Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Rupert Lowe, Restore Britain, The Rape Gang Enquiry - 'Then millions must go'. 'I don't care'.
I did a skim of the testimony, unless you're in the mood for elemental ragebait do yourselves a favour and skip to the conclusions, it's nothing we've not seen before but it's somehow just as bad.
As for the findings themselves? You love to see it: they're really not holding back, the wording is fancy but the message is straight out of a /pol/ greentext
The best part is every single "but that's racist!" thing: the source for it is the quran lol.
The snippets from this report that have been on X are among the most upsetting things I’ve read in years. Entirely radicalized me about Muslims unlike anything else.
I almost wish I lived in the UK so that I could join Restore. Lowe is the most inspiring politician in decades. I pray that there’s a (inevitably narrow) path where the British public is allowed to accept his party’s offer and he gets into power. Lowe is the only leader actually rejecting mass immigration and promising remigration. Reform will eventually have to get out of the way, but for now they’re a useful distraction to tptb as Restore gets its feet under it.
Next time you run into one of the people that supports this, ask them if it was worth it. Ask them if the GDP bump was worth traumatizing two hundred fifty thousand children.
Some vicious [redacted] giggling because she thinks she found a technical error in the inquiry report (she's mistaken). She's an independent councillor, previously of Advance UK and Reform. The scuttlebutt is she wanted to steer the report and be paid for it, but was declined. X account.
5:39
Crossposting for good info about her, and other critics of the report (features Pete North):
What was she actually hoping to achieve? No matter your political leaning you’d have to realize this was a tone deaf move, no? I’m getting the feeling she’s walked through life thinking she’s all ~controversial~ when she’s actually just lacking a theory of mind.
What was she actually hoping to achieve? No matter your political leaning you’d have to realize this was a tone deaf move, no? I’m getting the feeling she’s walked through life thinking she’s all ~controversial~ when she’s actually just lacking a theory of mind.
As people have pointed out repeatedly on twitter, this Jew woman (as well as the cunts on Question Time from a few weeks ago, as well as the cunt that interviewed that actress that did the Jeans ad, as well as Kamala a few times) defaulted to the social consensus look. The "can you believe what they're saying" / "get a load of this" look, expecting the longhouse to shame the rogue male into compliance. Giving them influence opened our societies to a unique attack vector -- tricking these brain dead idiots into believing in a false consensus.
The final results declaration for the Makerfield by-election is expected in the early hours of Friday morning, between 4am and 5am. It is possible that the final result may be indicated sooner than this, with observers on-site at the count able to report what they see on the night.
In the event of a tight contest, it is also possible that there could be a recount, which could potentially add a couple of extra hours on to the final declaration time.
Is there an exit poll?
Unlike a general election, exit polls are not usually carried out for single constituency by-elections. Instead, those who want to gauge an idea of the possible result can turn to final constituency opinion polls published over the past few days and weeks.
Reform has been nowhere in the headlines for days. I sense they got word that potential exit polling would put them in third. I expect the results to be;
Labour
Restore
Reform
If Restore won, it would be seismic. I expect that at that point, there would be a lot of member defections to Restore.
The final poll put Restore at 7% so technically anything above that's a win but I think they'll be hoping for double digits. Lowe is bullish, Downes sounds a little more cope-y. Labour are reporting turnout as 60-65% (vs 52% in 2024).
The minor drama of the day - a van branded 'Muslims for Reform' was pictured in Makerfield. Lowe reposted it, but deleted it when he realized it was a troll by Restore supporters. Young Bob was probably in on the stunt, which is funny in theory but dumb in practice. The minor heartwarmer of the day was Restore campaigners performing a hedgehog rescue.
Note: Ben Habib did not turn up to campaign in Makerfield over the weekend as threatened.
Rachel Donna Edmunds released another video, after locking posts. She doesn't giggle this time, just reiterates why she's better than Lowe and how stupid you are for questioning her. She's 100% trying to grift for her companies so Companies House link & archive. There's a BBC article about her fundraising for spa days for rape gang survivors which may not have been posted, also her original post when she was dumped by the inquiry and some general gossip. George Alexopoulous mader her a custom avatar.
I'd posted this on the Rupert Low thread, but she's been doing the fame by any means circuit for nearly twenty years. Here she is in 2009, as the romantic interest of Prince Africa Zulu.
Reposted from the other thread. Full disclosure, someone else read it as a troll (@BSC ) so decide with your own level of skepticism -
In the replies to the rape gang inquiry report there was an account, Aqeeb Khan, taunting one of the survivors and an absoltely subhuman manner. The account was a month old and deleted after their posts got attention. Before that, they tagged in Ayoub Khan MP, and posted what they claimed to be their own mobile number. When a journo called it an Aqueeb Khan answered and said it was a fraud.
The real Aqeeb Khan as confirmed (sources are this article, and Khan's Instagram, which doesn't archive. Link & screenshots below).
-Convicted and imprisoned for stalking in Telford, a notorious rape gang hotspot (whether you believe the 1 in 7 figure or not, it's at the top of the list).
-In Birmingham for several years (unimaginable horrors), long term professional association with Akmed Yakoob (even more so).
-Barred from practicing law in 2021, currently claiming to be a criminal lawyer, unclear what happened there.
-Photographed with Ayoub Khan MP at some point (unsourced but clearly him directly to the left of the MP).
Restore, as expected, did not win. They got 6% instead of the projected 7%. Opinions seem to be that it's not the best but is still a positive for them as they're a new party and manged to come in 3rd place, beating the Tories and the Greens. Plus Makersfield is a bit of an exception since it's also an opportunity to get Kier Starmer, who is deeply unpopular, out of power.
Well, Burnham won it, I'll see if I can't find the vote totals.
Edit: per the beeb
Not the best possible result for Restore, but it's a brand new party, and utterly btfoing the Cons, Greens and Lib Dems is good for a start.
Also Farage got btfo with that sort of vote share, and all Reform Wet Blankets have lost the "SPLIDDERVOTE" card because of just how poorly Reform actually did.
Restore did better than the Conservative, Lib Dems and Greens combined. 6% is pretty much in line with what they expected, and way better than the "sub 2%" that Nigel was claiming.
"Best" part is that Restore + Reform combined didn't overdo Labour's count so that kills Reform's "they split the vote cause we're owed your support" stance.
Labour was obviously gonna win, but that result is atrocious when you actually analyze it.
They barely cracked 55% of the vote on a safe and strong Labour seat, where the vast majority of normies literally just vote Labour because their parents and grandparents did like it was football teams. An of course over 40% of voters didn't even BOTHER to show up.
"Best" part is that Restore + Reform combined didn't overdo Labour's count so that kills Reform's "they split the vote cause we're owed your support" stance.
Labour was obviously gonna win, but that result is atrocious when you actually analyze it.
They barely cracked 55% of the vote on a safe and strong Labour seat, where the vast majority of normies literally just vote Labour because their parents and grandparents did like it was football teams. An of course over 40% of voters didn't even BOTHER to show up.
How many Restore votes come exactly from those voters that usually wouldn't even show up? That is something to keep in mind as well.
Don't a lot of voters tend not to turn up at all elections anyways? I've heard it said on the news they've increased their vote share since last time, so I really don't think it's that bad for them. Do you have any statistics from other stronghold constituencies for comparison?
Don't a lot of voters tend not to turn up at all elections anyways? I've heard it said on the news they've increased their vote share since last time, so I really don't think it's that bad for them. Do you have any statistics from other stronghold constituencies for comparison?
In 2024 it was a historical low turnout nationwide of something like 33%. The 2019 election which Boris carried with his false promisses and which Corbyn lost by a historical margin actually had Corbyn get way more votes than Starmer did in 2024.
