- Registrado
- 8 de Feb, 2019
So I've been having arguments for years now about salad. Why? Because salad doesn't exist. You cannot meaningfully define salad without making decisively unsalad-like things a salad. At least, that's what I thought until this week when I stumbled upon Salad Theory. It took what I had taken to be proof that salad didn't exist and completely turned it on its head and proved, definitively, that salad DOES exist, and almost anything edible is a salad, or a saladoid. (Or a soup, but there's no distinction between a soupy salad and a salady soup)
Being that I now, as a kiwi, possess this knowledge, it is my duty to pass it along to you.
I'd try to condense it down for extra readability (all my tl;dr fellas will weep upon the sight of this obelisk generated by the salad equivalent of AM) but alas, salad just cannot be defined in such a succinct way. So what do you consider a salad? Has salad theory changed your perspective on salad? Am I the retard for considering a rootbeer float a salad, or are you a retard for being too scared to open your mind?
Being that I now, as a kiwi, possess this knowledge, it is my duty to pass it along to you.
I'd try to condense it down for extra readability (all my tl;dr fellas will weep upon the sight of this obelisk generated by the salad equivalent of AM) but alas, salad just cannot be defined in such a succinct way. So what do you consider a salad? Has salad theory changed your perspective on salad? Am I the retard for considering a rootbeer float a salad, or are you a retard for being too scared to open your mind?