wagner said. And changes in American agriculture remove weeds and flowers they need for nectar.

"We're creating a giant biological desert except for soybeans and corn in a giant area of the Midwest," he said.

Last month, Trump administration officials announced Tuesday that the Monarch butterfly was a "candidate" for federal designation as a threatened species — but will not receive the designation for several years, as there are other priorities.

The numbers of honeybees are down from the "dangerously low" levels of less than 30,000 monarchs for the past two years, the zoo said. "The incredible migration of western monarchs is a unique yet fragile piece of North America's natural history, and it is on the brink of collapse," said Paige Howorth, director of invertebrate care and conservation at San Diego Zoo Global.

Monday's scientific papers don't provide new data, yet show a big but incomplete picture of a problem starting to get attention. Scientists have identified 1 million insect species, while probably 4 million more are still to be discovered, Berenbaum said.

University of Delaware entomologist Doug Tallamy, who wasn't part of the studies, said they highlight how the world has "spent the last 30 years spending billions of dollars finding new ways to kill insects and mere pennies working to preserve them."

"The good news is, with the exception of climate change, individuals can do much to reverse insect declines," Tallamy said in an email. "This is a global problem with a grassroots solution."
 
This is why the sole focus on climate change is harming genuine efforts to improve the environment. What will kill us is ecosystem collapse, and that will happen because we are pumping absolute shite into every conceivable ecological niche and stressing environments past their tolerance.
Looking after your LOCAL environment is an achievable goal and it used to be the focus. Protect that wetland in your county. Stop that factory pumping tailings waste into poorly bunded ponds. That kind of thing. People can act on that - they can do NOTHING against the monolith of climate change. So we have to ask why climate change is the only focus now and the only reason is that it is a looming existential type threat that can be used to leverage social control.
 
I think you're probably correct then, when you say most people don't know what they're talking about because I'm sure that is what people think about when they think about conventional modern agriculture. But don't some modern techniques also include intercropping themselves? It seems you have a bone to pick with this concept. I obviously know less about this than you, so I'm not trying to argue, but from what I heard intercropping isn't that bad. Here is the first result from a quick google I did:
Resultant biomass is less. The only thing that gets a net return are uses in extremely nitrogen deficient soil. In which case you should just run a legume. That's what the meta studies say.
And I swear I recently saw a video from Kubota (or another agro-machine company) about how they're developing machinery to be used on specific intercroppings.
Lol, Kubota.

Probably some PR "look at me" thing. You aren't going to make some 2-in-1 combine so that you can cut it all in one pass. You either make two passes with the header set at different heights or you harvest your tall cash crop then till the undercrop in. That's pretty much what all the dual cropping is. Some kind of nitrogen-fixing fallow-year "green-manure" erosion-prevention scheme. You aren't actually growing food with it.
There is a lot of research on integrated pest management as a way to improve conventional methods, for example, which I don't think is just coming from whiny hippies.
"Integrated pest management" is a bullshit meme. Every farm has pest management plans, ones that work. They are going back to basics with the little old lady who swallowed a fly. Then they do some trial run and it does better than doing nothing and they declare victory.

They never actually compare the two. If they did it would get BTFO just like their fertilizer schemes, their seeds, and all the other crap their supposedly "sustainable" techniques have provided.

This really is just some bullshit hippy city people made up. Other departments butting in and pretending to be gardeners.

Another more insidious reason is the EU. They love making excuses to keep US crops out and are not above fabricating health and environmental scares to do it. There is a reason why the ideal being pushed with all this is some little German-style hobby farm.
 
If you don’t have China and India on board, nothing will change and you probably weren’t serious about it to begin with.

Member destruction of the Amazon? Member overpopulation? Member global cooling?
 
Resultant biomass is less. The only thing that gets a net return are uses in extremely nitrogen deficient soil. In which case you should just run a legume. That's what the meta studies say.

Lol, Kubota.

Probably some PR "look at me" thing. You aren't going to make some 2-in-1 combine so that you can cut it all in one pass. You either make two passes with the header set at different heights or you harvest your tall cash crop then till the undercrop in. That's pretty much what all the dual cropping is. Some kind of nitrogen-fixing fallow-year "green-manure" erosion-prevention scheme. You aren't actually growing food with it.

"Integrated pest management" is a bullshit meme. Every farm has pest management plans, ones that work. They are going back to basics with the little old lady who swallowed a fly. Then they do some trial run and it does better than doing nothing and they declare victory.

They never actually compare the two. If they did it would get BTFO just like their fertilizer schemes, their seeds, and all the other crap their supposedly "sustainable" techniques have provided.

This really is just some bullshit hippy city people made up. Other departments butting in and pretending to be gardeners.

Another more insidious reason is the EU. They love making excuses to keep US crops out and are not above fabricating health and environmental scares to do it. There is a reason why the ideal being pushed with all this is some little German-style hobby farm.
I have no idea how accurate this is but I'm fascinated by these posts of yours. You redpilled me on landfills too.
 
Screenshot_20210113-140129_Chrome.jpg

lol that's pretty fucking funny. Nice job.
 
What's with the soybeans? What are we using them all for for in the west? Do they mainly go overseas?

I know people hate bugs but I don't get why. They're neat little guys. I hate it when people see some random harmless bug and scream bloody murder. Why are you afraid of something so tiny?

Mosquitoes suck. But they are food for other critters.

It's hard for insects to thrive in cities if they can't live off of humans and their trash though. We need to preserve land for wildlife instead of building more Walmarts.

I mean, in Europe we tore down all the trees and replaced them with advanced agriculture. It wrecked the wildlife and turned the continent boring from a nature perspective. But hey, sometimes it's good not having to worry about coyotes out in the wild.

The people too slow to run away from predators are just Darwin's Little Mistakes.;)
 
What's with the soybeans? What are we using them all for for in the west? Do they mainly go overseas?

I know people hate bugs but I don't get why. They're neat little guys. I hate it when people see some random harmless bug and scream bloody murder. Why are you afraid of something so tiny?

Mosquitoes suck. But they are food for other critters.

It's hard for insects to thrive in cities if they can't live off of humans and their trash though. We need to preserve land for wildlife instead of building more Walmarts.



The people too slow to run away from predators are just Darwin's Little Mistakes.;)
We grow lots of soybeans because they like the same climate as corn. It is typically the legume part of a corn rotation.

Also, we do set aside land. Look up "Conservation Reserve Program".
 
US farming is absolutely the most sustainable, cost-effective (and profitable) in the world. Reminder that NAFTA absolutely cratered the Mexican agriculture economy as a result of its outdated agrarian practices and small subsistence farms being unable to compete with US corn and other crops.
 
I know people hate bugs but I don't get why. They're neat little guys. I hate it when people see some random harmless bug and scream bloody murder. Why are you afraid of something so tiny?

Mosquitoes suck. But they are food for other critters.
The more different from us something gets the more we dislike it. We'd find cats fairly disgusting as well if they were tiny enough to fit in our ear, their bones wee on the outside, and they laid eggs in living flesh

They can also be bearers of disease, as seen with malaria. Combine that with often finding insects in rotting food have made humans instinctively find them repulsive.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo